AzTrials
AzTrials

HealthyTIKiSNCT06501300

Tuning in to Kids in School - Competence Building and Collaboration in the Team Around Primary School Students

A study testing Emotion-focused: Tuning in to Kids in School in people with Healthy, run by Sophie Havighurst at 1 site in Norway.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The current project is a randomized controlled trial of the Australian evidence-based parenting program Tuning in to Kids® which has been adapted for using with Norwegian elementary school teachers (Tuning in to Kids in Schools; TIKiS). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Healthy
What is being tested?
Emotion-focused: Tuning in to Kids in School
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
450 participants
Where
1 siteNorway
Study dates
1 Aug 2022to 31 Jul 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • School staff that work with children in grades 1.-4.

Who cannot join

  • (Exclusion from analysis) school staff in the intervention school that did not participate in the intervention.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Norway1 site
  • Department of Psychology, University of Oslo

    Oslo, 0373

Other trials in Norway

About this study

The current project is a randomized controlled trial of the Australian evidence-based parenting program Tuning in to Kids® which has been adapted for using with Norwegian elementary school teachers (Tuning in to Kids in Schools; TIKiS).

TIKiS aims to improve emotion socialization practices of primary school teachers so that children's emotional competence is promoted.

This project will determine effectiveness and implementation quality of TIKiS through questionnaire and observation measures given before and after the intervention, comparing intervention and wait-list control schools.

Read the detailed description

This project is a collaboration between the University of Oslo, the education agency and health agency in Oslo municipality, Norway.

A total of 20 schools will be recruited for the project, and randomly allocated to the intervention or wait-list control condition (10 in each). Teachers in the intervention schools will receive the TIKiS intervention delivered by trained facilitators. Facilitators of the teacher groups will be from staff from education and health agencies and will have at least a masters' degree in psychology, pedagogy or similar.

The TIKiS program facilitators attend a two day training in TIKiS. In addition, they will attend a 90-minute workshop and receive three days of 90-minute program supervision before they act as program facilitators for the teachers.

In the intervention condition, school leaders will attend adapted three 90-minute group sessions to assist with implementation. All teachers in the intervention schools will attend introduction sessions outlining the program. Then teachers and other relevant school staff (special education teachers, resource teachers, social teachers and assistants) in grade 1-4 (the first 4 years of elementary school) will attend six x 90 minute group sessions led by a pair of program facilitators.

In intervention and control schools, facilitators of groups, teachers and relevant school staff will complete questionnaires at baseline and follow-up. Observations of classes of these teachers and staff will be conducted at baseline and follow-up.

Control schools will receive the intervention following completion of all follow-up measures.

Conditions
Healthy
Being tested
Emotion-focused: Tuning in to Kids in School
Keywords
Teachers, Schools, Tuning in to Kids, Intervention, TIK, TIKiS, Emotion Socialisation, Emotional Competence

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Emotion-focused: Tuning in to Kids in SchoolBehavioural

    The aim of the TIKiS is to improve emotion coaching and reduce emotion dismissing in elementary school teachers through six x 90-minute group sessions.

Study groups in NCT06501300
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
InterventionExperimentalTeachers and relevant school staff six 90-minute supervised group lessons with a 1-2 week space between each time. School leaders attend three 90-minute sessions adapted to them
Receives: Behavioral: Emotion-focused: Tuning in to Kids in School
Waitlist ControlNo interventionReceives no intervention, business as usual. Receives intervention the following year.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Classroom Assessment Scoring system - CLASS- K3

    A structured, validated observation measure of a classroom's social-emotional environment. Scored from 1 to 7 where 1 is low score (few behaviour markers observed or are rarely observed) and 7 is a high score (many behaviour indicators are frequently observed). (Pianta, La Paro, \& Hamre, 2008).

    Measured: Right before intervention (Baseline) and 5 months after intervention (post-intervention)

  2. Coping with Children's Negative Emotions Teacher Version - CCNES-T:

    A measure of emotion coaching and emotion dismissing behaviors (Fabes et al., 2000). This study uses a short form of the original CCNES (21 questions), which has been modified and translated to Norwegian.

    Teachers rate how likely they are to respond to childrens' expressions of negative emotions in various scenarios on a scale of 1 (very unlikely) to 7 (very likely).

    Measured: Right before intervention (Baseline) and 5 months after intervention (post-intervention)

  3. Program differentiation

    Program differentiation is how differnt our intervention is from similar interventions that the school has used recently. This is measured by asing teachers to what degree they have worked with similar teaching strategies in the previous year on a scale of 1 (not at all) to 5 (a lot).

