AzTrials
AzTrials

Chronic PainEQUIPDNCT06500780

Equipping Patients Using Interventions for Pain and Depression

A study testing Coaching and Decision Aid in people with Chronic Pain and Musculoskeletal Pain, run by Indiana University at 1 site in United States.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This project is part of the NIH Helping to End Addiction Long-term (HEAL) initiative (https://heal.nih.gov/). This randomized controlled trial (RCT) is phase 2 of a two-phase, 5-year project with the overarching goal of testing a decision aid (DA)/coaching intervention, tailored to Black patients with comorbid chronic… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Chronic Pain, Musculoskeletal Pain, Depression
What is being tested?
Coaching and Decision Aid
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
304 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
13 Aug 2024to 31 May 2027
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Eligible patients must
  • have musculoskeletal pain in the low back, cervical spine, or extremities (hip, knee, shoulder) for ≥3 months,
  • have at least moderate pain intensity and interference with function, defined by a score ≥4 (possible range: 0-10) on the Pain, Enjoyment of Life and General Activity scale (PEG), a 3-item measure of pain intensity, interference with enjoyment of life, and interference with general activity,
  • have at least mild depression, defined as PHQ-8 score ≥5,
  • identify as Black or African American,
  • have consistent access to a telephone,
  • indicate openness to new pain treatments, and
  • have a scheduled appointment with their PCP in the next approximate 2-4 months or be willing to schedule one

Who cannot join

  • Patients are excluded:
  • if previously participated in Dr. Matthias' past pilot study (IRB #12885), the pilot RCT for this project (IRB #16571), or are participating as a Patient Engagement Panel member for this project (Aim 1.1),
  • if the eligibility screener or medical records indicate severe medical conditions likely precluding participation (e.g. stroke in the last 6 months, hospitalized with congestive heart failure or a heart attack in the last 6 months, cancer other than skin cancer and receiving active treatment), or
  • if the eligibility screener or medical records reveal (1) active suicidal ideation, or (2) severe hearing/speech or cognitive impairment.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Research Specialist contact

317-274-9402

equipd@regenstrief.org

Jennifer Garabrant contact

317-278-2510

jwilkers@iu.edu

United States1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Eskenazi Health Primary Care

    Indianapolis, Indiana, 46254

    Research Specialist, 317-274-9402, equipd@regenstrief.org

    Adam T Hirsh, PhD

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Equipping Patients Using Interventions for Pain and Depression (EQUIPD) - Phase 2

This project is part of the NIH Helping to End Addiction Long-term (HEAL) initiative (https://heal.nih.gov/). This randomized controlled trial (RCT) is phase 2 of a two-phase, 5-year project with the overarching goal of testing a decision aid (DA)/coaching intervention, tailored to Black patients with comorbid chronic pain and depression, to encourage use of and adherence to nonpharmacological pain treatments (NPTs).

This 2-arm trial will randomize 304 patients with comorbid chronic musculoskeletal pain and depression in primary care from an urban safety-net health system (Eskenazi). After the baseline assessment, patients randomized to the intervention will be asked to participate in 4 coaching sessions over approximately 12 weeks. Sessions will use Motivational Interviewing principles to foster openness to NPTs and self-efficacy by helping patients identify their goals and priorities, understand their NPT options, prepare them to discuss and choose options with their primary care providers (PCPs), and reinforce these choices to foster maintenance of these changes. DA contents will be integrated into these sessions, which will facilitate discussion of these options with their PCP. The first 3 sessions take place prior to the patient's next scheduled PCP visit; the final session occurs after this visit. Assessments will be conducted at baseline, 3 months (i.e., after completing the final coaching session), and 6 months.

Patients randomized to the wait-list control group will receive usual care (in addition to study assessments at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months). After completing the final assessment, they will then be given the DA and offered a 20-minute coaching session to walk them through it.

Being tested
Coaching and Decision Aid
Keywords
chronic pain, depression, health equity, shared decision making, decision aid, depressive symptoms
Medical subject headings
Chronic Pain, Musculoskeletal Pain, Depression

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Coaching and Decision AidBehavioural

    Four (4) coaching sessions over approximately 12 weeks with integration of Decision Aid contents

Study groups in NCT06500780
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Coaching and Decision AidExperimentalIntervention group (Individual coaching sessions and Decision Aid)
Receives: Behavioral: Coaching and Decision Aid
ControlNo interventionWait-list control group

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change from Baseline Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Interference Scale at 3 months

    The pain interference score averages seven ratings, 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes).

