Fungal InfectionPhase 2PRAGMATICNCT06510699
Pharmacogenomics for Better Treatment of Fungal Infections Clinical Trial
A Phase 2 study testing genotype-directed dosing with dosing software based on therapeutic drug monitoring in people with Fungal Infection and Haematological Malignancy, run by The University of Queensland at 7 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
This project aims to address invasive fungal infections in patients, by precision dosing of voriconazole based on CYP2C19 genotype testing with Bayesian dose-forecasting dosing software to develop patient-centric and maximally effective dosing regimens. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 2 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Fungal Infection, Haematological Malignancy, Blood Cancer
- What is being tested?
- genotype-directed dosing with dosing software based on therapeutic drug monitoring
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 104 participants
- Where
- 7 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- 14 Apr 2025to 26 Mar 2027
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 2 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age ≥ 2 years.
- Written informed consent obtained.
- Decision to prescribe voriconazole.
- Admitted to a trial site, or sufficient outpatient follow-up appointments are feasible
Who cannot join
- Post-allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCT) patient, without access to pre HCT DNA
- Death is likely imminent within 7 days.
- Previously randomised to this trial
Trial locations and contacts
7 sites in 2 countries. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
7 sites in 2 countries
Australia6 sites, 6 recruiting
- Recruiting
Royal Adelaide Hospital
Adelaide, South Australia, 5000
Philip R Selby, 08 7074 0000, philip.selby@sa.gov.au
Jane Rose, Jane.rose@sa.gov.au
- Recruiting
Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital
Brisbane, Queensland, 4029
Midori Nakagaki, PhD, +61 7 3647 0185, midori.nakagaki@health.qld.gov.au
Amy Legg, +61 7 3647 0802, amy.legg@health.qld.gov.au
- Recruiting
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
Melbourne, Victoria, 3053
Monica Slavin, MBBS, FRACP, MD, FAAHMS, FECMM, +61 3 8559 5000, monica.slavin@petermac.org
Rachel Wolstencroft, +61 3 8559 7973, infectiousdiseases.clinicaltrials@petermac.org
- Recruiting
Children's Hospital Queensland
South Brisbane, Queensland, 4029
Adam D Irwin, MBBS, PhD, 07 3346 5075, a.irwin@uq.edu.au
Rachael Lawson, PhD, rachael.lawson@health.qld.gov.au
- Recruiting
Sydney Children's Hospital Network
Sydney, New South Wales, 21452031
Tony Lai, +61 2 9845 2700, tony.lai@health.nsw.gov.au
Shirley Wong, shirley.wong@health.nsw.gov.au
- Recruiting
Westmead Hospital
Sydney, New South Wales, 2145
Johannes Alffenaar, +61 2 8627 0019, johannes.alffenaar@sydney.edu.au
Catherine Linh, catherine.linh@health.nsw.gov.au
United States1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Centre
Seattle, Washington, 908109-1024
Ashleigh Miller, 206-667-1994, amiller3@fredhutch.org
Catherine Professor Liu, MD, 206-667-2729, catherine.liu@fredhutch.org
About this study
Official title: Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Use of Genotype-based Dosing of Voriconazole
This project aims to address invasive fungal infections in patients, by precision dosing of voriconazole based on CYP2C19 genotype testing with Bayesian dose-forecasting dosing software to develop patient-centric and maximally effective dosing regimens. This study investigates if voriconazole increases the proportion of patients achieving therapeutic exposure at day 8 of dosing compared with standard care; and will assess factors that influence the implementation of genotype testing and dosing software in the healthcare system, including fidelity, feasibility, acceptability and cost-effectiveness. It will recruit at least 104 kids and adults in a parallel-group randomised clinical trial. A hybrid feasibility sub-study will assess the scalability of genotype-directed dosing to ensure sustainable integration of the interventions into the clinical workflow. A health economic sub-study will evaluate the costs, health outcomes and cost-effectiveness of genotype-directed testing compared to standard care.
Read the detailed description
Participants will be randomly assigned to standard care or precision care. Current standard of care at trial-site institutions uses weight-based (mg/kg) initial dosing of voriconazole, with dose adjustment based on standard therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) results of measured voriconazole concentrations based on clinical judgement. In precision care, voriconazole dosing will be initiated using current standard dosing. Samples for the TDM and genotype testing will be collected. Based on results of these tests on Day 5 (+/- 1 day) patients will be evaluated for dose adjustment using dosing software that includes patient data, TDM and genotype data.
