HIV PreventionPAC-ManNCT06493357
Evaluation of a Differentiated Point-of-care Active Case Finding & Management Model to Eliminate Mother-to-Child Transmission of HIV in Malawi
A study testing PAC-Man in people with HIV Prevention, run by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill at 3 sites in Malawi.
Trial summary
Purpose: To conduct a hybrid effectiveness-implementation stepped-wedge trial to: 1. Estimate the effect of the PAC-Man model, compared to SOC, on the proportion of infants who receive timely EID testing. 2. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 16 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- HIV Prevention
- What is being tested?
- PAC-Man
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 2,426 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesMalawi
- Study dates
- 27 Mar 2025to 31 Mar 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 16 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Enrolled in the national EMTCT program at a study site in the 12 months preceding a survey.
- Age 16 years or older.
- Enrolled in the national EMTCT program at a study site in the 12 months preceding a survey.
- Age 16 years or older.
- Met high-risk criteria for PAC-Man model.
- Participated in a field survey.
Show all 16Show fewer
- Age 18 years or older.
- MOH or implementing partner professional or lay health worker at a study site (such as nurses, community health workers, health surveillance assistants, and HIV diagnostic assistants)
- Generally familiar with the PAC-Man model and/or EMTCT/ EID service delivery at their site.
- Age 18 years or older.
- HIV/ EMTCT policy maker OR MOH/ PEPFAR implementing partner senior manager.
- Generally familiar with HIV and/or EMTCT/ EID service delivery.
- Age 18 years or older.
- Professional or lay health provider at a study site.
- Generally familiar with HIV and/or EMTCT/ EID service delivery at their site.
- Participated in a focus group discussion.
Who cannot join
- None.
- The criteria for Enumerated MIP Field Survey is as follows:
- Documented transferred out from a site prior to the field survey.
- Participated previously in the field survey.
- Decline informed consent.
- The criteria for In-Depth Interviews is as follows:
Show all 13Show fewer
- Decline informed consent.
- The criteria for Focus Group Discussions is as follows:
- Decline informed consent.
- The criteria for Key Informant Interviews is as follows:
- Decline informed consent.
- The criteria for Implementation Actor Questionnaires is as follows:
- Decline informed consent.
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Malawi3 sites, 3 recruiting
- Not yet recruiting
Bwaila Hospital
Lilongwe, Central Region
Michael Herce, MD, MPH, 9198435996, michael_herce@med.unc.edu
- Recruiting
Area 18 Health Centre
Lilongwe
Chimwemwe Kumwenda, +265-999-265626, ckumwenda@unclilongwe.org
- Recruiting
Monkey Bay Community Hospital
Monkey Bay
Chimwemwe Kumwenda, +265-999-265626, ckumwenda@unclilongwe.org
About this study
Official title: UNCPM 22401 - Evaluation of a Differentiated Point-of-care Active Case Finding & Management Model for the Elimination of Mother-to-Child Transmission of HIV in Lilongwe and Mangochi, Malawi
Purpose: To conduct a hybrid effectiveness-implementation stepped-wedge trial to:
- Estimate the effect of the PAC-Man model, compared to SOC, on the proportion of infants who receive timely EID testing.
- Estimate the effect of the PAC-Man model, compared to SOC, on the proportion of pregnant and breastfeeding women living with HIV who receive guideline-adherent viral load testing.
- Compare implementation outcomes between the PAC-Man model and SOC.
Read more
Participants: The total study sample size is 2,426, including 2,304 mother-infant pair (MIP) survey participants, 48 high-risk pregnant/breastfeeding women living with HIV for in-depth interviews (from high-risk MIPs who participated in a survey); 10 PMTCT policy makers and Ministry of Health (MOH)/ President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) implementing partner senior managers for key informant interviews; and about 48-64 professional and lay health providers for focus group discussions and implementation actor surveys.
