Retinopathy of PrematurityNCT06517836
Automated Screening Device to Detect MTMROP
A study testing iROP DL in people with Retinopathy of Prematurity and ROP, run by Siloam Vision at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the i-ROP DL system for autonomous ROP screening. To demonstrate the sensitivity and specificity of the i-ROP DL system on images obtained by healthcare providers in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) setting to detect more than mild ROP (MTMROP), defined as type 2 or worse… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 4 weeks to 2 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Retinopathy of Prematurity, ROP
- What is being tested?
- iROP DL
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1,284 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 20 Oct 2024to 1 Mar 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 4 weeks to 2 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Eligible subjects under protocol e-ROP, defined as Infants with birth weight (BW) less than 1251 g meeting current ROP screening.
- All examinations will be eligible for inclusion regardless of the e-ROP label for image quality.
- Cases are collected during the telemedicine-based remote digital fundus imaging (RDFI-TM) evaluations.
Who cannot join
- Postmenstrual age greater than 39 weeks at first opportunity for imaging unless transferred in for ROP treatment.
- Admission to a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) with regressing or treated ROP.
- Significant media opacity precluding visualization of the retina.
- Major ocular or systemic congenital abnormality.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Oregon Health and Sciences University
Portland, Oregon, 97239
About this study
Official title: Validation Study of i-ROP DL, an Automated Screening Device to Detect More Than Mild Retinopathy of Prematurity (MTMROP)
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the i-ROP DL system for autonomous ROP screening. To demonstrate the sensitivity and specificity of the i-ROP DL system on images obtained by healthcare providers in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) setting to detect more than mild ROP (MTMROP), defined as type 2 or worse (as defined by the Early Treatment for ROP [ETROP] study), or pre-plus, compared to an image-based reference standard diagnosis (RSD).
This study will utilize a large multicenter dataset of images obtained as part of the Multicenter Telemedicine Approaches to Evaluating Acute-phase ROP (e-ROP) Study, a National Institute of Health multicenter study.
Read the detailed description
Retinopathy of prematurity is a disease that develops when babies are born prematurely, before the retina has fully developed. It is a leading cause of childhood blindness worldwide, but blindness is usually avoidable with accurate diagnosis, and timely treatment of babies with treatment-requiring disease. The purpose of diagnostic eye exams therefore (sometimes referred to as "ROP screening" examinations by clinicians) is to identify severe disease that requires treatment, and administer treatment, to reduce the risk of blindness.
Each country has accepted criteria for which babies require eye examinations for ROP. In the United States, all babies born less than 31 weeks post-menstrual age (PMA) or under 1500 grams require diagnostic eye examinations starting at 31 weeks PMA or 4 weeks after birth, whichever is later. Exams are repeated at 1-2 week intervals depending on the level of disease identified on examination.
Diagnosis of ROP is made using either ophthalmoscopy (in person examination at the bedside) or using telemedicine with remote digital fundus imaging. Telemedicine has become an acceptable standard of care for ROP diagnostic examinations, and in most telemedicine workflows, exams are repeated weekly to minimize the risk of missing ROP. Whether exams occur in person or via telemedicine, the ophthalmologist is responsible for documenting the presence or absence of ROP using the International Classification of ROP (ICROP) guidelines, including documenting the presence and degree of zone, stage, and plus disease.
The zone, stage and plus disease classifications lead to overall disease severity categories, as defined by the Early Treatment for ROP (ETROP) study (see Table). The ETROP study determined that urgent treatment (within 48 hours) should occur when babies develop "type 1" ROP, but was not indicated for babies with type 2 ROP or less. Follow-up guidelines are determined by the responsible physician based on the level of disease, although in telemedicine these typically occur weekly.
ROP "screening" criteria are designed to be highly sensitive so that babies with any risk of developing type 1 ROP are captured in the screening population and receive diagnostic eye examinations. As a result, most babies who receive examinations do not have severe ROP on examination. ROP examinations (especially in person ophthalmoscopic examinations where scleral depression is utilized) are stressful to the neonates, and time consuming to the ophthalmologist, and thus the current system is inefficient and exposes neonates to added stress, which can have significant short and long-term consequences . The ideal solution would be to reduce the number of in person examinations a baby receives without missing any cases of type 1 ROP, and limit the number of diagnostic eye examinations an ophthalmologist needs to perform to those babies with more than mild ROP (type 2 or worse).