    Measured: Right before intervention (Baseline) and 5 months after intervention (post-intervention)

  4. Content Fidelity/Adherance

    Content Fidelity/Adherance is is how much of the manual and planned content that the facilitators cover for each group session. Facilitators fill in a checklist of core components after each group session to get the proportion of core content completed for each session and in total for the whole intervention.

    Measured: Right before intervention (Baseline) and 5 months after intervention (post-intervention)

  5. Dosage

    Dosage is how much of the intervention each participant received, which will be measured as the proportion of intervention sessions that each teacher participated in.

    Measured: Right before intervention (Baseline) and 5 months after intervention (post-intervention)

  6. Reach

    Reach is measured as the proportion of eligible teachers that have participated in the intervention, and the proportion of eligible schools that have participated.

    Measured: Right before intervention (Baseline) and 5 months after intervention (post-intervention)

  7. Teacher Implementation

    Teacher feedback on program satisfaction and use of program content will be measured quantitively trhough a questionnaire and qualitatively and through focus group interviews.

    The questionnaire will ask about obstacles and ease of attending the intervention and using the learned content afterwards, and what aspects they found useful on a scale of 1 to 7 where 1 is a low score and 7 is a high score. The questionnaire will also ask about what cocepts they have used, and what stopped them from attending using multiple choice with a free text option.

    The focus group interviews will be used to get a more detailed assessment of program satisfaction and use of program content

    Measured: 5 months after intervention (post-intervention)

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Affect Integration Inventory (AII)

    A measure of how well various emotions are integrated (Solbakken \& Monsen, 2017). Teachers rate how well 18 statements about emotions describe them from a scale of 0 (doesnt fit at all) to 9 (fits perfectly).

    Measured: Right before intervention (Baseline) and 5 months after intervention (post-intervention)

  2. Bergen burnout inventory (BBI)

    A measure of employee burnout with 9 items. Participants rate how nmuch they agree with each of the 9 statemetns from 1 (disagree completely ) to 6 (agree completely).

    (Matthiesen, 1992; Salmela-Aro et al., 2011)

    Measured: Right before intervention (Baseline) and 5 months after intervention (post-intervention)

  3. Hopkins symptom checklist 10 - HSCL-10

    A measure of distress, which consists of two subscales; anxiety and depression (Derogatis et al., 1974; Hesbacher et al., 1980; Strand et al., 2003). This is a short form of the HSCL with only 10 questions (6 depression, 4 anxiety). Particiapnts rate how much they have experienced each of the 10 symptoms in the past week form 1 (not at all) to 4 (a lot).

    Measured: Right before intervention (Baseline) and 5 months after intervention (post-intervention)

  4. Satisfaction with Life scale (SWLS)

    A 5 item scale that measures satisfaction with life (Diener et al., 1985). Participatns rate how much they agree with each of the 5 statements on a scale of 1 (fits poorly) to 7 (fits perfectly).

    Measured: Right before intervention (Baseline) and 5 months after intervention (post-intervention)

  5. Collaboration between school health service, educational psychological services and teachers in Oslo.

    Likert scale from 1 to 5 of how well the employees experience the collaboration with the other services. Where 1 is they disagree completely that there is a good collaboration and 5 is they agree completely that there is a good colaboration.

    Measured: Right before intervention (Baseline) and 5 months after intervention (post-intervention)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Jul 2024
  2. Study start1 Aug 2022
  3. Primary completion1 Jun 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Jul 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
10 schools are assigned to a wait-list control group, while 10 are assigned to the intervention group.
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
450 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06501300
Sponsor's protocol ID
TIKiS Norway
Acronym
TIKiS
Status last verified
Jul 2024
First submitted
5 Feb 2024
Last updated
15 Jul 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Koleini A, Skoe FF, Kehoe CE, Idsoe T, Randgaard HE, Olsen HM, Mjanger RH, Havighurst SS. Tuning in to Kids in Schools: a protocol for evaluating an emotion socialization intervention for teachers in Norwegian elementary schools. Front Psychol. 2026 Mar 17;17:1618238. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1618238. eCollection 2026.

    PubMed 41924060

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Emotion-focused: Tuning in to Kids in School in people with Healthy, run by Sophie Havighurst at 1 site in Norway.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Jul 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Norway. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Classroom Assessment Scoring system - CLASS- K3 (time frame: Right before intervention (Baseline) and 5 months after intervention (post-intervention)). The study lists 7 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06501300, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Jul 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in