To rigorously evaluate the PAC-Man model, investigators will use a hybrid (type 3) effectiveness-implementation incomplete stepped-wedge trial design. The hybrid incomplete stepped-wedge design is a rigorous quasi-experimental design that allows for incremental "rollout" of the PAC-Man model and serial measurement of both health outcomes (for infants and mothers in Objectives 1 and 2, respectively), as well as implementation outcomes (Objective 3). The incomplete stepped-wedge design is more efficient than a complete design, minimizes costs, and reduces participant burden, without sacrificing statistical precision. Using this design, sequential crossover from control (i.e., the SOC) to intervention (i.e., SOC plus the PAC-Man model) takes place at each 'step' using cluster randomization until all clusters (defined as a group of "sites," or health facilities plus the surrounding communities in its catchment area) receive the intervention. The 12 sites included in our study will be divided into 4 clusters of 3 sites each.
Read the detailed description
PAC-Man Model:
PAC-Man represents an integrated differentiated services delivery (DSD) model for mothers and infants that brings the following three evidence-based practices into the community for elimination of mother to child transmission (EMTCT): 1) pediatric active case finding using novel point-of-care (POC) early infant diagnosis (EID) technology; 2) same-day antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiation for infants newly diagnosed with HIV infection; and 3) maternal viral load (mVL) testing and back-to-care services. PAC-Man uses a mobile approach to offer EMTCT services in the community and reach "high risk" MIPs in which the mother living with HIV did not initiate ART, started ART late during pregnancy or breastfeeding, dropped off treatment following ART initiation, was unsuppressed on ART, was identified with HIV infection for the first-time during the post-partum period, and/or did not return with her infant for EID testing. Because these evidence-based practices are already recommended by the Ministry of Health and will be functioning at the site and not the individual level, delivering the PAC-Man model will be done under the auspices of routine care, applying an overarching implementation strategy of creating new mobile care teams equipped with new diagnostic technology who deploy the m-PIMA™ in community settings.
PAC-Man Implementation Approaches:
The overall implementation strategy being evaluated in this study is the creation of mobile care teams to deploy m-PIMA™ and provide EMTCT services in the community. Complementing this overarching strategy will be two sub-strategies used to enhance PAC-Man adoption: 1) task shifting of active case finding, EID and mVL testing, ART initiation, and back-to-care services to community health workers (CHWs), community nurses, and HIV diagnostic assistants; and 2) changing service sites to convenient locations in the community to overcome barriers to EID and mVL delivery. These strategies are intended to work in concert with the above evidence-based practices to integrate PAC-Man into the EMTCT program.
- Conditions
- HIV Prevention
- Being tested
- PAC-Man, Standard of Care
- Keywords
- HIV Treatment
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PAC-ManBehavioural
PAC-Man represents an integrated DSD model for mothers and infants that brings the following three evidence-based practices into the community for EMTCT: 1) pediatric active case finding using novel POC EID technology; 2) same-day ART initiation for infants newly diagnosed with HIV infection; and 3) mVL testing and back-to-care services. PAC-Man uses a mobile approach to offer EMTCT services in the community and reach "high risk" MIPs. Delivering the PAC-Man model will be done under the auspices of routine care, applying an overarching implementation strategy of creating new mobile care teams equipped with new diagnostic technology who deploy the m-PIMA in community settings.
Standard of CareBehavioural
Routine care as provided by Ministry of Health.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| PAC-Man Model | Experimental | PAC-Man represents an integrated DSD model for mothers and infants that brings the following three evidence-based practices into the community for EMTCT: 1) pediatric active case finding using novel POC EID technology; 2) same-day ART initiation for infants newly diagnosed with HIV infection; and 3) mVL testing and back-to-care services. PAC-Man uses a mobile approach to offer EMTCT services in the community and reach "high risk" MIPs. Delivering the PAC-Man model will be done under the auspices of routine care, applying an overarching implementation strategy of creating new mobile care teams equipped with new diagnostic technology who deploy the m-PIMA in community settings. Receives: Behavioral: PAC-Man |
| Standard of care (control arm) | Active comparator | Routine care as provided by the Ministry of Health. Receives: Behavioral: Standard of Care |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Proportion of infants who receive EID testing by age 6 months
Proportion of infants exposed to HIV who receive EID testing by age 6 months among the enumerated cohort of MIPs with infants at least 6 weeks old at all study sites.
