AzTrials
AzTrials

Kidney CancerRein3DP-MNCT06525831

Rein 3D PRINT MECHANICS

A study testing MR-elastography exam and Ultrasound exam in people with Kidney Cancer, run by University Hospital, Bordeaux at 1 site in France.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this innovative project is to evaluate the correspondence between several imaging modalities for characterizing the elasticity of healthy and pathological renal tissue which could help improve the realism of 3D prints used by urological surgeons and allow the identification of new, complementary imaging… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Kidney Cancer
What is being tested?
MR-elastography exam and Ultrasound exam
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
50 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
7 Mar 2025to 7 May 2027
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adult patients (≥ 18 years of age)
  • Scheduled for surgical management with nephrectomy for kidney tumor in the urology department of Bordeaux University Hospital
  • CT scan available or scheduled for surgery
  • Consent expressed for integration of the UroCCR database
  • Expressed consent for participation in the Rein 3D Print Mechanics study
  • Patients affiliated or benefiting from social security system

Who cannot join

  • - Pregnant or breast-feeding women
  • Contraindication to MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging)
  • Contraindication to injection of gadoline contrast agents
  • Biopsy performed within 15 days prior to MRI, CT and ultrasound scans (risk of artifactual alteration, via iatrogenic hemorrhagic changes, of the biomechanical properties of the renal tumor and parenchyma).
  • Presence of thoracolumbar arthrodesis material
  • Obese patient (body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m²)
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Cystic renal tumors with solid component (corresponding to either parietal thickening or tumor bud) < 2 cm
  • Necrotic renal tumors with solid component (corresponding to either parietal thickening or tumor bud) < 2 cm
  • Ascites
  • Person under legal protection
  • Difficulty understanding and expressing in French

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

France1 site, 1 recruiting
  • CHU de Bordeaux

    Bordeaux, 33076

    Eva FOURAGE, Dr

    Recruiting

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Multimodal Imaging of the Biomechanical Properties of Kidney Tumors: Feasibility, Inter-modality Correspondence and Diagnostic Value

The goal of this innovative project is to evaluate the correspondence between several imaging modalities for characterizing the elasticity of healthy and pathological renal tissue which could help improve the realism of 3D prints used by urological surgeons and allow the identification of new, complementary imaging biomarkers. The main objective is to develop a predictive model of the biomechanical properties of normal and pathological kidney tissue, as assessed by the reference method (Magnetic Resonance (MR)-elastography).

Read the detailed description

Medical imaging plays a key role in the diagnostic and therapeutic management of renal cell carcinomas. It can be used to confirm the presence of a tumor, localize it, suggest malignancy or even histological subtype, guide sampling, perform TNM staging, assist in surgical scheduling, monitor therapeutic efficacy in the event of systemic treatment, guide ablathermy procedures and look for relapses after curative treatments have ended. Imaging of kidney tumors relies on three complementary imaging modalities: ultrasound (US), Computed Tomography based on X-ray absorption (CT-scan) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The most commonly performed examination remains the CT scan, which is used to print 3D models. However, the correlation between renal parenchyma densities and renal tumors (before and during the scan acquisition times after injection) and elasticity parameters measured by US and MRI has never been explored.

This trial aim to evaluate the correspondence between several imaging modalities for characterizing the elasticity of healthy and pathological kidney tissue. It will also improve the realism of 3D models used by surgeons, and identify new complementary imaging biomarkers.

To achieve this aim, 50 patients will undergo DWI -elastography (Diffusion Weigthed Imaging-elastography) and MR-elastography sequences, as well as an US before the surgery. After surgery, a fragment of the resected specimen will be used to perform mechanical tests to determine the real hardness of the tissue.

