Immediate Dental Implant LoadingNCT06510621
The Preliminary Application of Socket-shield Technique in Orthodontic Extraction and Fixed Orthodontic Treatment
A study testing Socket-Shield Technique in people with Immediate Dental Implant Loading, run by The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
Background This study was conducted to investigate the clinical efficacy of Socket-Shield Technique on the first premolar bone preservation in Orthodontic Extraction Treatment. Methods patients were underwent Orthodontic Extraction Treatment in the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University were… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Immediate Dental Implant Loading
- What is being tested?
- Socket-Shield Technique
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 26 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 2 Jan 2024to 1 Oct 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- had an orthodontic treatment plan involving the extraction of symmetrical left and right first premolars;
- had maxillary protrusion or bimaxillary protrusion with crowding within 4mm;
- had permanent dentition;
- had good oral hygiene and had no periodontitis;
- agreed to the orthodontic extraction treatment plan and signed the treatment informed consent form and the experimental informed consent form.
Who cannot join
- underlying diseases such as hypertension, heart disease, diabetes, osteoporosis, or hyperthyroidism;
- infection in the extraction area;
- dental root caries in the extraction area;
- gingival recession on the buccal aspect of the extraction area;
- refused to undergo SST treatments;
- pregnancy or lactation.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
China1 site
The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510120
About this study
Background This study was conducted to investigate the clinical efficacy of Socket-Shield Technique on the first premolar bone preservation in Orthodontic Extraction Treatment.
Methods patients were underwent Orthodontic Extraction Treatment in the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University were enrolled. Extracted teeth were paired and randomly allocated into two groups: test group (Socket-Shield Technique) and control group. Cone beam computerized tomography were utilized to access the horizontal resorption and vertical resorption at 1mm, 3mm and 5mm from a reference plane of alveolar crest, as well as tooth movement rate at four time-points: before tooth extraction (T0), three months after tooth extraction (T1), the juncture socket-shield was removed (T2) and three months after socket-shield removal (T3).
Read the detailed description
2.1 Participants This study was conducted following the Declaration of Helsinki, the Consolidates Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT), and the Good Clinical Practice (GCP) guideline. The protocol was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University (Approval No. 2018-27). All patients were informed and agreed to provide informed consent and their data for further analysis and publication. Additionally, for minors participating in the study, informed consent was obtained from a parent or legal guardian.
Patients were included in the study if they reached all of the following criteria: (1) had an orthodontic treatment plan involving the extraction of symmetrical left and right first premolars; (2) had maxillary protrusion or bimaxillary protrusion with crowding within 4mm; (3) had permanent dentition; (4) had good oral hygiene and had no periodontitis; and (5) agreed to the orthodontic extraction treatment plan and signed the treatment informed consent form and the experimental informed consent form.
The study exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) underlying diseases such as hypertension, heart disease, diabetes, osteoporosis, or hyperthyroidism; (2) infection in the extraction area; (3) dental root caries in the extraction area; (4) gingival recession on the buccal aspect of the extraction area; (5) refused to undergo SST treatments; and (6) pregnancy or lactation.
2.2 Surgical procedure Test Group (SST): A high-speed turbine was used to cut the tooth crown 1.5-2 mm from the buccal gingival margin (Figure 1a, 1b). The tooth was then divided along the long axis, approximately 2 mm from the buccal side(Figure 1c, 1d). The palatal roots were removed using minimally invasive elevation and extraction forceps. Next, the buccal socket-shield was trimmed to approximately 4-6 mm in height (1 mm from the buccal gingival margin)[18], 3-4 mm in width, and 1-1.5 mm in thickness. The trimming process required with clear visualization of the shield and calibration by periodontal probe. Finally, the socket-shield was removed by minimally invasive forceps when the adjacent tooth moved proximate to the shield during the process of closing orthodontic gap.
Control Group (non-SST): The same technique was used to cut the crown, divide the root, remove the palatal root, trim the socket-shield, and extract the shield immediately .
After the tooth extraction, patients were prescribed clindamycin and ibuprofen sustained-release capsules, instructed to use oral rinse, and received oral health education. Fixed orthodontic treatment with straight wire (AO self-ligating brackets, 0.022 x 0.028 inch slot, Empower® Philosophies, American Orthodontics, Sheboygan, USA) was used. The alignment and leveling procedures typically lasted three to four months. Subsequently, the orthodontic gap was closed by a 0.019 x 0.025 inch (0.48 mm x 0.64 mm) stainless steel square wire with a force gauge to control the sliding force value at approximately 150 g.
