AzTrials
AzTrials

Hip OsteoarthritisNCT06499038

The Ace Avanteon Study - A Randomized Controled Trial

A study testing Total Hip Arthroplasty in people with Hip Osteoarthritis, run by Helse Møre og Romsdal HF at 1 site in Norway.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this randomized controled trial is to compare if using of ancillary screws yields equal results as no use of ancillary screws in the ACE acetabulum cup of a total hip arthroplasty. Further, the migration of the Avanteon stem over time will be assessed. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 65 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Hip Osteoarthritis
What is being tested?
Total Hip Arthroplasty
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteNorway
Study dates
25 Aug 2024to 1 Nov 2028
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 65 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • • Patients with primary hip osteoarthritis between the age of 65 and 80 years at time of surgery
  • Patients requiring primary total hip replacement
  • Patients who understand the conditions of the study, are willing to, and able to comply with the postoperative scheduled clinical and radiographic evaluations

Who cannot join

  • • Patients who are unable to provide informed consent
  • Patients who require revision hip arthroplasty
  • Patients who have had a previous osteotomy or osteosynthesis of the femur or acetabulum
  • Patients with metabolic bone disease, other than osteoporosis
  • Patients with inflammatory arthritis
  • Obese patients where obesity is severe enough to affect the patient's ability to perform activities of daily living (BMI > 40)
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Patients with active or suspected infection
  • Patients with malignancy
  • Patients unable to cooperate caused by language or psychosocial conditions

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Norway1 site
  • Kristiansund Hospital, Møre and Romsdal Hospital Trust

    Kristiansund, Møre and Romsdal, 6508

Other trials in Norway

About this study

Official title: Migration Analysis of a Hybrid Hip Replacement Evaluating Stem and Ancillary Acetabular Screw Fixation-A Randomized Controlled CT-RSA Trial

The goal of this randomized controled trial is to compare if using of ancillary screws yields equal results as no use of ancillary screws in the ACE acetabulum cup of a total hip arthroplasty. Further, the migration of the Avanteon stem over time will be assessed. Patients included are patients with hip osteoarthritis from 65-80 years old. The purpose of this study is to compare implant migration and early fixation of a hybrid hip replacement combining the uncemented ACE acetabular component and the cemented Avanteon femoral stem, by using CT based Radiostereometric Analysis, a new innovative method for evaluating implant migration. Our study may predict the long term survival of the implants used.

Participants will go through total hip arthroplasty, and be followed by CT-RSA, plain x-rays and patients reported outcome measures.

Read the detailed description

Hip and knee osteoarthritis OA is one of the leading causes of disability worldwide. The lifetime risk of developing hip OA is estimated to be 25%, in people who reach the age of 85. Total hip replacement THR is considered to be a safe and reliable surgical treatment for end stage hip OA and was described as "Surgery of the century". One of the challenges in hip replacement surgery is to ensure the longevity and durability of the implants used. New implants are designed to improve the primary stability and long-term survival of the implant. Early failure of implants and the need for revision surgery, is a major concern. Revision hip replacement surgery is a surgical procedure with high rates of postoperative complications and overall re-revision rate of 15,8% within 1 year. In the Norwegian arthroplasty register 10 year failure rate of hip revision prostheses is 26%. Thus, the longevity and durability of implants is a continuous challenge in which the ultimate goal is to develop well-functioning implants which will last a lifetime.

The purpose of this study is to compare implant migration and early fixation of a hybrid hip replacement combining the uncemented ACE acetabular component and the cemented Avanteon femoral stem, by using CT based Radiostereometric Analysis, a new innovative method for evaluating implant migration. Our study may predict the long term survival of the implants used. This will be the first ever CT-RSA study in Norway and one of the first world-wide, evaluating hip implants.

Radiostereometric analysis RSA is a method used to measure implant migration and micromotion after joint replacement surgery, with high precision and accuracy. It is considered the gold standard for to assess migration in orthopedic implants. Early implant migration predicts later loosening, and failure of the implant. Subsidence of the femoral stem of more than 1.2 mm at 24m months is predictive of revision. Proximal migration of the acetabular component of up to 0.2mm is considered acceptable, 0.2-1mm is considered at risk, and above 1mm is unacceptable. RSA is thereby used as an early measure of longevity and durability of new implants. However, RSA is an expensive and time consuming procedure. It requires special equipment such as RSA cages, software, and special x-ray setup. It also requires specially trained personnel to do the examination. Loss of data due to occlusion of tantalum beads from metallic implants, is unavoidable in RSA. Over the last years CT-RSA has evolved to overcome some of the challenges of RSA. CT-RSA has been validated to have similar or even higher precision and accuracy than RSA in both hip and knee implant analysis.By using CT-RSA we can evaluate implant migration without the need for implant or bone markers, by using bone surface anatomy. One of the authors (FDØ) has recently shown that a vast decrease of effective radiation doses of CT-RSA in total knee arthroplasty yields equal precision in a cadaver study (publication in press). We assume this applies to CT-RSA of the hip as well. We therefore would like to perform a study on ultra low dose CT-RSA of hip implants, to evaluate the precision. This could have a major impact for future CT-RSA studies of the hip, since we potentially could reduce the effective radiation dose.