Trial procedures: following baseline data collection and randomisation genotype testing will be performed on Day 1. The precision care group have dose adjustment performed on Days 5, 9, 15, and 22 using genotype and/or TDM results in dosing software. The standard care group will have TDM performed, and dose adjustments in accordance with usual clinical practice. Blood sampling for TDM will be performed 24-hours prior to dose adjustment, with additional blood samples collected on Days 1 and 2 in both standard care and precision care groups. All blood sampling, genotype testing and dose adjustments will be performed +/- day to support feasibility.
The primary objective is to compare the proportion of patients achieving therapeutic voriconazole exposure at Day 8 when using precision care compared to standard care.
Secondary objectives are:
- Clinical: comparison of clinical success of voriconazole treatment between precision care and standard care groups, where clinical success is defined as an absence of clinical deterioration or event that requires a change of therapy.
- Antifungal exposure: to compare antifungal exposure over the first 28 days of therapy between precision care and standard care groups.
- Comparative precision care methodologies: compare if there is a difference in daily dose recommendations between using a genotype nomogram, dosing software with TDM, or a combination of dose adjustment in precision care.
- Feasibility of precision care interventions: to determine if it is feasible to perform the measurement of voriconazole concentrations and genotype testing for use in dosing software in time to intervene prior to Day 5 and/or Day 9 dose adjustment.
- Genotype: describe clinical success of voriconazole between genotypes.
The implementation feasibility sub-study will assess the scalability of precision care to support optimal voriconazole dosing by tailoring the intervention to each trial setting and measuring outcomes with the involvement of key stakeholders (end-users, health administrators, consumers, community members).
Data will be collected to ascertain Fidelity including: 1) assess barriers and enablers; 2) identify prioritise the factors influencing delivery and tailor these to fit local settings; 3) assess intended fidelity to the precision care intervention.
Data will be collected to ascertain Feasibility or the extent to which precision care can be successfully used in each study setting via completion of the feasibility implementation measure (FIM) at baselines and quarterly thereafter, including qualitative interviews at the end of the study.
Data will be collected to ascertain Acceptability or whether end-users perceive precision care as agreeable or satisfactory by survey and qualitative interviews with pharmacists, physicians and health administrators.
Data will be collected to undertake an economic evaluation to determine the cost-effectiveness of precision versus standard care, exploring individual level data, incremental cost effectiveness ratios (ICERs) at day 14 and 30; and cost-utility analysis to demonstrate if precision care offers value for money at Day 30 in the Australian setting. The health economic evaluation will include use of surveys to capture: 1) healthcare usage of trial participants; 2) implementation feasibility measures; and 3) implementation costs.
Data will be collected to ascertain scalability or the ability to expand the efficacy of precision care on a small scale in controlled conditions to real world conditions to a greater proportion of the population.
Therapeutic trough voriconazole exposures (concentrations) In this trial, serum concentrations > 1 mg/L (minimum effective concentration) and < 5 mg/L (maximum safe concentration) are defined as the therapeutic range. Treating clinicians may nominate an individualised patient target within this range prior to randomisation and that range will be applied during the trial. Where dosing software is being applied, the software will be programmed to target 2.5 mg/L.
- Being tested
- genotype-directed dosing with dosing software based on therapeutic drug monitoring
- Keywords
- infection, cancer, pharmacogenomic, genotype-based dosing, CYP2C19
- Medical subject headings
- Mycoses, Hematologic Neoplasms, Communicable Diseases, Infections, Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
genotype-directed dosing with dosing software based on therapeutic drug monitoringOther
Also called genotype directed with dosing software
Genotype-directed dosing with dosing software based on therapeutic drug monitoring
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Precision Care | Experimental | Voriconazole dosing will be initiated using current standard care dosing. Samples for TDM and genotype testing will be collected. Based on the results of these tests on Day 5, 8, 14, and up to day 30 ( ± 1 day) patients will be evaluated for dose adjustment using dosing software that includes patient data including TDM and genotype data. Receives: Other: genotype-directed dosing with dosing software based on therapeutic drug monitoring |
| Standard Care | No intervention | Current standard of care at trial-site institutions uses weight-based (mg/kg) initial dosing of voriconazole, with dose adjustment based on standard therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) results of measured voriconazole concentrations and based on clinical judgement. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Therapeutic trough voriconazole concentration at Day 8
Proportion of patients with measured therapeutic trough voriconazole concentration at Day 9 (+/- 1 day)
Measured: Day 8
Secondary outcomes (19)
Simulated therapeutic trough voriconazole exposure at Day 8
Proportion of patients with simulated therapeutic trough voriconazole exposure at Day 8
Measured: Day 8
Measured therapeutic trough voriconazole exposure at Day 14.
