Osteo Arthritis KneeNCT06527313
Investigation of the Effect of Movement Mobilization Concept on Sensory, Pain, Muscle Activation in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis
A study testing Movement Mobilization Concept, Exercise and Tape and Special Exercises in people with Osteo Arthritis Knee and Movement Disorders, run by Istinye University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
Individuals with knee osteoarthritis are one of the groups most affected by musculoskeletal disorders and experience pain and mobility limitations that significantly limit their daily living activities. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 45 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Osteo Arthritis Knee, Movement Disorders, Physical Disability
- What is being tested?
- Movement Mobilization Concept, Exercise and Tape and Special Exercises
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 36 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 25 Jul 2024to 10 Oct 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 45 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosing knee OA according to the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria (Primary knee OA diagnosis)
- Stage 2 or 3 patients according to Kellgren-Lawrence radiological staging criteria
- Patients with a disease duration of 6 months or longer
- Participants aged between 50 and 70
- Being able to walk without using assistive devices
- Body mass index is below 35 kg/m²
- Pain intensity must be between 3 and 7 according to the Numerical Pain Rating Scale
- Not having received physiotherapy in the last year.
Who cannot join
- Infiltration with steroids or local anesthetics in the year before the patient entered the study or during follow-up
- Obtaining the indication for surgery
- Severe hearing, vision and speech impairment
- Having serious systemic and cardiovascular diseases that prevent exercise
- Having a neurological disease
- Having a lower extremity deformity (severe varus or valgus deformity, significant joint instability and other orthopedic problems requiring surgical intervention)
Show all 9Show fewer
- Patients with acute knee inflammation
- Having any disorder, syndrome or disease that may cause myofascial or neuropathic pain in the lower extremities, such as lumbar radiculopathy, meralgia paresthetica or Saphenous nerve compression.
- Cognitive deficit (Alzheimer's, dementia) revealed in the clinical history.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Investigation of the Effect of Movement Mobilization Concept on Quantitative Sensory Parameters, Pain, Muscle Activation Levels in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis
Individuals with knee osteoarthritis are one of the groups most affected by musculoskeletal disorders and experience pain and mobility limitations that significantly limit their daily living activities. Quantitative sensory assessment in individuals with osteoarthritis plays a critical role in evaluating disease progression and treatment effectiveness by objectively measuring changes in sensory perception such as proprioception and nociception. These changes in sensory perception can negatively affect individuals' movement control and balance. In this context, evaluation of quantitative sensory parameters allows the development of more targeted and effective interventions in the rehabilitation processes of individuals with osteoarthritis.
Additionally, electromyographic evaluation in individuals with osteoarthritis analyzes muscle activation levels, providing a better understanding of the impairments in muscle functions of these individuals. EMG data helps to design rehabilitation programs individually by determining to what degree muscles are activated and which muscle groups are more affected. Decreased muscle activation or abnormal muscle activation in individuals with osteoarthritis can negatively affect joint stability and mobility. Therefore, EMG evaluations are an objective method to evaluate the effectiveness of treatment strategies aimed at restoration of muscle functions in individuals with osteoarthritis.
Read more
The quantitative sensory and EMG evaluations performed in this project aim to improve the quality of life of individuals by offering innovative approaches in the clinical management of individuals with osteoarthritis. Therefore, these evaluations are of critical importance for the original value and scientific contribution of our project. For these reasons, the selection of individuals with osteoarthritis and the detailed evaluations made on these individuals and its connection with the methods can be considered as the innovative and original aspect of our project.
The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of the Mulligan movement mobilization concept on quantitative sensory parameters, pain and muscle activation levels in patients with knee osteoarthritis.