This scenario is directly analogous to diabetic retinopathy, where the recommendation is for all diabetics to have an eye examination every year, even though only a small minority will have treatment-requiring disease. In diabetic retinopathy, autonomous AI has provided an alternative care delivery model where screening examinations occur in the primary care office, and only positive screens are sent for full ophthalmoscopic examination by an eye care provider.
In this clinical study, we are proposing to use the i-ROP DL system as an autonomous screening software as medical device for the detection of "more than mild ROP" (MTMROP) defined as type 2 or type 1 ROP using ETROP criteria. Digital images can be acquired by a technician in a standardized fashion. The system can analyze the images and output a positive or negative exam result.
- A positive result triggers a referral for telemedical review by an ophthalmologist using the same set of images (does not require additional stress to babies). The responsible clinician can document the level of ROP and recommend either in person examination for possible treatment, or repeat screening examination or telemedical review at the appropriate interval.
- A negative result automatically triggers a scheduled follow-up appointment for repeated screening examination in 1 week.
The i-ROP DL system was originally trained to diagnose plus disease at 3 levels (no plus, pre-plus or plus ). Subsequent work using the outputs for plus disease classification, we developed the concept of a "vascular severity score" (VSS) as an output of the system. The VSS is applied at the eye level from 1-9 and reflects the spectrum of vascular changes in pre-plus and plus disease. Because pre-plus and plus disease develop in more severe ROP, the VSS can be used as an objective assessment of ROP severity, increasing with increasing stage of disease, and overall category of ROP.
Thus, with the appropriate cut-point, the VSS can be used for screening purposes ensuring nearly 100% sensitivity for detection of treatment-requiring (type 1) ROP, and high sensitivity for detection of type 2 (or worse) ROP. The cut-point for this study will be >=2.9.
This study will utilize a large multicenter dataset of images obtained as part of the Multicenter Telemedicine Approaches to Evaluating Acute-phase ROP (e-ROP) Study, a National Institute of Health multicenter study.
Importantly, the e-ROP study was designed and executed prospectively to evaluate telemedical eye examinations compared to in person ophthalmoscopic examinations. Digital fundus images were acquired using the Retcam Shuttle by trained technicians using a standardized protocol for image acquisition. Images were then subsequently read by telemedical graders. All babies received in person ophthalmological examinations by ophthalmologists who were masked to the images and were not part of the image acquisition process. In other words, the study was perfectly designed to evaluate an autonomous screening model for ROP where images are acquired by non-physicians using a defined protocol at the point of care and only positive exams are subsequently reviewed by the ophthalmologist.
- Conditions
- Retinopathy of Prematurity, ROP
- Being tested
- iROP DL
- Keywords
- Retinopathy of Prematurity, ROP
- Medical subject headings
- Retinopathy of Prematurity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
iROP DLDevice
First, to evaluate the i-ROP DL system for autonomous ROP screening. To demonstrate the sensitivity and specificity of the i-ROP DL system on images obtained by technicians in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) setting to detect more than mild ROP (MTMROP), defined as type 2 or worse from the Early Treatment for ROP study) compared to an image-based reference standard diagnosis (RSD).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| eROP data | Experimental | Not described Receives: Device: iROP DL |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
sensitivity and specificity of the i-ROP DL system
sensitivity and specificity of the I-ROP DL system for more than mild ROP and treatment requiring (type 1) ROP
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Jul 2024
- Study start20 Oct 2024
- Primary completion1 Jan 2025
- Study completion1 Mar 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Retinopathy of PrematurityStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 1,284 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Siloam Vision
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- National Eye Institute (NEI)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- John P Campbell, MD/MPH, Principal investigator, Oregon Health and Science University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06517836
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SVCT-002
- Other IDs
- 1R44EY035596-01
- Status last verified
- Dec 2025
- First submitted
- 18 Jul 2024
- Last updated
- 18 Dec 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Dec 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Validation Study of i-ROP DL, an Automated Screening Device to Detect More Than Mild Retinopathy of Prematurity (MTMROP)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06517836
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SVCT-002
- Conditions
- Retinopathy of Prematurity, ROP
- Keywords
- Retinopathy of Prematurity, ROP
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,284 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Siloam VisionIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- National Eye Institute (NEI)
- Study start
- 20 Oct 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jan 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Mar 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 24 Jul 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the i-ROP DL system for autonomous ROP screening. To demonstrate the sensitivity and specificity of the i-ROP DL system on images obtained by healthcare providers in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) setting to detect more than mild ROP (MTMROP), defined as type 2 or worse (as defined by the Early Treatment for ROP [ETROP] study), or pre-plus, compared to an image-based reference standard diagnosis (RSD).