Proportion of patients with measured therapeutic trough voriconazole exposure at Day 14.
Measured: Day 14
Simulated therapeutic trough voriconazole exposure at Day 14
Proportion of patients with simulated therapeutic trough voriconazole exposure at Day 14
Measured: Day 14
Measured therapeutic trough voriconazole exposure at both Days 8 and 14
Proportion of patients with measured therapeutic trough voriconazole exposure at both Days 8 and 14
Measured: Days 8 and 14
Simulated therapeutic trough voriconazole exposure at both Days 8 and 14
Proportion of patients with simulated therapeutic trough voriconazole exposure at both Days 8 and 14
Measured: Days 8 and 14
Simulated therapeutic trough voriconazole exposure from Day 8 to Day 30
Proportion of patients with simulated therapeutic trough voriconazole exposure from Day 8 to Day 30
Measured: Day 8 to Day 30
Days to achieve first measured therapeutic trough voriconazole exposure
Number of days to achieve first measured therapeutic trough voriconazole exposure
Measured: Assessed over 30 days
Doses to achieve first measured therapeutic trough voriconazole exposure.
Number of doses to achieve first measured therapeutic trough voriconazole exposure.
Measured: Assessed over 30 days
Percent difference in dose when dose adjustment is performed
Percent difference in dose when dose adjustment is performed (i) on the first occasion and (ii) on subsequent occasions (set to 0 if no adjustment).
Measured: Assessed over 30 days
Number of days of antifungal therapy
Number of days of antifungal therapy
Measured: Assessed over 30 days
Number of doses of antifungal therapy
Number of doses of antifungal therapy
Measured: Assessed over 30 days
Clinical cure or stable disease
Proportion of patients achieving invasive fungal disease (IFD) clinical cure or stable disease; defined by treating team, if indication is IFD treatment
Measured: Assessed over 30 days
Patients with no reported fungal infection during course
Proportion of patients with no reported fungal infection during course, if indication is IFD prophylaxis.
Measured: Assessed over 30 days
Hospital free days
Number of hospital free days at day 30
Measured: Day 30
Length of hospital stay post-randomisation
Length of hospital stay post-randomisation
Measured: Assessed over 30 days
Number of patients experiencing at least one adverse event
Number of patients experiencing at least one adverse event
Measured: Assessed over 30 days
Number and type of adverse events
Number and type of adverse events
Measured: Assessed over 30 days
All-cause mortality at 30 days
All-cause mortality at 30 days
Measured: Assessed over 30 days
Clinical success
Proportion of patients achieving clinical success, defined as an absence of a clinical deterioration or event that requires a change of therapy
Measured: Assessed over 30 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Jul 2024
- Study start14 Apr 2025
- Primary completion1 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion26 Mar 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Fungal InfectionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- PRAGMATIC is a parallel-group randomised (1:1) clinical trial aiming to recruit at least 104 patients. A hybrid feasibility sub-study will assess the scalability of genotype directed dosing to ensure a sustainable integration of the interventions into the clinical workflow. A health economic sub-study will evaluate the costs, health outcomes and cost effectiveness of genotype-directed testing compared to standard care.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 104 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- The University of Queensland
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/University of Washington Cancer Consortium, University of Sydney, Western Sydney Local Health District, Sydney Children's Hospitals Network, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Australia, University of Melbourne, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Pathology Queensland, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Lady Cilento Children's Hospital, Brisbane
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Jason A Roberts, PhD, Principal investigator, The University of Queensland
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06510699
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PRAGMATIC 02
- Acronym
- PRAGMATIC
- Status last verified
- Oct 2025
- First submitted
- 14 Jul 2024
- Last updated
- 16 Apr 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Apr 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Use of Genotype-based Dosing of Voriconazole
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06510699
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PRAGMATIC / PRAGMATIC 02
- Keywords
- infection, cancer, pharmacogenomic, genotype-based dosing, CYP2C19
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 104 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- The University of QueenslandUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/University of Washington Cancer Consortium, University of Sydney, Western Sydney Local Health District, Sydney Children's Hospitals Network, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Australia, University of Melbourne, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Pathology Queensland, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Lady Cilento Children's Hospital, Brisbane
- Study start
- 14 Apr 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 26 Mar 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 19 Jul 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This project aims to address invasive fungal infections in patients, by precision dosing of voriconazole based on CYP2C19 genotype testing with Bayesian dose-forecasting dosing software to develop patient-centric and maximally effective dosing regimens. This study investigates if voriconazole increases the proportion of patients achieving therapeutic exposure at day 8 of dosing compared with standard care; and will assess factors that influence the implementation of genotype testing and dosing software in the healthcare system, including fidelity, feasibility, acceptability and cost-effectiveness. It will recruit at least 104 kids and adults in a parallel-group randomised clinical trial. A hybrid feasibility sub-study will assess the scalability of genotype-directed dosing to ensure sustainable integration of the interventions into the clinical workflow. A health economic sub-study will evaluate the costs, health outcomes and cost-effectiveness of genotype-directed testing compared to standard care.