Measured: Within 12 months of MIP enrollment in the national EMTCT program
Secondary outcomes (25)
Proportion of infants who receive EID testing by age 2 months
Proportion of infants exposed to HIV who receive EID testing by age 2 months among the enumerated cohort of all MIPs with infants at least 6 weeks old at all study sites.
Measured: Within 12 months of MIP enrollment in the national EMTCT program
Proportion of infants who receive EID testing by age 12 months
Proportion of infants exposed to HIV who receive EID testing by age 12 months among the enumerated cohort of all MIPs with infants at least 6 weeks old at all study sites.
Measured: Within 12 months of MIP enrollment in the national EMTCT program
Proportion of high-risk infants who receive EID testing by age 6 months
Proportion of infants with high-risk mothers exposed to HIV who receive EID testing by age 6 months among all high-risk MIPs with infants at least 6 weeks old at all study sites.
Measured: Within 12 months of MIP enrollment in the national EMTCT program
Proportion of infants who initiate ART
Proportion of infants newly diagnosed with HIV who initiate ART ≤60 days from EID sample collection among the enumerated cohort of all infants.
Measured: Within 12 months of MIP enrollment in the national EMTCT program
Median infant results return time
Median number of days from infant EID sample collection to results returned to caregivers.
Measured: Within 12 months of MIP enrollment in the national EMTCT program
Proportion of infants newly diagnosed with HIV
Proportion of infants newly diagnosed with HIV among the enumerated cohort of all infants.
Measured: Within 12 months of MIP enrollment in the national EMTCT program
Median age at ART initiation among infants
Median age in months at ART initiation among infants who test positive for HIV.
Measured: Within 12 months of MIP enrollment in the national EMTCT program
Median time to ART initiation among infants
Median number of days to ART initiation among infants who test positive for HIV.
Measured: Within 12 months of MIP enrollment in the national EMTCT program
Proportion of infants who initiate ART the same day as diagnosis
Proportion of infants newly diagnosed with HIV who initiate ART on the same day as EID results received among the enumerated cohort of all infants.
Measured: Within 12 months of MIP enrollment in the national EMTCT program
Proportion of infants with HIV retained in care at 3 months post-ART initiation
Proportion of infants with HIV who are retained in care at 3-months post-ART initiation.
Measured: Within 12 months of MIP enrollment in the national EMTCT program
Proportion of infants with HIV retained in care at 6 months post-ART initiation
Proportion of infants with HIV who are retained in care at 6-months post-ART initiation.
Measured: Within 12 months of MIP enrollment in the national EMTCT program
Proportion of MIPs reached with viral load testing
Proportion of mothers living with HIV who received MOH-recommended 6-monthly VL testing during pregnancy and breastfeeding among the enumerated cohort of all MIPs.
Measured: Within 12 months of MIP enrollment in the national EMTCT program
Proportion of high-risk MIPs reached with viral load testing
Proportion of high-risk MIPs living with HIV who received MOH-recommended 6-monthly VL testing during pregnancy and breastfeeding among all high-risk MIPs from the enumerated cohort.
Measured: Within 12 months of MIP enrollment in the national EMTCT program
Proportion of MIPs virally suppressed at 6 months
Proportion of mothers with viral suppression (<1,000 copies of HIV per ml.) at 6 months after EMTCT enrollment among the enumerated cohort of all MIPs.
Measured: Within 12 months of MIP enrollment in the national EMTCT program
Proportion of high-risk MIPs virally suppressed at 6 months
Proportion of high-risk mothers with viral suppression (<1,000 copies of HIV per ml.) at 6 months after EMTCT enrollment among the enumerated cohort of all MIPs.
Measured: Within 12 months of MIP enrollment in the national EMTCT program
Proportion of MIPs virally suppressed at 12 months
Proportion of mothers with viral suppression (<1,000 copies of HIV per ml.) at 12 months after EMTCT enrollment among the enumerated cohort of all MIPs.
