Food ServicesNCT06502093
Hospital Foodservice, Patient Satisfaction, and Malnutrition Risk
An observational study of Food Services and Malnutrition, run by Istanbul Bilgi University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
Malnutrition is the body's inability to absorb necessary nutrients, often due to disease, hunger, aging, or other factors. The European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) focuses on the malnutrition aspect [1,2]. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Food Services, Malnutrition
- What is being tested?
- Observational Malnutrition Screening and Foodservice Satisfaction
- How many people
- 310 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2022to 28 Feb 2022
- How long will I take part?
- 7 Days
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients who were hospitalized in neurology, internal medicine, general surgery, cardiovascular surgery, and chest disease clinics.
Who may be able to join
- aged 18-65 years
- volunteers patients
- Patients who were hospitalized for at least seven days
Who cannot join
- Patients with a hospital stay of less than seven days,
- receiving oral intake restrictive treatment,
- patients in the terminal phase,
- patients under 18 years of ages,
- patients over 65 years of ages.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Relationship Between Hospital Foodservice, Patient Satisfaction, and Malnutrition Risk: A Pilot Study in Hospital
Malnutrition is the body's inability to absorb necessary nutrients, often due to disease, hunger, aging, or other factors. The European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) focuses on the malnutrition aspect [1,2]. Unidentified or unmonitored malnutrition before hospitalization, complications affecting eating, patient inability to eat regularly due to exams/treatments, delayed meal times, psychological factors, hospital stay duration, lack of nutrition awareness, prejudices against hospital meals, etc., can lead to hospital malnutrition. Patient-related issues and lack of dietitian referrals may contribute, with food service problems being a key factor in nutritional decline [3,4]. The critical factors affecting the patient's food appreciation include the appearance, presentation, taste, consistency, texture, and temperature. In cases where patient expectations and satisfaction are not met, a decrease in food consumption and an increase in the amount of leftovers are observed. It has been observed that if the organoleptic properties and presentation style of the food offered to the patient are good, the patients evaluate the food as high quality, and their satisfaction with the food increases [5]. As a result, not being able to consume food due to lack of meal satisfaction means that the energy and elements that the patient needs are not taken into the body, which increases the patient's risk of malnutrition [4]. Effective hospital meal provision is crucial in preventing malnutrition, as emphasized by ESPEN. One of the most essential duties of the dietitian is to supervise every stage of food services to ensure the consumption of foods suitable for medical nutrition treatment of the hospitalized patient [6,7].
This study aimed to determine the role and effect of hospital food services on inpatient malnutrition. For this purpose, NRS-2002 screening was performed on 310 inpatients within three days after admission. NRS-2002 is a comprehensive screening test that the ESPEN recommends for hospitalized patients. Along with the second NRS-2002 screening, a food service satisfaction survey was administered to patients. The results of both NRS-2002 screening and satisfaction surveys were evaluated.
- Conditions
- Food Services, Malnutrition
- Being tested
- Observational Malnutrition Screening and Foodservice Satisfaction
- Keywords
- Nutritional Assessment, Food Services, Malnutrition, Patient Satisfaction
- Medical subject headings
- Malnutrition, Patient Satisfaction
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Observational Malnutrition Screening and Foodservice SatisfactionOther
Patients asked Acute Care Hospital Foodservice Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire and malnutrition risk assessed with NRS-2002 screening tool.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Observational Study Group | * Aged 18-65,
* Volunteers at the Isparta City Hospital
* Patients who were hospitalized in neurology, internal medicine, general surgery, cardiovascular surgery, and chest disease clinics for at least seven days Receives: Other: Observational Malnutrition Screening and Foodservice Satisfaction |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
NRS-2002 Screening Tool
NRS-2002 is a malnutrition assessment tool developed by Kondrup et al. As a result of the screening test, patients are classified as having no risk of malnutrition (<3 points) and having a risk of malnutrition (≥3 points)
Measured: NRS-2002 was administered for the first time 2 days after the patients were hospitalized. It was repeated for the second time 1 week later.
Acute Care Hospital Foodservice Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (ACHFPSQ)
Acute Care Hospital Foodservice Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (ACHFPSQ), developed by Capra et al. It is evaluated out of a total of 100 points. The increase in the patient's scale score in each sub-dimension means that satisfaction with hospital food services also increases.
Measured: The scale was administered once, 9 days after hospitalization, together with the NRS-2002 second screening.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Jul 2024
- Study start1 Jan 2022
- Primary completion28 Feb 2022
- Study completion28 Feb 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Food ServicesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 310 participants (actual)
- Target duration
- 7 Days
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Istanbul Bilgi University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Hande Seven Avuk, Istanbul Bilgi University
- Investigators
- Birsen Demirel, PhD, Principal investigator, Ondokuz Mayıs University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06502093
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- FOODSAT
- Status last verified
- Jul 2024
- First submitted
- 3 Jul 2024
- Last updated
- 15 Jul 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided: Data will be available upon reasonable request from corresponding author.
