Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromePhase 2/3NCT06496997
A Comparative Study of Glucocorticoids Efficacy in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
A Phase 2/3 study testing Methylprednisolone, Dexamethasone and Hydrocortisone in people with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, run by Fayoum University at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
The aim of the work is to compare the efficacy of equivalent doses of methylprednisolone, dexamethasone and hydrocortisone in patients with ARDS Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
- What is being tested?
- Methylprednisolone, Dexamethasone and Hydrocortisone
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 195 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- 1 Aug 2024to 1 Aug 2025
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- We include patients receiving mechanical ventilation for hypoxemic respiratory failure if they met the diagnostic criteria for ARDS according to the American-European Consensus definition, as later reclassified on the basis of the 2012 Berlin criteria for the diagnosis of ARDS, defined as:
- Presence of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (an arterial oxygen partial pressure to fraction of inspired oxygen ratio (PaO2/FiO2) of ≤ 300 mm Hg, requiring supplemental oxygen administrated by simple face mask, nasal cannula, or other similar oxygen-delivery device to maintain oxygen saturation at greater than 93% within the first 48 h of the onset of ARDS)
- Onset within 7 days of insult, or new (within 7 days) or worsening respiratory symptoms
- Bilateral opacities on chest x-ray or CT not fully explained by effusions, lobar or lung collapse, or nodules
- Cardiac failure not the primary cause of acute respiratory failure
Who cannot join
- We exclude patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure caused by congestive heart failure
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
The aim of the work is to compare the efficacy of equivalent doses of methylprednisolone, dexamethasone and hydrocortisone in patients with ARDS
Read the detailed description
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a secondary disease that follows-usually within 6-48 h-a primary disease of multifactorial etiology (most frequently pneumonia and extrapulmonary sepsis) associated with severe systemic inflammation. Inflammatory mediators released into the systemic circulation (systemic inflammation) from the site of infection reach the broad pulmonary capillary surface, producing severe and diffuse inflammatory exudate of the pulmonary lobules and resulting in hypoxemic respiratory failure.
In ARDS, systemic inflammation is activated by the nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) signaling system and downregulated by activated glucocorticoid receptor α (GRα). In these patients, inadequate (endogenous glucocorticoid-activated) GRα-mediated downregulation of proinflammatory transcription factor NF-κB in circulating and tissue cells leads to higher initial levels and persistent elevation over time of plasma and bronchoalveolar lavage markers of inflammation, hemostasis, and tissue repair. Inadequate intracellular GRα-mediated anti-inflammatory activity for the severity of the patient's illness was recently termed critical illness-related corticosteroid insufficiency (CIRCI). Experimental and clinical research shows that CIRCI can be improved with quantitatively and temporally adequate glucocorticoid administration.
Glucocorticoids are commonly used in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) or at-risk for ARDS with proposed mechanisms including reduction of local lung inflammation and dampening of systemic immune responses.
Clinical trials of glucocorticoids in patients with ARDS or at-risk from a pulmonary infection have had mixed results with some studies suggesting benefit and others showing no beneficial effects. Notably, the glucocorticoid agent, dose, and duration has varied widely between studies increasing the challenge of interpreting discordant findings.
In animal models of ARDS, glucocorticoids decreased the expression of pro-inflammatory mediators in lung tissue, including TNF-a, IL-1a, IL-1b, IL-6 and IL-12 p40, and reduces lung injury through the reduction of oxygen radicals produced by neutrophils. Beyond their anti-inflammatory effects during the acute phase of inflammation, glucocorticoids also contributed to the resolution of inflammation, trough reprogramming effects on macrophages.
Glucocorticoids have been administered during two distinct phases of ARDS, during the early stage of ARDS when inflammation is expected to be most important and during late phase of ARDS, when lung fibrosis predominates. The biological and pathological characteristics of these two entities differ greatly, explaining the observed conflicting results in the effects of glucocorticoids in these two distinct conditions.
The early phase of ARDS is characterized by major alveolar inflammation. Thus, glucocorticoids, potent anti-inflammatory agents, are theoretically expected to be relevant treatment for ARDS.
Late-stage ARDS is characterized histologically by ongoing inflammation with fibroproliferation, presence of hyaline membranes, and persistent diffuse alveolar damage, leading to prolonged mechanical ventilation and a higher risk of death. The largest multicenter placebo-controlled trial, found no evidence for beneficial effects of glucocorticoids initiated for late-stage ARDS.