Measured: Within 12 months of MIP enrollment in the national EMTCT program
Proportion of high-risk MIPs virally suppressed at 12 months
Proportion of high-risk mothers with viral suppression (<1,000 copies of HIV per ml.) at 12 months after EMTCT enrollment among the enumerated cohort of all MIPs.
Measured: Within 12 months of MIP enrollment in the national EMTCT program
Proportion of MIPs retained in care at 6 months
Proportion of mothers who are retained in care (≥1 clinic encounter within the last 180 days) at 6 months after EMTCT enrollment among the enumerated cohort of all MIPs.
Measured: Within 12 months of MIP enrollment in the national EMTCT program
Proportion of MIPs retained in care at 12 months
Proportion of mothers who are retained in care (≥1 clinic encounter within the last 180 days) at 12 months after EMTCT enrollment among the enumerated cohort of all MIPs.
Measured: Within 12 months of MIP enrollment in the national EMTCT program
Proportion of MIPs who resumed ART
Proportion of mothers who had documented treatment interruption (i.e., a treatment gap ≥28 days) who later resumed ART among the enumerated cohort of all MIPs.
Measured: Within 12 months of MIP enrollment in the national EMTCT program
Proportion of MIPs who received enhanced adherence counseling
Proportion of MIPs who had unsuppressed viral load and then completed enhanced adherence counselling among the enumerated cohort of all MIPs.
Measured: Within 12 months of MIP enrollment in the national EMTCT program
Adoption - proportion of sites that adopt the PAC-Man model
Number of trained sites that deliver the PAC-Man intervention divided by the total number of trained sites. Study endline sustainability survey is conducted at the end of the trial once all study sites have been randomized to receive the intervention.
Measured: 6-12 months after sites switch to intervention; study endline (Approximately 12 months from the time that last study sites are switched to the intervention)
Adoption - proportion of providers who adopt the PAC-Man model
Number of trained providers who deliver the PAC-Man intervention divided by the total number of trained providers. Study endline sustainability survey is conducted at the end of the trial once all study sites have been randomized to receive the intervention.
Measured: 6-12 months after sites switch to intervention; study endline (Approximately 12 months from the time that last study sites are switched to the intervention)
Implementation - cost per pediatric case
Incremental cost of PAC-Man implementation per pediatric HIV case identified, compared to standard of care. Study endline sustainability survey is conducted at the end of the trial once all study sites have been randomized to receive the intervention.
Measured: 6-12 months after sites switch to intervention; study endline (Approximately 12 months from the time that last study sites are switched to the intervention)
Implementation - cost per unsuppressed MIP
Incremental cost of PAC-Man implementation per pregnant and breastfeeding woman with unsuppressed viral load identified, compared to standard of care. Study endline sustainability survey is conducted at the end of the trial once all study sites have been randomized to receive the intervention.
Measured: 6-12 months after sites switch to intervention; study endline (Approximately 12 months from the time that last study sites are switched to the intervention)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Jul 2024
- Study start27 Mar 2025
- Primary completion31 Mar 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Mar 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for HIV PreventionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of North Carolina, Chapel HillThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 2,426 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Michael Herce, MD, MPH, Principal investigator, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06493357
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 24-0561
- Other IDs
- 1P01HD112215
- Acronym
- PAC-Man
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 26 Jun 2024
- Last updated
- 18 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Deidentified individual data that supports the results will be shared beginning 9 to 36 months following publication provided the investigator who proposes to use the data has approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB), Independent Ethics Committee (IEC), or Research Ethics Board (REB), as applicable, and executes a data use/sharing agreement with The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC).
Publications
Herce ME, Cassidy C, Munson A, Edwards JK, Rutstein SE, Matoga M, Kumwenda C, Simon KR, van Oosterhout JJ, Cox CM, Kamanga F, Kumwenda W, Phiri S, Rambiki E, Thawani A, Huwa J, Malewezi B, Mvalo T, Bula A, Chinula L, Hoffman I, Squibb MA, Nyirenda RK, Saidi F, Hosseinipour MC, Chagomerana MB. Study design and procedures for a hybrid effectiveness-implementation incomplete stepped-wedge cluster-randomized trial to evaluate a differentiated point-of-care HIV diagnosis and management model for the prevention of vertical transmission of HIV in Malawi: The PAC-Man trial protocol. Implement Sci Commun. 2025 Jul 28;6(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s43058-025-00762-5.
