Treatment Resistant SchizophreniaNCT06505668
Effect of Atenolol Versus Ivabradine on HRV in TRS Patients on Clozapine With Tachycardia: A Randomised Control Trial.
A study testing Atenolol 25 mg and Ivabradine 10mg in people with Treatment Resistant Schizophrenia and Clozapine Adverse Reaction, run by All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar at 1 site in India.
Trial summary
Clozapine is the only drug approved for Treatment Resistant Schizophrenia. However, it has been associated with many adverse drug reactions including agranulocytosis, myocarditis, sialorrhea, constipation, orthostasis, tachycardia. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 60 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Treatment Resistant Schizophrenia, Clozapine Adverse Reaction, Heart Rate Variability
- What is being tested?
- Atenolol 25 mg and Ivabradine 10mg
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 1 siteIndia
- Study dates
- 1 Aug 2023to 30 Jun 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- All patients coming for treatment at the Out-patient department and In-patient department of the Department of Psychiatry fulfilling the following are included:
- Patients diagnosed with TRS (TRRIP consensus) receiving clozapine.
- Aged between 18 to 60 years of either sex
- Having baseline heart rate of >100/minute.
- Written informed consent from Legally Authorized representative.
Who cannot join
- Patients with any one of the following are excluded from the study:
- Already receiving Atenolol or Ivabradine.
- Patients having any contraindication to using Atenolol or Ivabradine.
- Receiving any other medication other than Clozapine known to cause autonomic dysregulation.
- Active substance use.
- Serious medical or neurological comorbidity.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
India1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
All India Institute of Medical Sciences
Bhubaneswar, Odisha, 751019
Biswa R Mishra, MD, DPM, 9438884220, brm1678@gmail.com
Amit Bahmnia, MBBS, 9996445295, amitbahmnia@gmail.com
About this study
Official title: Effect Of Atenolol Versus Ivabradine On Heart Rate Variability In Treatment Resistant Schizophrenia Patients On Clozapine With Tachycardia: A Randomized Control Trial.
Clozapine is the only drug approved for Treatment Resistant Schizophrenia. However, it has been associated with many adverse drug reactions including agranulocytosis, myocarditis, sialorrhea, constipation, orthostasis, tachycardia. There are many factors that have impacted the use of clozapine in TRS patients including physician hesitation, patient denial, stopping of drug due to Adverse drug reactions.
Although Tachycardia should not be the reason to stop clozapine, but data shows that it leads to discontinuation of drugs in significant patient population. If patient on clozapine develops tachycardia; first orthostasis, myocarditis and systemic infection should be ruled out. Tachycardia traditionally have been treated with B1 adrenergic blockers such as Atenolol. But the problem with beta blocker medications is that significant proportion develops hypotension.
Read more
Recently developed Ivabradine slows heart rate via I(f) current, and is not associated with much cardiac adverse effects. Recent Clinical trials have been carried out to show its effects on Clozapine associated tachycardia which shows promising results. Some studies suggest using Ivabradine in patient population that have contraindication for beta blockers.
Although both of these drugs are used widely in clinical practice, but as Ivabradine is relatively new drug there have been no head-to-head comparison with Atenolol. A recent meta-analysis tried to compare treatment efficacy in these patients, but found no studies that met their inclusion criteria. This current study attempts to make such comparison and guide further research.
Read the detailed description
Schizophrenia is a severe debilitating mental disorder characterised by distortions of thinking, perception and blunt affect. It poses a major healthcare burden with the prevalence of 1% worldwide. As per National Mental Health Survey of India (2016), the prevalence of Schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders was 0.4% and the lifetime prevalence was 1.4%. The earliest success in treating some of the symptoms of schizophrenia came with the discovery of typical antipsychotics. Later, newer "atypical" antipsychotics with different psychopharmacological actions promised better outcomes, but were found similar in clinical response although with less extrapyramidal side effects.
Almost 30% patients with schizophrenia do not show clinically significant improvement with antipsychotic medications. Treatment resistant schizophrenia (TRS) is thus, defined as inadequate response to at least two failed antipsychotic trials of adequate dose and duration. However, clozapine has been found to be exceptionally effective in such cases.
