Lung CancerNCT06502249
Modulatory Effect of Prodigiosin or Pioglitazone on TIME and the Crosstalk to Immune-Checkpoint Protein(s)
An observational study of Lung Cancer and NSCLC, run by Ain Shams University at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
Lung cancer is one of the most common and serious types of cancer. Lung tumor cells exploit immune checkpoint proteins (ICPs) to maintain immune tolerance and thus promote tumor progression and invasion. Inhibition of ICPs using antibody therapies is one of the most common approaches for the treatment of lung cancer. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Lung Cancer, NSCLC
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- Jun 2026to Sep 2028
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: Lung cancer patients diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer and healthy volunteers not suffering from any disease will be enrolled in the study
Who may be able to join
- Adults over 50 years old with NSCLC.
Who cannot join
- Lung cancer patients with any cancer other than NSCLC
- Lung cancer patients with incomplete data or incomplete histopathology diagnosis report.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Egypt1 site
Faculty of Pharmacy, Ain Shams University, Advanced Biochemistry Research Lab
Cairo, 11566
About this study
Official title: Modulatory Effect of Prodigiosin or Pioglitazone on Tumor Immune Microenvironment and the Crosstalk to Immune-Checkpoint Protein(s)
Lung cancer is one of the most common and serious types of cancer. Lung tumor cells exploit immune checkpoint proteins (ICPs) to maintain immune tolerance and thus promote tumor progression and invasion. Inhibition of ICPs using antibody therapies is one of the most common approaches for the treatment of lung cancer. Unfortunately, these antibody-based therapies can lead to severe adverse events. Moreover, a significant number of patients do not respond to immune checkpoint inhibition due to tumor heterogeneity and the immunosuppressive tumor immune microenvironment (TIME). The use of small molecule targeted approach instead of antagonizing antibodies may have the potential advantage of being able to target multiple ICPs in TIME with a single agent as well as improved tumor distribution.
Read the detailed description
- Introduction 1.1. Background Components of the tumor microenvironment (TME) presented by immune cells, tumor cells, and their derived factors are known as Tumor immune microenvironment (TIME). Tumors can gradually shape TIME into an immunosuppressive state to hinder host immunity. Two opposing immune responses help shape TIME. One side of the immune cells represented by M1 macrophage, T-lymphocyte, Dendritic cells (DC), and Natural killer cells (NK) play a role in the antitumor immune response. On the contrary, tumor-promoting immune cells represented by regulatory T cells (Treg), myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC), M2 macrophage, and group 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2) contribute to an immunosuppressive microenvironment.
Under physiological conditions, several immune checkpoint proteins (ICPs) are expressed on various immune cells. These ICPs bind to their complementary ligand to activate T-cells' inhibitory signals, therefore they act as gatekeepers for normal cells. Among the first immune checkpoint proteins discovered were cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen number 4 (CTLA-4) and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1).. Recently, several immune checkpoint proteins have been discovered; T-cell immunoglobulin domain and mucin domain-containing molecule-3 (TIM-3), T-cell immunoglobulin and ITIM domain (TIGIT), B and T cell lymphocyte attenuator (BTLA), lymphocyte activation gene (LAG3) and V-domain Ig suppressor of T cell activation (VISTA). Unfortunately, tumor and tumor-promoting immune cells exploit these ICPs to escape immune system-mediated cell death.
Several factors could control the expression of ICPs. HSP90 chaperone function plays a role in the regulation of immune cell function by controlling ICPs expression. Zavareh and his colleagues showed that HSP90 inhibitors have a direct inhibitory effect on the expression of ICPs including PD-L1 and PD-L2. Only one study implicated prodigiosin inhibitory effect on HSP90, yet, the effect of prodigiosin on novel immune checkpoint proteins and its modulatory effect on TIME via HSP90 has not been investigated.
The expression of ICPs has also been shown to be controlled by the IL-6/JAK2/STAT3 pathway. High levels of STAT3 and JAK2 levels have been attributed to poor prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. c-MYC, one of the downstream targets of IL-6/STAT3 signaling, could promote tumor immune escape by increasing the levels ICPs . Pioglitazone, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ agonist, inhibited c-MYC-mediated immune escape by inducing PD-L1 protein degradation. Pioglitazone could enhance cancer immunotherapy and T-cell activation by decreasing PD-L1 protein levels . The inhibitory effect of pioglitazone on STAT3 has been studied in different types of cancer . However, the modulatory effect of pioglitazone on novel ICPs via the IL-6/STAT3 pathway and c-MYC remains to be investigated.