Read the detailed description
Osteoarthritis is a degenerative disease that occurs especially in weight-bearing joints, characterized by a decrease in joint space due to progressive cartilage loss, subchondral sclerosis and osteophyte formations (Martel et al., 2016). Although OA is also seen in the hip, spine and hand joints, it is most commonly seen in the knee joint (Neogi et al., 2012). Although the primary change in knee OA is in the articular cartilage of the knee, all tissues in and around the joint are affected by OA. The clinical features of the condition are pain, joint stiffness, edema, local tenderness in the joint, crepitation and swelling, muscle weaknesses, osteophytes, instability, subluxations, joint deformities, limitation of joint movement and functional limitations (Sharma 2021).
Pain in knee osteoarthritis is a multifactorial phenomenon in which structural, neurophysiological and psychosocial factors play a role (Emmert et al, 2018). Regarding neurophysiological factors, it has been shown that there are inflammatory mediators within the articular cartilage that alter afferent sensory inputs and cause plastic changes in the nervous system leading to central sensitization (Schaible et al, 2022). Although it is such a multifactorial symptom, the methods used in the evaluation of pain sensation for osteoarthritis are mostly subjective and include the patient's feedback, such as visual analog scale, numerical rating scale, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). ) is limited to tests, surveys or scales (Dainese et al, 2022). Although these scales are an important part of clinical practice and reflect the patient's capacity to express his or her own experience, they provide subjective information on issues such as the patient's pain intensity, the effects of pain, and its effects on quality of life (Dainese et al, 2022).
Quantitative sensory testing (QST) is a systematic psychophysical testing method used to measure sensory thresholds for pain, touch, vibration and temperature sensations (Mücke et al, 2021). It measures individual sensory perceptions using direct patient feedback. It tests sensory loss (hypoesthesia, hypoalgesia) and sensory gain (hyperesthesia, hyperalgesia, allodynia) and is used to test the nociceptive and non-nociceptive properties of different afferent nerve fibers and central pathways (Mücke et al, 2021). Quantitative sensory testing may offer a more objective approach to identifying underlying causes of pain. Physical measurements such as nerve damage, loss of sensation, and changes in touch sensitivity can provide more objective data in assessing pain (Arant et al, 2021).
It has been reported that pain, movement limitations and muscle weakness in individuals with osteoarthritis cause indirect effects on muscle activity and functions (Petterson et al, 2023). Changes in muscle activity usually occur in response to pain or as the patient tries to compensate for functional limitations in the joint (Petterson et al, 2023).
It has been shown that due to pain and movement limitations in the affected joint, it causes the individual to change body position and use other muscle groups more (Sharma 2021). Avoidance of using the affected joint has also been reported as a factor in the weakening of the relevant muscle groups. OA can affect joint stability, which can impair muscle coordination (Sharma 2021). Superficial Electromyography (EMG) appears as a method that helps us monitor changes in the activation patterns of certain muscle groups and understand the underlying causes of these functional limitations (Simonsen et al., 2014).
OA treatment generally focuses on relieving symptoms, controlling pain, improving joint function, and improving quality of life (Block et al, 2020). Treatment methods used in the rehabilitation of patients with OA include exercise, electrotherapy and manual therapy. Mulligan Movement Mobilization (MWM), which is among manual therapy practices, is a manual therapy concept developed by Brian Mulligan. This concept includes a set of techniques aimed at correcting pain and limitations in joint range of motion (Anwer et al, 2018). It has been supported by studies that in conditions such as osteoarthritis, these mobilization techniques can help increase joint mobility and relieve the patient's symptoms (Alkhawajah et al, 2019).
The basic principles of Mulligan Movement Mobilization include collaboration with the patient, pain-free mobilization, and a manual force applied during a specific joint movement. It is aimed to increase joint range of motion, pain control and functional recovery, and to contribute to the patient being more effective in daily activities by increasing joint function (Oskay et al., 2015), (Alkhawajah et al., 2019).