Therefore, multiple guidelines including FDA approve clozapine as the only pharmacological agent in the treatment for TRS. However, its use is associated with serious myocarditis, agranulocytosis, seizures and sudden cardiac death along with a plethora of common side effects like sedation, weight gain, constipation, hypersalivation, tachycardia, orthostatic hypotension. Clozapine causes dysregulation of the autonomic nervous system possibly by anti-muscarinic effects and inhibition of vagal neurons resulting in constipation, orthostasis, tachycardia. The side-effects of clozapine has been notoriously the major cause behind its underutilisation under clinical settings, therapeutic challenge due to need for constant monitoring of the physical and blood parameters of the patients and high rates of treatment dropouts. For instance, persistent tachycardia occurs in approximately 33% of TRS receiving clozapine ultimately leading to treatment discontinuation in at least 10% of cases. Moreover, high heart rate has been an independent predictor for cardiovascular diseases, stroke, sudden cardiac death and noncardiac diseases. It has been shown that for each rise in 10 bpm from resting heart rate the relative risk for these diseases increases linearly. Therefore, there is a need to understand the effects of clozapine on the autonomic nervous system, and regularly monitor the relevant parameters for early detection and intervention to ensure treatment adherence, prevention of any serious cardiac event and improve the overall quality of life of these patients.
One way to measure autonomic dysregulation induced by clozapine is with the help of heart rate variability. Heart Rate Variability (HRV) is the change in time duration of adjacent heart beats, arising from various mechanisms including but not limited to brain-heart interaction, blood pressure, gaseous exchange, vascular tone, hormone levels. HRV can be measured in different time periods (ultra-short-term(<5min), short-term (5min) and 24hours measurement)and described into different metrics (including time-domain, frequency-domain and non-linear measurements). The time-domain includes interbeat duration variation as measured by standard deviation of all interbeat duration, root mean square of all interbeat duration etc. Frequency-domain is analysed using Power spectral density (PSD) calculated using Fast Fourier Transformation (FFT) . When measuring for short-term, frequency-domain should be preferred. Due to its antimuscarinic effects, Clozapine has shown to cause high mean heart rate, low heart rate variability, high low-frequency component when compared to other antipsychotics or control patients.
Most guidelines suggest treating persistent tachycardia in patients receiving clozapine after excluding other causes of tachycardia. Beta blockers (like Atenolol) or Calcium channel blockers have been recommended for clozapine associated tachycardia (20). Patients who do not tolerate these drugs can be prescribed Ivabradine. The exact mechanism by which Ivabradine modulates autonomic function is not known, but is hypothesised to be its effects on the intra cardiac nervous system, which by a feedback to the Central Nervous System via the afferent nerve fibres from the heart results in overall increase in the parasympathetic activity.
The available literature is scarce about the effects of clozapine on the heart rate variability. Moreover, despite the usual prescription of beta blockers/ ivabradine in the treatment of the clozapine induced tachycardia, evidence for the same are limited in the specific population of TRS patients. Furthermore, all studies supporting their use has been conducted in western countries. Again, there is no clear consensus regarding the choice of one drug over the other, given their different pharmacodynamic actions. The specific effects of these drugs (beta blockers/ ivabradine) on the HRV caused by clozapine therefore needs further exploration. This study is intended to compare the effects of atenolol versus ivabradine on heart rate variability in patients of TRS on Clozapine with tachycardia. The findings of the study will be able to guide appropriate use of the mentioned pharmacological therapies in context of clozapine-induced autonomic instability/tachycardia. This will help improve the overall cardiac functioning and the tolerability and compliance in TRS scenarios.
- Conditions
- Treatment Resistant Schizophrenia, Clozapine Adverse Reaction, Heart Rate Variability, Tachycardia
- Being tested
- Atenolol 25 mg, Ivabradine 10mg
- Keywords
- Clozapine, Treatment resistant schizophrenia, heart rate variability
- Medical subject headings
- Schizophrenia, Treatment-Resistant, Tachycardia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Atenolol 25 mgDrug
Also called Arm A
Patients will be receiving Atenolol 25mg OD for 2 months.