1.2. PROBLEM. 1.2.1.Lung Cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in both men and women aged 50 years and older. The response rate to current ICIs used for the treatment of lung cancer is far from satisfactory.
1.2.2. Cancer cells escape from immune surveillance through "immune-editing". Further research is needed for a better understanding of different immune aspects of lung cancer, including immune escape, immunosuppression, immune editing, and tumor-intrinsic adaptive response.
- Proposal state of the art: 3.1. TIME is a dynamic process and despite heterogeneity across different cancer types and populations, the role of TIME in tumor progression is similar. 3.2. The expression of ICPs could be regulated by HSP90, IL-6/JAK2/STAT3 Pathway, and c-MYC. Thus, HSP90 inhibition by prodigiosin as well as IL-6/STAT3 and c-MYC inhibition by pioglitazone could have the potential to enhance immune surveillance and immune checkpoint protein blockade therapy.
- Aim of the work: 4.1. Measuring gene and protein expression of Heat shock Protein 90 (HSP90), IL-6, STAT3, c-MYC and novel immune checkpoint proteins from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.
4.2. Studying the effect of prodigiosin on HSP90and pioglitazone of IL-6/STAT3 and c-MYC for modulating TIME via the expression of one of the novel immune checkpoint proteins.
4.3. Investigate the difference in expression at both protein and mRNA levels following treatment of prodigiosin and pioglitazone on lung cancer cell line(s) (A549 or H460 or Calu-3).
4.4. Loading both drugs in nano-sized particles (NPs) and testing the efficacy against lung cancer cell model both in-vivo and in-vitro.
- Research objectives: 5.1. Main objectives:
Identifying and targeting promising molecular targets to help eradicate lung tumor cells and prevent the development of treatment resistance or immune resistance.
5.2. Secondary objectives:
5.2.1. Studying the cytotoxic effect of prodigiosin and pioglitazone on lung cancer cell line and in vitro safety assay towards normal human retina pigmented epithelial (RPE1) cell line.
5.2.2. Identification of cell surface markers expressed by various immune cells on lung cancer cell lines (A549 or H460 or Calu-3) using flow cytometry.
5.2.3. Cell treatment with prodigiosin and HSP90 transfection in lung cancer cell lines for further investigation of the modulatory effect of Prodigiosin on TIME.
5.2.4. Cell treatment with pioglitazone and c-MYC transfection or using JAK2/STAT3 inhibitor in lung cancer cell lines for further investigation of the modulatory effect of Pioglitazone on TIME.
5.2.5. Gene expression and measuring protein levels of HSP90 and the novel immune checkpoint proteins before and after the addition of prodigiosin in lung cancer cell line.
5.2.6. Gene expression and measuring protein levels of IL-6, STAT3, c-MYC, and the novel immune checkpoint proteins before and after the addition of pioglitazone in lung cancer cell line.
5.2.7. Studying the in-vivo and in-vitro effects of drug-load nanoparticles in lung cancer model.
- Conditions
- Lung Cancer, NSCLC
- Keywords
- Immune checkpoint proteins, pioglitazone, prodigiosin, TIME
- Medical subject headings
- Lung Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| control | Healthy volunteers not suffering from any disease or not taking any Medications | |
| Diseased | NSCLC patients |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Gene Expression (mRNA levels)
mRNA levels of HSP90, IL-6, STAT3,c-MYC and the novel immune checkpoint proteins by qRT-PCR from blood samples collected from NSCLC patients and cell pellets collected from lung cancer cell lines before and after pioglitazone or prodigiosin treatment
Measured: 36 months
Gene Expression (Protein levels)
Protein levels of HSP90, IL-6, STAT3,c-MYC and the novel immune checkpoint proteins by immunoblotting from blood samples collected from NSCLC patients and cell pellets collected from lung cancer cell lines before and after pioglitazone or prodigiosin treatment
Measured: 36 months
cytotoxic effect
Cytotoxic effect of prodigiosin or pioglitazone on lung cancer cell line using MTT assay
Measured: 36 months
Anti-cancer efficiency of drug-loaded nanoparticles
Anticancer efficiency against lung cancer in vivo model using Urethan as lung cancer inducer or in vitro lung cancer cell line
Measured: 36 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Jul 2024
- Study startJun 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completionJun 2028 (estimated)
- Study completionSep 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (20)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Lung CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Ain Shams UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ain Shams University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Prof. Nadia M. Hamdy, Ph.D., Ain Shams University
- Investigators
- Nadia Hamdy, PhD, Principal investigator, Faculty of pharmacy Ain Shams university
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06502249
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- P#2
- Status last verified
- Jul 2024
- First submitted
- 12 Jun 2024
- Last updated
- 16 Jul 2024
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Abdelhamed S, Ogura K, Yokoyama S, Saiki I, Hayakawa Y. AKT-STAT3 Pathway as a Downstream Target of EGFR Signaling to Regulate PD-L1 Expression on NSCLC cells. J Cancer. 2016 Jul 18;7(12):1579-1586. doi: 10.7150/jca.14713. eCollection 2016.