- Being tested
- Movement Mobilization Concept, Exercise and Tape, Sham Movement Mobilization Concept, Exercise and Tape, Special Exercises
- Keywords
- osteoartritis, movement mobilization concept, mulligan, knee, taping
- Medical subject headings
- Movement Disorders, Osteoarthritis, Knee
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Movement Mobilization Concept, Exercise and TapeBehavioural
Mulligan Concept MWM Mulligan Taping Mulligan Self Home Workout
Sham Movement Mobilization Concept, Exercise and TapeBehavioural
The technique will be applied to cases in the sham group with only hand contact, without any slippage or rotation in any direction. Then, rigid taping will be applied without any tension or direction, and home exercises will be given.
Special ExercisesBehavioural
Subjects in the control group will be shown home exercises customized for knee osteoarthritis and asked to continue them.
Specialized Home Exercises for the Knee Joint
- Lumbar extensor stretching, Hamstring stretching, hip flexors stretching, TFL stretching,
- Straight leg raise (lying on back and side)
- Bridge exercise
- Drawing circles while lying on your back and side
- Knee flexion-extension
- Weight bearing exercises
- Tiptoe exercise
- Step climbing and descending exercise
- Terminal knee extension
- Strengthening the muscles around the hips
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Movement Mobilization Concept Group | Experimental | MWM and appropriate taping will be applied to the cases included in the Mulligan group, according to the Mulligan Concept, and home exercises will be given to the patient as recommended by the concept. Receives: Behavioral: Movement Mobilization Concept, Exercise and Tape |
| Sham Movement Mobilization Concept Group | Sham comparator | The technique will be applied to cases in the sham group with only hand contact, without any slippage or rotation in any direction. Then, rigid taping will be applied without any tension or direction, and home exercises will be given. Receives: Behavioral: Sham Movement Mobilization Concept, Exercise and Tape |
| Control Group | Active comparator | Subjects in the control group will be shown home exercises customized for knee osteoarthritis and asked to continue them. Receives: Behavioral: Special Exercises |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Evaluation of muscle activation:
Evaluation of muscle activation with EMG: It will be evaluated with the Noraxon MyoMuscle system. (Noraxon Inc., Scottsdale, AZ, USA) sEMG (Noraxon myosystem DTS, USA) will be used to measure the electrical activity of the muscles. sEMG data of the muscles will be recorded and muscle activities will be analyzed. Ag/AgC superficial electrodes will be used for sEMG measurements. Superficial 8-channel EMG (Bilateral Quadrieps Femoris (rectus femoris, vastus lateralis, vastus medialis), Biceps femoris (long and short head), Semitendinosus).
Measured: 2 mounth
Pain Sensation and Sensory Evaluation
Pressure pain thresholds (BAEs) are measured using a calibrated digital algometer (Algomed/MEDOC) by slowly increasing mechanical pressure at a computer-controlled rate of 1 kg/s.
To elicit temporal summation in all of the above-mentioned regions, mechanical stimulation was applied 10 times using a digital algometer calibrated at 110% of the pressure pain threshold intensity with a 1-second interstimulus interval. When creating temporal summation, the procedure was started at least 2 minutes after the last PPT was measured to ensure that the tests were not contaminated. Before the first stimulus, study participants were asked to verbally indicate their pain levels at the first, fifth and tenth stimuli according to a visual analogue scale (VAS) placed in front of them. VAS is fixed with single digit numbers from 0 to 10, 0 being "no pain", 1-2 "very mild pain", 3-4 "mild pain", 5-6 "moderate pain", 7-8 " "severe pain" and 9-10 as "very severe unbearable pain".
Measured: 2 mounth
Secondary outcomes (5)
Muscle strength assessment
Muscle strength assessment and maximum voluntary contraction measurement: with Hand Held Dynamometer Quadriceps and Hamistring muscle strength will be measured with a portable manual muscle strength measuring device (Model 01165, Lafayette, IN, USA). (Layefette Instrument®, Layafette,IN).
