Eosinophilic EsophagitisCosieNCT06501274
Capsule Sponge Study in Eosinophilic Oesophagitis
A study testing capsule sponge in people with Eosinophilic Esophagitis, run by East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
Open pragmatic, descriptive single site study in adult patients with non-stenotic eosinophilic oesophagitis. To assess the clinical value of Capsule sponge in the assessment of treatment response in patients with known non-stenosing eosinophilic oesophagitis, as an alternative to gastroscopy in a real world setting. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Eosinophilic Esophagitis
- What is being tested?
- capsule sponge
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 143 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- 31 Jul 2023to 31 Dec 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- patients diagnosed with non -stenotic eosinophilic oesophagitis who have a change in treatment
Who cannot join
- Strictures or rings at most recent endoscopy that prevent passage of adult gastroscope
- Previous oesophageal dilatation
- Previous oesophageal perforation or surgical resection
- Oesophago-gastric malignancy
- Oesophageal varices
- Bolus obstruction since last endoscopy requiring hospital visit
Show all 9Show fewer
- Previous fundoplication or complicated hiatus hernia
- Patient on Warfarin with INR>=3
- Suspected new diagnosis of EOE without prior endoscopic confirmation
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United Kingdom1 site
East and North Herts NHS Trust
Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 4AB
About this study
Official title: A Pragmatic Interventional Study to Assess the Clinical Value of Capsule Sponge in the Assessment of Response to Treatment of Non-stenotic Eosinophilic Oesophagitis in a Single District General Hospital
Open pragmatic, descriptive single site study in adult patients with non-stenotic eosinophilic oesophagitis.
To assess the clinical value of Capsule sponge in the assessment of treatment response in patients with known non-stenosing eosinophilic oesophagitis, as an alternative to gastroscopy in a real world setting.
Read more
To assess patient preference for Capsule sponge or gastroscopy. All patients with non-stenosing eosinophilic oesophagitis who are reviewed in clinic that have not had reassessment of their oesophagus post treatment initiation or change in treatment will be offered Capsule sponge as an alternative to gastroscopy.
A standardised clinical symptom questionnaire will be self-administered for 2w prior to clinic visits and Capsule sponge.
Telephone triage for safety check and exclusion criteria by Capsule sponge nurse.
A patient symptom questionnaire at the time of procedure by research nurse. A patient satisfaction survey will be delivered after the Capsule sponge procedure by Capsule sponge nurse.
Cytological assessment of the Capsule sponge and eosinophil count and other markers of inflammation will be reported by Cyted.
Clinic follow up will occur at approximately 6-8 weeks post Capsule sponge. Descriptive Changes in management as a result of the Capsule sponge findings and /or symptoms will be recorded by clinician.
Read the detailed description
Eosinophilic oesophagitis is a condition characterised by symptoms of dysphagia (swallowing difficulties) and/or food impaction in adults, with oesophageal biopsies (histology) showing a peak eosinophil count of >15 eosinophils/high power field (or >15 eosinophils/0.3mm2 or >60 eosinophils / mm2), and the absence of other causes of oesophageal.
Evidence suggests that if inadequately treated there is increased risk of oesophageal fibrosis and stricture formation that can lead to progressive dysphagia, food bolus obstruction (food blockages) and increased morbidity. The degree of eosinophil infiltration in the mucosa is thought to reflect the disease activity better than patient symptoms.
Current guidelines from Europe and newly published national guidelines from the British Society of Gastroenterology from the UK recommend reassessment of oesophageal eosinophilia after treatment to ensure remission This has traditionally involved repeating gastroscopies after each treatment (diet -after each food group, proton pump inhibitor (PPI), topical steroids) which is unpleasant for patients, expensive and labour intensive as well as producing a large carbon footprint.
Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic in January 2020 there has been restricted or delayed access to gastroscopy nationally and consequently many patients with EOE have had their repeat gastroscopies cancelled or postponed, increasing the risk of complications from undertreated disease.