PubMed 27698894Anwar MM, Shalaby M, Embaby AM, Saeed H, Agwa MM, Hussein A. Prodigiosin/PU-H71 as a novel potential combined therapy for triple negative breast cancer (TNBC): preclinical insights. Sci Rep. 2020 Sep 7;10(1):14706. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-71157-w.
PubMed 32895397Casey SC, Baylot V, Felsher DW. MYC: Master Regulator of Immune Privilege. Trends Immunol. 2017 Apr;38(4):298-305. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2017.01.002. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
PubMed 28233639Fu S, Liu Y, Zhang Z, Mei M, Chen Q, Wang S, Yang X, Sun T, Ma M, Xie W. Identification of a Novel Myc-Regulated Gene Signature for Patients with Kidney Renal Clear Cell Carcinoma. J Oncol. 2022 Dec 26;2022:3487859. doi: 10.1155/2022/3487859. eCollection 2022.
PubMed 37342680Gao FY, Li XT, Xu K, Wang RT, Guan XX. c-MYC mediates the crosstalk between breast cancer cells and tumor microenvironment. Cell Commun Signal. 2023 Jan 31;21(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12964-023-01043-1.
PubMed 36721232Gou Q, Che S, Chen M, Chen H, Shi J, Hou Y. PPARgamma inhibited tumor immune escape by inducing PD-L1 autophagic degradation. Cancer Sci. 2023 Jul;114(7):2871-2881. doi: 10.1111/cas.15818. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
PubMed 37096255Harada D, Takigawa N, Kiura K. The Role of STAT3 in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Cancers (Basel). 2014 Mar 26;6(2):708-22. doi: 10.3390/cancers6020708.
PubMed 24675568Jia X, Qian J, Chen H, Liu Q, Hussain S, Jin J, Shi J, Hou Y. PPARgamma agonist pioglitazone enhances colorectal cancer immunotherapy by inducing PD-L1 autophagic degradation. Eur J Pharmacol. 2023 Jul 5;950:175749. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2023.175749. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
PubMed 37105516Lv B, Wang Y, Ma D, Cheng W, Liu J, Yong T, Chen H, Wang C. Immunotherapy: Reshape the Tumor Immune Microenvironment. Front Immunol. 2022 Jul 6;13:844142. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.844142. eCollection 2022.
PubMed 35874717Mbofung RM, McKenzie JA, Malu S, Zhang M, Peng W, Liu C, Kuiatse I, Tieu T, Williams L, Devi S, Ashkin E, Xu C, Huang L, Zhang M, Talukder AH, Tripathi SC, Khong H, Satani N, Muller FL, Roszik J, Heffernan T, Allison JP, Lizee G, Hanash SM, Proia D, Amaria R, Davis RE, Hwu P. HSP90 inhibition enhances cancer immunotherapy by upregulating interferon response genes. Nat Commun. 2017 Sep 6;8(1):451. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-00449-z.
PubMed 28878208Proia DA, Kaufmann GF. Targeting Heat-Shock Protein 90 (HSP90) as a Complementary Strategy to Immune Checkpoint Blockade for Cancer Therapy. Cancer Immunol Res. 2015 Jun;3(6):583-9. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-15-0057. Epub 2015 May 6.
PubMed 25948551Qin S, Xu L, Yi M, Yu S, Wu K, Luo S. Novel immune checkpoint targets: moving beyond PD-1 and CTLA-4. Mol Cancer. 2019 Nov 6;18(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s12943-019-1091-2.
PubMed 31690319Rahmy S, Mishra SJ, Murphy S, Blagg BSJ, Lu X. Hsp90beta inhibition upregulates interferon response and enhances immune checkpoint blockade therapy in murine tumors. Front Immunol. 2022 Oct 20;13:1005045. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1005045. eCollection 2022.
