IntravenousPhase 4NCT06498323
Intravenous TNK vs TPA for AIS Treatment on MSU,a Prospective Multicenter RCT
A Phase 4 study testing tenecteplase in people with Intravenous and Thrombosis, run by Mahidol University at 1 site in Thailand.
Trial summary
Acute ischemic stroke is one of the devastating diseases that increase hospitalization, disabilities, and deaths worldwide. Current treatment with intravenous thrombolytic agent can help reduce disabilities and improve quality of life. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Intravenous, Thrombosis, Acute Ischemic Stroke
- What is being tested?
- tenecteplase
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 160 participants
- Where
- 1 siteThailand
- Study dates
- 3 Aug 2022to 31 Aug 2025
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosed as Acute ischemic stroke within 4.5 hr of symptom onset
- Age > 18 years old
- No contraindication for thrombolytic drug
- Informed consent from patients
Who cannot join
- Diagnosed as Acute ischemic stroke with more than 4.5 hours of symptom onset or uncontained onset
- Have contraindication for thrombolytic drugs
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Thailand1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Siriraj Stroke Center,Siriraj Hospital
Bangkok, 10700
Yongchai Nilanont, 859398772, ynilanon@gmail.com
Kanokkarn Wongmayurachat, 658794744, wkanokkarn@gmail.com
About this study
Official title: Intravenous Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase for Acute Ischemic Stroke Treatment on Mobile Stroke Units, a Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
Acute ischemic stroke is one of the devastating diseases that increase hospitalization, disabilities, and deaths worldwide. Current treatment with intravenous thrombolytic agent can help reduce disabilities and improve quality of life. Intravenous Alteplase is proven benefit and now used as the first-line drug for acute ischemic stroke with symptom onset less than 4.5 hours and without contraindications.
Tenecteplase, a genetically engineered tissue-type plasminogen activator, has been questioned to treat acute ischemic stroke instead of intravenous alteplase. Tenecteplase has more advantages over alteplase including higher fibrin specificity, longer half-life and easier to administer as a single intravenous bolus. The efficacy and safety of intravenous tenecteplase has been studied recently. In 2017, A phase 3 randomized open-label, blinded trial (NOR-TEST) 6 showed that there were no significant differences in efficacy and safety between tenecteplase and alteplase in mild stroke patients. A study in 2020, in the setting of acute large artery occlusion, Tenecteplase resulted in a better 90-day neurological outcome and provided more benefits in reperfusion before endovascular thrombectomy10. Regarding safety concerns, tenecteplase showed no significant higher incidence of intracerebral hemorrhage. Administration, tenecteplase might be better in the setting of the case on mobile stroke units. Assuming, earlier reperfusion by thrombolytic drug may have improved patient's neurologic outcomes. We aim to compare the efficacy and safety between intravenous tenecteplase and alteplase in acute ischemic stroke patients given on mobile stroke units within 4.5 hours after symptom onset.
- Conditions
- Intravenous, Thrombosis, Acute Ischemic Stroke
- Being tested
- tenecteplase
- Keywords
- Acute ischemic stroke, Mobile stroke unit, Intravenous Tenecteplase
- Medical subject headings
- Thrombosis, Ischemic Stroke
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
tenecteplaseDrug
Intravenous thrombolytic agents administration
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| tenecteplase | Experimental | Intravenous tenecteplase (0.25mg/kg) will be given in acute ischemic stroke patients on mobile stroke units within 4.5 hours according to the eligibility criteria after randomization allocation. Receives: Drug: tenecteplase |
| alteplase | Active comparator | Intravenous alteplase (0.9mg/kg) will be given in acute ischemic stroke patients on mobile stroke units within 4.5 hours according to the eligibility criteria after randomization allocation. Receives: Drug: tenecteplase |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
mRS Score
mRS Score
Measured: at 3 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
NIHSS Score at 24 hrs
NIHSS Score at 24 hrs after intravenous tenecteplase
Measured: at 24 hours
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Jul 2024
- Study start3 Aug 2022
- Primary completion31 Aug 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Aug 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (10)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for IntravenousStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Mahidol UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 160 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Mahidol University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Yongchai Nilanont, Mahidol University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06498323
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 376/2565(IRB1)
- Status last verified
- Jul 2024
- First submitted
- 13 Jun 2022
- Last updated
- 12 Jul 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Campbell BCV, Mitchell PJ, Churilov L, Yassi N, Kleinig TJ, Dowling RJ, Yan B, Bush SJ, Dewey HM, Thijs V, Scroop R, Simpson M, Brooks M, Asadi H, Wu TY, Shah DG, Wijeratne T, Ang T, Miteff F, Levi CR, Rodrigues E, Zhao H, Salvaris P, Garcia-Esperon C, Bailey P, Rice H, de Villiers L, Brown H, Redmond K, Leggett D, Fink JN, Collecutt W, Wong AA, Muller C, Coulthard A, Mitchell K, Clouston J, Mahady K, Field D, Ma H, Phan TG, Chong W, Chandra RV, Slater LA, Krause M, Harrington TJ, Faulder KC, Steinfort BS, Bladin CF, Sharma G, Desmond PM, Parsons MW, Donnan GA, Davis SM; EXTEND-IA TNK Investigators. Tenecteplase versus Alteplase before Thrombectomy for Ischemic Stroke. N Engl J Med. 2018 Apr 26;378(17):1573-1582. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1716405.