Capsule sponge (Cytosponge and Endosign being the current commercially produced example in the UK) is an oesophageal cell sampling device that is a 'pill on a string'. The patient swallows the pill with water and the sponge expands in the stomach. The nurse withdraws the string after 7 minutes and the sponge collects oesophageal cells on withdrawal. The sponge is sent for cytological analysis that identifies cells that can be stained for various biomarkers of Barrett's oesophagus (TFF3) and markers of dysplasia (p53 and atypia) as well as the opportunity to look at inflammation and in particular in this setting to assess the number of eosinophils and other histological and inflammatory markers supporting a diagnosis of EOE.
The use of Capsule sponge in the diagnosis and monitoring of EOE has been described as an alternative to gastroscopy and a quantitative eosinophil count is possible on cytology to allow sequential assessment. The eosinophil count on cytology samples from Capsule sponge are similar to biopsies taken from the same patient at the same time, when assessed per high power field (area of 0.3mm2) in a single study.
Over 10,000 Capsule sponge procedures have now been performed in the UK. The Capsule sponge service at East and North Herts trust has now performed over 1000 procedures making the trust the largest UK single site experience.
The trial population will involve adult patients over 18 years who are known to have a histological diagnosis of EOE and are under follow up at East and North Herts NHS trust.
Preclinical/Clinical Data The use of Capsule sponge in the monitoring of EOE has been described in a single prospective cross sectional 2-centre study in USA .
There have been no studies to date assessing the clinical value of Capsule sponge in monitoring disease activity or response to treatment in adults in a real-world setting.
Rationale
- Does the use of Capsule sponge instead of endoscopy and biopsies in monitoring known non-stenotic EOE provide sufficient information to affect management decisions in a real-world setting?
- Current practice to monitor EOE disease activity with endoscopy and biopsies has been severely affected by the COVID19 pandemic resulting in delays to treatment and the risk of progressive stenotic disease and morbidity.
- Gastroscopy is invasive, expensive, unpleasant and aerosol generating whilst Capsule sponge is cheaper, much less invasive does not require sedation and is preferred by patients and carries a lower carbon footprint.
STUDY OBJECTIVES AND DESIGN Objectives Primary objectives: Does Capsule sponge instead of endoscopy and biopsies in monitoring known non stenotic EOE provide sufficient information to affect management decisions in a real-world setting? Do patients show a preference for Capsule sponge over endoscopy and biopsies?
Secondary objectives:
- Subgroup analysis by current treatment
- Do Symptom scores reflect eosinophil count and other markers of inflammation on cytology and histology?
- Complications
- Failure to swallow rate
- Inadequate cytology rate
- Gastroscopy rate by 1year if not done simultaneously
- Potential Cost savings compared with gastroscopy
Endpoints/outcomes
Primary Endpoints/outcomes:
Descriptive analysis of management decision made as a result of the Capsule sponge findings Patient preference for Capsule sponge or gastroscopy
Secondary Endpoints/outcomes:
- Subgroup analysis by current treatment (diet/PPI/topical steroid/combination/no treatment)
- Correlation between Symptom scores and eosinophil count and other markers of inflammation on cytology and histology
- Additional cytological findings of EOE activity and inflammation
- Other cytological findings: Barrett's oesophagus/dysplasia/other diagnoses
- Number of Complications
- Failure to swallow rate
- Inadequate cytology rate
- Gastroscopy rate if not done simultaneously
- Cost savings
- Patient satisfaction and pain scores
Study Design
- Purpose of research To identify a suitable alternative to endoscopic biopsies for monitoring patients with non-stenotic EOE.
- Real-world prospective pragmatic interventional study in a single district general hospital secondary care setting with quantitative and qualitative outcome measures. Design chosen as pragmatic and comparative control study with endoscopy would be impractical due to COVID backlog, cost and such a study has already been performed
- Data collection methods:
- An excel database of patients with EOE will be established and used as a screening log.
With demographic data, date of diagnosis, date of previous endoscopies, endoscopic findings (EREFS criteria if documented) eosinophil count on previous histology and any other histological supportive features, current and previous treatments documented. Reasons for ineligibility will also be documented.
