ALL, AdultVOIRNCT06512272
Video-recOrded hospItal dischaRge (VOIR)
A study testing Video recorded shared using a mobile application in people with ALL, Adult, run by Anglia Ruskin University.
Trial summary
This study evaluates the suitability and acceptability of video-recorded discharge via the Patient Knows Best app. Through a randomized control trial, patients receive either standard discharge care or standard care supplemented with video-recorded discharge. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- ALL, Adult
- What is being tested?
- Video recorded shared using a mobile application
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Aug 2024to 31 Oct 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age >18 years old
- Anticipated to be discharged to their own home or that of a relative;
- Staying for at least one night on a participating hospital ward;
- Recently discharge (in the last 2 months) from the participating hospital ward with the same clinical problem as assessed by the care professionals;
- From cardiothoracic centre-Basildon or Elderly ward-Southend
- Have a personal digital device (e.g., mobile or tablet)/ or their close relative and mobile app
Show all 9Show fewer
- Able to read and understand English.
- Relative or patient willing and able to give informed consent
- Clinical Frailty scale of ≤ 8 using Rockwood Frailty Scale
Who cannot join
- Patients live out of the area or plan to be transferred to another acute hospital;
- Discharged after recurrent admissions for the same clinical complaint as assessed by the care professionals;
- Patient or immediate carer don't have a personal digital device capable of hosting Patient Knows Best/ Ortus-iHealth app;
- Patient or relative unable or unwilling to upload the personalised discharge video to mobile app;
- Admitted for psychiatric reasons (other than dementia/delirium);
- Identified as being at the end of life and whose care has become palliative / clinical Frailty scale of > 8 using Rockwood Frailty Scale
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet.
About this study
Official title: Evaluating Feasibility and Acceptability of Video Discharge Hosted in Patient Knows Best or Ortus-iHealth Apps: A Feasibility Randomised Controlled Trial
This study evaluates the suitability and acceptability of video-recorded discharge via the Patient Knows Best app. Through a randomized control trial, patients receive either standard discharge care or standard care supplemented with video-recorded discharge. Clinical teams record briefings covering medication and wound care, which patients can access multiple times on their smart devices. Patients and clinical staff complete questionnaires to assess acceptance and feasibility. Feasibility is determined by recruitment, retention, and completion rates, with patient engagement and viewing habits also analyzed. The study aims to enhance patient understanding and continuity of care through accessible discharge information.
Read the detailed description
Study Design
The study aims to assess how suitable and acceptable the use of video-recorded discharge via the Patient Knows Best or Ortus-iHealth application is. It employs a randomised control trial design, with one group receiving standard discharge care and another receiving the standard care plus video-recorded discharge.
Upon discharge from hospital, the clinical team (e.g, nurses and doctors) will record the routine discharge briefing, covering aspects such as medication and wound care, for consenting patients. This briefing will be based on the discharge letter from the medical team and will last approximately up to three minutes. It will take place in a private hospital ward room, using the patient's or their relative's smart device (e.g., mobile or tablet). Subsequently, the recorded video will be uploaded to the patient's Patient Knows Best app account. Patients can review the video multiple times to reinforce their understanding of the discharge information, including medication advice, wound dressing, and exercise. Additionally, they can share it with their relatives, as well as community and district nursing teams, to enhance the clarity of shared information and continuity of care.
Both control and intervention group patients will receive a self-reported questionnaire regarding their acceptance of the discharge process, satisfaction levels, and its impact on their quality of life. Clinical staff involved in the recording will also complete a questionnaire assessing the feasibility, practicality, and satisfaction with the new intervention.
The feasibility of the study will be evaluated based on recruitment numbers, retention rates, completion rates, and the chosen questionnaire\'s suitability. Questionnaires will be administered post-discharge, one week after discharge, and thirty days later. Additionally, patient engagement with the Patient Knows Best platform and video viewing habits will be analysed to explore any differences among demographic groups.
- Conditions
- ALL, Adult
- Being tested
- Video recorded shared using a mobile application
- Keywords
- hospital discharge, video recorded discharge, transition of care, mobile application
- Medical subject headings
- Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Video recorded shared using a mobile applicationOther
The routine hospital discharge explanation is video recorded [up to three minutes].