PubMed 29694815Huang X, Cheripelli BK, Lloyd SM, Kalladka D, Moreton FC, Siddiqui A, Ford I, Muir KW. Alteplase versus tenecteplase for thrombolysis after ischaemic stroke (ATTEST): a phase 2, randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint study. Lancet Neurol. 2015 Apr;14(4):368-76. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(15)70017-7. Epub 2015 Feb 26.
PubMed 25726502Haley EC Jr, Thompson JL, Grotta JC, Lyden PD, Hemmen TG, Brown DL, Fanale C, Libman R, Kwiatkowski TG, Llinas RH, Levine SR, Johnston KC, Buchsbaum R, Levy G, Levin B; Tenecteplase in Stroke Investigators. Phase IIB/III trial of tenecteplase in acute ischemic stroke: results of a prematurely terminated randomized clinical trial. Stroke. 2010 Apr;41(4):707-11. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.572040. Epub 2010 Feb 25.
PubMed 20185783Parsons M, Spratt N, Bivard A, Campbell B, Chung K, Miteff F, O'Brien B, Bladin C, McElduff P, Allen C, Bateman G, Donnan G, Davis S, Levi C. A randomized trial of tenecteplase versus alteplase for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2012 Mar 22;366(12):1099-107. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1109842.
PubMed 22435369Logallo N, Novotny V, Assmus J, Kvistad CE, Alteheld L, Ronning OM, Thommessen B, Amthor KF, Ihle-Hansen H, Kurz M, Tobro H, Kaur K, Stankiewicz M, Carlsson M, Morsund A, Idicula T, Aamodt AH, Lund C, Naess H, Waje-Andreassen U, Thomassen L. Tenecteplase versus alteplase for management of acute ischaemic stroke (NOR-TEST): a phase 3, randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint trial. Lancet Neurol. 2017 Oct;16(10):781-788. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30253-3. Epub 2017 Aug 2.
PubMed 28780236Nepal G, Kharel G, Ahamad ST, Basnet B. Tenecteplase versus Alteplase for the Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke in a Low-income Country-Nepal: Cost, Efficacy, and Safety. Cureus. 2018 Feb 9;10(2):e2178. doi: 10.7759/cureus.2178.
PubMed 29651371Muir KW. Should Tenecteplase Replace Alteplase for Acute Thrombolysis? Stroke. 2021 Mar;52(3):1091-1093. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.033593. Epub 2021 Feb 16. No abstract available.
PubMed 33588587Ronning OM, Logallo N, Thommessen B, Tobro H, Novotny V, Kvistad CE, Aamodt AH, Naess H, Waje-Andreassen U, Thomassen L. Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase Between 3 and 4.5 Hours in Low National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. Stroke. 2019 Feb;50(2):498-500. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.024223.
PubMed 30602354Katsanos AH, Safouris A, Sarraj A, Magoufis G, Leker RR, Khatri P, Cordonnier C, Leys D, Shoamanesh A, Ahmed N, Alexandrov AV, Tsivgoulis G. Intravenous Thrombolysis With Tenecteplase in Patients With Large Vessel Occlusions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Stroke. 2021 Jan;52(1):308-312. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.030220. Epub 2020 Dec 4.
PubMed 33272127Hacke W, Kaste M, Bluhmki E, Brozman M, Davalos A, Guidetti D, Larrue V, Lees KR, Medeghri Z, Machnig T, Schneider D, von Kummer R, Wahlgren N, Toni D; ECASS Investigators. Thrombolysis with alteplase 3 to 4.5 hours after acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2008 Sep 25;359(13):1317-29. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0804656.