The study will be discussed with eligible patients at their normal clinic appointment and for eligible patients who agree to enrol in the study:
The following will be sent to patient by email/post as preferred and the Capsule sponge service contact email and phone details:
- Eligible patients will be sent copies of the trust standard Capsule sponge procedure information leaflet.
- Copies of patient Information leaflet regarding the COSiE trial
- Study specific Consent form
- 2 week symptoms diary Dysphagia Symptom Questionnaire (DSQ)
The following will be administered with the patient on the day of the Capsule sponge procedure:
- Capsule sponge eligibility and safety questionnaire
- Documentation of Current treatment and duration and compliance
- Patient satisfaction survey after procedure
Patient participation opinion group has been completed
Number of subjects A total of 100 -140 evaluable patients will be enrolled in the study. This is thought to be an achievable sufficiently large sample target given the prevalence of EOE in the catchment population. The PI runs a dedicated EOE teleclinic every month that sees approximately 12 patients. It is estimated that 2/3 of these would be eligible for Capsule sponge. In addition, other patients with EOE are also followed up in 5 other consultant gastroenterology clinics that would be eligible for the study.
Study Duration The length of time the study is expected to run over 2 years in order to recruit sufficiently large sample.
- Conditions
- Eosinophilic Esophagitis
- Being tested
- capsule sponge
- Keywords
- capsule sponge
- Medical subject headings
- Eosinophilic Esophagitis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
capsule spongeDevice
capsule sponge sampling device of the oesophagus
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| all eligible patients with non stenotic eosinophilic oesophagitis | Other | single arm observational study Receives: Device: capsule sponge |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
• Descriptive Changes in clinical management of EOE following Capsule sponge assessment
has the results of the capsule sponge resulted in a decision to change treatment drug, or drug dose?-yes/ no response
Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year
• symptom score
Dysphagia symptom score (DSQ) scored as continuous variable in 2 weeks prior to capsule sponge
Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year
• Eosinophil count on cytology
no of eosinophils per high powered field on cytology
Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year
• Patient pain evaluation
wong -baker faces visual scale from 0 to 10 with 0 being no pain and 10 being maximum pain
Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year
patient preference for endoscopy or capsule sponge
tick box
Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Secondary outcomes (5)
• Failure to swallow rate
proportion of patients unable to swallow device after 2 attempts
Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year
• Inadequate sample rate
proportion of samples with inadequate squamous cells for analysis
Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year
• Complications
recognised immediate complications
Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year
• Repeat gastroscopy rate
numbers of patients requiring gastroscopy within 1year of sponge
Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Cost evaluation
comparison of sponge v gastroscopy real world costs of service in GB Pounds
Measured: at end of study at 2 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Jul 2024
- Study start31 Jul 2023
- Primary completion31 Dec 2025
- Study completion31 Dec 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Eosinophilic EsophagitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 143 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Danielle Morris, MD FRCP, Principal investigator, East and North Herts NHS Trust
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06501274
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RD2022-43 314770
- Acronym
- Cosie
- Status last verified
- Jul 2026
- First submitted
- 29 Aug 2023
- Last updated
- 7 Jul 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: there is no current plan to make de-identified individual participant data (IPD) collected in this study available to other researchers (e.g., outside the primary research group). Individual requests for data sharing can be considered on request via email
Publications
Dhar A, Haboubi HN, Attwood SE, Auth MKH, Dunn JM, Sweis R, Morris D, Epstein J, Novelli MR, Hunter H, Cordell A, Hall S, Hayat JO, Kapur K, Moore AR, Read C, Sami SS, Turner PJ, Trudgill NJ. British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) and British Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (BSPGHAN) joint consensus guidelines on the diagnosis and management of eosinophilic oesophagitis in children and adults. Gut. 2022 Aug;71(8):1459-1487. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2022-327326. Epub 2022 May 23.
PubMed 35606089di Pietro M, Modolell I, O'Donovan M, Price C, Pilonis ND, Debiram-Beecham I, Fitzgerald RC. Use of Cytosponge as a triaging tool to upper gastrointestinal endoscopy during the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Sep;5(9):805-806. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(20)30242-9. Epub 2020 Jul 30. No abstract available.
