Femoral Neck FracturesNCT06521671
Evaluation of Fracture Migration After Internal Fixation of Femoral Neck Fractures in Younger Adults: A Clinical RCT Using RSA
A study testing Dynaloc implant, Cannulated cancellous screws and Sliding hip screw in people with Femoral Neck Fractures and Internal Fixation; Complications, run by Odense University Hospital at 4 sites in Denmark.
Trial summary
The goal of the clinical trial is to compare different surgical methods for internal fixation of femoral neck fractures in younger adults. The main question it aims to answer is: Is internal fixation with the novel implant consisting of three angle stable screws locked together by a plate equal to internal fixation… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Femoral Neck Fractures, Internal Fixation; Complications, Hip Fractures
- What is being tested?
- Dynaloc implant, Cannulated cancellous screws and Sliding hip screw
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 75 participants
- Where
- 4 sitesDenmark
- Study dates
- 16 Jun 2025to Dec 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Femoral neck fracture (DS720)
- Age 18-64 years
- Ability to speak and read Danish
- Willingness to participate
Who cannot join
- Pathological, basicervical or transcervical fracture
- Clinical Frailty Scale ≥5, indicating mild to severe frailty prior to the fracture
- Cognitive impairment that hinders informed consent
- Previous fracture in the ipsilateral femur
- Patients who are unwilling or incapable of following post-operative care instructions.
- Comorbidities making the participant ineligible for internal fixation such as:
Show all 11Show fewer
- Material sensitivity, documented or suspected
- Active or suspected latent infection, sepsis or marked local inflammation in or around the surgical area
- Compromised vascularity, inadequate skin or neurovascular status
- Compromised bone stock that cannot provide adequate support and/or fixation of the device due to disease, infection or prior implantation
- Other physical, mental, medical or surgical conditions that would preclude the potential benefit of surgery.
Trial locations and contacts
4 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Denmark4 sites, 4 recruiting
- Recruiting
Aarhus University Hospital
Aarhus
Hansen, +4560808836, michaela.manalili.hansen@rsyd.dk
- Recruiting
Regional Hospital Gødstrup
Gødstrup
Hansen, +4560808836, michaela.manalili.hansen@rsyd.dk
- Not yet recruiting
Hvidovre Hospital
Hvidovre
Hansen, +4560808836, michaela.manalili.hansen@rsyd.dk
- Recruiting
Odense University Hospital
Odense
Hansen, +4560808836, michaela.manalili.hansen@rsyd.dk
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of Femoral Neck Fracture Migration After Internal Fixation With an Angle Stable Implant Compared With Gold Standard Cannulated Cancellous Screws in Young Adults: Study Protocol for a Clinical RCT Using Radiostereometric Analysis
The goal of the clinical trial is to compare different surgical methods for internal fixation of femoral neck fractures in younger adults.
The main question it aims to answer is:
Read more
Is internal fixation with the novel implant consisting of three angle stable screws locked together by a plate equal to internal fixation with cancellous screws or a sliding hip screw in younger adults under 65 years of age in terms of fracture migration?
The study will examine how stable the fracture remains during healing. This will be measured by assessing how much the fracture moves after surgery using a highly precise imaging method called radiostereometric analysis (RSA). The study will also record complications and evaluate pain, health related quality of life, and hip function over time.
The participants will be treated with either a novel angle stable implant (Dynaloc), cannulated cancellous screws or sliding hip screw and followed up at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months and 12 months. Recruitment will continue until 75 participants, 25 in each group, have completed the 12-week follow-up for the primary outcome.
Read the detailed description
Objective The overall purpose of the study is to assess internal fixation methods for femoral neck fractures in adults under 65 years of age. The primary objective is to compare fracture migration following internal fixation with a novel angle-stable implant (Dynaloc, Swemac) and cannulated cancellous screws (CCS), using fracture migration as the primary outcome.
In addition, a cohort of patients treated with a sliding hip screw (SHS) as part of standard care will be included to provide an additional basis for comparison.
Dynaloc, CCS, and SHS are all CE-marked medical devices used in accordance with the manufacturers' intended use.
Trial design The study is designed as a multicentre, single-blinded randomised controlled trial with radiostereometric analysis (RSA), including an additional prospective cohort.
Patients undergoing internal fixation with Dynaloc or CCS will be randomised, while patients treated with a sliding hip screw will be followed as a separate cohort using the same imaging and follow-up protocol.
Interventions Eligible patients will be randomised to internal fixation with either three CCS or the Dynaloc implant.