PubMed 18815396
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Jul 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Intravenous Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase for Acute Ischemic Stroke Treatment on Mobile Stroke Units, a Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06498323
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 376/2565(IRB1)
- Conditions
- Intravenous, Thrombosis, Acute Ischemic Stroke
- Keywords
- Acute ischemic stroke, Mobile stroke unit, Intravenous Tenecteplase
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 160 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Mahidol UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 3 Aug 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Aug 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Aug 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 12 Jul 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Acute ischemic stroke is one of the devastating diseases that increase hospitalization, disabilities, and deaths worldwide. Current treatment with intravenous thrombolytic agent can help reduce disabilities and improve quality of life. Intravenous Alteplase is proven benefit and now used as the first-line drug for acute ischemic stroke with symptom onset less than 4.5 hours and without contraindications.
Tenecteplase, a genetically engineered tissue-type plasminogen activator, has been questioned to treat acute ischemic stroke instead of intravenous alteplase. Tenecteplase has more advantages over alteplase including higher fibrin specificity, longer half-life and easier to administer as a single intravenous bolus. The efficacy and safety of intravenous tenecteplase has been studied recently. In 2017, A phase 3 randomized open-label, blinded trial (NOR-TEST) 6 showed that there were no significant differences in efficacy and safety between tenecteplase and alteplase in mild stroke patients. A study in 2020, in the setting of acute large artery occlusion, Tenecteplase resulted in a better 90-day neurological outcome and provided more benefits in reperfusion before endovascular thrombectomy10. Regarding safety concerns, tenecteplase showed no significant higher incidence of intracerebral hemorrhage. Administration, tenecteplase might be better in the setting of the case on mobile stroke units. Assuming, earlier reperfusion by thrombolytic drug may have improved patient's neurologic outcomes. We aim to compare the efficacy and safety between intravenous tenecteplase and alteplase in acute ischemic stroke patients given on mobile stroke units within 4.5 hours after symptom onset.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| tenecteplase | Experimental | Drug: tenecteplaseIntravenous tenecteplase (0.25mg/kg) will be given in acute ischemic stroke patients on mobile stroke units within 4.5 hours according to the eligibility criteria after randomization allocation. |
| alteplase | Active comparator | Drug: tenecteplaseIntravenous alteplase (0.9mg/kg) will be given in acute ischemic stroke patients on mobile stroke units within 4.5 hours according to the eligibility criteria after randomization allocation. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Diagnosed as Acute ischemic stroke within 4.5 hr of symptom onset
- Age > 18 years old
- No contraindication for thrombolytic drug
- Informed consent from patients
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Diagnosed as Acute ischemic stroke with more than 4.5 hours of symptom onset or uncontained onset
- Have contraindication for thrombolytic drugs
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| tenecteplaseIntravenous thrombolytic agents administration | Drug | alteplase, tenecteplase |
Primary outcome
mRS Score
Time frame: at 3 months
mRS Score
1 secondary outcome
NIHSS Score at 24 hrs
Time frame: at 24 hours
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Jul 2024.
- Background: PubMed 29694815Campbell BCV, Mitchell PJ, Churilov L, Yassi N, Kleinig TJ, Dowling RJ, Yan B, Bush SJ, Dewey HM, Thijs V, Scroop R, Simpson M, Brooks M, Asadi H, Wu TY, Shah DG, Wijeratne T, Ang T, Miteff F, Levi CR, Rodrigues E, Zhao H, Salvaris P, Garcia-Esperon C, Bailey P, Rice H, de Villiers L, Brown H, Redmond K, Leggett D, Fink JN, Collecutt W, Wong AA, Muller C, Coulthard A, Mitchell K, Clouston J, Mahady K, Field D, Ma H, Phan TG, Chong W, Chandra RV, Slater LA, Krause M, Harrington TJ, Faulder KC, Steinfort BS, Bladin CF, Sharma G, Desmond PM, Parsons MW, Donnan GA, Davis SM; EXTEND-IA TNK Investigators. Tenecteplase versus Alteplase before Thrombectomy for Ischemic Stroke. N Engl J Med. 2018 Apr 26;378(17):1573-1582. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1716405.
- Results publication: PubMed 25726502Huang X, Cheripelli BK, Lloyd SM, Kalladka D, Moreton FC, Siddiqui A, Ford I, Muir KW. Alteplase versus tenecteplase for thrombolysis after ischaemic stroke (ATTEST): a phase 2, randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint study. Lancet Neurol. 2015 Apr;14(4):368-76. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(15)70017-7. Epub 2015 Feb 26.