    Measured: 3 months

  2. Change from Baseline Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Interference Scale at 6 months

    The pain interference score averages seven ratings, 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes).

    Measured: 6 months

  3. Change from Baseline Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-8 at 3 months

    The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-8 is a widely-used, validated 8-item measure of depression severity that uses a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day).

    Measured: 3 months

  4. Change from Baseline Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-8 at 6 months

    The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-8 is a widely-used, validated 8-item measure of depression severity that uses a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day).

    Measured: 6 months

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Change from Baseline Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD)-7 at 3 months

    Anxiety will be measured with the 7 item Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD)-7 that uses a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day).

    Measured: 3 months

  2. Change from Baseline Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD)-7 at 6 months

    Anxiety will be measured with the 7 item Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD)-7 that uses a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day).

    Measured: 6 months

  3. Change from Baseline Pain Catastrophizing Scale at 3 months

    The Pain Catastrophizing Scale is a 13-item scale that assesses catastrophizing-a cognitive-emotional factor that predicts poor treatment response. The scale uses a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (all the time).

    Measured: 3 months

  4. Change from Baseline Pain Catastrophizing Scale at 6 months

    The Pain Catastrophizing Scale is a 13-item scale that assesses catastrophizing-a cognitive-emotional factor that predicts poor treatment response. The scale uses a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (all the time).

    Measured: 6 months

  5. Change from Baseline Use of Nonpharmacological and Self-Care Approaches (NSCAP) at 3 months

    The NSCAP asks about 9 nonpharmacological treatment (NPT) modalities and assesses details of use such as frequency, location/source of service, and patients' judgments of effectiveness. Space is also provided for other NPTs that are used but not listed. The number of modalities for which patients answer "yes" will be summed for analyses.

    Measured: 3 months

  6. Change from Baseline Use of Nonpharmacological and Self-Care Approaches (NSCAP) at 6 months

    The NSCAP asks about 9 nonpharmacological treatment (NPT) modalities and assesses details of use such as frequency, location/source of service, and patients' judgments of effectiveness. Space is also provided for other NPTs that are used but not listed. The number of modalities for which patients answer "yes" will be summed for analyses.

    Measured: 6 months

  7. Change from Baseline Altarum Consumer Engagement (ACE) Measure at 3 months

    Patient engagement will be measured with the 12-item Altarum Consumer Engagement (ACE) Measure, which has 3 subscales: 1) commitment to manage one's health, 2) informed choice, and 3) confidence to participate in treatment decisions. Items are assessed on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree).

    Measured: 3 months

  8. Change from Baseline Altarum Consumer Engagement (ACE) Measure at 6 months

    Patient engagement will be measured with the 12-item Altarum Consumer Engagement (ACE) Measure, which has 3 subscales: 1) commitment to manage one's health, 2) informed choice, and 3) confidence to participate in treatment decisions. Items are assessed on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree).

    Measured: 6 months

  9. Change from Baseline Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) at 3 months

    Decisional conflict will be measured with the 16-item Decisional Conflict Scale that measures personal perceptions of a) uncertainty in choosing options, b) modifiable factors contributing to uncertainty, and c) effective decision making on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree).

    Measured: 3 months

  10. Change from Baseline Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) at 6 months

    Decisional conflict will be measured with the 16-item Decisional Conflict Scale that measures personal perceptions of a) uncertainty in choosing options, b) modifiable factors contributing to uncertainty, and c) effective decision making on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree).

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Jul 2024
  2. Study start13 Aug 2024
  3. Primary completion31 May 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 May 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
304 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06500780
Sponsor's protocol ID
22412
Other IDs
4R33NR020845-02
Acronym
EQUIPD
Status last verified
Jun 2026
First submitted
8 Jul 2024
Last updated
9 Jun 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: NIH intends to maximize the impact of HEAL Initiative-supported projects through broad and rapid data sharing. All HEAL Initiative award recipients, regardless of the amount of direct costs requested for any one year, are required to comply with the HEAL Public Access and Data Sharing Policy, which also aligns with the NIH Policy for Data Management and Sharing (https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-21-013.html). HEAL award recipients must following all requirements and timelines developed through the HEAL Initiative Data Ecosystem, as described in HEAL's compliance guidance (https://heal.nih.gov/data/complying-heal-data-sharing-policy).

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Coaching and Decision Aid in people with Chronic Pain and Musculoskeletal Pain, run by Indiana University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Research Specialist (317-274-9402, equipd@regenstrief.org), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change from Baseline Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Interference Scale at 3 months (time frame: 3 months). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Jun 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 29 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in