PubMed 32738939Paterson AL, Lao-Sirieix P, O'Donovan M, Debiram-Beecham I, di Pietro M, Miremadi A, Attwood SE, Walter FM, Sasieni PD, Fitzgerald RC; BEST and BEST2 study groups. Range of pathologies diagnosed using a minimally invasive capsule sponge to evaluate patients with reflux symptoms. Histopathology. 2017 Jan;70(2):203-210. doi: 10.1111/his.13039. Epub 2016 Oct 12.
PubMed 27417524Katzka DA, Smyrk TC, Alexander JA, Geno DM, Beitia RA, Chang AO, Shaheen NJ, Fitzgerald RC, Dellon ES. Accuracy and Safety of the Cytosponge for Assessing Histologic Activity in Eosinophilic Esophagitis: A Two-Center Study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017 Oct;112(10):1538-1544. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2017.244. Epub 2017 Aug 15.
PubMed 28809387Januszewicz W, Tan WK, Lehovsky K, Debiram-Beecham I, Nuckcheddy T, Moist S, Kadri S, di Pietro M, Boussioutas A, Shaheen NJ, Katzka DA, Dellon ES, Fitzgerald RC; BEST1 and BEST2 study investigators. Safety and Acceptability of Esophageal Cytosponge Cell Collection Device in a Pooled Analysis of Data From Individual Patients. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Mar;17(4):647-656.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.07.043. Epub 2018 Aug 9.
PubMed 30099104Swart N, Maroni R, Muldrew B, Sasieni P, Fitzgerald RC, Morris S; BEST3 Consortium. Economic evaluation of Cytosponge(R)-trefoil factor 3 for Barrett esophagus: A cost-utility analysis of randomised controlled trial data. EClinicalMedicine. 2021 Jun 18;37:100969. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100969. eCollection 2021 Jul.
PubMed 34195582Hudgens S, Evans C, Phillips E, Hill M. Psychometric validation of the Dysphagia Symptom Questionnaire in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis treated with budesonide oral suspension. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2017;1(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s41687-017-0006-5. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
PubMed 29757322Dellon ES, Irani AM, Hill MR, Hirano I. Development and field testing of a novel patient-reported outcome measure of dysphagia in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2013 Sep;38(6):634-42. doi: 10.1111/apt.12413. Epub 2013 Jul 9.
PubMed 23837796
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Jul 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Pragmatic Interventional Study to Assess the Clinical Value of Capsule Sponge in the Assessment of Response to Treatment of Non-stenotic Eosinophilic Oesophagitis in a Single District General Hospital
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06501274
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Cosie / RD2022-43 314770
- Conditions
- Eosinophilic Esophagitis
- Keywords
- capsule sponge
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 143 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- East and North Hertfordshire NHS TrustOther government
- Study start
- 31 Jul 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Jul 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Open pragmatic, descriptive single site study in adult patients with non-stenotic eosinophilic oesophagitis.
To assess the clinical value of Capsule sponge in the assessment of treatment response in patients with known non-stenosing eosinophilic oesophagitis, as an alternative to gastroscopy in a real world setting.
To assess patient preference for Capsule sponge or gastroscopy. All patients with non-stenosing eosinophilic oesophagitis who are reviewed in clinic that have not had reassessment of their oesophagus post treatment initiation or change in treatment will be offered Capsule sponge as an alternative to gastroscopy.
A standardised clinical symptom questionnaire will be self-administered for 2w prior to clinic visits and Capsule sponge.
Telephone triage for safety check and exclusion criteria by Capsule sponge nurse.
A patient symptom questionnaire at the time of procedure by research nurse. A patient satisfaction survey will be delivered after the Capsule sponge procedure by Capsule sponge nurse.
Cytological assessment of the Capsule sponge and eosinophil count and other markers of inflammation will be reported by Cyted.
Clinic follow up will occur at approximately 6-8 weeks post Capsule sponge. Descriptive Changes in management as a result of the Capsule sponge findings and /or symptoms will be recorded by clinician.