Conditions
Kidney Cancer
Being tested
MR-elastography exam, Ultrasound exam
Keywords
Renal-Cell Carcinoma, Renal Elasticity, Biomarkers, Ultrasound, CT-scan, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, AFRI, Diffusion weighted imaging
Medical subject headings
Kidney Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Renal Cell

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • MR-elastography examDiagnostic test

    Imaging acquisition

  • Ultrasound examDiagnostic test

    Imaging acquisition

Study groups in NCT06525831
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Patient with kidney cancer surgeryExperimentalthe patients will have an additionnal MRI elastography and Ultrasound exams for the research. The exams will be performed between the inclusion of the patient and the day before the surgery. Both exams are non-invasive, without radiation
Receives: Diagnostic Test: MR-elastography exam; Diagnostic Test: Ultrasound exam

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Measurement of the root mean square error (RMSE)

    The aim is to successfully predict μMRE from dCT-, dCT40s, dCT90s, dCT10min (naming μCT the scan model prediction) with the lowest possible error.

    Measured: Between Day 0 and Month 4

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. Measure of Spearman's rho

    Researh of the highest possible value (maximum = 1).

    Measured: Between Day 0 and Month 4

  2. Measure of the qualitative assessment

    Measure based on a 5-point ordinal qualitative scale

    Measured: Between Day 0 and Month 4

  3. Measure of the contrast

    Calculation using the contrast-to-noise ratio

    Measured: Between Day 0 and Month 4

  4. Measure of the noise

    Calculation using the signal-to-noise ratio

    Measured: Between Day 0 and Month 4

  5. Identification of imaging faisability limiting factors

    Evaluation of the number of situations where the examination has no clinical diagnostic value and associations with potential limiting factors by using a composite criteria including :

    • body mass index
    • sarcopenia,
    • lesion location
    • lesion size
    • lesion architecture

    Measured: Between Day 0 and Month 4

  6. Evaluation of imaging repetabiliy limiting factors

    Measurement of the intra-class correlation coefficients and Bland-Altmann plot traces.

    The aim is for the intra-class score to be as high as possible (maximum = 1, ideally >0.90).

    Measured: Between Day 0 and Month 4

  7. identification of decorrelation situations and potential bias between biomechanical properties obtained by hardness measurements in the different imaging modalities

    Visual measurement for each patient and anatomical situation with possible matching, point clouds with in X the hardness obtained by one imaging modality and in Y the hardness obtained by another imaging modality. The descriptive characteristics of the points (voxel or patient segmentation) with decorrelation will then be analyzed.

    Measured: Between Day 0 and Month 4

  8. Carry out associations between histological categorical variables and numerical elasticity variables

    The measurement will be based on associations between categorical histological and numerical elasticity variables, with area under the ROC curve comparisons or cut-off identification where appropriate.

    Malignant/benign character (binary variable) and histological type (non- ordinal categorical variable) will be assessed as part of routine care by the pathologist.

    Measured: Between Day 0 and Month 4

  9. Measure of the accuracy

    Measure accordance between continuous scanner elasticity mapping (in kPa) and discrete elasticity mapping derived from density classes (necrosis, tissue, calcifications), assessed by Spearman's correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman analysis (bias and limits of agreement), with the objective being a high correlation and minimal bias.

    Measured: Between Day 0 and Month 4

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Jul 2024
  2. Study start7 Mar 2025
  3. Primary completion7 May 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completion7 May 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
The participants will undergo a Magnetic Resonance-elastography and Ultrasound exams for the research.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
50 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06525831
Sponsor's protocol ID
CHUBX 2022/11
Acronym
Rein3DP-M
Status last verified
Jun 2025
First submitted
11 Jul 2024
Last updated
14 Apr 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Ronca M, Conforti P, Crombe A, Jaffredo M, Ricard S, Colin T, Yacoub M, Le Bras Y, Bernhard JC, Margue G, Fourage-Jambon E. Multimodal imaging to analyze the biomechanical properties of kidney tumors, evaluating feasibility, inter-modality correspondence, and diagnostic value (UroCCR-115). PLoS One. 2026 Jul 8;21(7):e0351477. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0351477. eCollection 2026.

    PubMed 42418537

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing MR-elastography exam and Ultrasound exam in people with Kidney Cancer, run by University Hospital, Bordeaux at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact FOURAGE EVA, Dr (0033556795679, eva.fourage@chu-bordeaux.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Measurement of the root mean square error (RMSE) (time frame: Between Day 0 and Month 4). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06525831, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Apr 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in