AzTrials
AzTrials

Pleural InfectionTORPIDS-2NCT06513689

The Oxford Pleural Infection Endotyping Study

An observational study of Pleural Infection and Pleural Diseases, run by University of Oxford at 1 site in United Kingdom.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Pleural infection is a severe disease with increasing incidence worldwide. The subphenotypes of pleural infection remain unknown.We designed a study to endotype the disease and assess the association between patient phenotype, microbiology and clinical outcome. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
How many people
80 participants
Where
1 siteUnited Kingdom
Study dates
20 Jun 2021to 20 Jun 2024
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients with evidence of pleural infection

Samples collected for the PILOT clinical trial (DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00130-2020) used for the TORPIDS-2 study.

Patients were included if they had a clinical presentation consistent with pleural infection and any of the following criteria: 1. pleural fluid that was macroscopically purulent; or 2. pleural fluid that was positive on culture for bacterial infection; or 3. pleural fluid that demonstrated bacteria on Gram staining; or 4. pleural fluid with a pH ≤7.2 (measured by blood gas analyser) or low glucose level (≤3 mmol·L-1 or ≤55 mg·dL-1) in a patient with clinical evidence of infection; or 5. contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) evidence of pleural infection (consolidation of underlying lung with enhancing pleural collection) in a patient with clinical evidence of infection, alongside exclusion of other sources of infection. Evidence of infection was assessed by the recruiting physician on the basis of fever, an elevated peripheral blood white-cell count, or elevated serum inflammatory markers such as C-reactive protein (CRP). Study exclusion criteria were as follows: 1. age <18 years; 2. no pleural fluid available for analysis; 3. previous pneumonectomy on the side of pleural infection; and 4. expected survival of <3 months due to co-morbid disease, as judged by the recruiting physician.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United Kingdom1 site
  • Laboratory of Pleural Translational Research, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford

    Oxford, Oxfordshire, OX3 7FZ

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: Pleural Fluid Proteomics From Patients With Pleural Infection Shows Signatures of Diverse Neutrophilic Responses: The Oxford Pleural Infection Endotyping Study (TORPIDS 2)

Pleural infection is a severe disease with increasing incidence worldwide. The subphenotypes of pleural infection remain unknown.We designed a study to endotype the disease and assess the association between patient phenotype, microbiology and clinical outcome.

We subjected 80 pleural fluid samples to unlabelled mass spectrometry.

Read more

Pathway analysis of the differentially expressed proteins identified the neutrophil degranulation, glycolysis, pentose phosphate pathway, and the liver and retinoid X receptors (LXR-RXR) activation. Higher neutrophil degranulation was associated with increased glycolysis and pentose phosphate activation.

Pleural infection patients exhibit proteomic signatures indicating diverse responses of neutrophil mediated immunity, glycolysis, and pentose phosphate activation.

Read the detailed description

Pleural infection is a common and severe disease with increasing incidence worldwide. The endotypes of pleural infection remain unknown. A better understanding of patient variation in underlying biological response to infection may lead to improved treatments and clinical outcomes. We designed a study with the aim to endotype the disease and assess the association between patient phenotype, microbiology and clinical outcome.

We subjected 80 pleural fluid samples from the PILOT study, a prospective study on pleural infection, to unlabelled mass spectrometry. Proteins were retained if they were detected in at least 50% of the samples resulting in a total of 449 proteins. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering and UMAP analyses were used to cluster samples, Spearman and exact Fischer's methods were used for correlation assessment and protein expression was correlated with clinical outcomes.

UMAP plotting separated the samples in to two different and distinct cohorts. Pathway analysis of the differentially expressed proteins identified neutrophil degranulation, glycolysis, the pentose phosphate pathway, and the liver and retinoid X receptors (LXR-RXR) activation. Higher neutrophil degranulation was associated with increased glycolysis and pentose phosphate activation. Specimens dominated by Streptococcus Pneumoniae exhibited high neutrophil degranulation. Increased activity of the LXR-RXR pathway was associated with better survival.

Pleural infection patients exhibit proteomic signatures indicating diverse responses of neutrophil mediated immunity, glycolysis, and pentose phosphate activation which were associated with microbiology. Therapeutic targeting the LXR-XRX pathway with agonists may improve survival.

Keywords
pleural, pleural infection, respiratory, neutrophils
Medical subject headings
Pleural Diseases, Pleural Effusion, Empyema, Pleural, Inflammation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT06513689
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
EnrolmentAll samples were collect at patient enrolment for the PILOT study (PMID: 32675200, ISRCTN 50236700)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Pleural infection endotypes

    Discovery of pleural infection biological endotypes

    Measured: 12 months

  2. Association between endotypes and microbiology

    Investigate the association between pleural infection endotypes and microbiology

    Measured: 12 months

  3. Association between endotypes and one-year survival

    Investigate the association between pleural infection endotypes and one-year survival

    Measured: 12 months

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Association between endotypes and need for surgical treatment

    Investigate the association between pleural infection endotypes and need for surgical treatment

    Measured: 12 months

  2. Association between levels of pleural fluid plasminogen and neutrophil elastase

    Investigate the association between pleural fluid plasminogen and neutrophil elastase protein levels

    Measured: 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Jul 2024
  2. Study start20 Jun 2021
  3. Primary completion20 Jun 2023
  4. Study completion20 Jun 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
80 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06513689
Sponsor's protocol ID
R74885/RE001
Acronym
TORPIDS-2
Status last verified
Jun 2024
First submitted
16 Jul 2024
Last updated
22 Jul 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Anonymised and non-identifiable data could be shared with other researchers. The mass spectrometry data are deposited in PRIDE to share with other researchers.

Publications

  • "Prospective validation of the RAPID clinical risk prediction score in adult patients with pleural infection: the PILOT study." John P. Corcoran, Ioannis Psallidas, Stephen Gerry, Francesco Piccolo, Coenraad F. Koegelenberg, Tarek Saba, Cyrus Daneshvar, Ian Fairbairn, Richard Heinink, Alex West, Andrew E. Stanton, Jayne Holme, Jack A. Kastelik, Henry Steer, Nicola J. Downer, Mohammed Haris, Emma H. Baker, Caroline F. Everett, Justin Pepperell, Thomas Bewick, Lonny Yarmus, Fabien Maldonado, Burhan Khan, Alan Hart-Thomas, Georgina Hands, Geoffrey Warwick, Duneesha De Fonseka, Maged Hassan, Mohammed Munavvar, Anur Guhan, Mitra Shahidi, Zara Pogson, Lee Dowson, Natalia D. Popowicz, Judith Saba, Neil R. Ward, Rob J. Hallifax, Melissa Dobson, Rachel Shaw, Emma L. Hedley, Assunta Sabia, Barbara Robinson, Gary S. Collins, Helen E. Davies, Ly-Mee Yu, Robert F. Miller, Nick A. Maskell and Najib M. Rahman. Eur Respir J 2020; 56: 2000130. Eur Respir J. 2020 Dec 17;56(6):2050130. doi: 10.1183/13993003.50130-2020. Print 2020 Dec. No abstract available.

    PubMed 33334780

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Pleural Infection and Pleural Diseases, run by University of Oxford at 1 site in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Jul 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Pleural infection endotypes (time frame: 12 months). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06513689, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Jul 2024.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in