During orthodontic follow-up, the mobility of socket-shield, as well as clinical manifestations such as color, texture, and bleeding of gingiva, were evaluated to assess the clinical condition of the socket-shield.
2.3 Measurement methods In order to evaluate the clinical effects of SST and non-SST on alveolar bone width and height at the extraction site in the first premolar area, the left and right first premolars in same jaw were paired and randomly assigned to the test group (SST) or the control group (non-SST). The time points prior to tooth extraction, three months after tooth extraction, when the socket-shield extracted, and three months after socket-shield extraction were marked as T0, T1, T2, and T3 respectively. Cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT) scans (120 kVp and 18.66 mAs, voxel size 0.3, Alpha Plus RCT700-SC, RayScan, Hwaseong-si, Korea) were taken at each time point. T01 was defined as the interval from T0 to T1, T02 as T0 to T2, T12 as T1 to T2, T03 as T0 to T3, and T23 as T2 to T3.
Three-dimensional coordinate systems were established by CBCT data in Invivo Dental 5.0 software (Anatomage, Inc., Milan, Italy) to measure the alveolar bone height and width.
The most anterior-inferior point of the left mental foramen was defined as the origin, the line parallel to the line connecting the most anterior-inferior points of two mental foramina as the X-axis, and line parallel to the inferior border of the left mandible as the Y axes. Then, a three-dimensional coordinate system for the left mandible was established. A symmetric coordinate was established for the right mandible.
The most anterior point of the anterior nasal spine was set as the origin, the line parallel to the line connecting the lowest points of both maxillary sinus as the X-axis, and the line parallel to the palatal plane as Y-axis. Then, a three-dimensional coordinate system for the maxilla was established.
To ensure the consistency of the measurements at each time point, a cross-section parallel to the XZ plane through the lowest point of the alveolar crest was defined as the reference plane at T0. At T0, T1, T2, and T3, the Z value of the lowest point of the alveolar crest was recorded as alveolar bone height, and X value at 1 mm, 3 mm, and 5 mm from the reference plane was recorded as width, denoted as H0/W0(1,3,5), H1/W1(1,3,5), H2/W2(1,3,5), and H3/W3(1,3,5), respectively. The the changes of height and width can be calculated as follows: ΔH1=H1-H0/ΔW1=W1-W0 during T01, ΔH2=H2-H0/ΔW2=W2-W0 during T02, and ΔH3=H3-H0/ΔW3=W3-W0 during T03.
CBCT three-dimensional reconstruction graphics were used to measure the distance between the most convex points of the adjacent teeth in the mesial and distal distance of the orthodontic gap. Data at T1, T2, and T3 were recorded as D1, D2, and D3 respectively. Tooth movement rate can be calculated by dividing tooth movement distance (in mm) by the time taken for orthodontic gap closing (in months): (D1-D2)/(T2-T1) during T12 and (D2-D3)/(T3-T2) during T23.
All measurement were performed by two doctors who underwent standardized training. The data was subjected to a qualitative consistency test, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Only when ICC≥0.75, the average of the two measurements was used as the final result.