Detailed description
Participants will be randomly assigned to standard care or precision care. Current standard of care at trial-site institutions uses weight-based (mg/kg) initial dosing of voriconazole, with dose adjustment based on standard therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) results of measured voriconazole concentrations based on clinical judgement. In precision care, voriconazole dosing will be initiated using current standard dosing. Samples for the TDM and genotype testing will be collected. Based on results of these tests on Day 5 (+/- 1 day) patients will be evaluated for dose adjustment using dosing software that includes patient data, TDM and genotype data.
Trial procedures: following baseline data collection and randomisation genotype testing will be performed on Day 1. The precision care group have dose adjustment performed on Days 5, 9, 15, and 22 using genotype and/or TDM results in dosing software. The standard care group will have TDM performed, and dose adjustments in accordance with usual clinical practice. Blood sampling for TDM will be performed 24-hours prior to dose adjustment, with additional blood samples collected on Days 1 and 2 in both standard care and precision care groups. All blood sampling, genotype testing and dose adjustments will be performed +/- day to support feasibility.
The primary objective is to compare the proportion of patients achieving therapeutic voriconazole exposure at Day 8 when using precision care compared to standard care.
Secondary objectives are:
- Clinical: comparison of clinical success of voriconazole treatment between precision care and standard care groups, where clinical success is defined as an absence of clinical deterioration or event that requires a change of therapy.
- Antifungal exposure: to compare antifungal exposure over the first 28 days of therapy between precision care and standard care groups.
- Comparative precision care methodologies: compare if there is a difference in daily dose recommendations between using a genotype nomogram, dosing software with TDM, or a combination of dose adjustment in precision care.
- Feasibility of precision care interventions: to determine if it is feasible to perform the measurement of voriconazole concentrations and genotype testing for use in dosing software in time to intervene prior to Day 5 and/or Day 9 dose adjustment.
- Genotype: describe clinical success of voriconazole between genotypes.
The implementation feasibility sub-study will assess the scalability of precision care to support optimal voriconazole dosing by tailoring the intervention to each trial setting and measuring outcomes with the involvement of key stakeholders (end-users, health administrators, consumers, community members).
Data will be collected to ascertain Fidelity including: 1) assess barriers and enablers; 2) identify prioritise the factors influencing delivery and tailor these to fit local settings; 3) assess intended fidelity to the precision care intervention.
Data will be collected to ascertain Feasibility or the extent to which precision care can be successfully used in each study setting via completion of the feasibility implementation measure (FIM) at baselines and quarterly thereafter, including qualitative interviews at the end of the study.
Data will be collected to ascertain Acceptability or whether end-users perceive precision care as agreeable or satisfactory by survey and qualitative interviews with pharmacists, physicians and health administrators.
Data will be collected to undertake an economic evaluation to determine the cost-effectiveness of precision versus standard care, exploring individual level data, incremental cost effectiveness ratios (ICERs) at day 14 and 30; and cost-utility analysis to demonstrate if precision care offers value for money at Day 30 in the Australian setting. The health economic evaluation will include use of surveys to capture: 1) healthcare usage of trial participants; 2) implementation feasibility measures; and 3) implementation costs.
Data will be collected to ascertain scalability or the ability to expand the efficacy of precision care on a small scale in controlled conditions to real world conditions to a greater proportion of the population.