Detailed description
Eosinophilic oesophagitis is a condition characterised by symptoms of dysphagia (swallowing difficulties) and/or food impaction in adults, with oesophageal biopsies (histology) showing a peak eosinophil count of >15 eosinophils/high power field (or >15 eosinophils/0.3mm2 or >60 eosinophils / mm2), and the absence of other causes of oesophageal.
Evidence suggests that if inadequately treated there is increased risk of oesophageal fibrosis and stricture formation that can lead to progressive dysphagia, food bolus obstruction (food blockages) and increased morbidity. The degree of eosinophil infiltration in the mucosa is thought to reflect the disease activity better than patient symptoms.
Current guidelines from Europe and newly published national guidelines from the British Society of Gastroenterology from the UK recommend reassessment of oesophageal eosinophilia after treatment to ensure remission This has traditionally involved repeating gastroscopies after each treatment (diet -after each food group, proton pump inhibitor (PPI), topical steroids) which is unpleasant for patients, expensive and labour intensive as well as producing a large carbon footprint.
Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic in January 2020 there has been restricted or delayed access to gastroscopy nationally and consequently many patients with EOE have had their repeat gastroscopies cancelled or postponed, increasing the risk of complications from undertreated disease.
Capsule sponge (Cytosponge and Endosign being the current commercially produced example in the UK) is an oesophageal cell sampling device that is a 'pill on a string'. The patient swallows the pill with water and the sponge expands in the stomach. The nurse withdraws the string after 7 minutes and the sponge collects oesophageal cells on withdrawal. The sponge is sent for cytological analysis that identifies cells that can be stained for various biomarkers of Barrett's oesophagus (TFF3) and markers of dysplasia (p53 and atypia) as well as the opportunity to look at inflammation and in particular in this setting to assess the number of eosinophils and other histological and inflammatory markers supporting a diagnosis of EOE.
The use of Capsule sponge in the diagnosis and monitoring of EOE has been described as an alternative to gastroscopy and a quantitative eosinophil count is possible on cytology to allow sequential assessment. The eosinophil count on cytology samples from Capsule sponge are similar to biopsies taken from the same patient at the same time, when assessed per high power field (area of 0.3mm2) in a single study.
Over 10,000 Capsule sponge procedures have now been performed in the UK. The Capsule sponge service at East and North Herts trust has now performed over 1000 procedures making the trust the largest UK single site experience.
The trial population will involve adult patients over 18 years who are known to have a histological diagnosis of EOE and are under follow up at East and North Herts NHS trust.
Preclinical/Clinical Data The use of Capsule sponge in the monitoring of EOE has been described in a single prospective cross sectional 2-centre study in USA .
There have been no studies to date assessing the clinical value of Capsule sponge in monitoring disease activity or response to treatment in adults in a real-world setting.
Rationale
- Does the use of Capsule sponge instead of endoscopy and biopsies in monitoring known non-stenotic EOE provide sufficient information to affect management decisions in a real-world setting?
- Current practice to monitor EOE disease activity with endoscopy and biopsies has been severely affected by the COVID19 pandemic resulting in delays to treatment and the risk of progressive stenotic disease and morbidity.
- Gastroscopy is invasive, expensive, unpleasant and aerosol generating whilst Capsule sponge is cheaper, much less invasive does not require sedation and is preferred by patients and carries a lower carbon footprint.
STUDY OBJECTIVES AND DESIGN Objectives Primary objectives: Does Capsule sponge instead of endoscopy and biopsies in monitoring known non stenotic EOE provide sufficient information to affect management decisions in a real-world setting? Do patients show a preference for Capsule sponge over endoscopy and biopsies?
Secondary objectives:
- Subgroup analysis by current treatment
- Do Symptom scores reflect eosinophil count and other markers of inflammation on cytology and histology?