This study will utilize a large multicenter dataset of images obtained as part of the Multicenter Telemedicine Approaches to Evaluating Acute-phase ROP (e-ROP) Study, a National Institute of Health multicenter study.
Detailed description
Retinopathy of prematurity is a disease that develops when babies are born prematurely, before the retina has fully developed. It is a leading cause of childhood blindness worldwide, but blindness is usually avoidable with accurate diagnosis, and timely treatment of babies with treatment-requiring disease. The purpose of diagnostic eye exams therefore (sometimes referred to as "ROP screening" examinations by clinicians) is to identify severe disease that requires treatment, and administer treatment, to reduce the risk of blindness.
Each country has accepted criteria for which babies require eye examinations for ROP. In the United States, all babies born less than 31 weeks post-menstrual age (PMA) or under 1500 grams require diagnostic eye examinations starting at 31 weeks PMA or 4 weeks after birth, whichever is later. Exams are repeated at 1-2 week intervals depending on the level of disease identified on examination.
Diagnosis of ROP is made using either ophthalmoscopy (in person examination at the bedside) or using telemedicine with remote digital fundus imaging. Telemedicine has become an acceptable standard of care for ROP diagnostic examinations, and in most telemedicine workflows, exams are repeated weekly to minimize the risk of missing ROP. Whether exams occur in person or via telemedicine, the ophthalmologist is responsible for documenting the presence or absence of ROP using the International Classification of ROP (ICROP) guidelines, including documenting the presence and degree of zone, stage, and plus disease.
The zone, stage and plus disease classifications lead to overall disease severity categories, as defined by the Early Treatment for ROP (ETROP) study (see Table). The ETROP study determined that urgent treatment (within 48 hours) should occur when babies develop "type 1" ROP, but was not indicated for babies with type 2 ROP or less. Follow-up guidelines are determined by the responsible physician based on the level of disease, although in telemedicine these typically occur weekly.
ROP "screening" criteria are designed to be highly sensitive so that babies with any risk of developing type 1 ROP are captured in the screening population and receive diagnostic eye examinations. As a result, most babies who receive examinations do not have severe ROP on examination. ROP examinations (especially in person ophthalmoscopic examinations where scleral depression is utilized) are stressful to the neonates, and time consuming to the ophthalmologist, and thus the current system is inefficient and exposes neonates to added stress, which can have significant short and long-term consequences . The ideal solution would be to reduce the number of in person examinations a baby receives without missing any cases of type 1 ROP, and limit the number of diagnostic eye examinations an ophthalmologist needs to perform to those babies with more than mild ROP (type 2 or worse).
This scenario is directly analogous to diabetic retinopathy, where the recommendation is for all diabetics to have an eye examination every year, even though only a small minority will have treatment-requiring disease. In diabetic retinopathy, autonomous AI has provided an alternative care delivery model where screening examinations occur in the primary care office, and only positive screens are sent for full ophthalmoscopic examination by an eye care provider.
In this clinical study, we are proposing to use the i-ROP DL system as an autonomous screening software as medical device for the detection of "more than mild ROP" (MTMROP) defined as type 2 or type 1 ROP using ETROP criteria. Digital images can be acquired by a technician in a standardized fashion. The system can analyze the images and output a positive or negative exam result.