Publications
Kruizenga HM, Seidell JC, de Vet HC, Wierdsma NJ, van Bokhorst-de van der Schueren MA. Development and validation of a hospital screening tool for malnutrition: the short nutritional assessment questionnaire (SNAQ). Clin Nutr. 2005 Feb;24(1):75-82. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2004.07.015.
PubMed 15681104Klek S, Krznaric Z, Gundogdu RH, Chourdakis M, Kekstas G, Jakobson T, Paluszkiewicz P, Vranesic Bender D, Uyar M, Demirag K, Poulia KA, Klimasauskas A, Starkopf J, Galas A. Prevalence of malnutrition in various political, economic, and geographic settings. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2015 Feb;39(2):200-10. doi: 10.1177/0148607113505860. Epub 2013 Nov 4.
PubMed 24190900Sorensen J, Fletcher H, Macdonald B, Whittington-Carter L, Nasser R, Gramlich L. Canadian Hospital Food Service Practices to Prevent Malnutrition. Can J Diet Pract Res. 2021 Dec 1;82(4):167-175. doi: 10.3148/cjdpr-2021-013. Epub 2021 Jul 21.
PubMed 34286621Arends J, Baracos V, Bertz H, Bozzetti F, Calder PC, Deutz NEP, Erickson N, Laviano A, Lisanti MP, Lobo DN, McMillan DC, Muscaritoli M, Ockenga J, Pirlich M, Strasser F, de van der Schueren M, Van Gossum A, Vaupel P, Weimann A. ESPEN expert group recommendations for action against cancer-related malnutrition. Clin Nutr. 2017 Oct;36(5):1187-1196. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2017.06.017. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
PubMed 28689670Kondrup J, Rasmussen HH, Hamberg O, Stanga Z; Ad Hoc ESPEN Working Group. Nutritional risk screening (NRS 2002): a new method based on an analysis of controlled clinical trials. Clin Nutr. 2003 Jun;22(3):321-36. doi: 10.1016/s0261-5614(02)00214-5.
PubMed 12765673Capra S, Wright O, Sardie M, Bauer J, Askew D. The acute hospital foodservice patient satisfaction questionnaire: the development of a valid and reliable tool to measure patient satisfaction with acute care hospital foodservices. Foodserv Res Int. 2005;16(1-2):1-14.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Jul 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Relationship Between Hospital Foodservice, Patient Satisfaction, and Malnutrition Risk: A Pilot Study in Hospital
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06502093
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- FOODSAT
- Conditions
- Food Services, Malnutrition
- Keywords
- Nutritional Assessment, Food Services, Malnutrition, Patient Satisfaction
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 310 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Istanbul Bilgi UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 28 Feb 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 28 Feb 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Jul 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Malnutrition is the body's inability to absorb necessary nutrients, often due to disease, hunger, aging, or other factors. The European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) focuses on the malnutrition aspect [1,2]. Unidentified or unmonitored malnutrition before hospitalization, complications affecting eating, patient inability to eat regularly due to exams/treatments, delayed meal times, psychological factors, hospital stay duration, lack of nutrition awareness, prejudices against hospital meals, etc., can lead to hospital malnutrition. Patient-related issues and lack of dietitian referrals may contribute, with food service problems being a key factor in nutritional decline [3,4]. The critical factors affecting the patient's food appreciation include the appearance, presentation, taste, consistency, texture, and temperature. In cases where patient expectations and satisfaction are not met, a decrease in food consumption and an increase in the amount of leftovers are observed. It has been observed that if the organoleptic properties and presentation style of the food offered to the patient are good, the patients evaluate the food as high quality, and their satisfaction with the food increases [5]. As a result, not being able to consume food due to lack of meal satisfaction means that the energy and elements that the patient needs are not taken into the body, which increases the patient's risk of malnutrition [4]. Effective hospital meal provision is crucial in preventing malnutrition, as emphasized by ESPEN. One of the most essential duties of the dietitian is to supervise every stage of food services to ensure the consumption of foods suitable for medical nutrition treatment of the hospitalized patient [6,7].
This study aimed to determine the role and effect of hospital food services on inpatient malnutrition. For this purpose, NRS-2002 screening was performed on 310 inpatients within three days after admission. NRS-2002 is a comprehensive screening test that the ESPEN recommends for hospitalized patients. Along with the second NRS-2002 screening, a food service satisfaction survey was administered to patients. The results of both NRS-2002 screening and satisfaction surveys were evaluated.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Target follow-up
- 7 Days
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Observational Study Group | – | Other: Observational Malnutrition Screening and Foodservice Satisfaction* Aged 18-65, * Volunteers at the Isparta City Hospital * Patients who were hospitalized in neurology, internal medicine, general surgery, cardiovascular surgery, and chest disease clinics for at least seven days |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients who were hospitalized in neurology, internal medicine, general surgery, cardiovascular surgery, and chest disease clinics.
