AzTrials
AzTrials

Femoral Neck FracturesNCT06521671

Evaluation of Fracture Migration After Internal Fixation of Femoral Neck Fractures in Younger Adults: A Clinical RCT Using RSA

A study testing Dynaloc implant, Cannulated cancellous screws and Sliding hip screw in people with Femoral Neck Fractures and Internal Fixation; Complications, run by Odense University Hospital at 4 sites in Denmark.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of the clinical trial is to compare different surgical methods for internal fixation of femoral neck fractures in younger adults. The main question it aims to answer is: Is internal fixation with the novel implant consisting of three angle stable screws locked together by a plate equal to internal fixation… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
What is being tested?
Dynaloc implant, Cannulated cancellous screws and Sliding hip screw
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
75 participants
Where
4 sitesDenmark
Study dates
16 Jun 2025to Dec 2028
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Femoral neck fracture (DS720)
  • Age 18-64 years
  • Ability to speak and read Danish
  • Willingness to participate

Who cannot join

  • Pathological, basicervical or transcervical fracture
  • Clinical Frailty Scale ≥5, indicating mild to severe frailty prior to the fracture
  • Cognitive impairment that hinders informed consent
  • Previous fracture in the ipsilateral femur
  • Patients who are unwilling or incapable of following post-operative care instructions.
  • Comorbidities making the participant ineligible for internal fixation such as:
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Material sensitivity, documented or suspected
  • Active or suspected latent infection, sepsis or marked local inflammation in or around the surgical area
  • Compromised vascularity, inadequate skin or neurovascular status
  • Compromised bone stock that cannot provide adequate support and/or fixation of the device due to disease, infection or prior implantation
  • Other physical, mental, medical or surgical conditions that would preclude the potential benefit of surgery.

Trial locations and contacts

4 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Michaela Manalili Hansen, MD contact

+4560808836

michaela.manalili.hansen@rsyd.dk

Denmark4 sites, 4 recruiting
  • Aarhus University Hospital

    Aarhus

    Hansen, +4560808836, michaela.manalili.hansen@rsyd.dk

    Recruiting
  • Regional Hospital Gødstrup

    Gødstrup

    Hansen, +4560808836, michaela.manalili.hansen@rsyd.dk

    Recruiting
  • Hvidovre Hospital

    Hvidovre

    Hansen, +4560808836, michaela.manalili.hansen@rsyd.dk

    Not yet recruiting
  • Odense University Hospital

    Odense

    Hansen, +4560808836, michaela.manalili.hansen@rsyd.dk

    Recruiting

Other trials in Denmark

About this study

Official title: Evaluation of Femoral Neck Fracture Migration After Internal Fixation With an Angle Stable Implant Compared With Gold Standard Cannulated Cancellous Screws in Young Adults: Study Protocol for a Clinical RCT Using Radiostereometric Analysis

The goal of the clinical trial is to compare different surgical methods for internal fixation of femoral neck fractures in younger adults.

The main question it aims to answer is:

Read more

Is internal fixation with the novel implant consisting of three angle stable screws locked together by a plate equal to internal fixation with cancellous screws or a sliding hip screw in younger adults under 65 years of age in terms of fracture migration?

The study will examine how stable the fracture remains during healing. This will be measured by assessing how much the fracture moves after surgery using a highly precise imaging method called radiostereometric analysis (RSA). The study will also record complications and evaluate pain, health related quality of life, and hip function over time.

The participants will be treated with either a novel angle stable implant (Dynaloc), cannulated cancellous screws or sliding hip screw and followed up at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months and 12 months. Recruitment will continue until 75 participants, 25 in each group, have completed the 12-week follow-up for the primary outcome.

Read the detailed description

Objective The overall purpose of the study is to assess internal fixation methods for femoral neck fractures in adults under 65 years of age. The primary objective is to compare fracture migration following internal fixation with a novel angle-stable implant (Dynaloc, Swemac) and cannulated cancellous screws (CCS), using fracture migration as the primary outcome.

In addition, a cohort of patients treated with a sliding hip screw (SHS) as part of standard care will be included to provide an additional basis for comparison.

Dynaloc, CCS, and SHS are all CE-marked medical devices used in accordance with the manufacturers' intended use.

Trial design The study is designed as a multicentre, single-blinded randomised controlled trial with radiostereometric analysis (RSA), including an additional prospective cohort.

Patients undergoing internal fixation with Dynaloc or CCS will be randomised, while patients treated with a sliding hip screw will be followed as a separate cohort using the same imaging and follow-up protocol.

Interventions Eligible patients will be randomised to internal fixation with either three CCS or the Dynaloc implant.

Patients who do not undergo randomisation and are treated with SHS as standard care may be included in a prospective cohort and followed according to the study protocol.

All surgical procedures will be performed according to the manufacturers' surgical techniques and instructions for use.

Sample size calculation The primary outcome is shortening of the femoral neck at 12 weeks. A clinically relevant difference is defined as femoral neck shortening greater than 5 mm. Femoral neck shortening in patients treated with CCS is expected to be 5.3 mm (SD 4.5 mm) at 6 weeks, and no further clinically relevant shortening is expected between 6 and 12 weeks.