Measured: 2 mounth
sit and reach test battery
General flexibility of lower extremity muscles: sit and reach test battery
Sit-Reach Test for Flexibility: The participant was asked to sit with his knees straight, without shoes, and to reach as far forward as he could with his arms and palms facing down, without bending his knees. The distance the participant crosses their toes is measured. The test is repeated 3 times and the best result is recorded in cm (Lemmink et al., 2003).
Measured: 2 mounth
Timed get up and go test
Patients are instructed to sit upright on a standard stool of approximately 45 cm with their feet flat on the floor. With the 'Start' command, patients are told to get up without holding on, walk towards the object 3 meters away, turn around and sit down again. The entire duration is recorded with a stopwatch (Piva et al., 2004).
Measured: 2 mounth
WOMAC
The Western Ontario and McMaster University Arthritis Index (WOMAC) is a patient-reported outcome index for the evaluation of lower extremity OA. The WOMAC index has been used for decades. It is one of the most frequently used outcome measures in research on hip and knee OA. WOMAC has been suggested as one of the highest performing outcome measures for knee and hip OA in terms of reliability, validity, responsiveness, and interpretability (Tüzün et al., 2005).
Measured: 2 mounth
Tampa kinesiophobia scale
Chronic pain may cause behavioral changes due to physical and psychological reasons. The Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale score range is 17 to 68, with a higher score indicating increased kinesiophobia. The psychometric properties of the Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale have been tested in many different languages and have been used for many different musculoskeletal pains (Yılmaz et al., 2011).
Measured: 2 mounth
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Jul 2024
- Study start25 Jul 2024
- Primary completion1 Jul 2025
- Study completion10 Oct 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Osteo Arthritis KneeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Istinye UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- . The study will be planned as a parallel research with 3 groups.
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 36 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Istinye University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Burcu Pamukcu, Istinye University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06527313
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- BI-1
- Status last verified
- Jan 2026
- First submitted
- 25 Jul 2024
- Last updated
- 21 Jan 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Jan 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Investigation of the Effect of Movement Mobilization Concept on Quantitative Sensory Parameters, Pain, Muscle Activation Levels in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06527313
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BI-1
- Keywords
- osteoartritis, movement mobilization concept, mulligan, knee, taping
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 36 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Istinye UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 25 Jul 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jul 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 10 Oct 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Jul 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Individuals with knee osteoarthritis are one of the groups most affected by musculoskeletal disorders and experience pain and mobility limitations that significantly limit their daily living activities. Quantitative sensory assessment in individuals with osteoarthritis plays a critical role in evaluating disease progression and treatment effectiveness by objectively measuring changes in sensory perception such as proprioception and nociception. These changes in sensory perception can negatively affect individuals' movement control and balance. In this context, evaluation of quantitative sensory parameters allows the development of more targeted and effective interventions in the rehabilitation processes of individuals with osteoarthritis.
Additionally, electromyographic evaluation in individuals with osteoarthritis analyzes muscle activation levels, providing a better understanding of the impairments in muscle functions of these individuals. EMG data helps to design rehabilitation programs individually by determining to what degree muscles are activated and which muscle groups are more affected. Decreased muscle activation or abnormal muscle activation in individuals with osteoarthritis can negatively affect joint stability and mobility. Therefore, EMG evaluations are an objective method to evaluate the effectiveness of treatment strategies aimed at restoration of muscle functions in individuals with osteoarthritis.
The quantitative sensory and EMG evaluations performed in this project aim to improve the quality of life of individuals by offering innovative approaches in the clinical management of individuals with osteoarthritis. Therefore, these evaluations are of critical importance for the original value and scientific contribution of our project. For these reasons, the selection of individuals with osteoarthritis and the detailed evaluations made on these individuals and its connection with the methods can be considered as the innovative and original aspect of our project.
The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of the Mulligan movement mobilization concept on quantitative sensory parameters, pain and muscle activation levels in patients with knee osteoarthritis.