Patients who do not undergo randomisation and are treated with SHS as standard care may be included in a prospective cohort and followed according to the study protocol.
All surgical procedures will be performed according to the manufacturers' surgical techniques and instructions for use.
Sample size calculation The primary outcome is shortening of the femoral neck at 12 weeks. A clinically relevant difference is defined as femoral neck shortening greater than 5 mm. Femoral neck shortening in patients treated with CCS is expected to be 5.3 mm (SD 4.5 mm) at 6 weeks, and no further clinically relevant shortening is expected between 6 and 12 weeks.
Using a power of 0.9, a significance level of 0.05, and assuming a maximum femoral neck shortening of 1 mm in the Dynaloc group compared with 5.3 mm (SD 4.5 mm) in the CCS group, a total sample size of 50 randomised patients (25 per group) is required.
In addition, a cohort of 25 patients treated with a sliding hip screw will be included for comparative purposes.
Inclusion will continue until all 50 randomised patients and all 25 cohort patients have completed the 12-week follow-up for the primary outcome. Due to the rarity of femoral neck fractures in this age group, up to approximately 20% additional patients may be included to ensure complete 12-week follow-up.
Randomization/allocation After informed consent is obtained, eligible patients will be enrolled and entered into an electronic database. Patients will be randomised to either CCS or Dynaloc using block randomisation with block sizes of 4 and 6. Randomisation will be stratified by Garden classification (Garden 1-2 vs. 3-4) to account for fracture displacement and by hospital of admission.
The operating surgeon will contact a central coordinator to perform the randomisation prior to surgery and will therefore know the allocated implant before entering the operating theatre.
Blinding Participants and care providers will be blinded to the allocated implant. A standardised description of the surgical procedure will be used. Treatment allocation will remain blinded during statistical analyses.
Data Collection Project staff will collect clinical data, CT scans, and radiostereometric X-rays and perform image analyses using AutoRSA. Screening will be conducted by the admitting physician. Baseline data will be collected during admission and entered directly into REDCap by project personnel.
Patient-reported outcome questionnaires will be distributed electronically via REDCap, with responses automatically uploaded to the database. Follow-up visits will take place in the outpatient clinic, where project personnel will complete and verify data entry.
Statistical methods Treatment groups will remain blinded during statistical analyses. Data distribution will be assessed and results presented accordingly. Continuous outcomes will be analysed using linear mixed-effects models, and categorical variables will be compared using χ² or Fisher's exact tests, as appropriate.
A p-value of <0.05 will be considered statistically significant. Postoperative complication rates will be defined as the combined incidence of complications and reoperations. Mortality will be analysed using Cox regression. Statistical analyses and graphical presentation will be performed using STATA 18 (StataCorp).
- Being tested
- Dynaloc implant, Cannulated cancellous screws, Sliding hip screw
- Keywords
- femoral neck fracture, radiostereometric analysis, hip fracture, internal fixation
- Medical subject headings
- Femoral Neck Fractures, Hip Fractures
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Dynaloc implantDevice
Internal fixation with Dynaloc implant
Cannulated cancellous screwsDevice
Internal fixation with two or three cannulated cancellous screws
Sliding hip screwDevice
Internal fixation with a sliding hip screw
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Dynaloc | Experimental | Randomisation Receives: Device: Dynaloc implant |
| Cannulated cancellous screws | Active comparator | Randomisation Receives: Device: Cannulated cancellous screws |
| Sliding hip screw | Active comparator | Prospective cohort Receives: Device: Sliding hip screw |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Static fracture migration
Static non-weight bearing fracture migration in a supine set-up
Measured: 12 weeks
Secondary outcomes (8)
Static fracture migration
Static non-weight bearing fracture migration in a supine set-up
Measured: 6 weeks
New mobility score
Assessment of gait. 0-9 points
Measured: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
Modified Harris Hip Score
Measure of hip dysfunction. <70 = poor result; 70-80 = fair, 80-90 = good, and 90-100 = excellent.