- Conditions
- Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
- Being tested
- Methylprednisolone, Dexamethasone, Hydrocortisone
- Medical subject headings
- Respiratory Distress Syndrome
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Methylprednisolone at a dose of 1 mg/kg/day (an average dose of 70 mg/day based on 70 kg body weight)
DexamethasoneDrug
Dexamethasone at an equivalent dose of 13 mg/day
HydrocortisoneDrug
Hydrocortisone at an equivalent dose of 350 mg/day
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | Experimental | 100 ARDS patients Receives: Drug: Methylprednisolone |
| Group 2 | Experimental | 100 ARDS patients Receives: Drug: Dexamethasone |
| Group 3 | Experimental | 100 ARDS patients Receives: Drug: Hydrocortisone |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
28-day mortality after enrolment
Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 28 days
Secondary outcomes (5)
The number of patients needing invasive mechanical ventilation
Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 28 days
The Number of ventilator-free days
Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 28 days
Duration of the ICU stay
Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 28 days
Duration of hospitalization
Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 28 days
Incidence of serious adverse events, including secondary infections, hyperglycemia, clinically important gastrointestinal bleeding, and hypertension
Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 28 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Jul 2024
- Study start1 Aug 2024
- Primary completion1 Apr 2025
- Study completion1 Aug 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Fayoum UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 195 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Fayoum University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Mahmoud Ezzat Musa Abdel Tawab, Fayoum University
- Investigators
- Mahmoud Ezzat Elkmash, Teaching Assistant, Principal investigator, Faculty of Pharmacy - Fayoum UniversityRaghda Roshdy Hussein, Assistant Professor, Study director, Faculty of Pharmacy - Beni Suef UniversityMarwa Kamal Tolba, Assistant Professor, Study director, Faculty of Pharmacy - Fayoum UniversityMarian Sobhi Saeed, Lecturer, Study director, Faculty of Pharmacy - Beni Suef UniversityMona Ibrahim Ahmed, Lecturer, Study director, Faculty of Medicine - Fayoum University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06496997
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Steroids Efficacy in ARDS
- Status last verified
- Aug 2026
- First submitted
- 4 Jul 2024
- Last updated
- 1 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Comparative Study of Glucocorticoids Efficacy in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06496997
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Steroids Efficacy in ARDS
- Conditions
- Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 195 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Fayoum UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Aug 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Apr 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Aug 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Jul 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of the work is to compare the efficacy of equivalent doses of methylprednisolone, dexamethasone and hydrocortisone in patients with ARDS
Detailed description
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a secondary disease that follows-usually within 6-48 h-a primary disease of multifactorial etiology (most frequently pneumonia and extrapulmonary sepsis) associated with severe systemic inflammation. Inflammatory mediators released into the systemic circulation (systemic inflammation) from the site of infection reach the broad pulmonary capillary surface, producing severe and diffuse inflammatory exudate of the pulmonary lobules and resulting in hypoxemic respiratory failure.
In ARDS, systemic inflammation is activated by the nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) signaling system and downregulated by activated glucocorticoid receptor α (GRα). In these patients, inadequate (endogenous glucocorticoid-activated) GRα-mediated downregulation of proinflammatory transcription factor NF-κB in circulating and tissue cells leads to higher initial levels and persistent elevation over time of plasma and bronchoalveolar lavage markers of inflammation, hemostasis, and tissue repair. Inadequate intracellular GRα-mediated anti-inflammatory activity for the severity of the patient's illness was recently termed critical illness-related corticosteroid insufficiency (CIRCI). Experimental and clinical research shows that CIRCI can be improved with quantitatively and temporally adequate glucocorticoid administration.
Glucocorticoids are commonly used in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) or at-risk for ARDS with proposed mechanisms including reduction of local lung inflammation and dampening of systemic immune responses.
Clinical trials of glucocorticoids in patients with ARDS or at-risk from a pulmonary infection have had mixed results with some studies suggesting benefit and others showing no beneficial effects. Notably, the glucocorticoid agent, dose, and duration has varied widely between studies increasing the challenge of interpreting discordant findings.