- Results publication: PubMed 20185783Haley EC Jr, Thompson JL, Grotta JC, Lyden PD, Hemmen TG, Brown DL, Fanale C, Libman R, Kwiatkowski TG, Llinas RH, Levine SR, Johnston KC, Buchsbaum R, Levy G, Levin B; Tenecteplase in Stroke Investigators. Phase IIB/III trial of tenecteplase in acute ischemic stroke: results of a prematurely terminated randomized clinical trial. Stroke. 2010 Apr;41(4):707-11. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.572040. Epub 2010 Feb 25.
- Results publication: PubMed 22435369Parsons M, Spratt N, Bivard A, Campbell B, Chung K, Miteff F, O'Brien B, Bladin C, McElduff P, Allen C, Bateman G, Donnan G, Davis S, Levi C. A randomized trial of tenecteplase versus alteplase for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2012 Mar 22;366(12):1099-107. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1109842.
- Results publication: PubMed 28780236Logallo N, Novotny V, Assmus J, Kvistad CE, Alteheld L, Ronning OM, Thommessen B, Amthor KF, Ihle-Hansen H, Kurz M, Tobro H, Kaur K, Stankiewicz M, Carlsson M, Morsund A, Idicula T, Aamodt AH, Lund C, Naess H, Waje-Andreassen U, Thomassen L. Tenecteplase versus alteplase for management of acute ischaemic stroke (NOR-TEST): a phase 3, randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint trial. Lancet Neurol. 2017 Oct;16(10):781-788. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30253-3. Epub 2017 Aug 2.
- Results publication: PubMed 29651371Nepal G, Kharel G, Ahamad ST, Basnet B. Tenecteplase versus Alteplase for the Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke in a Low-income Country-Nepal: Cost, Efficacy, and Safety. Cureus. 2018 Feb 9;10(2):e2178. doi: 10.7759/cureus.2178.
- Results publication: PubMed 33588587Muir KW. Should Tenecteplase Replace Alteplase for Acute Thrombolysis? Stroke. 2021 Mar;52(3):1091-1093. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.033593. Epub 2021 Feb 16. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 30602354Ronning OM, Logallo N, Thommessen B, Tobro H, Novotny V, Kvistad CE, Aamodt AH, Naess H, Waje-Andreassen U, Thomassen L. Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase Between 3 and 4.5 Hours in Low National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. Stroke. 2019 Feb;50(2):498-500. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.024223.
- Results publication: PubMed 33272127Katsanos AH, Safouris A, Sarraj A, Magoufis G, Leker RR, Khatri P, Cordonnier C, Leys D, Shoamanesh A, Ahmed N, Alexandrov AV, Tsivgoulis G. Intravenous Thrombolysis With Tenecteplase in Patients With Large Vessel Occlusions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Stroke. 2021 Jan;52(1):308-312. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.030220. Epub 2020 Dec 4.
- Results publication: PubMed 18815396Hacke W, Kaste M, Bluhmki E, Brozman M, Davalos A, Guidetti D, Larrue V, Lees KR, Medeghri Z, Machnig T, Schneider D, von Kummer R, Wahlgren N, Toni D; ECASS Investigators. Thrombolysis with alteplase 3 to 4.5 hours after acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2008 Sep 25;359(13):1317-29. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0804656.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Intravenous
RecruitingObservational study
Comparison of Hemodynamic Responses During Anesthesia Induction Using Eleveld and Schnider
Spinal (Fusion) Surgery, Total Intravenous Anesthesia
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Effects of Sequential Therapy With Mexidol® (Intravenous) and Mexidol® FORTE 250 (Oral) on Functional Brain Activity Assessed by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Biochemical Parameters in Patients With Chronic Cerebral Ischemia: A Comparison of Patients With and Without Metabolic Disorders
Metabolic Abnormalities, Obesity & Overweight
Not yet recruiting
Comparison of Effect of Two Different Doses of Intravenous Oxytocin on Patients Undergoing Elective Cesarean Section
Postpartum Hemorrhage, Uterine Atony
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of SGT-212 Gene Therapy in Friedreich's Ataxia
Friedreich's Ataxia (FA)
Active, not recruiting
Acute Non-severe Osteomyelitis in Children - Outpatient Management Strategy With Oral Antibiotic Therapy Compared to a Standard Strategy With Conventional Hospitalization and Intravenous Antibiotic Therapy: a Randomized Open-label Non-inferiority Study With Bayesian and Medical-economic Analyses.
Osteomyelitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing tenecteplase in people with Intravenous and Thrombosis, run by Mahidol University at 1 site in Thailand.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Jul 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Thailand. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Yongchai Nilanont (924245898, ynilanon@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
mRS Score (time frame: at 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06498323, which also lists 10 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Jul 2024.