PubMed 36341371Rebe C, Ghiringhelli F. STAT3, a Master Regulator of Anti-Tumor Immune Response. Cancers (Basel). 2019 Aug 30;11(9):1280. doi: 10.3390/cancers11091280.
PubMed 31480382Siegel RL, Miller KD, Wagle NS, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J Clin. 2023 Jan;73(1):17-48. doi: 10.3322/caac.21763.
PubMed 36633525
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Jul 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Modulatory Effect of Prodigiosin or Pioglitazone on Tumor Immune Microenvironment and the Crosstalk to Immune-Checkpoint Protein(s)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06502249
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- P#2
- Conditions
- Lung Cancer, NSCLC
- Keywords
- Immune checkpoint proteins, pioglitazone, prodigiosin, TIME
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Ain Shams UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jun 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Jun 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Sep 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 16 Jul 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Lung cancer is one of the most common and serious types of cancer. Lung tumor cells exploit immune checkpoint proteins (ICPs) to maintain immune tolerance and thus promote tumor progression and invasion. Inhibition of ICPs using antibody therapies is one of the most common approaches for the treatment of lung cancer. Unfortunately, these antibody-based therapies can lead to severe adverse events. Moreover, a significant number of patients do not respond to immune checkpoint inhibition due to tumor heterogeneity and the immunosuppressive tumor immune microenvironment (TIME). The use of small molecule targeted approach instead of antagonizing antibodies may have the potential advantage of being able to target multiple ICPs in TIME with a single agent as well as improved tumor distribution.
Detailed description
- Introduction 1.1. Background Components of the tumor microenvironment (TME) presented by immune cells, tumor cells, and their derived factors are known as Tumor immune microenvironment (TIME). Tumors can gradually shape TIME into an immunosuppressive state to hinder host immunity. Two opposing immune responses help shape TIME. One side of the immune cells represented by M1 macrophage, T-lymphocyte, Dendritic cells (DC), and Natural killer cells (NK) play a role in the antitumor immune response. On the contrary, tumor-promoting immune cells represented by regulatory T cells (Treg), myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC), M2 macrophage, and group 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2) contribute to an immunosuppressive microenvironment.
Under physiological conditions, several immune checkpoint proteins (ICPs) are expressed on various immune cells. These ICPs bind to their complementary ligand to activate T-cells' inhibitory signals, therefore they act as gatekeepers for normal cells. Among the first immune checkpoint proteins discovered were cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen number 4 (CTLA-4) and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1).. Recently, several immune checkpoint proteins have been discovered; T-cell immunoglobulin domain and mucin domain-containing molecule-3 (TIM-3), T-cell immunoglobulin and ITIM domain (TIGIT), B and T cell lymphocyte attenuator (BTLA), lymphocyte activation gene (LAG3) and V-domain Ig suppressor of T cell activation (VISTA). Unfortunately, tumor and tumor-promoting immune cells exploit these ICPs to escape immune system-mediated cell death.
Several factors could control the expression of ICPs. HSP90 chaperone function plays a role in the regulation of immune cell function by controlling ICPs expression. Zavareh and his colleagues showed that HSP90 inhibitors have a direct inhibitory effect on the expression of ICPs including PD-L1 and PD-L2. Only one study implicated prodigiosin inhibitory effect on HSP90, yet, the effect of prodigiosin on novel immune checkpoint proteins and its modulatory effect on TIME via HSP90 has not been investigated.
The expression of ICPs has also been shown to be controlled by the IL-6/JAK2/STAT3 pathway. High levels of STAT3 and JAK2 levels have been attributed to poor prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. c-MYC, one of the downstream targets of IL-6/STAT3 signaling, could promote tumor immune escape by increasing the levels ICPs . Pioglitazone, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ agonist, inhibited c-MYC-mediated immune escape by inducing PD-L1 protein degradation. Pioglitazone could enhance cancer immunotherapy and T-cell activation by decreasing PD-L1 protein levels . The inhibitory effect of pioglitazone on STAT3 has been studied in different types of cancer . However, the modulatory effect of pioglitazone on novel ICPs via the IL-6/STAT3 pathway and c-MYC remains to be investigated.
1.2. PROBLEM. 1.2.1.Lung Cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in both men and women aged 50 years and older. The response rate to current ICIs used for the treatment of lung cancer is far from satisfactory.
1.2.2. Cancer cells escape from immune surveillance through "immune-editing". Further research is needed for a better understanding of different immune aspects of lung cancer, including immune escape, immunosuppression, immune editing, and tumor-intrinsic adaptive response.