- Complications
- Failure to swallow rate
- Inadequate cytology rate
- Gastroscopy rate by 1year if not done simultaneously
- Potential Cost savings compared with gastroscopy
Endpoints/outcomes
Primary Endpoints/outcomes:
Descriptive analysis of management decision made as a result of the Capsule sponge findings Patient preference for Capsule sponge or gastroscopy
Secondary Endpoints/outcomes:
- Subgroup analysis by current treatment (diet/PPI/topical steroid/combination/no treatment)
- Correlation between Symptom scores and eosinophil count and other markers of inflammation on cytology and histology
- Additional cytological findings of EOE activity and inflammation
- Other cytological findings: Barrett's oesophagus/dysplasia/other diagnoses
- Number of Complications
- Failure to swallow rate
- Inadequate cytology rate
- Gastroscopy rate if not done simultaneously
- Cost savings
- Patient satisfaction and pain scores
Study Design
- Purpose of research To identify a suitable alternative to endoscopic biopsies for monitoring patients with non-stenotic EOE.
- Real-world prospective pragmatic interventional study in a single district general hospital secondary care setting with quantitative and qualitative outcome measures. Design chosen as pragmatic and comparative control study with endoscopy would be impractical due to COVID backlog, cost and such a study has already been performed
- Data collection methods:
- An excel database of patients with EOE will be established and used as a screening log.
With demographic data, date of diagnosis, date of previous endoscopies, endoscopic findings (EREFS criteria if documented) eosinophil count on previous histology and any other histological supportive features, current and previous treatments documented. Reasons for ineligibility will also be documented.
The study will be discussed with eligible patients at their normal clinic appointment and for eligible patients who agree to enrol in the study:
The following will be sent to patient by email/post as preferred and the Capsule sponge service contact email and phone details:
- Eligible patients will be sent copies of the trust standard Capsule sponge procedure information leaflet.
- Copies of patient Information leaflet regarding the COSiE trial
- Study specific Consent form
- 2 week symptoms diary Dysphagia Symptom Questionnaire (DSQ)
The following will be administered with the patient on the day of the Capsule sponge procedure:
- Capsule sponge eligibility and safety questionnaire
- Documentation of Current treatment and duration and compliance
- Patient satisfaction survey after procedure
Patient participation opinion group has been completed
Number of subjects A total of 100 -140 evaluable patients will be enrolled in the study. This is thought to be an achievable sufficiently large sample target given the prevalence of EOE in the catchment population. The PI runs a dedicated EOE teleclinic every month that sees approximately 12 patients. It is estimated that 2/3 of these would be eligible for Capsule sponge. In addition, other patients with EOE are also followed up in 5 other consultant gastroenterology clinics that would be eligible for the study.
Study Duration The length of time the study is expected to run over 2 years in order to recruit sufficiently large sample.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| all eligible patients with non stenotic eosinophilic oesophagitis | Other | Device: capsule spongesingle arm observational study |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- patients diagnosed with non -stenotic eosinophilic oesophagitis who have a change in treatment
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Strictures or rings at most recent endoscopy that prevent passage of adult gastroscope
- Previous oesophageal dilatation
- Previous oesophageal perforation or surgical resection
- Oesophago-gastric malignancy
- Oesophageal varices
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| capsule spongecapsule sponge sampling device of the oesophagus | Device | all eligible patients with non stenotic eosinophilic oesophagitis |
Primary outcome
• Descriptive Changes in clinical management of EOE following Capsule sponge assessment
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
has the results of the capsule sponge resulted in a decision to change treatment drug, or drug dose?-yes/ no response
• symptom score
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Dysphagia symptom score (DSQ) scored as continuous variable in 2 weeks prior to capsule sponge
• Eosinophil count on cytology
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
no of eosinophils per high powered field on cytology
• Patient pain evaluation
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
wong -baker faces visual scale from 0 to 10 with 0 being no pain and 10 being maximum pain
patient preference for endoscopy or capsule sponge
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
tick box
5 secondary outcomes
• Failure to swallow rate
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
• Inadequate sample rate
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
• Complications
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
• Repeat gastroscopy rate
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Cost evaluation
Time frame: at end of study at 2 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Jul 2026.
- Background: PubMed 35606089Dhar A, Haboubi HN, Attwood SE, Auth MKH, Dunn JM, Sweis R, Morris D, Epstein J, Novelli MR, Hunter H, Cordell A, Hall S, Hayat JO, Kapur K, Moore AR, Read C, Sami SS, Turner PJ, Trudgill NJ. British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) and British Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (BSPGHAN) joint consensus guidelines on the diagnosis and management of eosinophilic oesophagitis in children and adults. Gut. 2022 Aug;71(8):1459-1487. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2022-327326. Epub 2022 May 23.