The video is uploaded by to a mobile app for the patient and patient/ relatives can review the advice multiple times
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Control group | No intervention | Usual hospital discharge include medical discharge letter and verbal advice from healthcare team. |
| Intervention group | Other | Usual hospital discharge + video recorded medical advice from the healthcare team uploaded in a mobile app Receives: Other: Video recorded shared using a mobile application |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Acceptability of video-discharge
Questionnaire with close ended and open ended question based on validated questionnaire
Measured: 7 days and 30 days post-discharge
Secondary outcomes (3)
Patient satisfaction
Brief questionnaire on patient satisfaction
Measured: 7 and 30 days post discharge
Care of Transitions
Three questions measuring validated tool
Measured: 7 and 30 days post discharge
Staff satisfaction of video recorded discharge
Close and opened questionnaire
Measured: within 7 days of post-discharge experience
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Jul 2024
- Study start1 Aug 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completion30 Sep 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Oct 2024 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (10)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for ALL, AdultStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Randomisation on a ratio of 1:1 * A: allocated usual care * B: allocated intervention group which include usual care plus video-recorded discharge
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Anglia Ruskin University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Basildon and Thurrock Hospitals NHS FoundationTrust, Southend NHS Foundation Trust
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Naim Abdulmohdi, PhD, Principal investigator, Anglia Ruskin University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06512272
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 320936
- Other IDs
- 423607
- Acronym
- VOIR
- Status last verified
- Mar 2024
- First submitted
- 16 Jul 2024
- Last updated
- 22 Jul 2024
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Barker RE, Jones SE, Banya W, Fleming S, Kon SSC, Clarke SF, Nolan CM, Patel S, Walsh JA, Maddocks M, Farquhar M, Bell D, Wedzicha JA, Man WD. The Effects of a Video Intervention on Posthospitalization Pulmonary Rehabilitation Uptake. A Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Jun 15;201(12):1517-1524. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201909-1878OC.
PubMed 32182098Baxter R, Murray J, Cockayne S, Baird K, Mandefield L, Mills T, Lawton R, Hewitt C, Richardson G, Sheard L, O'Hara JK; PACT research team. Improving the safety and experience of transitions from hospital to home: a cluster randomised controlled feasibility trial of the 'Your Care Needs You' intervention versus usual care. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2022 Oct 1;8(1):222. doi: 10.1186/s40814-022-01180-3.
PubMed 36183129Forster AJ, Murff HJ, Peterson JF, Gandhi TK, Bates DW. The incidence and severity of adverse events affecting patients after discharge from the hospital. Ann Intern Med. 2003 Feb 4;138(3):161-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-138-3-200302040-00007.
PubMed 12558354Hesselink G, Schoonhoven L, Barach P, Spijker A, Gademan P, Kalkman C, Liefers J, Vernooij-Dassen M, Wollersheim H. Improving patient handovers from hospital to primary care: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2012 Sep 18;157(6):417-28. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-6-201209180-00006.
PubMed 22986379Hoek AE, Joosten M, Dippel DWJ, van Beeck EF, van den Hengel L, Dijkstra B, Papathanasiou D, van Rijssel D, van den Hamer M, Schuit SCE, Burdorf A, Haagsma JA, Rood PPM. Effect of Video Discharge Instructions for Patients With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2021 Mar;77(3):327-337. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.10.023.
PubMed 33618811Kapoor A, Field T, Handler S, Fisher K, Saphirak C, Crawford S, Fouayzi H, Johnson F, Spenard A, Zhang N, Gurwitz JH. Adverse Events in Long-term Care Residents Transitioning From Hospital Back to Nursing Home. JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Sep 1;179(9):1254-1261. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.2005.
PubMed 31329223Le Berre M, Maimon G, Sourial N, Gueriton M, Vedel I. Impact of Transitional Care Services for Chronically Ill Older Patients: A Systematic Evidence Review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017 Jul;65(7):1597-1608. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14828. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
PubMed 28403508Laugaland K, Aase K, Barach P. Interventions to improve patient safety in transitional care--a review of the evidence. Work. 2012;41 Suppl 1:2915-24. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2012-0544-2915.
PubMed 22317162Mallet KH, Shamloul RM, Lecompte-Collin J, Winkel J, Donnelly B, Dowlatshahi D. Telerehab at Home: Mobile Tablet Technology for Patients With Poststroke Communication Deficits-A Pilot Feasibility Randomized Control Trial. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2023 Feb 13;66(2):648-655. doi: 10.1044/2022_JSLHR-21-00616. Epub 2023 Jan 12.
PubMed 36634230Wang Q, Lee RL, Hunter S, Chan SW. Patients' experiences of using a mobile application-based rehabilitation programme after total hip or knee arthroplasty: a qualitative descriptive study. BMC Nurs. 2023 Jul 27;22(1):246. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01409-3.