Measured: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
EQ-5D-5L
Health related Quality of Life
Measured: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
Pain VRS
Pain verbal rating scale 0-10
Measured: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
Reoperation
Any secondary operation
Measured: 0-12 weeks
Complication
Any complication (non-union, avascular necrosis of the femoral head, fixation failure)
Measured: 0-12 weeks
Mortality
Death
Measured: 0-12 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Jul 2024
- Study start16 Jun 2025
- Primary completionDec 2027 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Femoral Neck FracturesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Odense University HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider
- Enrolment
- 75 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Odense University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Aarhus University Hospital, Region of Southern Denmark, Swemac Innovation AB, Gødstrup Hospital
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Michaela Manalili Hansen, Odense University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06521671
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2401073
- Status last verified
- Jan 2026
- First submitted
- 22 Jul 2024
- Last updated
- 27 Jan 2026
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Hansen MM, Petersen ET, Gundtoft PH, Jensen J, Stilling M, Ding M, Viberg B. Evaluation of femoral neck fracture migration after internal fixation with an angle stable implant compared with gold standard cannulated cancellous screws in young adults: study protocol for a clinical RCT using radiostereometric analysis. Trials. 2026 Feb 7;27(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s13063-026-09497-7.
PubMed 41652608
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Jan 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of Femoral Neck Fracture Migration After Internal Fixation With an Angle Stable Implant Compared With Gold Standard Cannulated Cancellous Screws in Young Adults: Study Protocol for a Clinical RCT Using Radiostereometric Analysis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06521671
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2401073
- Keywords
- femoral neck fracture, radiostereometric analysis, hip fracture, internal fixation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 75 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Odense University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Aarhus University Hospital, Region of Southern Denmark, Swemac Innovation AB, Gødstrup Hospital
- Study start
- 16 Jun 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 26 Jul 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of the clinical trial is to compare different surgical methods for internal fixation of femoral neck fractures in younger adults.
The main question it aims to answer is:
Is internal fixation with the novel implant consisting of three angle stable screws locked together by a plate equal to internal fixation with cancellous screws or a sliding hip screw in younger adults under 65 years of age in terms of fracture migration?
The study will examine how stable the fracture remains during healing. This will be measured by assessing how much the fracture moves after surgery using a highly precise imaging method called radiostereometric analysis (RSA). The study will also record complications and evaluate pain, health related quality of life, and hip function over time.
The participants will be treated with either a novel angle stable implant (Dynaloc), cannulated cancellous screws or sliding hip screw and followed up at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months and 12 months. Recruitment will continue until 75 participants, 25 in each group, have completed the 12-week follow-up for the primary outcome.
Detailed description
Objective The overall purpose of the study is to assess internal fixation methods for femoral neck fractures in adults under 65 years of age. The primary objective is to compare fracture migration following internal fixation with a novel angle-stable implant (Dynaloc, Swemac) and cannulated cancellous screws (CCS), using fracture migration as the primary outcome.
In addition, a cohort of patients treated with a sliding hip screw (SHS) as part of standard care will be included to provide an additional basis for comparison.
Dynaloc, CCS, and SHS are all CE-marked medical devices used in accordance with the manufacturers' intended use.
Trial design The study is designed as a multicentre, single-blinded randomised controlled trial with radiostereometric analysis (RSA), including an additional prospective cohort.
Patients undergoing internal fixation with Dynaloc or CCS will be randomised, while patients treated with a sliding hip screw will be followed as a separate cohort using the same imaging and follow-up protocol.
Interventions Eligible patients will be randomised to internal fixation with either three CCS or the Dynaloc implant.
Patients who do not undergo randomisation and are treated with SHS as standard care may be included in a prospective cohort and followed according to the study protocol.
All surgical procedures will be performed according to the manufacturers' surgical techniques and instructions for use.
Sample size calculation The primary outcome is shortening of the femoral neck at 12 weeks. A clinically relevant difference is defined as femoral neck shortening greater than 5 mm. Femoral neck shortening in patients treated with CCS is expected to be 5.3 mm (SD 4.5 mm) at 6 weeks, and no further clinically relevant shortening is expected between 6 and 12 weeks.
Using a power of 0.9, a significance level of 0.05, and assuming a maximum femoral neck shortening of 1 mm in the Dynaloc group compared with 5.3 mm (SD 4.5 mm) in the CCS group, a total sample size of 50 randomised patients (25 per group) is required.
In addition, a cohort of 25 patients treated with a sliding hip screw will be included for comparative purposes.
Inclusion will continue until all 50 randomised patients and all 25 cohort patients have completed the 12-week follow-up for the primary outcome. Due to the rarity of femoral neck fractures in this age group, up to approximately 20% additional patients may be included to ensure complete 12-week follow-up.