Previous cadaveric studies have shown that screw fixation increases initial stability of acetabular components. In long term, press-fit screwless fixation achieve sufficient stability.The use of augmented screw fixation may increase the risk of particle debris and osteolysis around the acetabular component. The use of ancillary screw fixation may thereby increase the risk of loosening, and need for major revision surgery. There is also a risk for iatrogenic damage to nearby vessels and pelvic organs, due to screw misplacement.

The Avanteon JRI is a highly polished double tapered femoral stem, designed by force-closed principles. The stem is intended to subside gradually in the cement mantle over time. Highly polished femoral stems have shown excellent results, and lower revision rates compared to shape-closed design stems. New implants are developed to increase early fixation and long term survival, to avoid the need for revision surgery.

In the field of orthopedic surgery, our study may predict the long term survival of the implants used, and thereby contributing to the goal of life-long lasting implants. This will also contribute to lower the need for revision surgery, avoiding the risk of major complications for our patients. The economic impact off revision surgery is of great concern for both the patient and the society, and avoiding the need for revision arthroplasty is of economic importance.

Research questions and goals In our study we will evaluate the migration of the Avanteon femoral stem using CT-RSA, to predict long-term survival. We will also evaluate the role of ancillary screw fixation of the new ACE acetabular component by using CT-RSA, to see if ancillary screw fixation increases stability of the implant. By using a patient attached accelerometer-based activity monitor ActivePAL, we can measure patient activity to see if the screw fixation has any effect on activity levels.

Hypotheses; Article 1

  • H0-hypothesis; subsidence of the Avanteon femoral stem is less than 1.2mm at 24 months
  • H1-hypothesis; subsidence of the Avanteon femoral stem is more than 1.2mm at 24 months

Article 2

  • H0-hypothesis; ancillary screw fixation of the ACE acetabular component does not increase stability of the implant
  • H1-hypothesis; ancillary screw fixation of the ACE acetabular component increases stability of the implant

Article 3

  • H0-hypothesis; ancillary screw fixation of the ACE acetabular component does not increase patient activity
  • H1-hypothesis; ancillary screw fixation of the ACE acetabular component increases patient activity

Article 4

  • H0-hypothesis; reducing the effective radiation dose does not reduce the precision of CT-RSA of hip implants
  • H1-hypothesis; reducing the effective radiation dose reduce the precision of CT-RSA of hip implants

Short term goals;

  • Demonstrating the stability and migration of the Avanteon femoral stem
  • Evaluate the stability and migration of the ACE acetabular component with and without ancillary screw fixation
  • Demonstrate the clinical efficacy and safety of the ACE acetabular component and Avanteon femoral stem
  • Demonstrate the effect of acetabular screw fixation on patient activity levels in the postoperative period Demonstrate the precision of ultra low dose CT-RSA Long term goals;
  • Contributing to the development of longer lasting hip replacement implants
  • Evaluate the increase in activity levels after hip replacement surgery

Results expected to be achieved during the project period;

  • Establishing the new innovative CT-RSA as a method for hip implant migration analysis in Norway
  • Develop recommendation for the routine use of ancillary screw fixation of acetabular components

This is a single blinded randomized controlled trial. Eligible patients referred will be evaluated for inclusion consecutively from the outpatient clinic of the research department at Kristiansund hospital.

Being tested
Total Hip Arthroplasty
Keywords
, Total Hip Arthroplasty,, Total Hip Replacement, CT-RSA, CTMA, Migration study
Medical subject headings
Osteoarthritis, Hip

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Total Hip ArthroplastyProcedure or surgery

    Also called ACE cup and Avanteon Stem

    Surgery for total hip replacement

Study groups in NCT06499038
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Ancillary screw groupExperimentalPatients with ancillary screw fixation acetabular component
Receives: Procedure: Total Hip Arthroplasty
Without ancillary screws groupActive comparatorNo ancillary screws in acetabular component
Receives: Procedure: Total Hip Arthroplasty

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Translation

    Proximal Y migration acetabular cup measured by CT-RSA

    Measured: 2 years

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Rotation

    Rotation XYZ measured by CT-RSA

    Measured: 2 years

  2. Migration

    Anterior and axial XZ migration acetabular cup measured by CT-RSA

    Measured: 2 years

  3. MTPM

    MTPM of acetabular cup

    Measured: 2 years

  4. Stem Tr

    Subsidence of stem

    Measured: 2 years

  5. XZ translation of Avanteon stem

    Migration

    Measured: 2 years

  6. XYZ rotation

    Rotation of stem in 3 dimensions

    Measured: 2 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Jul 2024
  2. Study start25 Aug 2024
  3. Primary completion1 Jun 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Nov 2028 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Randomized controled trial
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
60 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06499038
Sponsor's protocol ID
536698
Status last verified
Aug 2026
First submitted
3 Jun 2024
Last updated
14 Aug 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Upon request with proper reasons, we will share data with other researchers including CT-RSA data and PROMs. This will of course be performed within the laws of Norway and totally anonymized.