PubMed 37496003
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Jul 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluating Feasibility and Acceptability of Video Discharge Hosted in Patient Knows Best or Ortus-iHealth Apps: A Feasibility Randomised Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06512272
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- VOIR / 320936
- Conditions
- ALL, Adult
- Keywords
- hospital discharge, video recorded discharge, transition of care, mobile application
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Anglia Ruskin UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Basildon and Thurrock Hospitals NHS FoundationTrust, Southend NHS Foundation Trust
- Study start
- 1 Aug 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 30 Sep 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Oct 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 22 Jul 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study evaluates the suitability and acceptability of video-recorded discharge via the Patient Knows Best app. Through a randomized control trial, patients receive either standard discharge care or standard care supplemented with video-recorded discharge. Clinical teams record briefings covering medication and wound care, which patients can access multiple times on their smart devices. Patients and clinical staff complete questionnaires to assess acceptance and feasibility. Feasibility is determined by recruitment, retention, and completion rates, with patient engagement and viewing habits also analyzed. The study aims to enhance patient understanding and continuity of care through accessible discharge information.
Detailed description
Study Design
The study aims to assess how suitable and acceptable the use of video-recorded discharge via the Patient Knows Best or Ortus-iHealth application is. It employs a randomised control trial design, with one group receiving standard discharge care and another receiving the standard care plus video-recorded discharge.
Upon discharge from hospital, the clinical team (e.g, nurses and doctors) will record the routine discharge briefing, covering aspects such as medication and wound care, for consenting patients. This briefing will be based on the discharge letter from the medical team and will last approximately up to three minutes. It will take place in a private hospital ward room, using the patient's or their relative's smart device (e.g., mobile or tablet). Subsequently, the recorded video will be uploaded to the patient's Patient Knows Best app account. Patients can review the video multiple times to reinforce their understanding of the discharge information, including medication advice, wound dressing, and exercise. Additionally, they can share it with their relatives, as well as community and district nursing teams, to enhance the clarity of shared information and continuity of care.
Both control and intervention group patients will receive a self-reported questionnaire regarding their acceptance of the discharge process, satisfaction levels, and its impact on their quality of life. Clinical staff involved in the recording will also complete a questionnaire assessing the feasibility, practicality, and satisfaction with the new intervention.
The feasibility of the study will be evaluated based on recruitment numbers, retention rates, completion rates, and the chosen questionnaire\'s suitability. Questionnaires will be administered post-discharge, one week after discharge, and thirty days later. Additionally, patient engagement with the Patient Knows Best platform and video viewing habits will be analysed to explore any differences among demographic groups.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Randomisation on a ratio of 1:1 * A: allocated usual care * B: allocated intervention group which include usual care plus video-recorded discharge
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Control group | No intervention | –Usual hospital discharge include medical discharge letter and verbal advice from healthcare team. |
| Intervention group | Other | Other: Video recorded shared using a mobile applicationUsual hospital discharge + video recorded medical advice from the healthcare team uploaded in a mobile app |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Age >18 years old
- Anticipated to be discharged to their own home or that of a relative;
- Staying for at least one night on a participating hospital ward;
- Recently discharge (in the last 2 months) from the participating hospital ward with the same clinical problem as assessed by the care professionals;
- From cardiothoracic centre-Basildon or Elderly ward-Southend
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Patients live out of the area or plan to be transferred to another acute hospital;
- Discharged after recurrent admissions for the same clinical complaint as assessed by the care professionals;
- Patient or immediate carer don't have a personal digital device capable of hosting Patient Knows Best/ Ortus-iHealth app;
- Patient or relative unable or unwilling to upload the personalised discharge video to mobile app;
- Admitted for psychiatric reasons (other than dementia/delirium);
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Video recorded shared using a mobile applicationThe routine hospital discharge explanation is video recorded [up to three minutes]. The video is uploaded by to a mobile app for the patient and patient/ relatives can review the advice multiple times | Other | Intervention group |
Primary outcome
Acceptability of video-discharge
Time frame: 7 days and 30 days post-discharge
Questionnaire with close ended and open ended question based on validated questionnaire
3 secondary outcomes
Patient satisfaction
Time frame: 7 and 30 days post discharge
Care of Transitions
Time frame: 7 and 30 days post discharge
Staff satisfaction of video recorded discharge
Time frame: within 7 days of post-discharge experience
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Jul 2024.