Therapeutic trough voriconazole exposures (concentrations) In this trial, serum concentrations > 1 mg/L (minimum effective concentration) and < 5 mg/L (maximum safe concentration) are defined as the therapeutic range. Treating clinicians may nominate an individualised patient target within this range prior to randomisation and that range will be applied during the trial. Where dosing software is being applied, the software will be programmed to target 2.5 mg/L.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- PRAGMATIC is a parallel-group randomised (1:1) clinical trial aiming to recruit at least 104 patients. A hybrid feasibility sub-study will assess the scalability of genotype directed dosing to ensure a sustainable integration of the interventions into the clinical workflow. A health economic sub-study will evaluate the costs, health outcomes and cost effectiveness of genotype-directed testing compared to standard care.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Precision Care | Experimental | Other: genotype-directed dosing with dosing software based on therapeutic drug monitoringVoriconazole dosing will be initiated using current standard care dosing. Samples for TDM and genotype testing will be collected. Based on the results of these tests on Day 5, 8, 14, and up to day 30 ( ± 1 day) patients will be evaluated for dose adjustment using dosing software that includes patient data including TDM and genotype data. |
| Standard Care | No intervention | –Current standard of care at trial-site institutions uses weight-based (mg/kg) initial dosing of voriconazole, with dose adjustment based on standard therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) results of measured voriconazole concentrations and based on clinical judgement. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 2 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Age ≥ 2 years.
- Written informed consent obtained.
- Decision to prescribe voriconazole.
- Admitted to a trial site, or sufficient outpatient follow-up appointments are feasible
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Post-allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCT) patient, without access to pre HCT DNA
- Death is likely imminent within 7 days.
- Previously randomised to this trial
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| genotype-directed dosing with dosing software based on therapeutic drug monitoringAlso: genotype directed with dosing softwareGenotype-directed dosing with dosing software based on therapeutic drug monitoring | Other | Precision Care |
Primary outcome
Therapeutic trough voriconazole concentration at Day 8
Time frame: Day 8
Proportion of patients with measured therapeutic trough voriconazole concentration at Day 9 (+/- 1 day)
19 secondary outcomes
Simulated therapeutic trough voriconazole exposure at Day 8
Time frame: Day 8
Measured therapeutic trough voriconazole exposure at Day 14.
Time frame: Day 14
Simulated therapeutic trough voriconazole exposure at Day 14
Time frame: Day 14
Measured therapeutic trough voriconazole exposure at both Days 8 and 14
Time frame: Days 8 and 14
Simulated therapeutic trough voriconazole exposure at both Days 8 and 14
Time frame: Days 8 and 14
Simulated therapeutic trough voriconazole exposure from Day 8 to Day 30
Time frame: Day 8 to Day 30
Days to achieve first measured therapeutic trough voriconazole exposure
Time frame: Assessed over 30 days
Doses to achieve first measured therapeutic trough voriconazole exposure.
Time frame: Assessed over 30 days
Percent difference in dose when dose adjustment is performed
Time frame: Assessed over 30 days
Number of days of antifungal therapy
Time frame: Assessed over 30 days
Number of doses of antifungal therapy
Time frame: Assessed over 30 days
Clinical cure or stable disease
Time frame: Assessed over 30 days
Patients with no reported fungal infection during course
Time frame: Assessed over 30 days
Hospital free days
Time frame: Day 30
Length of hospital stay post-randomisation
Time frame: Assessed over 30 days
Number of patients experiencing at least one adverse event
Time frame: Assessed over 30 days
Number and type of adverse events
Time frame: Assessed over 30 days
All-cause mortality at 30 days
Time frame: Assessed over 30 days
Clinical success
Time frame: Assessed over 30 days
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Apr 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Fungal Infection
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
A Pivotal Safety and Immunogenicity GBS-NN/NN2 Vaccine Maternal Immunisation Trial
Streptococcus Agalactiae Infection, Neonatal Sepsis
RecruitingObservational study
Blood, Urine, and Tissue Collection for Cutaneous Lymphoma, Eczema, and Atopic Dermatitis Research
Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma, Sezary Syndrome
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study to Learn About How a New Pneumococcal Vaccine Works in Infants
Pneumococcal Disease
Not yet recruiting
Early Pathophysiology of Hidradenitis Suppurativa and Prediction of the Risk of Progression: a Prospective Cohort
Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS)
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Dosing of Brentuximab Vedotin for Mycosis Fungoides, Sezary Syndrome Patients
Mycosis Fungoides, Lymphomatoid Papulosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Jason A Roberts, PhD principal investigator
The University of Queensland
7 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing genotype-directed dosing with dosing software based on therapeutic drug monitoring in people with Fungal Infection and Haematological Malignancy, run by The University of Queensland at 7 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 7 sites in Australia, United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Jason A Roberts, PhD (+61 7 3346 5032 ext. 65032, j.roberts2@uq.edu.au), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Therapeutic trough voriconazole concentration at Day 8 (time frame: Day 8). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Apr 2026.