Publications

  • Murphy LB, Helmick CG, Schwartz TA, Renner JB, Tudor G, Koch GG, Dragomir AD, Kalsbeek WD, Luta G, Jordan JM. One in four people may develop symptomatic hip osteoarthritis in his or her lifetime. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2010 Nov;18(11):1372-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2010.08.005. Epub 2010 Aug 14.

    PubMed 20713163
  • Learmonth ID, Young C, Rorabeck C. The operation of the century: total hip replacement. Lancet. 2007 Oct 27;370(9597):1508-19. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60457-7.

    PubMed 17964352
  • Badarudeen S, Shu AC, Ong KL, Baykal D, Lau E, Malkani AL. Complications After Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty in the Medicare Population. J Arthroplasty. 2017 Jun;32(6):1954-1958. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.01.037. Epub 2017 Feb 1.

    PubMed 28236550
  • Lie SA, Havelin LI, Furnes ON, Engesaeter LB, Vollset SE. Failure rates for 4762 revision total hip arthroplasties in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004 May;86(4):504-9.

    PubMed 15174543
  • Selvik G. Roentgen stereophotogrammetry. A method for the study of the kinematics of the skeletal system. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 1989;232:1-51.

    PubMed 2686344
  • Valstar ER, Gill R, Ryd L, Flivik G, Borlin N, Karrholm J. Guidelines for standardization of radiostereometry (RSA) of implants. Acta Orthop. 2005 Aug;76(4):563-72. doi: 10.1080/17453670510041574.

    PubMed 16195075
  • Karrholm J, Borssen B, Lowenhielm G, Snorrason F. Does early micromotion of femoral stem prostheses matter? 4-7-year stereoradiographic follow-up of 84 cemented prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1994 Nov;76(6):912-7.

    PubMed 7983118
  • Ryd L, Albrektsson BE, Carlsson L, Dansgard F, Herberts P, Lindstrand A, Regner L, Toksvig-Larsen S. Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis as a predictor of mechanical loosening of knee prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995 May;77(3):377-83.

    PubMed 7744919
  • Pijls BG, Nieuwenhuijse MJ, Fiocco M, Plevier JW, Middeldorp S, Nelissen RG, Valstar ER. Early proximal migration of cups is associated with late revision in THA: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 26 RSA studies and 49 survivalstudies. Acta Orthop. 2012 Dec;83(6):583-91. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2012.745353. Epub 2012 Nov 5.

    PubMed 23126575
  • Broden C, Sandberg O, Olivecrona H, Emery R, Skoldenberg O. Precision of CT-based micromotion analysis is comparable to radiostereometry for early migration measurements in cemented acetabular cups. Acta Orthop. 2021 Aug;92(4):419-423. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2021.1906082. Epub 2021 Apr 6.

    PubMed 33821746
  • Otten V, Maguire GQ Jr, Noz ME, Zeleznik MP, Nilsson KG, Olivecrona H. Are CT Scans a Satisfactory Substitute for the Follow-Up of RSA Migration Studies of Uncemented Cups? A Comparison of RSA Double Examinations and CT Datasets of 46 Total Hip Arthroplasties. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:3681458. doi: 10.1155/2017/3681458. Epub 2017 Jan 24.

    PubMed 28243598
  • Engseth LHW, Schulz A, Pripp AH, Rohrl SMH, Ohrn FD. CT-based migration analysis is more precise than radiostereometric analysis for tibial implants: a phantom study on a porcine cadaver. Acta Orthop. 2023 Apr 27;94:207-214. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2023.12306.

    PubMed 37114404
  • Burkhart TA, Khadem M, Wood TJ, Dunning CE, Degen R, Lanting BA. Comparison of trans-cortical and cancellous screws to press fit for acetabular shell fixation in total hip arthroplasty: A cadaveric study. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2019 Oct;69:34-38. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2019.06.017. Epub 2019 Jun 28.

    PubMed 31295668
  • Otten VT, Crnalic S, Rohrl SM, Nivbrant B, Nilsson KG. Stability of Uncemented Cups - Long-Term Effect of Screws, Pegs and HA Coating: A 14-Year RSA Follow-Up of Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2016 Jan;31(1):156-61. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.07.012. Epub 2015 Jul 11.

    PubMed 26260783
  • Brodt S, Bischoff K, Schulze M, Nowack D, Roth A, Matziolis G. The use of acetabular screws in total hip arthroplasty and its influence on wear and periacetabular osteolysis in the long-term follow-up. Int Orthop. 2022 Apr;46(4):717-722. doi: 10.1007/s00264-021-05219-7. Epub 2021 Sep 28.

    PubMed 34581866

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Total Hip Arthroplasty in people with Hip Osteoarthritis, run by Helse Møre og Romsdal HF at 1 site in Norway.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Norway. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Translation (time frame: 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06499038, which also lists 33 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Aug 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 26 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in