PeriodontitisNCT06516523
Impact of Pulsed Electromagnetic Field (PEMF) on Human Peri-implant Tissues
A study testing PEMF and without PEMF in people with Periodontitis and Dental Plaque, run by University of Guarulhos at 1 site in Brazil.
Trial summary
Pulsed Electromagnetic field (PEMF) has been shown to heighten bone regeneration and wound healing in various clinical areas, including dentistry. In Oral implantology, PEMF stimulation may enhance peri-implant bone formation and secondary stability and modulate the peri-implant microbiome. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Periodontitis, Dental Plaque
- What is being tested?
- PEMF and without PEMF
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 80 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBrazil
- Study dates
- 1 Feb 2022to 1 Jul 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Bone formation
- good systemic and oral health
- sufficient native bone to place implants of 3.0 mm diameter and 10 mm length for the bone formation arm
- treatment of peri-implantitis
- patients aged 18-85 years with evidence of peri-implant crestal bone loss greater than 3mm but not more than 5mm;
- the presence of bleeding on probing or suppuration;
Show all 10Show fewer
- an implant pocket depth of 6-8 mm;
- implants with an internal hex connection of 3.75-4.1mm diameter;
- implant-supported restoration that could be removed and later refitted
- patients who adhered to their scheduled periodontal maintenance visits.
Who cannot join
- patients consuming medications that might affect soft and hard tissue healing/health (such as calcium channel blockers, immunosuppressive, and anticonvulsive medications)
- patients currently taking systemic antibiotics
- chronic use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) on a long-term basis (excluding low dose aspirin);
- presence of a pacemaker; patients with periodontal disease;
- cigarette smoking of more than 10 cigarettes a day
- missing data in patient's files.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Impact of Pulsed Electromagnetic Field (PEMF) on Human Peri-implant Tissues: Clinical, Proteomic Profile, and Histological Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial
Pulsed Electromagnetic field (PEMF) has been shown to heighten bone regeneration and wound healing in various clinical areas, including dentistry. In Oral implantology, PEMF stimulation may enhance peri-implant bone formation and secondary stability and modulate the peri-implant microbiome. This randomized controlled study will evaluate:
- the impact of PEMF around interim additive manufacturing (AM) implants immediately loaded and retrieved from human jaws after 60 days.
- the effect of PEMF on diseased dental implants using non-surgical therapy.
Read the detailed description
Non-surgical treatment of peri-implantitis:This is a prospective, double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled pilot study of a 3-month duration, as shown in the study flow chart (Figure 1). The data are reported according to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines. Treatment allocation was by block randomization, with a block size of four. Both patients and evaluators were blind to whether the MED device was active or not.
Patients who were diagnosed with peri-implantitis and fit the inclusion criteria were identified from the records. The inclusion criteria were: patients aged 20-85 years with evidence of peri-implant crestal bone loss greater than 3mm but not more than 5mm; presence of bleeding on probing or suppuration; an implant pocket depth of 6-8 mm; implants with an internal hex connection of 3.75-4.1mm diameter; implant-supported restoration that could be removed and later refitted; and patients who adhered to their scheduled periodontal maintenance visits. All patients in the study were under strict periodontal maintenance with no residual pockets at other sites at the time of diagnosis. Furthermore, all patients included in the study had signed an informed consent form.
Exclusion criteria were identified based on patient records and included: patients consuming medications that might affect soft and hard tissue healing/health (such as calcium channel blockers, immunosuppressive, and anticonvulsive medications); patients currently taking systemic antibiotics; chronic use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) on a long-term basis (excluding low dose aspirin); presence of a pacemaker; patients with periodontal disease; cigarette smoking of more than 10 cigarettes a day; and missing data in patient's files.
Bone formation:The present study will be designed as a randomized controlled investigation, reporting on immediately loaded transitional transmucosal implants placed in the human posterior jaws and retrieved after 60 days. This study aims to compare the early peri-implant tissues response to implants with or without PEMF activation when placed in the human posterior jaws and subjected to immediate loading protocol. During a routine surgical procedure for the placement of conventional implants, each enrolled patient also will receive two transitional transmucosal implants (test-with and control-without PEMF), which were inserted in the posterior area of the jaws (mandible and maxilla), according to a randomization process. The transitional implants (3.0 mm x 10mm) will be placed to support an interim prosthesis until healing of the conventional implants. After 8 weeks, during the second-stage surgery to uncover the conventional implants, all transitional implants, and surrounding tissues will be retrieved for evaluation. This protocol was elaborated according to the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Studies (SPIRIT) protocol. All eligible volunteers will be informed about the nature, potential risks, and benefits of participating in this study and will sign a free and informed consent term.