In animal models of ARDS, glucocorticoids decreased the expression of pro-inflammatory mediators in lung tissue, including TNF-a, IL-1a, IL-1b, IL-6 and IL-12 p40, and reduces lung injury through the reduction of oxygen radicals produced by neutrophils. Beyond their anti-inflammatory effects during the acute phase of inflammation, glucocorticoids also contributed to the resolution of inflammation, trough reprogramming effects on macrophages.
Glucocorticoids have been administered during two distinct phases of ARDS, during the early stage of ARDS when inflammation is expected to be most important and during late phase of ARDS, when lung fibrosis predominates. The biological and pathological characteristics of these two entities differ greatly, explaining the observed conflicting results in the effects of glucocorticoids in these two distinct conditions.
The early phase of ARDS is characterized by major alveolar inflammation. Thus, glucocorticoids, potent anti-inflammatory agents, are theoretically expected to be relevant treatment for ARDS.
Late-stage ARDS is characterized histologically by ongoing inflammation with fibroproliferation, presence of hyaline membranes, and persistent diffuse alveolar damage, leading to prolonged mechanical ventilation and a higher risk of death. The largest multicenter placebo-controlled trial, found no evidence for beneficial effects of glucocorticoids initiated for late-stage ARDS.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | Experimental | Drug: Methylprednisolone100 ARDS patients |
| Group 2 | Experimental | Drug: Dexamethasone100 ARDS patients |
| Group 3 | Experimental | Drug: Hydrocortisone100 ARDS patients |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- We include patients receiving mechanical ventilation for hypoxemic respiratory failure if they met the diagnostic criteria for ARDS according to the American-European Consensus definition, as later reclassified on the basis of the 2012 Berlin criteria for the diagnosis of ARDS, defined as:
- Presence of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (an arterial oxygen partial pressure to fraction of inspired oxygen ratio (PaO2/FiO2) of ≤ 300 mm Hg, requiring supplemental oxygen administrated by simple face mask, nasal cannula, or other similar oxygen-delivery device to maintain oxygen saturation at greater than 93% within the first 48 h of the onset of ARDS)
- Onset within 7 days of insult, or new (within 7 days) or worsening respiratory symptoms
- Bilateral opacities on chest x-ray or CT not fully explained by effusions, lobar or lung collapse, or nodules
- Cardiac failure not the primary cause of acute respiratory failure
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- We exclude patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure caused by congestive heart failure
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MethylprednisoloneMethylprednisolone at a dose of 1 mg/kg/day (an average dose of 70 mg/day based on 70 kg body weight) | Drug | Group 1 |
| DexamethasoneDexamethasone at an equivalent dose of 13 mg/day | Drug | Group 2 |
| HydrocortisoneHydrocortisone at an equivalent dose of 350 mg/day | Drug | Group 3 |
Primary outcome
28-day mortality after enrolment
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 28 days
5 secondary outcomes
The number of patients needing invasive mechanical ventilation
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 28 days
The Number of ventilator-free days
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 28 days
Duration of the ICU stay
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 28 days
Duration of hospitalization
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 28 days
Incidence of serious adverse events, including secondary infections, hyperglycemia, clinically important gastrointestinal bleeding, and hypertension
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 28 days
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Sep 2026.
Related trials for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Enrolling by invitation
Personalized Ventilator Settings for Patients on ECMO
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
Active, not recruiting
CT for Personalized Mechanical Ventilation
Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury, Sepsis Syndrome
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Development and Multicenter Validation of an Explainable System for Neonatal ARDS-Compatible Phenotyping
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
RecruitingObservational study
Assessment of Blood Viscosity in ARDS (Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome)
ARDS
Recruiting
Comparing Surfactant Administration Through Supraglottic Airway and Thin Catheter for Preterm Infants
Surfactant, Respiratory Distress Syndrome (Neonatal)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Mahmoud Ezzat Elkmash, Teaching Assistant principal investigator
Faculty of Pharmacy - Fayoum University
Raghda Roshdy Hussein, Assistant Professor study director
Faculty of Pharmacy - Beni Suef University
Marwa Kamal Tolba, Assistant Professor study director
Faculty of Pharmacy - Fayoum University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing Methylprednisolone, Dexamethasone and Hydrocortisone in people with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, run by Fayoum University at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
28-day mortality after enrolment (time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 28 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Sep 2026.