Randomization/allocation After informed consent is obtained, eligible patients will be enrolled and entered into an electronic database. Patients will be randomised to either CCS or Dynaloc using block randomisation with block sizes of 4 and 6. Randomisation will be stratified by Garden classification (Garden 1-2 vs. 3-4) to account for fracture displacement and by hospital of admission.
The operating surgeon will contact a central coordinator to perform the randomisation prior to surgery and will therefore know the allocated implant before entering the operating theatre.
Blinding Participants and care providers will be blinded to the allocated implant. A standardised description of the surgical procedure will be used. Treatment allocation will remain blinded during statistical analyses.
Data Collection Project staff will collect clinical data, CT scans, and radiostereometric X-rays and perform image analyses using AutoRSA. Screening will be conducted by the admitting physician. Baseline data will be collected during admission and entered directly into REDCap by project personnel.
Patient-reported outcome questionnaires will be distributed electronically via REDCap, with responses automatically uploaded to the database. Follow-up visits will take place in the outpatient clinic, where project personnel will complete and verify data entry.
Statistical methods Treatment groups will remain blinded during statistical analyses. Data distribution will be assessed and results presented accordingly. Continuous outcomes will be analysed using linear mixed-effects models, and categorical variables will be compared using χ² or Fisher's exact tests, as appropriate.
A p-value of <0.05 will be considered statistically significant. Postoperative complication rates will be defined as the combined incidence of complications and reoperations. Mortality will be analysed using Cox regression. Statistical analyses and graphical presentation will be performed using STATA 18 (StataCorp).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, care provider)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Dynaloc | Experimental | Device: Dynaloc implantRandomisation |
| Cannulated cancellous screws | Active comparator | Device: Cannulated cancellous screwsRandomisation |
| Sliding hip screw | Active comparator | Device: Sliding hip screwProspective cohort |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Femoral neck fracture (DS720)
- Age 18-64 years
- Ability to speak and read Danish
- Willingness to participate
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Pathological, basicervical or transcervical fracture
- Clinical Frailty Scale ≥5, indicating mild to severe frailty prior to the fracture
- Cognitive impairment that hinders informed consent
- Previous fracture in the ipsilateral femur
- Patients who are unwilling or incapable of following post-operative care instructions.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Dynaloc implantInternal fixation with Dynaloc implant | Device | Dynaloc |
| Cannulated cancellous screwsInternal fixation with two or three cannulated cancellous screws | Device | Cannulated cancellous screws |
| Sliding hip screwInternal fixation with a sliding hip screw | Device | Sliding hip screw |
Primary outcome
Static fracture migration
Time frame: 12 weeks
Static non-weight bearing fracture migration in a supine set-up
8 secondary outcomes
Static fracture migration
Time frame: 6 weeks
New mobility score
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
Modified Harris Hip Score
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
EQ-5D-5L
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
Pain VRS
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
Reoperation
Time frame: 0-12 weeks
Complication
Time frame: 0-12 weeks
Mortality
Time frame: 0-12 weeks
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Jan 2026.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41652608Hansen MM, Petersen ET, Gundtoft PH, Jensen J, Stilling M, Ding M, Viberg B. Evaluation of femoral neck fracture migration after internal fixation with an angle stable implant compared with gold standard cannulated cancellous screws in young adults: study protocol for a clinical RCT using radiostereometric analysis. Trials. 2026 Feb 7;27(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s13063-026-09497-7.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Femoral Neck Fractures
Not yet recruiting
Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus PENG Block for Hip Fracture Surgery
Femur Neck Fracture, Hip Fractures
Active, not recruiting
Lumbar-Sacral Plexus Block vs Fascia Iliaca Block Plus Low-Dose Spinal Anesthesia for Femoral Neck Fracture Surgery
Femoral Neck Fractures, Nerve Block
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
BDSF Vs DHS With Anterotational Screw in Vertical FNF
Evaluation of BDSF in FNF
RecruitingObservational study
Z1 Hip System: Post-Market Clinical Follow Up Study
Hip Osteoarthritis, Acute Traumatic Fracture of the Femoral Head or Neck
Not yet recruiting
Trochanteric Bursa Repair and Lateral Hip Pain After Hemiarthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fracture
Femoral Neck Fracture
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
4 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Dynaloc implant, Cannulated cancellous screws and Sliding hip screw in people with Femoral Neck Fractures and Internal Fixation; Complications, run by Odense University Hospital at 4 sites in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 4 sites in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Michaela Manalili Hansen, MD (+4560808836, michaela.manalili.hansen@rsyd.dk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Static fracture migration (time frame: 12 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06521671, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Jan 2026.