Ivabradine 10mgDrug
Also called Arm B
Patients will be receiving Ivabradine 5mg BD for 2 months.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Atenolol 25mg | Active comparator | Patients will be receiving Atenolol 25mg OD for 2 months. Receives: Drug: Atenolol 25 mg |
| Ivabradine 10mg | Active comparator | Patients will be receiving Ivabradine 10mg (5mg BD) for 2 months. Receives: Drug: Ivabradine 10mg |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
To compare the effect of Atenolol vs Ivabradine as changes in the Frequency domain of HRV over 2 months.
Change in frequency domain parameters of participants will be compared between both the arms.
Measured: 2 months
Secondary outcomes (4)
To compare the changes in the time domain of HRV between the groups.
Change in the time domain parameters of participants will be compared between both the arms.
Measured: 2 months
To compare the changes in central & peripheral BP and Pulse Rate between the groups.
Change in the time domain parameters of participants will be compared between both the arms.
Measured: 2 months
To find any correlation between the severity of PANSS with HRV at baseline.
PANSS will be applied at the baseline and will be correlated with HRV parameters of all participants.
Measured: single measure
To compare the treatment emergent adverse reaction over 2 months between the groups.
All the participants will be kept in contact throughout the intervention period and will be screened for any adverse drug reaction.
Measured: 2 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Jul 2024
- Study start1 Aug 2023
- Primary completion30 Jun 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Jun 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Treatment Resistant SchizophreniaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, BISWA RANJAN MISHRA, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar
- Investigators
- Biswa Ranjan Mishra, MD, Principal investigator, Professor and Head, Department of Psychiatry
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06505668
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AIIMSBBSR/PGThesis/2023-24/90
- Status last verified
- Jul 2024
- First submitted
- 11 Jul 2024
- Last updated
- 17 Jul 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: It will be decided later on.
Publications
Bahmania A, Kar M, Biswas T, Maiti R, Mohapatra D, Behera S, Mishra A, Mishra BR. Effect of atenolol versus ivabradine on heart rate variability in patients of schizophrenia with clozapine-induced tachycardia: a randomized controlled trial. Psychiatry Res. 2026 Jul 28;365:117341. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2026.117341. Online ahead of print.
PubMed 42567080
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Jul 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effect Of Atenolol Versus Ivabradine On Heart Rate Variability In Treatment Resistant Schizophrenia Patients On Clozapine With Tachycardia: A Randomized Control Trial.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06505668
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AIIMSBBSR/PGThesis/2023-24/90
- Conditions
- Treatment Resistant Schizophrenia, Clozapine Adverse Reaction, Heart Rate Variability, Tachycardia
- Keywords
- Clozapine, Treatment resistant schizophrenia, heart rate variability
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- All India Institute of Medical Sciences, BhubaneswarUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Aug 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 17 Jul 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Clozapine is the only drug approved for Treatment Resistant Schizophrenia. However, it has been associated with many adverse drug reactions including agranulocytosis, myocarditis, sialorrhea, constipation, orthostasis, tachycardia. There are many factors that have impacted the use of clozapine in TRS patients including physician hesitation, patient denial, stopping of drug due to Adverse drug reactions.
Although Tachycardia should not be the reason to stop clozapine, but data shows that it leads to discontinuation of drugs in significant patient population. If patient on clozapine develops tachycardia; first orthostasis, myocarditis and systemic infection should be ruled out. Tachycardia traditionally have been treated with B1 adrenergic blockers such as Atenolol. But the problem with beta blocker medications is that significant proportion develops hypotension.
Recently developed Ivabradine slows heart rate via I(f) current, and is not associated with much cardiac adverse effects. Recent Clinical trials have been carried out to show its effects on Clozapine associated tachycardia which shows promising results. Some studies suggest using Ivabradine in patient population that have contraindication for beta blockers.