- Background: PubMed 32738939di Pietro M, Modolell I, O'Donovan M, Price C, Pilonis ND, Debiram-Beecham I, Fitzgerald RC. Use of Cytosponge as a triaging tool to upper gastrointestinal endoscopy during the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Sep;5(9):805-806. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(20)30242-9. Epub 2020 Jul 30. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 27417524Paterson AL, Lao-Sirieix P, O'Donovan M, Debiram-Beecham I, di Pietro M, Miremadi A, Attwood SE, Walter FM, Sasieni PD, Fitzgerald RC; BEST and BEST2 study groups. Range of pathologies diagnosed using a minimally invasive capsule sponge to evaluate patients with reflux symptoms. Histopathology. 2017 Jan;70(2):203-210. doi: 10.1111/his.13039. Epub 2016 Oct 12.
- Background: PubMed 28809387Katzka DA, Smyrk TC, Alexander JA, Geno DM, Beitia RA, Chang AO, Shaheen NJ, Fitzgerald RC, Dellon ES. Accuracy and Safety of the Cytosponge for Assessing Histologic Activity in Eosinophilic Esophagitis: A Two-Center Study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017 Oct;112(10):1538-1544. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2017.244. Epub 2017 Aug 15.
- Background: PubMed 30099104Januszewicz W, Tan WK, Lehovsky K, Debiram-Beecham I, Nuckcheddy T, Moist S, Kadri S, di Pietro M, Boussioutas A, Shaheen NJ, Katzka DA, Dellon ES, Fitzgerald RC; BEST1 and BEST2 study investigators. Safety and Acceptability of Esophageal Cytosponge Cell Collection Device in a Pooled Analysis of Data From Individual Patients. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Mar;17(4):647-656.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.07.043. Epub 2018 Aug 9.
- Background: PubMed 34195582Swart N, Maroni R, Muldrew B, Sasieni P, Fitzgerald RC, Morris S; BEST3 Consortium. Economic evaluation of Cytosponge(R)-trefoil factor 3 for Barrett esophagus: A cost-utility analysis of randomised controlled trial data. EClinicalMedicine. 2021 Jun 18;37:100969. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100969. eCollection 2021 Jul.
- Background: PubMed 29757322Hudgens S, Evans C, Phillips E, Hill M. Psychometric validation of the Dysphagia Symptom Questionnaire in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis treated with budesonide oral suspension. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2017;1(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s41687-017-0006-5. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
- Background: PubMed 23837796Dellon ES, Irani AM, Hill MR, Hirano I. Development and field testing of a novel patient-reported outcome measure of dysphagia in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2013 Sep;38(6):634-42. doi: 10.1111/apt.12413. Epub 2013 Jul 9.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. there is no current plan to make de-identified individual participant data (IPD) collected in this study available to other researchers (e.g., outside the primary research group). Individual requests for data sharing can be considered on request via email
Related trials for Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Recruiting
The Esophageal String Test as a Diagnostic Screening Tool for Eosinophilic Esophagitis Among Africans With Dysphagia in Mali and the United States
Dysphagia, Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Active, not recruiting
Patient-Centered Decision Support for Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study in Adult Participants With EoE to Evaluate Vonoprazan 20 mg Compared to Placebo After 12 Weeks and to Evaluate Vonoprazan 20 mg Up to 24 Weeks
Eosinophilic Esophagitis
RecruitingObservational study
Natural History and Genetics of Food Allergy and Related Conditions
Food Allergy, Loeys-Dietz Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 2
A Trial of Upadacitinib for Non-responsive Eosinophilic Esophagitis
EoE, Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Danielle Morris, MD FRCP principal investigator
East and North Herts NHS Trust
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing capsule sponge in people with Eosinophilic Esophagitis, run by East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
• Descriptive Changes in clinical management of EOE following Capsule sponge assessment (time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06501274, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Jul 2026.