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- aged 18-65 years
- volunteers patients
- Patients who were hospitalized for at least seven days
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patients with a hospital stay of less than seven days,
- receiving oral intake restrictive treatment,
- patients in the terminal phase,
- patients under 18 years of ages,
- patients over 65 years of ages.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Observational Malnutrition Screening and Foodservice SatisfactionPatients asked Acute Care Hospital Foodservice Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire and malnutrition risk assessed with NRS-2002 screening tool. | Other | Observational Study Group |
Primary outcome
NRS-2002 Screening Tool
Time frame: NRS-2002 was administered for the first time 2 days after the patients were hospitalized. It was repeated for the second time 1 week later.
NRS-2002 is a malnutrition assessment tool developed by Kondrup et al. As a result of the screening test, patients are classified as having no risk of malnutrition (<3 points) and having a risk of malnutrition (≥3 points)
Acute Care Hospital Foodservice Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (ACHFPSQ)
Time frame: The scale was administered once, 9 days after hospitalization, together with the NRS-2002 second screening.
Acute Care Hospital Foodservice Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (ACHFPSQ), developed by Capra et al. It is evaluated out of a total of 100 points. The increase in the patient's scale score in each sub-dimension means that satisfaction with hospital food services also increases.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Jul 2024.
- Background: PubMed 15681104Kruizenga HM, Seidell JC, de Vet HC, Wierdsma NJ, van Bokhorst-de van der Schueren MA. Development and validation of a hospital screening tool for malnutrition: the short nutritional assessment questionnaire (SNAQ). Clin Nutr. 2005 Feb;24(1):75-82. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2004.07.015.
- Background: PubMed 24190900Klek S, Krznaric Z, Gundogdu RH, Chourdakis M, Kekstas G, Jakobson T, Paluszkiewicz P, Vranesic Bender D, Uyar M, Demirag K, Poulia KA, Klimasauskas A, Starkopf J, Galas A. Prevalence of malnutrition in various political, economic, and geographic settings. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2015 Feb;39(2):200-10. doi: 10.1177/0148607113505860. Epub 2013 Nov 4.
- Background: PubMed 34286621Sorensen J, Fletcher H, Macdonald B, Whittington-Carter L, Nasser R, Gramlich L. Canadian Hospital Food Service Practices to Prevent Malnutrition. Can J Diet Pract Res. 2021 Dec 1;82(4):167-175. doi: 10.3148/cjdpr-2021-013. Epub 2021 Jul 21.
- Background: PubMed 28689670Arends J, Baracos V, Bertz H, Bozzetti F, Calder PC, Deutz NEP, Erickson N, Laviano A, Lisanti MP, Lobo DN, McMillan DC, Muscaritoli M, Ockenga J, Pirlich M, Strasser F, de van der Schueren M, Van Gossum A, Vaupel P, Weimann A. ESPEN expert group recommendations for action against cancer-related malnutrition. Clin Nutr. 2017 Oct;36(5):1187-1196. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2017.06.017. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
- Background: PubMed 12765673Kondrup J, Rasmussen HH, Hamberg O, Stanga Z; Ad Hoc ESPEN Working Group. Nutritional risk screening (NRS 2002): a new method based on an analysis of controlled clinical trials. Clin Nutr. 2003 Jun;22(3):321-36. doi: 10.1016/s0261-5614(02)00214-5.
- BackgroundCapra S, Wright O, Sardie M, Bauer J, Askew D. The acute hospital foodservice patient satisfaction questionnaire: the development of a valid and reliable tool to measure patient satisfaction with acute care hospital foodservices. Foodserv Res Int. 2005;16(1-2):1-14.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided. Data will be available upon reasonable request from corresponding author.
Related trials for Food Services
Not yet recruiting
Added-Sugars Warning Label PSAs
Dietary Behaviour, Nutrition Knowledge
Recruiting
Occupational Therapy and Registered Dietitian Services to Reduce Fall Risk Among Home Delivered Meal Clients
Diet, Food and Nutrition, Accidental Falls
Enrolling by invitation
Evaluating an Enhanced Home-delivered Meal Program on Older Adults' Health and Well-being
Diet, Healthy, Food Insecurity
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Nutrition in Action: Service-Learning Project
Skills Acquisition, Satisfaction
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Birsen Demirel, PhD principal investigator
Ondokuz Mayıs University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Food Services and Malnutrition, run by Istanbul Bilgi University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Jul 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
NRS-2002 Screening Tool (time frame: NRS-2002 was administered for the first time 2 days after the patients were hospitalized. It was repeated for the second time 1 week later.). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06502093, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Jul 2024.