- Background: PubMed 32182098Barker RE, Jones SE, Banya W, Fleming S, Kon SSC, Clarke SF, Nolan CM, Patel S, Walsh JA, Maddocks M, Farquhar M, Bell D, Wedzicha JA, Man WD. The Effects of a Video Intervention on Posthospitalization Pulmonary Rehabilitation Uptake. A Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Jun 15;201(12):1517-1524. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201909-1878OC.
- Background: PubMed 36183129Baxter R, Murray J, Cockayne S, Baird K, Mandefield L, Mills T, Lawton R, Hewitt C, Richardson G, Sheard L, O'Hara JK; PACT research team. Improving the safety and experience of transitions from hospital to home: a cluster randomised controlled feasibility trial of the 'Your Care Needs You' intervention versus usual care. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2022 Oct 1;8(1):222. doi: 10.1186/s40814-022-01180-3.
- Background: PubMed 12558354Forster AJ, Murff HJ, Peterson JF, Gandhi TK, Bates DW. The incidence and severity of adverse events affecting patients after discharge from the hospital. Ann Intern Med. 2003 Feb 4;138(3):161-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-138-3-200302040-00007.
- Background: PubMed 22986379Hesselink G, Schoonhoven L, Barach P, Spijker A, Gademan P, Kalkman C, Liefers J, Vernooij-Dassen M, Wollersheim H. Improving patient handovers from hospital to primary care: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2012 Sep 18;157(6):417-28. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-6-201209180-00006.
- Background: PubMed 33618811Hoek AE, Joosten M, Dippel DWJ, van Beeck EF, van den Hengel L, Dijkstra B, Papathanasiou D, van Rijssel D, van den Hamer M, Schuit SCE, Burdorf A, Haagsma JA, Rood PPM. Effect of Video Discharge Instructions for Patients With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2021 Mar;77(3):327-337. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.10.023.
- Background: PubMed 31329223Kapoor A, Field T, Handler S, Fisher K, Saphirak C, Crawford S, Fouayzi H, Johnson F, Spenard A, Zhang N, Gurwitz JH. Adverse Events in Long-term Care Residents Transitioning From Hospital Back to Nursing Home. JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Sep 1;179(9):1254-1261. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.2005.
- Background: PubMed 28403508Le Berre M, Maimon G, Sourial N, Gueriton M, Vedel I. Impact of Transitional Care Services for Chronically Ill Older Patients: A Systematic Evidence Review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017 Jul;65(7):1597-1608. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14828. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
- Background: PubMed 22317162Laugaland K, Aase K, Barach P. Interventions to improve patient safety in transitional care--a review of the evidence. Work. 2012;41 Suppl 1:2915-24. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2012-0544-2915.
- Background: PubMed 36634230Mallet KH, Shamloul RM, Lecompte-Collin J, Winkel J, Donnelly B, Dowlatshahi D. Telerehab at Home: Mobile Tablet Technology for Patients With Poststroke Communication Deficits-A Pilot Feasibility Randomized Control Trial. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2023 Feb 13;66(2):648-655. doi: 10.1044/2022_JSLHR-21-00616. Epub 2023 Jan 12.
- Background: PubMed 37496003Wang Q, Lee RL, Hunter S, Chan SW. Patients' experiences of using a mobile application-based rehabilitation programme after total hip or knee arthroplasty: a qualitative descriptive study. BMC Nurs. 2023 Jul 27;22(1):246. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01409-3.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for ALL, Adult
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Extension Study of Safety and Tolerability of DDY391 in Participants With Moderate to Severe Psoriatic Arthritis (CDDY391A12201-extension)
Moderate to Severe Psoriatic Arthritis
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Validation of the Healthcare Relationship Assessment Scale (ERA) in Health Sciences Students.
Health Adult Subjects, Communication
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly SHR-3167 Compared With Once-Daily Insulin Glargine in Adults With Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
An Open-label, DDI Study to Investigate the Effects of Duvakitug on the PK of Selected Cytochrome P450 Substrates
Ulcerative Colitis, Crohn's Disease
Recruiting
Effects of Lean Pork Loin Intake on Protein Homeostasis and Glucose Regulation in Prediabetic Adults
Hyperglycaemia (Non Diabetic), Prediabetes
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Naim Abdulmohdi, PhD principal investigator
Anglia Ruskin University
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Video recorded shared using a mobile application in people with ALL, Adult, run by Anglia Ruskin University.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Jul 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Naim Abdulmohdi, PhD ((+44)1223695538, naim.abdulmohdi@aru.ac.uk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Acceptability of video-discharge (time frame: 7 days and 30 days post-discharge). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06512272, which also lists 10 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Jul 2024.