Diabetic Foot Ulcer NeuropathicHBOTDFNCT06502808
Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy in Diabetic Foot
An observational study of Diabetic Foot Ulcer Neuropathic, run by National Polytechnic Institute, Mexico at 1 site in Mexico.
Trial summary
This study seeks to assess changes in genes that are related to inflammation and oxidative stress in patients with type 2 Diabetes with diabetic foot treated with hyperbaric chamber Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Diabetic Foot Ulcer Neuropathic
- What is being tested?
- Hyperbaric oxygen therapy
- How many people
- 15 participants
- Where
- 1 siteMexico
- Study dates
- 15 Jan 2019to 15 Jul 2020
- How long will I take part?
- 15 Months
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Women and men older than 18 years, with Diabetes type 2, residents of the CDMX, with diabetic foot with hyperbaric treatment, attended at the hospital of specialties in diabetes, secretary of health, accepted and signed the informed consent form
Who may be able to join
- Men and women with diabetic foot and hyperbaric treatment. Ages 30-60 years. Signed informed consent form.
Who cannot join
- Patients with diabetic foot without presence of dermatologic lesions.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: The Effect of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy on Oxidative Stress and Inflammation in Patients With Diabetic Foot Ulcers
This study seeks to assess changes in genes that are related to inflammation and oxidative stress in patients with type 2 Diabetes with diabetic foot treated with hyperbaric chamber
Read the detailed description
Aims: Patients with an uncontrolled glycemic index develop a wide variety of pathologies associated with diabetes, such as diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) is an adjunctive therapy used to help wound healing and prevent lower extremity amputations in this population. The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of HBOT on the gene expression of Super Oxide Dismutase 1 (SOD1), Super Oxide Dismutase 2 (SOD2), Glutathione Peroxidase (GPX2), and pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNFα, IL-1β, IL-12, IL-4, NLRP3) in patients with Wagner stage II-IV DFUs.
Methods: The effect of HBOT was evaluated in 15 patients that underwent 12 and 30 sessions in the hyperbaric chamber. Blood samples were collected and relative gene expression was assessed by quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). In the analysis, qualitative variables are presented in frequencies and percentages, compared with the Chi-square test; quantitative variables according to the Shapiro-Wilk normality test, normally distributed variables are presented in means and standard deviation, compared with Student;s t-test, those related with ANOVA test; quantitative variables of free distribution are presented in medians and interquartile ranges, compared with Mann Whitney U-test, those related with Kruskall-Wallis test. Data analysis was carried out with SPSS version 23, Graph Pad Prisma. A value p < 0.05 was taken as statistical significance, 95%.
- Conditions
- Diabetic Foot Ulcer Neuropathic
- Being tested
- Hyperbaric oxygen therapy
- Keywords
- Gene expression, Hyperbaric oxygen therapy, Diabetic foot
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetic Foot
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Hyperbaric oxygen therapyOther
Series of 30 HBOT sessions of 60 minutes at 2 ATA in the hyperbaric chamber for five consecutive days per week.
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Gene expression of superoxide dismutase 1/ SOD1
. Blood samples were collected and relative gene expression was assessed by quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR).
Measured: The effect of the hyperbaric chamber was evaluated after sessions 12 and 30, each session lasting 60 minutes for five consecutive days per week, for a total of 6 weeks.
Gene expression of superoxide dismutase 2
Blood samples were collected and relative gene expression was assessed by quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR).
Measured: The effect of the hyperbaric chamber was evaluated after sessions 12 and 30, each session lasting 60 minutes for five consecutive days per week, for a total of 6 weeks.
Glutathione Peroxidase (GPX2)
Blood samples were collected and relative gene expression was assessed by quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR).
Measured: The effect of the hyperbaric chamber was evaluated after sessions 12 and 30, each session lasting 60 minutes for five consecutive days per week, for a total of 6 weeks.
Interleukin-1β (IL-1β)
Blood samples were collected and relative gene expression was assessed by quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR).
Measured: The effect of the hyperbaric chamber was evaluated after sessions 12 and 30, each session lasting 60 minutes for five consecutive days per week, for a total of 6 weeks.
Interleukin-4 (IL-4)
Blood samples were collected and relative gene expression was assessed by quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR).