PubMed 40721832
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- UNCPM 22401 - Evaluation of a Differentiated Point-of-care Active Case Finding & Management Model for the Elimination of Mother-to-Child Transmission of HIV in Lilongwe and Mangochi, Malawi
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06493357
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PAC-Man / 24-0561
- Conditions
- HIV Prevention
- Keywords
- HIV Treatment
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 2,426 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of North Carolina, Chapel HillUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
- Study start
- 27 Mar 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Mar 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Mar 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 10 Jul 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Purpose: To conduct a hybrid effectiveness-implementation stepped-wedge trial to:
- Estimate the effect of the PAC-Man model, compared to SOC, on the proportion of infants who receive timely EID testing.
- Estimate the effect of the PAC-Man model, compared to SOC, on the proportion of pregnant and breastfeeding women living with HIV who receive guideline-adherent viral load testing.
- Compare implementation outcomes between the PAC-Man model and SOC.
Participants: The total study sample size is 2,426, including 2,304 mother-infant pair (MIP) survey participants, 48 high-risk pregnant/breastfeeding women living with HIV for in-depth interviews (from high-risk MIPs who participated in a survey); 10 PMTCT policy makers and Ministry of Health (MOH)/ President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) implementing partner senior managers for key informant interviews; and about 48-64 professional and lay health providers for focus group discussions and implementation actor surveys.
To rigorously evaluate the PAC-Man model, investigators will use a hybrid (type 3) effectiveness-implementation incomplete stepped-wedge trial design. The hybrid incomplete stepped-wedge design is a rigorous quasi-experimental design that allows for incremental "rollout" of the PAC-Man model and serial measurement of both health outcomes (for infants and mothers in Objectives 1 and 2, respectively), as well as implementation outcomes (Objective 3). The incomplete stepped-wedge design is more efficient than a complete design, minimizes costs, and reduces participant burden, without sacrificing statistical precision. Using this design, sequential crossover from control (i.e., the SOC) to intervention (i.e., SOC plus the PAC-Man model) takes place at each 'step' using cluster randomization until all clusters (defined as a group of "sites," or health facilities plus the surrounding communities in its catchment area) receive the intervention. The 12 sites included in our study will be divided into 4 clusters of 3 sites each.
Detailed description
PAC-Man Model:
PAC-Man represents an integrated differentiated services delivery (DSD) model for mothers and infants that brings the following three evidence-based practices into the community for elimination of mother to child transmission (EMTCT): 1) pediatric active case finding using novel point-of-care (POC) early infant diagnosis (EID) technology; 2) same-day antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiation for infants newly diagnosed with HIV infection; and 3) maternal viral load (mVL) testing and back-to-care services. PAC-Man uses a mobile approach to offer EMTCT services in the community and reach "high risk" MIPs in which the mother living with HIV did not initiate ART, started ART late during pregnancy or breastfeeding, dropped off treatment following ART initiation, was unsuppressed on ART, was identified with HIV infection for the first-time during the post-partum period, and/or did not return with her infant for EID testing. Because these evidence-based practices are already recommended by the Ministry of Health and will be functioning at the site and not the individual level, delivering the PAC-Man model will be done under the auspices of routine care, applying an overarching implementation strategy of creating new mobile care teams equipped with new diagnostic technology who deploy the m-PIMA™ in community settings.