- Conditions
- Immediate Dental Implant Loading
- Being tested
- Socket-Shield Technique
- Keywords
- Socket-Shield Technique, Bone preservation, First premolar extraction, Orthodontics
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Socket-Shield TechniqueProcedure or surgery
A high-speed turbine was used to cut the tooth crown 1.5-2 mm from the buccal gingival margin. The tooth was then divided along the long axis, approximately 2 mm from the buccal side(Figure 1c, 1d). The palatal roots were removed using minimally invasive elevation and extraction forceps. Next, the buccal socket-shield was trimmed to approximately 4-6 mm in height (1 mm from the buccal gingival margin)[18], 3-4 mm in width, and 1-1.5 mm in thickness[19,20]. The trimming process required with clear visualization of the shield and calibration by periodontal probe. Finally, the socket-shield was removed by minimally invasive forceps when the adjacent tooth moved proximate to the shield during the process of closing orthodontic gap.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Socket-Shield Technique | Experimental | Cut the tooth crown; divided along the long axis; trim the socket shield. Finally, the socket-shield was removed by minimally invasive forceps when the adjacent tooth moved proximate to the shield during the process of closing orthodontic gap. Receives: Procedure: Socket-Shield Technique |
| non-Socket-Shield Technique | No intervention | A high-speed turbine was used to cut the tooth crown 1.5-2 mm from the buccal gingival margin. The tooth was then divided along the long axis, approximately 2 mm from the buccal side. The palatal roots were removed using minimally invasive elevation and extraction forceps. Next, the buccal socket-shield was trimmed to approximately 4-6 mm in height (1 mm from the buccal gingival margin), 3-4 mm in width, and 1-1.5 mm in thickness. The trimming process required with clear visualization of the shield and calibration by periodontal probe. Finally, the socket-shield was removed immediately |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Vertical alveolar bone loss
Cone beam computerized tomography were utilized to access the vertical resorption at 1mm, 3mm and 5mm from a reference plane of alveolar crest
Measured: 0 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 9 months
Horizontal alveolar bone loss
Cone beam computerized tomography were utilized to access the horizontal resorption at 1mm, 3mm and 5mm from a reference plane of alveolar crest
Measured: 0 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 9 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
Tooth movement rate
CBCT three-dimensional reconstruction graphics were used to measure the distance between the most convex points of the adjacent teeth in the mesial and distal distance of the orthodontic gap. Data at T1, T2, and T3 were recorded as D1, D2, and D3 respectively. Tooth movement rate can be calculated by dividing tooth movement distance (in mm) by the time taken for orthodontic gap closing (in months): (D1-D2)/(T2-T1) during T12 and (D2-D3)/(T3-T2) during T23.
Measured: 3 months, 6 months and 9 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Jul 2024
- Study start2 Jan 2024
- Primary completion2 Sep 2024
- Study completion1 Oct 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Immediate Dental Implant LoadingStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 26 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Yuhang Zhang, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
- Investigators
- Jianxin Ji, DDS, Study chair, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical UniversityYuhang Zhang, MS, Principal investigator, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical UniversityZhe Ji, MS, Principal investigator, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06510621
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 201827
- Status last verified
- Nov 2024
- First submitted
- 8 Jul 2024
- Last updated
- 13 Nov 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Zhang Y, Ji Z, Lin L, Ye H, Ji J. The socket-shield technique in orthodontics: a method for alveolar ridge preservation. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2026 Jan 10;30(1):16. doi: 10.1007/s10006-025-01501-9.
PubMed 41514150
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Nov 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Preliminary Application of Socket-shield Technique in Orthodontic Extraction and Fixed Orthodontic Treatment
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06510621
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 201827
- Conditions
- Immediate Dental Implant Loading
- Keywords
- Socket-Shield Technique, Bone preservation, First premolar extraction, Orthodontics
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 26 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 2 Jan 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 2 Sep 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Oct 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Jul 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Background This study was conducted to investigate the clinical efficacy of Socket-Shield Technique on the first premolar bone preservation in Orthodontic Extraction Treatment.
Methods patients were underwent Orthodontic Extraction Treatment in the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University were enrolled. Extracted teeth were paired and randomly allocated into two groups: test group (Socket-Shield Technique) and control group. Cone beam computerized tomography were utilized to access the horizontal resorption and vertical resorption at 1mm, 3mm and 5mm from a reference plane of alveolar crest, as well as tooth movement rate at four time-points: before tooth extraction (T0), three months after tooth extraction (T1), the juncture socket-shield was removed (T2) and three months after socket-shield removal (T3).
Detailed description
2.1 Participants This study was conducted following the Declaration of Helsinki, the Consolidates Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT), and the Good Clinical Practice (GCP) guideline. The protocol was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University (Approval No. 2018-27). All patients were informed and agreed to provide informed consent and their data for further analysis and publication. Additionally, for minors participating in the study, informed consent was obtained from a parent or legal guardian.
Patients were included in the study if they reached all of the following criteria: (1) had an orthodontic treatment plan involving the extraction of symmetrical left and right first premolars; (2) had maxillary protrusion or bimaxillary protrusion with crowding within 4mm; (3) had permanent dentition; (4) had good oral hygiene and had no periodontitis; and (5) agreed to the orthodontic extraction treatment plan and signed the treatment informed consent form and the experimental informed consent form.
The study exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) underlying diseases such as hypertension, heart disease, diabetes, osteoporosis, or hyperthyroidism; (2) infection in the extraction area; (3) dental root caries in the extraction area; (4) gingival recession on the buccal aspect of the extraction area; (5) refused to undergo SST treatments; and (6) pregnancy or lactation.