- A positive result triggers a referral for telemedical review by an ophthalmologist using the same set of images (does not require additional stress to babies). The responsible clinician can document the level of ROP and recommend either in person examination for possible treatment, or repeat screening examination or telemedical review at the appropriate interval.
- A negative result automatically triggers a scheduled follow-up appointment for repeated screening examination in 1 week.
The i-ROP DL system was originally trained to diagnose plus disease at 3 levels (no plus, pre-plus or plus ). Subsequent work using the outputs for plus disease classification, we developed the concept of a "vascular severity score" (VSS) as an output of the system. The VSS is applied at the eye level from 1-9 and reflects the spectrum of vascular changes in pre-plus and plus disease. Because pre-plus and plus disease develop in more severe ROP, the VSS can be used as an objective assessment of ROP severity, increasing with increasing stage of disease, and overall category of ROP.
Thus, with the appropriate cut-point, the VSS can be used for screening purposes ensuring nearly 100% sensitivity for detection of treatment-requiring (type 1) ROP, and high sensitivity for detection of type 2 (or worse) ROP. The cut-point for this study will be >=2.9.
This study will utilize a large multicenter dataset of images obtained as part of the Multicenter Telemedicine Approaches to Evaluating Acute-phase ROP (e-ROP) Study, a National Institute of Health multicenter study.
Importantly, the e-ROP study was designed and executed prospectively to evaluate telemedical eye examinations compared to in person ophthalmoscopic examinations. Digital fundus images were acquired using the Retcam Shuttle by trained technicians using a standardized protocol for image acquisition. Images were then subsequently read by telemedical graders. All babies received in person ophthalmological examinations by ophthalmologists who were masked to the images and were not part of the image acquisition process. In other words, the study was perfectly designed to evaluate an autonomous screening model for ROP where images are acquired by non-physicians using a defined protocol at the point of care and only positive exams are subsequently reviewed by the ophthalmologist.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| eROP data | Experimental | Device: iROP DL |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 4 weeks to 2 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Eligible subjects under protocol e-ROP, defined as Infants with birth weight (BW) less than 1251 g meeting current ROP screening.
- All examinations will be eligible for inclusion regardless of the e-ROP label for image quality.
- Cases are collected during the telemedicine-based remote digital fundus imaging (RDFI-TM) evaluations.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Postmenstrual age greater than 39 weeks at first opportunity for imaging unless transferred in for ROP treatment.
- Admission to a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) with regressing or treated ROP.
- Significant media opacity precluding visualization of the retina.
- Major ocular or systemic congenital abnormality.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| iROP DLFirst, to evaluate the i-ROP DL system for autonomous ROP screening. To demonstrate the sensitivity and specificity of the i-ROP DL system on images obtained by technicians in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) setting to detect more than mild ROP (MTMROP), defined as type 2 or worse from the Early Treatment for ROP study) compared to an image-based reference standard diagnosis (RSD). | Device | eROP data |
Primary outcome
sensitivity and specificity of the i-ROP DL system
Time frame: 6 months
sensitivity and specificity of the I-ROP DL system for more than mild ROP and treatment requiring (type 1) ROP
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Dec 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Retinopathy of Prematurity
RecruitingObservational study
The Correlation Between Red Cell Transfusion and Complications of Prematurity
Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP), Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia (BPD)
RecruitingObservational study
An Observational Study to Collect Data on How Aflibercept (Eylea) Given Using a Paediatric Dosing Device is Used in Preterm Babies With Retinopathy of Prematurity in the United Kingdom (UK)
Retinopathy of Prematurity, Preterm Infants
RecruitingObservational study
Imaging Retinal Vasculature in Infant Eyes
Retinopathy of Prematurity
RecruitingPhase 1
Safety, PK and PD of FLQ-101 in Premature Neonates
Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP)
Recruiting
Analyzing Retinal Microanatomy in Retinopathy of Prematurity to Improve Care
Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
John P Campbell, MD/MPH principal investigator
Oregon Health and Science University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing iROP DL in people with Retinopathy of Prematurity and ROP, run by Siloam Vision at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Dec 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
sensitivity and specificity of the i-ROP DL system (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Dec 2025.