- Proposal state of the art: 3.1. TIME is a dynamic process and despite heterogeneity across different cancer types and populations, the role of TIME in tumor progression is similar. 3.2. The expression of ICPs could be regulated by HSP90, IL-6/JAK2/STAT3 Pathway, and c-MYC. Thus, HSP90 inhibition by prodigiosin as well as IL-6/STAT3 and c-MYC inhibition by pioglitazone could have the potential to enhance immune surveillance and immune checkpoint protein blockade therapy.
- Aim of the work: 4.1. Measuring gene and protein expression of Heat shock Protein 90 (HSP90), IL-6, STAT3, c-MYC and novel immune checkpoint proteins from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.
4.2. Studying the effect of prodigiosin on HSP90and pioglitazone of IL-6/STAT3 and c-MYC for modulating TIME via the expression of one of the novel immune checkpoint proteins.
4.3. Investigate the difference in expression at both protein and mRNA levels following treatment of prodigiosin and pioglitazone on lung cancer cell line(s) (A549 or H460 or Calu-3).
4.4. Loading both drugs in nano-sized particles (NPs) and testing the efficacy against lung cancer cell model both in-vivo and in-vitro.
- Research objectives: 5.1. Main objectives:
Identifying and targeting promising molecular targets to help eradicate lung tumor cells and prevent the development of treatment resistance or immune resistance.
5.2. Secondary objectives:
5.2.1. Studying the cytotoxic effect of prodigiosin and pioglitazone on lung cancer cell line and in vitro safety assay towards normal human retina pigmented epithelial (RPE1) cell line.
5.2.2. Identification of cell surface markers expressed by various immune cells on lung cancer cell lines (A549 or H460 or Calu-3) using flow cytometry.
5.2.3. Cell treatment with prodigiosin and HSP90 transfection in lung cancer cell lines for further investigation of the modulatory effect of Prodigiosin on TIME.
5.2.4. Cell treatment with pioglitazone and c-MYC transfection or using JAK2/STAT3 inhibitor in lung cancer cell lines for further investigation of the modulatory effect of Pioglitazone on TIME.
5.2.5. Gene expression and measuring protein levels of HSP90 and the novel immune checkpoint proteins before and after the addition of prodigiosin in lung cancer cell line.
5.2.6. Gene expression and measuring protein levels of IL-6, STAT3, c-MYC, and the novel immune checkpoint proteins before and after the addition of pioglitazone in lung cancer cell line.
5.2.7. Studying the in-vivo and in-vitro effects of drug-load nanoparticles in lung cancer model.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| control | – | –Healthy volunteers not suffering from any disease or not taking any Medications |
| Diseased | – | –NSCLC patients |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Lung cancer patients diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer and healthy volunteers not suffering from any disease will be enrolled in the study
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Adults over 50 years old with NSCLC.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Lung cancer patients with any cancer other than NSCLC
- Lung cancer patients with incomplete data or incomplete histopathology diagnosis report.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Gene Expression (mRNA levels)
Time frame: 36 months
mRNA levels of HSP90, IL-6, STAT3,c-MYC and the novel immune checkpoint proteins by qRT-PCR from blood samples collected from NSCLC patients and cell pellets collected from lung cancer cell lines before and after pioglitazone or prodigiosin treatment
Gene Expression (Protein levels)
Time frame: 36 months
Protein levels of HSP90, IL-6, STAT3,c-MYC and the novel immune checkpoint proteins by immunoblotting from blood samples collected from NSCLC patients and cell pellets collected from lung cancer cell lines before and after pioglitazone or prodigiosin treatment
cytotoxic effect
Time frame: 36 months
Cytotoxic effect of prodigiosin or pioglitazone on lung cancer cell line using MTT assay
Anti-cancer efficiency of drug-loaded nanoparticles
Time frame: 36 months
Anticancer efficiency against lung cancer in vivo model using Urethan as lung cancer inducer or in vitro lung cancer cell line
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Jul 2024.
- Background: PubMed 27698894Abdelhamed S, Ogura K, Yokoyama S, Saiki I, Hayakawa Y. AKT-STAT3 Pathway as a Downstream Target of EGFR Signaling to Regulate PD-L1 Expression on NSCLC cells. J Cancer. 2016 Jul 18;7(12):1579-1586. doi: 10.7150/jca.14713. eCollection 2016.