2.2 Surgical procedure Test Group (SST): A high-speed turbine was used to cut the tooth crown 1.5-2 mm from the buccal gingival margin (Figure 1a, 1b). The tooth was then divided along the long axis, approximately 2 mm from the buccal side(Figure 1c, 1d). The palatal roots were removed using minimally invasive elevation and extraction forceps. Next, the buccal socket-shield was trimmed to approximately 4-6 mm in height (1 mm from the buccal gingival margin)[18], 3-4 mm in width, and 1-1.5 mm in thickness. The trimming process required with clear visualization of the shield and calibration by periodontal probe. Finally, the socket-shield was removed by minimally invasive forceps when the adjacent tooth moved proximate to the shield during the process of closing orthodontic gap.
Control Group (non-SST): The same technique was used to cut the crown, divide the root, remove the palatal root, trim the socket-shield, and extract the shield immediately .
After the tooth extraction, patients were prescribed clindamycin and ibuprofen sustained-release capsules, instructed to use oral rinse, and received oral health education. Fixed orthodontic treatment with straight wire (AO self-ligating brackets, 0.022 x 0.028 inch slot, Empower® Philosophies, American Orthodontics, Sheboygan, USA) was used. The alignment and leveling procedures typically lasted three to four months. Subsequently, the orthodontic gap was closed by a 0.019 x 0.025 inch (0.48 mm x 0.64 mm) stainless steel square wire with a force gauge to control the sliding force value at approximately 150 g.
During orthodontic follow-up, the mobility of socket-shield, as well as clinical manifestations such as color, texture, and bleeding of gingiva, were evaluated to assess the clinical condition of the socket-shield.
2.3 Measurement methods In order to evaluate the clinical effects of SST and non-SST on alveolar bone width and height at the extraction site in the first premolar area, the left and right first premolars in same jaw were paired and randomly assigned to the test group (SST) or the control group (non-SST). The time points prior to tooth extraction, three months after tooth extraction, when the socket-shield extracted, and three months after socket-shield extraction were marked as T0, T1, T2, and T3 respectively. Cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT) scans (120 kVp and 18.66 mAs, voxel size 0.3, Alpha Plus RCT700-SC, RayScan, Hwaseong-si, Korea) were taken at each time point. T01 was defined as the interval from T0 to T1, T02 as T0 to T2, T12 as T1 to T2, T03 as T0 to T3, and T23 as T2 to T3.
Three-dimensional coordinate systems were established by CBCT data in Invivo Dental 5.0 software (Anatomage, Inc., Milan, Italy) to measure the alveolar bone height and width.
The most anterior-inferior point of the left mental foramen was defined as the origin, the line parallel to the line connecting the most anterior-inferior points of two mental foramina as the X-axis, and line parallel to the inferior border of the left mandible as the Y axes. Then, a three-dimensional coordinate system for the left mandible was established. A symmetric coordinate was established for the right mandible.
The most anterior point of the anterior nasal spine was set as the origin, the line parallel to the line connecting the lowest points of both maxillary sinus as the X-axis, and the line parallel to the palatal plane as Y-axis. Then, a three-dimensional coordinate system for the maxilla was established.
To ensure the consistency of the measurements at each time point, a cross-section parallel to the XZ plane through the lowest point of the alveolar crest was defined as the reference plane at T0. At T0, T1, T2, and T3, the Z value of the lowest point of the alveolar crest was recorded as alveolar bone height, and X value at 1 mm, 3 mm, and 5 mm from the reference plane was recorded as width, denoted as H0/W0(1,3,5), H1/W1(1,3,5), H2/W2(1,3,5), and H3/W3(1,3,5), respectively. The the changes of height and width can be calculated as follows: ΔH1=H1-H0/ΔW1=W1-W0 during T01, ΔH2=H2-H0/ΔW2=W2-W0 during T02, and ΔH3=H3-H0/ΔW3=W3-W0 during T03.
CBCT three-dimensional reconstruction graphics were used to measure the distance between the most convex points of the adjacent teeth in the mesial and distal distance of the orthodontic gap. Data at T1, T2, and T3 were recorded as D1, D2, and D3 respectively. Tooth movement rate can be calculated by dividing tooth movement distance (in mm) by the time taken for orthodontic gap closing (in months): (D1-D2)/(T2-T1) during T12 and (D2-D3)/(T3-T2) during T23.