Using a power of 0.9, a significance level of 0.05, and assuming a maximum femoral neck shortening of 1 mm in the Dynaloc group compared with 5.3 mm (SD 4.5 mm) in the CCS group, a total sample size of 50 randomised patients (25 per group) is required.

In addition, a cohort of 25 patients treated with a sliding hip screw will be included for comparative purposes.

Inclusion will continue until all 50 randomised patients and all 25 cohort patients have completed the 12-week follow-up for the primary outcome. Due to the rarity of femoral neck fractures in this age group, up to approximately 20% additional patients may be included to ensure complete 12-week follow-up.

Randomization/allocation After informed consent is obtained, eligible patients will be enrolled and entered into an electronic database. Patients will be randomised to either CCS or Dynaloc using block randomisation with block sizes of 4 and 6. Randomisation will be stratified by Garden classification (Garden 1-2 vs. 3-4) to account for fracture displacement and by hospital of admission.

The operating surgeon will contact a central coordinator to perform the randomisation prior to surgery and will therefore know the allocated implant before entering the operating theatre.

Blinding Participants and care providers will be blinded to the allocated implant. A standardised description of the surgical procedure will be used. Treatment allocation will remain blinded during statistical analyses.

Data Collection Project staff will collect clinical data, CT scans, and radiostereometric X-rays and perform image analyses using AutoRSA. Screening will be conducted by the admitting physician. Baseline data will be collected during admission and entered directly into REDCap by project personnel.

Patient-reported outcome questionnaires will be distributed electronically via REDCap, with responses automatically uploaded to the database. Follow-up visits will take place in the outpatient clinic, where project personnel will complete and verify data entry.

Statistical methods Treatment groups will remain blinded during statistical analyses. Data distribution will be assessed and results presented accordingly. Continuous outcomes will be analysed using linear mixed-effects models, and categorical variables will be compared using χ² or Fisher's exact tests, as appropriate.

A p-value of <0.05 will be considered statistically significant. Postoperative complication rates will be defined as the combined incidence of complications and reoperations. Mortality will be analysed using Cox regression. Statistical analyses and graphical presentation will be performed using STATA 18 (StataCorp).

Being tested
Dynaloc implant, Cannulated cancellous screws, Sliding hip screw
Keywords
femoral neck fracture, radiostereometric analysis, hip fracture, internal fixation
Medical subject headings
Femoral Neck Fractures, Hip Fractures

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Dynaloc implantDevice

    Internal fixation with Dynaloc implant

  • Cannulated cancellous screwsDevice

    Internal fixation with two or three cannulated cancellous screws

  • Sliding hip screwDevice

    Internal fixation with a sliding hip screw

Study groups in NCT06521671
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
DynalocExperimentalRandomisation
Receives: Device: Dynaloc implant
Cannulated cancellous screwsActive comparatorRandomisation
Receives: Device: Cannulated cancellous screws
Sliding hip screwActive comparatorProspective cohort
Receives: Device: Sliding hip screw

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Static fracture migration

    Static non-weight bearing fracture migration in a supine set-up

    Measured: 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Static fracture migration

    Static non-weight bearing fracture migration in a supine set-up

    Measured: 6 weeks

  2. New mobility score

    Assessment of gait. 0-9 points

    Measured: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks

  3. Modified Harris Hip Score

    Measure of hip dysfunction. <70 = poor result; 70-80 = fair, 80-90 = good, and 90-100 = excellent.

    Measured: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks

  4. EQ-5D-5L

    Health related Quality of Life

    Measured: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks

  5. Pain VRS

    Pain verbal rating scale 0-10

    Measured: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks

  6. Reoperation

    Any secondary operation

    Measured: 0-12 weeks

  7. Complication

    Any complication (non-union, avascular necrosis of the femoral head, fixation failure)

    Measured: 0-12 weeks

  8. Mortality

    Death

    Measured: 0-12 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Jul 2024
  2. Study start16 Jun 2025
  3. Primary completionDec 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2028 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider
Enrolment
75 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06521671
Sponsor's protocol ID
2401073
Status last verified
Jan 2026
First submitted
22 Jul 2024
Last updated
27 Jan 2026
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Hansen MM, Petersen ET, Gundtoft PH, Jensen J, Stilling M, Ding M, Viberg B. Evaluation of femoral neck fracture migration after internal fixation with an angle stable implant compared with gold standard cannulated cancellous screws in young adults: study protocol for a clinical RCT using radiostereometric analysis. Trials. 2026 Feb 7;27(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s13063-026-09497-7.

    PubMed 41652608

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Dynaloc implant, Cannulated cancellous screws and Sliding hip screw in people with Femoral Neck Fractures and Internal Fixation; Complications, run by Odense University Hospital at 4 sites in Denmark.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 4 sites in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Michaela Manalili Hansen, MD (+4560808836, michaela.manalili.hansen@rsyd.dk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Static fracture migration (time frame: 12 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06521671, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Jan 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in