Although both of these drugs are used widely in clinical practice, but as Ivabradine is relatively new drug there have been no head-to-head comparison with Atenolol. A recent meta-analysis tried to compare treatment efficacy in these patients, but found no studies that met their inclusion criteria. This current study attempts to make such comparison and guide further research.
Detailed description
Schizophrenia is a severe debilitating mental disorder characterised by distortions of thinking, perception and blunt affect. It poses a major healthcare burden with the prevalence of 1% worldwide. As per National Mental Health Survey of India (2016), the prevalence of Schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders was 0.4% and the lifetime prevalence was 1.4%. The earliest success in treating some of the symptoms of schizophrenia came with the discovery of typical antipsychotics. Later, newer "atypical" antipsychotics with different psychopharmacological actions promised better outcomes, but were found similar in clinical response although with less extrapyramidal side effects.
Almost 30% patients with schizophrenia do not show clinically significant improvement with antipsychotic medications. Treatment resistant schizophrenia (TRS) is thus, defined as inadequate response to at least two failed antipsychotic trials of adequate dose and duration. However, clozapine has been found to be exceptionally effective in such cases.
Therefore, multiple guidelines including FDA approve clozapine as the only pharmacological agent in the treatment for TRS. However, its use is associated with serious myocarditis, agranulocytosis, seizures and sudden cardiac death along with a plethora of common side effects like sedation, weight gain, constipation, hypersalivation, tachycardia, orthostatic hypotension. Clozapine causes dysregulation of the autonomic nervous system possibly by anti-muscarinic effects and inhibition of vagal neurons resulting in constipation, orthostasis, tachycardia. The side-effects of clozapine has been notoriously the major cause behind its underutilisation under clinical settings, therapeutic challenge due to need for constant monitoring of the physical and blood parameters of the patients and high rates of treatment dropouts. For instance, persistent tachycardia occurs in approximately 33% of TRS receiving clozapine ultimately leading to treatment discontinuation in at least 10% of cases. Moreover, high heart rate has been an independent predictor for cardiovascular diseases, stroke, sudden cardiac death and noncardiac diseases. It has been shown that for each rise in 10 bpm from resting heart rate the relative risk for these diseases increases linearly. Therefore, there is a need to understand the effects of clozapine on the autonomic nervous system, and regularly monitor the relevant parameters for early detection and intervention to ensure treatment adherence, prevention of any serious cardiac event and improve the overall quality of life of these patients.
One way to measure autonomic dysregulation induced by clozapine is with the help of heart rate variability. Heart Rate Variability (HRV) is the change in time duration of adjacent heart beats, arising from various mechanisms including but not limited to brain-heart interaction, blood pressure, gaseous exchange, vascular tone, hormone levels. HRV can be measured in different time periods (ultra-short-term(<5min), short-term (5min) and 24hours measurement)and described into different metrics (including time-domain, frequency-domain and non-linear measurements). The time-domain includes interbeat duration variation as measured by standard deviation of all interbeat duration, root mean square of all interbeat duration etc. Frequency-domain is analysed using Power spectral density (PSD) calculated using Fast Fourier Transformation (FFT) . When measuring for short-term, frequency-domain should be preferred. Due to its antimuscarinic effects, Clozapine has shown to cause high mean heart rate, low heart rate variability, high low-frequency component when compared to other antipsychotics or control patients.
Most guidelines suggest treating persistent tachycardia in patients receiving clozapine after excluding other causes of tachycardia. Beta blockers (like Atenolol) or Calcium channel blockers have been recommended for clozapine associated tachycardia (20). Patients who do not tolerate these drugs can be prescribed Ivabradine. The exact mechanism by which Ivabradine modulates autonomic function is not known, but is hypothesised to be its effects on the intra cardiac nervous system, which by a feedback to the Central Nervous System via the afferent nerve fibres from the heart results in overall increase in the parasympathetic activity.