- Background: PubMed 32895397Anwar MM, Shalaby M, Embaby AM, Saeed H, Agwa MM, Hussein A. Prodigiosin/PU-H71 as a novel potential combined therapy for triple negative breast cancer (TNBC): preclinical insights. Sci Rep. 2020 Sep 7;10(1):14706. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-71157-w.
- Background: PubMed 28233639Casey SC, Baylot V, Felsher DW. MYC: Master Regulator of Immune Privilege. Trends Immunol. 2017 Apr;38(4):298-305. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2017.01.002. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
- Background: PubMed 37342680Fu S, Liu Y, Zhang Z, Mei M, Chen Q, Wang S, Yang X, Sun T, Ma M, Xie W. Identification of a Novel Myc-Regulated Gene Signature for Patients with Kidney Renal Clear Cell Carcinoma. J Oncol. 2022 Dec 26;2022:3487859. doi: 10.1155/2022/3487859. eCollection 2022.
- Background: PubMed 36721232Gao FY, Li XT, Xu K, Wang RT, Guan XX. c-MYC mediates the crosstalk between breast cancer cells and tumor microenvironment. Cell Commun Signal. 2023 Jan 31;21(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12964-023-01043-1.
- Background: PubMed 37096255Gou Q, Che S, Chen M, Chen H, Shi J, Hou Y. PPARgamma inhibited tumor immune escape by inducing PD-L1 autophagic degradation. Cancer Sci. 2023 Jul;114(7):2871-2881. doi: 10.1111/cas.15818. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
- Background: PubMed 24675568Harada D, Takigawa N, Kiura K. The Role of STAT3 in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Cancers (Basel). 2014 Mar 26;6(2):708-22. doi: 10.3390/cancers6020708.
- Background: PubMed 37105516Jia X, Qian J, Chen H, Liu Q, Hussain S, Jin J, Shi J, Hou Y. PPARgamma agonist pioglitazone enhances colorectal cancer immunotherapy by inducing PD-L1 autophagic degradation. Eur J Pharmacol. 2023 Jul 5;950:175749. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2023.175749. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
- Background: PubMed 35874717Lv B, Wang Y, Ma D, Cheng W, Liu J, Yong T, Chen H, Wang C. Immunotherapy: Reshape the Tumor Immune Microenvironment. Front Immunol. 2022 Jul 6;13:844142. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.844142. eCollection 2022.
- Background: PubMed 28878208Mbofung RM, McKenzie JA, Malu S, Zhang M, Peng W, Liu C, Kuiatse I, Tieu T, Williams L, Devi S, Ashkin E, Xu C, Huang L, Zhang M, Talukder AH, Tripathi SC, Khong H, Satani N, Muller FL, Roszik J, Heffernan T, Allison JP, Lizee G, Hanash SM, Proia D, Amaria R, Davis RE, Hwu P. HSP90 inhibition enhances cancer immunotherapy by upregulating interferon response genes. Nat Commun. 2017 Sep 6;8(1):451. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-00449-z.
- Background: PubMed 25948551Proia DA, Kaufmann GF. Targeting Heat-Shock Protein 90 (HSP90) as a Complementary Strategy to Immune Checkpoint Blockade for Cancer Therapy. Cancer Immunol Res. 2015 Jun;3(6):583-9. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-15-0057. Epub 2015 May 6.
- Background: PubMed 31690319Qin S, Xu L, Yi M, Yu S, Wu K, Luo S. Novel immune checkpoint targets: moving beyond PD-1 and CTLA-4. Mol Cancer. 2019 Nov 6;18(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s12943-019-1091-2.
Related trials for Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
A Prospective ,Multicenter ,Non-interventional ,Real-world Study Observing Changes in Molecular Markers Osimertinib Targeted Therapy in EGFRm NSCLC
Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study Evaluating Sotorasib Platinum Doublet Combination Versus Pembrolizumab Platinum Doublet Combination as a Front-Line Therapy in Participants With Stage IV or Advanced Stage IIIB/C Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers (CodeBreaK 202)
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato-DXd, DS-1062a) in Advanced and/or Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Metastatic Lung Cancer, Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Nadia Hamdy, PhD principal investigator
Faculty of pharmacy Ain Shams university
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Lung Cancer and NSCLC, run by Ain Shams University at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Jul 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Nadia Hamdy, PhD (00201009570210, nadia_hamdy@pharma.asu.edu.eg), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Gene Expression (mRNA levels) (time frame: 36 months). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06502249, which also lists 20 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Jul 2024; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.