Dupilumab and House Dust Mite Immunotherapy in Patients With Atopic Dermatitis

Study design This randomized, 12-month trial has performed in the Clinical Outpatient Allergy Department and six other outpatient cities. All included patients has received SLIT to HDM and/or dupilumab for 12 months and were compared to patients on cyclosporine.

Patients Patients were eligible if they met the following criteria: were diagnosed with AD a minimum of one year before the study (documented one year of therapy for AD); were between 18 and 45 years of age; had severe AD with an Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) >20 points, a %BSA (body surface area) >10 points, an IsGA (Investigator Global Assessment) = 4 points, a positive skin prick test (SPT) and a positive result for specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) to extracts of D. pteronyssinus and D. farinae and to Der p 1; had negative results for SPT and sIgE to other inhalant allergens; and had no symptoms of allergic asthma and/or allergic rhinitis. The diagnosis of severe AD was based on the guidelines of the Polish Dermatological Society with more restrictive cut-off points on the EASI, %BSA, and IsGA scales, as presented in the inclusion criteria, to limit the study group to the most advanced forms of AD.14

The exclusion criteria included the following: other active dermatoses, systemic immunosuppressant treatment up to 7 months before the study, other chronic diseases, contraindications to sublingual immunotherapy or sarilumab, and lack of written consent. The dermatologist assessed signs of AD at each study visit.

Treatment The patients have received SLIT-HDM (ACARIZAX, ALk Abello, Denmark) with 12 SQ-HDMs of a standardized allergen extract of the house dust mites Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus and Dermatophagoides farinae (50/50%). The Acarizax tablets were removed from the blister unit immediately after opening the blister and placed under the tongue, where they were dissolved. Swallowing was avoided for approximately 2 minutes. Food and beverages were not ingested for 5 minutes after intake of the tablet. The daily dose was one tablet every day for 12 months. Dupilumab treatment was administered according to established recommendations. Briefly, the patient received a single initial dose of 600 mg of dupilumab followed by subsequent doses of 300 mg every 2 weeks.

All patients used emollients. During therapy, patients with clinical signs of bacterially infected skin were allowed to receive treatment with topical mupirocin or/and a 7-day course of amoxicillin or/and prednisolone (0.5 mg/kg) for seven days for any occurrence of skin exacerbation, including superinfection. In the control group, cyclosporine was administered at 3.5 mg/kg at the start of therapy, with the possibility of modifying the dose according to symptoms after a minimum of 6 months of therapy. Further treatment was administered for a minimum of another six months (12 months in total). Treatment was discontinued if adverse effects occurred.

In all groups, oral antihistamines such as desloratadine and topical medications were added depending on the individual disease. If there was clinical worsening of AD (reported significant severity of itching, the appearance of erythroderma, and new skin lesions of a large area), the patient also received oral glucocorticosteroids at a dose of 10 mg of encortolon per 7 days.

Symptomatic treatment was assessed via the following medication scores: one point for daily use of desloratadine, mometasone furoate cream, or mupirocin ointment, 7 points for every course of amoxicillin and 10 points for the course of encortolon. The patients were required to record symptomatic drug use on the diary card

The statistical analysis was performed using Statistica version 8.12 (SoftPol, Cracow, Poland). Nonparametric tests were used because the data were not normally distributed. The Wilcoxon test was used to analyse differences between the groups. ANOVA was used to compare the scale scores. Differences were considered significant at p < 0.05.