The available literature is scarce about the effects of clozapine on the heart rate variability. Moreover, despite the usual prescription of beta blockers/ ivabradine in the treatment of the clozapine induced tachycardia, evidence for the same are limited in the specific population of TRS patients. Furthermore, all studies supporting their use has been conducted in western countries. Again, there is no clear consensus regarding the choice of one drug over the other, given their different pharmacodynamic actions. The specific effects of these drugs (beta blockers/ ivabradine) on the HRV caused by clozapine therefore needs further exploration. This study is intended to compare the effects of atenolol versus ivabradine on heart rate variability in patients of TRS on Clozapine with tachycardia. The findings of the study will be able to guide appropriate use of the mentioned pharmacological therapies in context of clozapine-induced autonomic instability/tachycardia. This will help improve the overall cardiac functioning and the tolerability and compliance in TRS scenarios.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Atenolol 25mg | Active comparator | Drug: Atenolol 25 mgPatients will be receiving Atenolol 25mg OD for 2 months. |
| Ivabradine 10mg | Active comparator | Drug: Ivabradine 10mgPatients will be receiving Ivabradine 10mg (5mg BD) for 2 months. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- All patients coming for treatment at the Out-patient department and In-patient department of the Department of Psychiatry fulfilling the following are included:
- Patients diagnosed with TRS (TRRIP consensus) receiving clozapine.
- Aged between 18 to 60 years of either sex
- Having baseline heart rate of >100/minute.
- Written informed consent from Legally Authorized representative.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Already receiving Atenolol or Ivabradine.
- Patients having any contraindication to using Atenolol or Ivabradine.
- Receiving any other medication other than Clozapine known to cause autonomic dysregulation.
- Active substance use.
- Serious medical or neurological comorbidity.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Atenolol 25 mgAlso: Arm APatients will be receiving Atenolol 25mg OD for 2 months. | Drug | Atenolol 25mg |
| Ivabradine 10mgAlso: Arm BPatients will be receiving Ivabradine 5mg BD for 2 months. | Drug | Ivabradine 10mg |
Primary outcome
To compare the effect of Atenolol vs Ivabradine as changes in the Frequency domain of HRV over 2 months.
Time frame: 2 months
Change in frequency domain parameters of participants will be compared between both the arms.
4 secondary outcomes
To compare the changes in the time domain of HRV between the groups.
Time frame: 2 months
To compare the changes in central & peripheral BP and Pulse Rate between the groups.
Time frame: 2 months
To find any correlation between the severity of PANSS with HRV at baseline.
Time frame: single measure
To compare the treatment emergent adverse reaction over 2 months between the groups.
Time frame: 2 months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Jul 2024.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42567080Bahmania A, Kar M, Biswas T, Maiti R, Mohapatra D, Behera S, Mishra A, Mishra BR. Effect of atenolol versus ivabradine on heart rate variability in patients of schizophrenia with clozapine-induced tachycardia: a randomized controlled trial. Psychiatry Res. 2026 Jul 28;365:117341. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2026.117341. Online ahead of print.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. It will be decided later on.
Related trials for Treatment Resistant Schizophrenia
Not yet recruiting
Deep Brain Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia
Treatment Resistant Disorders
RecruitingPhase 3
Sequential Treatment Approaches for Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia
Treatment-resistant Schizophrenia
Recruiting
Magnetic Seizure Therapy for Schizophrenia - Trial
Treatment Resistant Schizophrenia, Schizophrenia
Recruiting
Theta-Burst Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Auditory Hallucinations
Auditory Verbal Hallucinations, Schizophrenia
Recruiting
French Minds Cohort: a French Longitudinal and Multimodal Cohort of Patients With Major Mood Disorders, Psychotic Disorders, Autism Spectrum Disorders, and Healthy Controls
Schizophrenia / Schizoaffective Disorder, First Episode Psychosis (FEP)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Biswa Ranjan Mishra, MD principal investigator
Professor and Head, Department of Psychiatry
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Atenolol 25 mg and Ivabradine 10mg in people with Treatment Resistant Schizophrenia and Clozapine Adverse Reaction, run by All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar at 1 site in India.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Jul 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in India. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Biswa R Mishra, MD, DPM (9438884220, brm1678@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
To compare the effect of Atenolol vs Ivabradine as changes in the Frequency domain of HRV over 2 months. (time frame: 2 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06505668, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Jul 2024.