Detailed description
Osteoarthritis is a degenerative disease that occurs especially in weight-bearing joints, characterized by a decrease in joint space due to progressive cartilage loss, subchondral sclerosis and osteophyte formations (Martel et al., 2016). Although OA is also seen in the hip, spine and hand joints, it is most commonly seen in the knee joint (Neogi et al., 2012). Although the primary change in knee OA is in the articular cartilage of the knee, all tissues in and around the joint are affected by OA. The clinical features of the condition are pain, joint stiffness, edema, local tenderness in the joint, crepitation and swelling, muscle weaknesses, osteophytes, instability, subluxations, joint deformities, limitation of joint movement and functional limitations (Sharma 2021).
Pain in knee osteoarthritis is a multifactorial phenomenon in which structural, neurophysiological and psychosocial factors play a role (Emmert et al, 2018). Regarding neurophysiological factors, it has been shown that there are inflammatory mediators within the articular cartilage that alter afferent sensory inputs and cause plastic changes in the nervous system leading to central sensitization (Schaible et al, 2022). Although it is such a multifactorial symptom, the methods used in the evaluation of pain sensation for osteoarthritis are mostly subjective and include the patient's feedback, such as visual analog scale, numerical rating scale, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). ) is limited to tests, surveys or scales (Dainese et al, 2022). Although these scales are an important part of clinical practice and reflect the patient's capacity to express his or her own experience, they provide subjective information on issues such as the patient's pain intensity, the effects of pain, and its effects on quality of life (Dainese et al, 2022).
Quantitative sensory testing (QST) is a systematic psychophysical testing method used to measure sensory thresholds for pain, touch, vibration and temperature sensations (Mücke et al, 2021). It measures individual sensory perceptions using direct patient feedback. It tests sensory loss (hypoesthesia, hypoalgesia) and sensory gain (hyperesthesia, hyperalgesia, allodynia) and is used to test the nociceptive and non-nociceptive properties of different afferent nerve fibers and central pathways (Mücke et al, 2021). Quantitative sensory testing may offer a more objective approach to identifying underlying causes of pain. Physical measurements such as nerve damage, loss of sensation, and changes in touch sensitivity can provide more objective data in assessing pain (Arant et al, 2021).
It has been reported that pain, movement limitations and muscle weakness in individuals with osteoarthritis cause indirect effects on muscle activity and functions (Petterson et al, 2023). Changes in muscle activity usually occur in response to pain or as the patient tries to compensate for functional limitations in the joint (Petterson et al, 2023).
It has been shown that due to pain and movement limitations in the affected joint, it causes the individual to change body position and use other muscle groups more (Sharma 2021). Avoidance of using the affected joint has also been reported as a factor in the weakening of the relevant muscle groups. OA can affect joint stability, which can impair muscle coordination (Sharma 2021). Superficial Electromyography (EMG) appears as a method that helps us monitor changes in the activation patterns of certain muscle groups and understand the underlying causes of these functional limitations (Simonsen et al., 2014).
OA treatment generally focuses on relieving symptoms, controlling pain, improving joint function, and improving quality of life (Block et al, 2020). Treatment methods used in the rehabilitation of patients with OA include exercise, electrotherapy and manual therapy. Mulligan Movement Mobilization (MWM), which is among manual therapy practices, is a manual therapy concept developed by Brian Mulligan. This concept includes a set of techniques aimed at correcting pain and limitations in joint range of motion (Anwer et al, 2018). It has been supported by studies that in conditions such as osteoarthritis, these mobilization techniques can help increase joint mobility and relieve the patient's symptoms (Alkhawajah et al, 2019).