PAC-Man Implementation Approaches:
The overall implementation strategy being evaluated in this study is the creation of mobile care teams to deploy m-PIMA™ and provide EMTCT services in the community. Complementing this overarching strategy will be two sub-strategies used to enhance PAC-Man adoption: 1) task shifting of active case finding, EID and mVL testing, ART initiation, and back-to-care services to community health workers (CHWs), community nurses, and HIV diagnostic assistants; and 2) changing service sites to convenient locations in the community to overcome barriers to EID and mVL delivery. These strategies are intended to work in concert with the above evidence-based practices to integrate PAC-Man into the EMTCT program.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| PAC-Man Model | Experimental | Behavioral: PAC-ManPAC-Man represents an integrated DSD model for mothers and infants that brings the following three evidence-based practices into the community for EMTCT: 1) pediatric active case finding using novel POC EID technology; 2) same-day ART initiation for infants newly diagnosed with HIV infection; and 3) mVL testing and back-to-care services. PAC-Man uses a mobile approach to offer EMTCT services in the community and reach "high risk" MIPs. Delivering the PAC-Man model will be done under the auspices of routine care, applying an overarching implementation strategy of creating new mobile care teams equipped with new diagnostic technology who deploy the m-PIMA in community settings. |
| Standard of care (control arm) | Active comparator | Behavioral: Standard of CareRoutine care as provided by the Ministry of Health. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 16 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (16 listed)
- Enrolled in the national EMTCT program at a study site in the 12 months preceding a survey.
- Age 16 years or older.
- Enrolled in the national EMTCT program at a study site in the 12 months preceding a survey.
- Age 16 years or older.
- Met high-risk criteria for PAC-Man model.
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- None.
- Documented transferred out from a site prior to the field survey.
- Participated previously in the field survey.
- Decline informed consent.
- Decline informed consent.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PAC-ManPAC-Man represents an integrated DSD model for mothers and infants that brings the following three evidence-based practices into the community for EMTCT: 1) pediatric active case finding using novel POC EID technology; 2) same-day ART initiation for infants newly diagnosed with HIV infection; and 3) mVL testing and back-to-care services. PAC-Man uses a mobile approach to offer EMTCT services in the community and reach "high risk" MIPs. Delivering the PAC-Man model will be done under the auspices of routine care, applying an overarching implementation strategy of creating new mobile care teams equipped with new diagnostic technology who deploy the m-PIMA in community settings. | Behavioural | PAC-Man Model |
| Standard of CareRoutine care as provided by Ministry of Health. | Behavioural | Standard of care (control arm) |
Primary outcome
Proportion of infants who receive EID testing by age 6 months
Time frame: Within 12 months of MIP enrollment in the national EMTCT program
Proportion of infants exposed to HIV who receive EID testing by age 6 months among the enumerated cohort of MIPs with infants at least 6 weeks old at all study sites.
25 secondary outcomes
Proportion of infants who receive EID testing by age 2 months
Time frame: Within 12 months of MIP enrollment in the national EMTCT program
Proportion of infants who receive EID testing by age 12 months
Time frame: Within 12 months of MIP enrollment in the national EMTCT program
Proportion of high-risk infants who receive EID testing by age 6 months
Time frame: Within 12 months of MIP enrollment in the national EMTCT program
Proportion of infants who initiate ART
Time frame: Within 12 months of MIP enrollment in the national EMTCT program
Median infant results return time
Time frame: Within 12 months of MIP enrollment in the national EMTCT program
Proportion of infants newly diagnosed with HIV
Time frame: Within 12 months of MIP enrollment in the national EMTCT program
Median age at ART initiation among infants
Time frame: Within 12 months of MIP enrollment in the national EMTCT program
Median time to ART initiation among infants
Time frame: Within 12 months of MIP enrollment in the national EMTCT program
Proportion of infants who initiate ART the same day as diagnosis
Time frame: Within 12 months of MIP enrollment in the national EMTCT program
Proportion of infants with HIV retained in care at 3 months post-ART initiation
Time frame: Within 12 months of MIP enrollment in the national EMTCT program
Proportion of infants with HIV retained in care at 6 months post-ART initiation
Time frame: Within 12 months of MIP enrollment in the national EMTCT program
Proportion of MIPs reached with viral load testing
Time frame: Within 12 months of MIP enrollment in the national EMTCT program
