AzTrials
AzTrials

Clozapine Resistant SchizophreniaPhase 4NCT06501339

Maintenance Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) Versus Aripiprazole in Clozapine-resistant Schizophrenia

A Phase 4 study testing maintenance ECT and Aripiprazole tablet in people with Clozapine Resistant Schizophrenia, run by All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The pharmacological treatment options in schizophrenia developing resistance to clozapine are limited. Few studies have found ECT as beneficial in TRS, including CRS. However, literature on the role of M-ECT in maintaining the therapeutic gains of acute ECT in CRS is lacking. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 60 years
Conditions the study is for
Clozapine Resistant Schizophrenia
What is being tested?
maintenance ECT and Aripiprazole tablet
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
40 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
10 Aug 2024to 31 Mar 2026
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 60 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients clinically diagnosed with CRS (currently under clozapine)
  • Patients aged 18-60 years of either sex.
  • LAR giving voluntary written consent for participation in the study

Who cannot join

  • Patient already on ECT or aripiprazole.
  • History of psychoactive substance abuse or dependence.
  • Co-morbid psychiatric, major medical or neurological disorders.
  • History of organicity or significant head injury.
  • Pacemaker or metal in any body part, excluding the mouth. Pregnant and breastfeeding females.

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet.

Biswa Ranjan Mishra, MD contact

9438884220

psych_biswa@aiimsbhubaneswar.edu.in

Debadatta Mohapatra, MD contact

psych_debadatta@aiimsbhubaneswar.edu.in

About this study

Official title: Maintenance Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) Versus Aripiprazole on Psychopathology and Cerebral Perfusion in Clozapine-resistant Schizophrenia: a Randomized, Double-blind Controlled Trial

The pharmacological treatment options in schizophrenia developing resistance to clozapine are limited. Few studies have found ECT as beneficial in TRS, including CRS. However, literature on the role of M-ECT in maintaining the therapeutic gains of acute ECT in CRS is lacking. The objective of the study is to compare the efficacy of M-ECT vs aripiprazole as an add-on to ongoing clozapine on the severity of symptom dimensions, cerebral perfusion, global functioning and cognitions in patients with CRS.

Being tested
maintenance ECT, Aripiprazole tablet
Keywords
Clozapine resistant, schizophrenia, Aripiprazole, m-ECT
Medical subject headings
Schizophrenia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • maintenance ECTProcedure or surgery

    Frequency of weekly sessions for 1 month, then fortnightly for 5 months

  • Aripiprazole tabletDrug

    Aripiprazole 10 mg in the morning throughout the study period

Study groups in NCT06501339
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Maintenance ECTExperimentalNot described
Receives: Procedure: maintenance ECT
AripiprazoleActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: Aripiprazole tablet

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in Positive And Negative Syndome Scale score

    Change from baseline in Total, Positive, negative and general scores with treatment. Minimum value: 30; maximum value: 210. Higher score means worsening of symptoms

    Measured: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Change in regional cerebral blood flow by the SPECT-CT brain

    Change frome baseline in regional cerebral blood flow by the SPECT-CT brain with treatment

    Measured: Baseline, 24 weeks

  2. change in the Monteal Cognitive Assessment scores

    change from baseline in the Monteal Cognitive Assessment scores with treatment. Minimum Value: 0 Maximum Value: 30: Higher score indicate better cognitive function

    Measured: Baseline,6 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks

  3. change in the Global Assessment of Functioning scores

    change from baseline in the Global Assessment of Functioning scores with treatment Minimum Value: 0 Maximum Value: 100: Higher score indicate better global functioning

    Measured: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks

  4. Safety evaluation

    Number of events observed in each patient and patients with at least one adverse event

    Measured: Baseline,6 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Jul 2024
  2. Study start10 Aug 2024 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion31 Oct 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Mar 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
40 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06501339
Sponsor's protocol ID
T/EMF/Psych/23-24/13
Status last verified
Jul 2024
First submitted
14 Oct 2023
Last updated
16 Jul 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Siskind D, Orr S, Sinha S, Yu O, Brijball B, Warren N, MacCabe JH, Smart SE, Kisely S. Rates of treatment-resistant schizophrenia from first-episode cohorts: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry. 2022 Mar;220(3):115-120. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2021.61.

    PubMed 35049446
  • Siskind D, Siskind V, Kisely S. Clozapine Response Rates among People with Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia: Data from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Can J Psychiatry. 2017 Nov;62(11):772-777. doi: 10.1177/0706743717718167. Epub 2017 Jun 28.

    PubMed 28655284
  • Campana M, Falkai P, Siskind D, Hasan A, Wagner E. Characteristics and definitions of ultra-treatment-resistant schizophrenia - A systematic review and meta-analysis. Schizophr Res. 2021 Feb;228:218-226. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2020.12.002. Epub 2021 Jan 14.

    PubMed 33454644
  • Rey JM, Walter G. Half a century of ECT use in young people. Am J Psychiatry. 1997 May;154(5):595-602. doi: 10.1176/ajp.154.5.595.

    PubMed 9137112
  • Chanpattana W, Andrade C. ECT for treatment-resistant schizophrenia: a response from the far East to the UK. NICE report. J ECT. 2006 Mar;22(1):4-12. doi: 10.1097/00124509-200603000-00002.

    PubMed 16633199

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing maintenance ECT and Aripiprazole tablet in people with Clozapine Resistant Schizophrenia, run by All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Jul 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Biswa Ranjan Mishra, MD (9438884220, psych_biswa@aiimsbhubaneswar.edu.in), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in Positive And Negative Syndome Scale score (time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06501339, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Jul 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in