Measured: The effect of the hyperbaric chamber was evaluated after sessions 12 and 30, each session lasting 60 minutes for five consecutive days per week, for a total of 6 weeks.
Interleukin-12 (IL-12)
Blood samples were collected and relative gene expression was assessed by quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR).
Measured: The effect of the hyperbaric chamber was evaluated after sessions 12 and 30, each session lasting 60 minutes for five consecutive days per week, for a total of 6 weeks.
NLRP3 inflammasome (NOD-, LRR- and pyrin domain-containing protein 3)
Blood samples were collected and relative gene expression was assessed by quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR).
Measured: The effect of the hyperbaric chamber was evaluated after sessions 12 and 30, each session lasting 60 minutes for five consecutive days per week, for a total of 6 weeks.
Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α)
Blood samples were collected and relative gene expression was assessed by quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR).
Measured: The effect of the hyperbaric chamber was evaluated after sessions 12 and 30, each session lasting 60 minutes for five consecutive days per week, for a total of 6 weeks.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Jul 2024
- Study start15 Jan 2019
- Primary completion15 Jan 2020
- Study completion15 Jul 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Diabetic Foot Ulcer NeuropathicStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (actual)
- Target duration
- 15 Months
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- National Polytechnic Institute, Mexico
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Modesto Gómez López, National Polytechnic Institute, Mexico
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06502808
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CEI-CICS-038
- Acronym
- HBOTDF
- Status last verified
- Jul 2024
- First submitted
- 20 Jun 2024
- Last updated
- 16 Jul 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Godman CA, Chheda KP, Hightower LE, Perdrizet G, Shin DG, Giardina C. Hyperbaric oxygen induces a cytoprotective and angiogenic response in human microvascular endothelial cells. Cell Stress Chaperones. 2010 Jul;15(4):431-42. doi: 10.1007/s12192-009-0159-0. Epub 2009 Dec 1.
PubMed 19949909van Neck JW, Tuk B, Fijneman EMG, Redeker JJ, Talahatu EM, Tong M. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for wound healing in diabetic rats: Varying efficacy after a clinically-based protocol. PLoS One. 2017 May 17;12(5):e0177766. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177766. eCollection 2017.
PubMed 28545109undefined
Dadmanesh M, Ranjbar MM, Ghorban K. Inflammasomes and their roles in the pathogenesis of viral hepatitis and their related complications: An updated systematic review. Immunol Lett. 2019 Apr;208:11-18. doi: 10.1016/j.imlet.2019.03.001. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
PubMed 30831142Hsieh CP, Chiou YL, Lin CY. Hyperbaric oxygen-stimulated proliferation and growth of osteoblasts may be mediated through the FGF-2/MEK/ERK 1/2/NF-kappaB and PKC/JNK pathways. Connect Tissue Res. 2010 Dec;51(6):497-509. doi: 10.3109/03008201003746679. Epub 2010 May 24.
PubMed 20497028Clokie M, Greenway AL, Harding K, Jones NJ, Vedhara K, Game F, Dhatariya KK. New horizons in the understanding of the causes and management of diabetic foot disease: report from the 2017 Diabetes UK Annual Professional Conference Symposium. Diabet Med. 2017 Mar;34(3):305-315. doi: 10.1111/dme.13313. Epub 2017 Jan 23.
PubMed 28029181Matchett GA, Martin RD, Zhang JH. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy and cerebral ischemia: neuroprotective mechanisms. Neurol Res. 2009 Mar;31(2):114-21. doi: 10.1179/174313209X389857.
PubMed 19298750Michalski D, Hartig W, Schneider D, Hobohm C. Use of normobaric and hyperbaric oxygen in acute focal cerebral ischemia - a preclinical and clinical review. Acta Neurol Scand. 2011 Feb;123(2):85-97. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2010.01363.x.
PubMed 20456243Calvert JW, Cahill J, Zhang JH. Hyperbaric oxygen and cerebral physiology. Neurol Res. 2007 Mar;29(2):132-41. doi: 10.1179/016164107X174156.