- Conditions
- Periodontitis, Dental Plaque
- Being tested
- PEMF and Control/Sham, PEMF and without PEMF
- Medical subject headings
- Periodontitis, Dental Plaque
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PEMF and Control/ShamProcedure or surgery
Also called Bone regeneration, Treatment of peri-implantitis
Use o PEMF on test implants (treatment of peri-implantitis and bone formation) Use of PEMF on experimental implants (Bone-to-implant contact)
PEMF and without PEMFDevice
Also called Treatment of peri-implantitis
Use o PEMF on test implants (treatment of peri-implantitis and bone formation)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| PEMF and Bone Formation | Experimental | Use of activated miniaturized device with PEMF Receives: Procedure: PEMF and Control/Sham; Device: PEMF and without PEMF |
| Control SHAM PEMF | Placebo comparator | Use of SHAM miniaturized device with PEMF (without Pulse) Receives: Procedure: PEMF and Control/Sham; Device: PEMF and without PEMF |
| Non-surgical treament of peri-implantitis with PEMF | Active comparator | USE of PEMF on the microbiome modulation and bone formation under inflammatory conditions Receives: Procedure: PEMF and Control/Sham; Device: PEMF and without PEMF |
| Non-surgical treatment of peri-implantitis without PEMF | Placebo comparator | USE of SHAM (no PEMF) on the microbiome modulation and bone formation under inflammatory conditions Receives: Procedure: PEMF and Control/Sham; Device: PEMF and without PEMF |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Non-surgical Treatment of peri-implantitis
reduction of probing depth
Measured: 12 months
Bone formations under PEMF
BIC% increase
Measured: 2 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Jul 2024
- Study start1 Feb 2022
- Primary completion1 Apr 2023
- Study completion1 Jul 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for PeriodontitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Guarulhos
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jamil awad shibli, University of Guarulhos
- Investigators
- Jamil Shibli, Principal investigator, Guaurlhos University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06516523
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 52969221.0.0000.5193
- Status last verified
- Jul 2024
- First submitted
- 17 Jul 2024
- Last updated
- 29 Jul 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Faveri M, Miquelleto DEC, Bueno-Silva B, Pingueiro JMS, Figueiredo LC, Dolkart O, Yakobson E, Barak S, Feres M, Shibli JA. Antimicrobial effects of a pulsed electromagnetic field: an in vitro polymicrobial periodontal subgingival biofilm model. Biofouling. 2020 Aug;36(7):862-869. doi: 10.1080/08927014.2020.1825694. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
PubMed 32993357
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Jul 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Impact of Pulsed Electromagnetic Field (PEMF) on Human Peri-implant Tissues: Clinical, Proteomic Profile, and Histological Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06516523
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 52969221.0.0000.5193
- Conditions
- Periodontitis, Dental Plaque
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of GuarulhosUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Feb 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Apr 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Jul 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 24 Jul 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Pulsed Electromagnetic field (PEMF) has been shown to heighten bone regeneration and wound healing in various clinical areas, including dentistry. In Oral implantology, PEMF stimulation may enhance peri-implant bone formation and secondary stability and modulate the peri-implant microbiome. This randomized controlled study will evaluate:
- the impact of PEMF around interim additive manufacturing (AM) implants immediately loaded and retrieved from human jaws after 60 days.
- the effect of PEMF on diseased dental implants using non-surgical therapy.
Detailed description
Non-surgical treatment of peri-implantitis:This is a prospective, double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled pilot study of a 3-month duration, as shown in the study flow chart (Figure 1). The data are reported according to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines. Treatment allocation was by block randomization, with a block size of four. Both patients and evaluators were blind to whether the MED device was active or not.
Patients who were diagnosed with peri-implantitis and fit the inclusion criteria were identified from the records. The inclusion criteria were: patients aged 20-85 years with evidence of peri-implant crestal bone loss greater than 3mm but not more than 5mm; presence of bleeding on probing or suppuration; an implant pocket depth of 6-8 mm; implants with an internal hex connection of 3.75-4.1mm diameter; implant-supported restoration that could be removed and later refitted; and patients who adhered to their scheduled periodontal maintenance visits. All patients in the study were under strict periodontal maintenance with no residual pockets at other sites at the time of diagnosis. Furthermore, all patients included in the study had signed an informed consent form.
Exclusion criteria were identified based on patient records and included: patients consuming medications that might affect soft and hard tissue healing/health (such as calcium channel blockers, immunosuppressive, and anticonvulsive medications); patients currently taking systemic antibiotics; chronic use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) on a long-term basis (excluding low dose aspirin); presence of a pacemaker; patients with periodontal disease; cigarette smoking of more than 10 cigarettes a day; and missing data in patient's files.