All measurement were performed by two doctors who underwent standardized training. The data was subjected to a qualitative consistency test, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Only when ICC≥0.75, the average of the two measurements was used as the final result.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Socket-Shield Technique | Experimental | Procedure: Socket-Shield TechniqueCut the tooth crown; divided along the long axis; trim the socket shield. Finally, the socket-shield was removed by minimally invasive forceps when the adjacent tooth moved proximate to the shield during the process of closing orthodontic gap. |
| non-Socket-Shield Technique | No intervention | –A high-speed turbine was used to cut the tooth crown 1.5-2 mm from the buccal gingival margin. The tooth was then divided along the long axis, approximately 2 mm from the buccal side. The palatal roots were removed using minimally invasive elevation and extraction forceps. Next, the buccal socket-shield was trimmed to approximately 4-6 mm in height (1 mm from the buccal gingival margin), 3-4 mm in width, and 1-1.5 mm in thickness. The trimming process required with clear visualization of the shield and calibration by periodontal probe. Finally, the socket-shield was removed immediately |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- had an orthodontic treatment plan involving the extraction of symmetrical left and right first premolars;
- had maxillary protrusion or bimaxillary protrusion with crowding within 4mm;
- had permanent dentition;
- had good oral hygiene and had no periodontitis;
- agreed to the orthodontic extraction treatment plan and signed the treatment informed consent form and the experimental informed consent form.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- underlying diseases such as hypertension, heart disease, diabetes, osteoporosis, or hyperthyroidism;
- infection in the extraction area;
- dental root caries in the extraction area;
- gingival recession on the buccal aspect of the extraction area;
- refused to undergo SST treatments;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Socket-Shield TechniqueA high-speed turbine was used to cut the tooth crown 1.5-2 mm from the buccal gingival margin. The tooth was then divided along the long axis, approximately 2 mm from the buccal side(Figure 1c, 1d). The palatal roots were removed using minimally invasive elevation and extraction forceps. Next, the buccal socket-shield was trimmed to approximately 4-6 mm in height (1 mm from the buccal gingival margin)[18], 3-4 mm in width, and 1-1.5 mm in thickness[19,20]. The trimming process required with clear visualization of the shield and calibration by periodontal probe. Finally, the socket-shield was removed by minimally invasive forceps when the adjacent tooth moved proximate to the shield during the process of closing orthodontic gap. | Procedure or surgery | Socket-Shield Technique |
Primary outcome
Vertical alveolar bone loss
Time frame: 0 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 9 months
Cone beam computerized tomography were utilized to access the vertical resorption at 1mm, 3mm and 5mm from a reference plane of alveolar crest
Horizontal alveolar bone loss
Time frame: 0 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 9 months
Cone beam computerized tomography were utilized to access the horizontal resorption at 1mm, 3mm and 5mm from a reference plane of alveolar crest
1 secondary outcome
Tooth movement rate
Time frame: 3 months, 6 months and 9 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Nov 2024.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41514150Zhang Y, Ji Z, Lin L, Ye H, Ji J. The socket-shield technique in orthodontics: a method for alveolar ridge preservation. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2026 Jan 10;30(1):16. doi: 10.1007/s10006-025-01501-9.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Immediate Dental Implant Loading
Not yet recruiting
Immediate vs Conventional Loading With Different Crown Materials on Immediately Placed Single Implants
Partial Edentulism, Dental Implant
Not yet recruiting
Blue®M Gel Versus Hyaluronic Acid for Stability of Immediately Loaded Dental Implants
Dental Implants, Immediate Dental Implant Loading
Active, not recruiting
Zirconia Implants: Practice-based Evidence
Dental Implants, Ceramic Implant
Active, not recruiting
Effect of Different Loading Protocols on Photofunctionalized Implants in the Posterior Maxilla
Tooth Loss, Surface Treatment
Not yet recruiting
Delayed Short Dental Implants With Immediate Loading
DENT IMPLANTS
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jianxin Ji, DDS study chair
The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
Yuhang Zhang, MS principal investigator
The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
Zhe Ji, MS principal investigator
The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Socket-Shield Technique in people with Immediate Dental Implant Loading, run by The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Nov 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Vertical alveolar bone loss (time frame: 0 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 9 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06510621, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Nov 2024.