Proportion of high-risk MIPs reached with viral load testing
Time frame: Within 12 months of MIP enrollment in the national EMTCT program
Proportion of MIPs virally suppressed at 6 months
Time frame: Within 12 months of MIP enrollment in the national EMTCT program
Proportion of high-risk MIPs virally suppressed at 6 months
Time frame: Within 12 months of MIP enrollment in the national EMTCT program
Proportion of MIPs virally suppressed at 12 months
Time frame: Within 12 months of MIP enrollment in the national EMTCT program
Proportion of high-risk MIPs virally suppressed at 12 months
Time frame: Within 12 months of MIP enrollment in the national EMTCT program
Proportion of MIPs retained in care at 6 months
Time frame: Within 12 months of MIP enrollment in the national EMTCT program
Proportion of MIPs retained in care at 12 months
Time frame: Within 12 months of MIP enrollment in the national EMTCT program
Proportion of MIPs who resumed ART
Time frame: Within 12 months of MIP enrollment in the national EMTCT program
Proportion of MIPs who received enhanced adherence counseling
Time frame: Within 12 months of MIP enrollment in the national EMTCT program
Adoption - proportion of sites that adopt the PAC-Man model
Time frame: 6-12 months after sites switch to intervention; study endline (Approximately 12 months from the time that last study sites are switched to the intervention)
Adoption - proportion of providers who adopt the PAC-Man model
Time frame: 6-12 months after sites switch to intervention; study endline (Approximately 12 months from the time that last study sites are switched to the intervention)
Implementation - cost per pediatric case
Time frame: 6-12 months after sites switch to intervention; study endline (Approximately 12 months from the time that last study sites are switched to the intervention)
Implementation - cost per unsuppressed MIP
Time frame: 6-12 months after sites switch to intervention; study endline (Approximately 12 months from the time that last study sites are switched to the intervention)
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Sep 2026.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40721832Herce ME, Cassidy C, Munson A, Edwards JK, Rutstein SE, Matoga M, Kumwenda C, Simon KR, van Oosterhout JJ, Cox CM, Kamanga F, Kumwenda W, Phiri S, Rambiki E, Thawani A, Huwa J, Malewezi B, Mvalo T, Bula A, Chinula L, Hoffman I, Squibb MA, Nyirenda RK, Saidi F, Hosseinipour MC, Chagomerana MB. Study design and procedures for a hybrid effectiveness-implementation incomplete stepped-wedge cluster-randomized trial to evaluate a differentiated point-of-care HIV diagnosis and management model for the prevention of vertical transmission of HIV in Malawi: The PAC-Man trial protocol. Implement Sci Commun. 2025 Jul 28;6(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s43058-025-00762-5.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Deidentified individual data that supports the results will be shared beginning 9 to 36 months following publication provided the investigator who proposes to use the data has approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB), Independent Ethics Committee (IEC), or Research Ethics Board (REB), as applicable, and executes a data use/sharing agreement with The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC).
Related trials for HIV Prevention
Not yet recruiting
HealthMpowerment Korea: Pilot Testing the Cultural Adaptation of a Digital HIV Intervention for Men Who Have Sex With Men in South Korea
HIV Infections, HIV Prevention and Care
Not yet recruiting
HIV/STI/HCV Testing and Overdose Prevention Among Survivors of Sex Trafficking
HIV Testing, STI
Not yet recruiting
HC-HMP: Healthy Choices Implementation Trial
Alcohol Drinking, HIV Infections
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
NOTRE: Optimizing Long-Acting Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis and Medications for Opioid Use Disorder Interventions in Carceral Settings
HIV Infections, Opioid Use Disorder
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Long-term Follow-up of Long-acting Cabotegravir (CAB LA) for PrEP (Pre-exposure Prophylaxis) in Participants at Risk of Acquiring HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus)
HIV Infections
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Michael Herce, MD, MPH principal investigator
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing PAC-Man in people with HIV Prevention, run by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill at 3 sites in Malawi.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 16 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in Malawi. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Michael Herce, MD, MPH (9198435996, michael_herce@med.unc.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Proportion of infants who receive EID testing by age 6 months (time frame: Within 12 months of MIP enrollment in the national EMTCT program). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06493357, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Sep 2026.