PubMed 17439697
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Jul 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy on Oxidative Stress and Inflammation in Patients With Diabetic Foot Ulcers
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06502808
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HBOTDF / CEI-CICS-038
- Conditions
- Diabetic Foot Ulcer Neuropathic
- Keywords
- Gene expression, Hyperbaric oxygen therapy, Diabetic foot
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- National Polytechnic Institute, MexicoUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 15 Jan 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Jan 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Jul 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Jul 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study seeks to assess changes in genes that are related to inflammation and oxidative stress in patients with type 2 Diabetes with diabetic foot treated with hyperbaric chamber
Detailed description
Aims: Patients with an uncontrolled glycemic index develop a wide variety of pathologies associated with diabetes, such as diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) is an adjunctive therapy used to help wound healing and prevent lower extremity amputations in this population. The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of HBOT on the gene expression of Super Oxide Dismutase 1 (SOD1), Super Oxide Dismutase 2 (SOD2), Glutathione Peroxidase (GPX2), and pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNFα, IL-1β, IL-12, IL-4, NLRP3) in patients with Wagner stage II-IV DFUs.
Methods: The effect of HBOT was evaluated in 15 patients that underwent 12 and 30 sessions in the hyperbaric chamber. Blood samples were collected and relative gene expression was assessed by quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). In the analysis, qualitative variables are presented in frequencies and percentages, compared with the Chi-square test; quantitative variables according to the Shapiro-Wilk normality test, normally distributed variables are presented in means and standard deviation, compared with Student;s t-test, those related with ANOVA test; quantitative variables of free distribution are presented in medians and interquartile ranges, compared with Mann Whitney U-test, those related with Kruskall-Wallis test. Data analysis was carried out with SPSS version 23, Graph Pad Prisma. A value p < 0.05 was taken as statistical significance, 95%.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Target follow-up
- 15 Months
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Women and men older than 18 years, with Diabetes type 2, residents of the CDMX, with diabetic foot with hyperbaric treatment, attended at the hospital of specialties in diabetes, secretary of health, accepted and signed the informed consent form
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Men and women with diabetic foot and hyperbaric treatment. Ages 30-60 years. Signed informed consent form.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients with diabetic foot without presence of dermatologic lesions.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Hyperbaric oxygen therapySeries of 30 HBOT sessions of 60 minutes at 2 ATA in the hyperbaric chamber for five consecutive days per week. | Other | – |
Primary outcome
Gene expression of superoxide dismutase 1/ SOD1
Time frame: The effect of the hyperbaric chamber was evaluated after sessions 12 and 30, each session lasting 60 minutes for five consecutive days per week, for a total of 6 weeks.
. Blood samples were collected and relative gene expression was assessed by quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR).
Gene expression of superoxide dismutase 2
Time frame: The effect of the hyperbaric chamber was evaluated after sessions 12 and 30, each session lasting 60 minutes for five consecutive days per week, for a total of 6 weeks.
Blood samples were collected and relative gene expression was assessed by quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR).
Glutathione Peroxidase (GPX2)
Time frame: The effect of the hyperbaric chamber was evaluated after sessions 12 and 30, each session lasting 60 minutes for five consecutive days per week, for a total of 6 weeks.
Blood samples were collected and relative gene expression was assessed by quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR).
Interleukin-1β (IL-1β)
Time frame: The effect of the hyperbaric chamber was evaluated after sessions 12 and 30, each session lasting 60 minutes for five consecutive days per week, for a total of 6 weeks.
Blood samples were collected and relative gene expression was assessed by quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR).
Interleukin-4 (IL-4)
Time frame: The effect of the hyperbaric chamber was evaluated after sessions 12 and 30, each session lasting 60 minutes for five consecutive days per week, for a total of 6 weeks.
Blood samples were collected and relative gene expression was assessed by quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR).
Interleukin-12 (IL-12)
Time frame: The effect of the hyperbaric chamber was evaluated after sessions 12 and 30, each session lasting 60 minutes for five consecutive days per week, for a total of 6 weeks.
Blood samples were collected and relative gene expression was assessed by quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR).
NLRP3 inflammasome (NOD-, LRR- and pyrin domain-containing protein 3)
Time frame: The effect of the hyperbaric chamber was evaluated after sessions 12 and 30, each session lasting 60 minutes for five consecutive days per week, for a total of 6 weeks.
Blood samples were collected and relative gene expression was assessed by quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR).
Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α)
Time frame: The effect of the hyperbaric chamber was evaluated after sessions 12 and 30, each session lasting 60 minutes for five consecutive days per week, for a total of 6 weeks.
Blood samples were collected and relative gene expression was assessed by quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR).
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Jul 2024.
- Results publication: PubMed 19949909Godman CA, Chheda KP, Hightower LE, Perdrizet G, Shin DG, Giardina C. Hyperbaric oxygen induces a cytoprotective and angiogenic response in human microvascular endothelial cells. Cell Stress Chaperones. 2010 Jul;15(4):431-42. doi: 10.1007/s12192-009-0159-0. Epub 2009 Dec 1.
- Results publication: PubMed 28545109van Neck JW, Tuk B, Fijneman EMG, Redeker JJ, Talahatu EM, Tong M. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for wound healing in diabetic rats: Varying efficacy after a clinically-based protocol. PLoS One. 2017 May 17;12(5):e0177766. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177766. eCollection 2017.
- Results publicationundefined
- Results publication: PubMed 30831142Dadmanesh M, Ranjbar MM, Ghorban K. Inflammasomes and their roles in the pathogenesis of viral hepatitis and their related complications: An updated systematic review. Immunol Lett. 2019 Apr;208:11-18. doi: 10.1016/j.imlet.2019.03.001. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
- Results publication: PubMed 20497028Hsieh CP, Chiou YL, Lin CY. Hyperbaric oxygen-stimulated proliferation and growth of osteoblasts may be mediated through the FGF-2/MEK/ERK 1/2/NF-kappaB and PKC/JNK pathways. Connect Tissue Res. 2010 Dec;51(6):497-509. doi: 10.3109/03008201003746679. Epub 2010 May 24.
- Results publication: PubMed 28029181Clokie M, Greenway AL, Harding K, Jones NJ, Vedhara K, Game F, Dhatariya KK. New horizons in the understanding of the causes and management of diabetic foot disease: report from the 2017 Diabetes UK Annual Professional Conference Symposium. Diabet Med. 2017 Mar;34(3):305-315. doi: 10.1111/dme.13313. Epub 2017 Jan 23.
- Results publication: PubMed 19298750Matchett GA, Martin RD, Zhang JH. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy and cerebral ischemia: neuroprotective mechanisms. Neurol Res. 2009 Mar;31(2):114-21. doi: 10.1179/174313209X389857.
- Results publication: PubMed 20456243Michalski D, Hartig W, Schneider D, Hobohm C. Use of normobaric and hyperbaric oxygen in acute focal cerebral ischemia - a preclinical and clinical review. Acta Neurol Scand. 2011 Feb;123(2):85-97. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2010.01363.x.
- Results publication: PubMed 17439697Calvert JW, Cahill J, Zhang JH. Hyperbaric oxygen and cerebral physiology. Neurol Res. 2007 Mar;29(2):132-41. doi: 10.1179/016164107X174156.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Diabetic Foot Ulcer Neuropathic
Recruiting
Comparative Study of Combination Treatment of Bionerv E+ Versus Vitamin B Complex in Treatment of Diabetic Polyneuropathy in Type 2 Diabetic Patients and Its Effect on Wound Healing
Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU), Diabetic Symmetrical Polyneuropathy
RecruitingEarly Phase 1
Efficacy of a Topical Palmitated Formulation of Capsaicin (Capsadyn®) In the Treatment of Diabetic Neuropathic Foot Pain
Diabetic Neuropathies, Painful, Diabetic Foot
Enrolling by invitation
Using Lymphovenous Bypass to Alleviate Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy
Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (DPN), Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain (DPNP)
Recruiting
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Research Study
Diabetic Foot Ulcer, Diabetic Foot Ulcer Neuropathic
Not yet recruiting
The Instant Effect of Whole Body Vibration in Diabetics
Diabetus Mellitus, Diabetic Foot Ulcer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Diabetic Foot Ulcer Neuropathic, run by National Polytechnic Institute, Mexico at 1 site in Mexico.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Jul 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Mexico. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Gene expression of superoxide dismutase 1/ SOD1 (time frame: The effect of the hyperbaric chamber was evaluated after sessions 12 and 30, each session lasting 60 minutes for five consecutive days per week, for a total of 6 weeks.). The study lists 8 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06502808, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Jul 2024.