Bone formation:The present study will be designed as a randomized controlled investigation, reporting on immediately loaded transitional transmucosal implants placed in the human posterior jaws and retrieved after 60 days. This study aims to compare the early peri-implant tissues response to implants with or without PEMF activation when placed in the human posterior jaws and subjected to immediate loading protocol. During a routine surgical procedure for the placement of conventional implants, each enrolled patient also will receive two transitional transmucosal implants (test-with and control-without PEMF), which were inserted in the posterior area of the jaws (mandible and maxilla), according to a randomization process. The transitional implants (3.0 mm x 10mm) will be placed to support an interim prosthesis until healing of the conventional implants. After 8 weeks, during the second-stage surgery to uncover the conventional implants, all transitional implants, and surrounding tissues will be retrieved for evaluation. This protocol was elaborated according to the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Studies (SPIRIT) protocol. All eligible volunteers will be informed about the nature, potential risks, and benefits of participating in this study and will sign a free and informed consent term.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| PEMF and Bone Formation | Experimental | Procedure: PEMF and Control/Sham, Device: PEMF and without PEMFUse of activated miniaturized device with PEMF |
| Control SHAM PEMF | Placebo comparator | Procedure: PEMF and Control/Sham, Device: PEMF and without PEMFUse of SHAM miniaturized device with PEMF (without Pulse) |
| Non-surgical treament of peri-implantitis with PEMF | Active comparator | Procedure: PEMF and Control/Sham, Device: PEMF and without PEMFUSE of PEMF on the microbiome modulation and bone formation under inflammatory conditions |
| Non-surgical treatment of peri-implantitis without PEMF | Placebo comparator | Procedure: PEMF and Control/Sham, Device: PEMF and without PEMFUSE of SHAM (no PEMF) on the microbiome modulation and bone formation under inflammatory conditions |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Bone formation
- good systemic and oral health
- sufficient native bone to place implants of 3.0 mm diameter and 10 mm length for the bone formation arm
- treatment of peri-implantitis
- patients aged 18-85 years with evidence of peri-implant crestal bone loss greater than 3mm but not more than 5mm;
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- patients consuming medications that might affect soft and hard tissue healing/health (such as calcium channel blockers, immunosuppressive, and anticonvulsive medications)
- patients currently taking systemic antibiotics
- chronic use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) on a long-term basis (excluding low dose aspirin);
- presence of a pacemaker; patients with periodontal disease;
- cigarette smoking of more than 10 cigarettes a day
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PEMF and Control/ShamAlso: Bone regeneration, Treatment of peri-implantitisUse o PEMF on test implants (treatment of peri-implantitis and bone formation) Use of PEMF on experimental implants (Bone-to-implant contact) | Procedure or surgery | Control SHAM PEMF, Non-surgical treament of peri-implantitis with PEMF, Non-surgical treatment of peri-implantitis without PEMF, PEMF and Bone Formation |
| PEMF and without PEMFAlso: Treatment of peri-implantitisUse o PEMF on test implants (treatment of peri-implantitis and bone formation) | Device | Control SHAM PEMF, Non-surgical treament of peri-implantitis with PEMF, Non-surgical treatment of peri-implantitis without PEMF, PEMF and Bone Formation |
Primary outcome
Non-surgical Treatment of peri-implantitis
Time frame: 12 months
reduction of probing depth
Bone formations under PEMF
Time frame: 2 months
BIC% increase
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Jul 2024.
- Background: PubMed 32993357Faveri M, Miquelleto DEC, Bueno-Silva B, Pingueiro JMS, Figueiredo LC, Dolkart O, Yakobson E, Barak S, Feres M, Shibli JA. Antimicrobial effects of a pulsed electromagnetic field: an in vitro polymicrobial periodontal subgingival biofilm model. Biofouling. 2020 Aug;36(7):862-869. doi: 10.1080/08927014.2020.1825694. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Periodontitis
Recruiting
Effect of Cryotherapeutic and Nanotherapeutic Sodium Hypochlorite on Post-Operative Endodontic Pain.
Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis, Symptomatic Apical Periodontitis
Active, not recruitingObservational study
A Retrospective Comparative Evaluation of Omega-3 and Resveratrol Supplementation in Patients With Periodontitis
Periodontitis
Recruiting
Probiotics Versus Antibiotics as an Adjuvant to Non-surgical Periodontal Treatment Among Smokers With Stage II, Grade B Periodontitis
Probiotics, Antibiotics
Recruiting
Effects of Different Activation Techniques on Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy in Apical Periodontitis
Apical Periodontitis, Endodontic Retreatment
Recruiting
Ozone Gel Versus Chlorohexidine Gel as an Adjunct to Non-Surgical Treatment of Stage II Periodontitis Grade B Among Smokers Patients
Ozone Gel, Chlorohexidine Gel
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jamil Shibli principal investigator
Guaurlhos University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing PEMF and without PEMF in people with Periodontitis and Dental Plaque, run by University of Guarulhos at 1 site in Brazil.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Jul 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Non-surgical Treatment of peri-implantitis (time frame: 12 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06516523, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Jul 2024.