The basic principles of Mulligan Movement Mobilization include collaboration with the patient, pain-free mobilization, and a manual force applied during a specific joint movement. It is aimed to increase joint range of motion, pain control and functional recovery, and to contribute to the patient being more effective in daily activities by increasing joint function (Oskay et al., 2015), (Alkhawajah et al., 2019).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- . The study will be planned as a parallel research with 3 groups.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Movement Mobilization Concept Group | Experimental | Behavioral: Movement Mobilization Concept, Exercise and TapeMWM and appropriate taping will be applied to the cases included in the Mulligan group, according to the Mulligan Concept, and home exercises will be given to the patient as recommended by the concept. |
| Sham Movement Mobilization Concept Group | Sham comparator | Behavioral: Sham Movement Mobilization Concept, Exercise and TapeThe technique will be applied to cases in the sham group with only hand contact, without any slippage or rotation in any direction. Then, rigid taping will be applied without any tension or direction, and home exercises will be given. |
| Control Group | Active comparator | Behavioral: Special ExercisesSubjects in the control group will be shown home exercises customized for knee osteoarthritis and asked to continue them. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 45 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Diagnosing knee OA according to the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria (Primary knee OA diagnosis)
- Stage 2 or 3 patients according to Kellgren-Lawrence radiological staging criteria
- Patients with a disease duration of 6 months or longer
- Participants aged between 50 and 70
- Being able to walk without using assistive devices
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Infiltration with steroids or local anesthetics in the year before the patient entered the study or during follow-up
- Obtaining the indication for surgery
- Severe hearing, vision and speech impairment
- Having serious systemic and cardiovascular diseases that prevent exercise
- Having a neurological disease
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Movement Mobilization Concept, Exercise and TapeMulligan Concept MWM Mulligan Taping Mulligan Self Home Workout | Behavioural | Movement Mobilization Concept Group |
| Sham Movement Mobilization Concept, Exercise and TapeThe technique will be applied to cases in the sham group with only hand contact, without any slippage or rotation in any direction. Then, rigid taping will be applied without any tension or direction, and home exercises will be given. | Behavioural | Sham Movement Mobilization Concept Group |
| Special ExercisesSubjects in the control group will be shown home exercises customized for knee osteoarthritis and asked to continue them. Specialized Home Exercises for the Knee Joint 1. Lumbar extensor stretching, Hamstring stretching, hip flexors stretching, TFL stretching, 2. Straight leg raise (lying on back and side) 3. Bridge exercise 4. Drawing circles while lying on your back and side 5. Knee flexion-extension 6. Weight bearing exercises 7. Tiptoe exercise 8. Step climbing and descending exercise 9. Terminal knee extension 10. Strengthening the muscles around the hips | Behavioural | Control Group |
Primary outcome
Evaluation of muscle activation:
Time frame: 2 mounth
Evaluation of muscle activation with EMG: It will be evaluated with the Noraxon MyoMuscle system. (Noraxon Inc., Scottsdale, AZ, USA) sEMG (Noraxon myosystem DTS, USA) will be used to measure the electrical activity of the muscles. sEMG data of the muscles will be recorded and muscle activities will be analyzed. Ag/AgC superficial electrodes will be used for sEMG measurements. Superficial 8-channel EMG (Bilateral Quadrieps Femoris (rectus femoris, vastus lateralis, vastus medialis), Biceps femoris (long and short head), Semitendinosus).
Pain Sensation and Sensory Evaluation
Time frame: 2 mounth
Pressure pain thresholds (BAEs) are measured using a calibrated digital algometer (Algomed/MEDOC) by slowly increasing mechanical pressure at a computer-controlled rate of 1 kg/s. To elicit temporal summation in all of the above-mentioned regions, mechanical stimulation was applied 10 times using a digital algometer calibrated at 110% of the pressure pain threshold intensity with a 1-second interstimulus interval. When creating temporal summation, the procedure was started at least 2 minutes after the last PPT was measured to ensure that the tests were not contaminated. Before the first stimulus, study participants were asked to verbally indicate their pain levels at the first, fifth and tenth stimuli according to a visual analogue scale (VAS) placed in front of them. VAS is fixed with single digit numbers from 0 to 10, 0 being "no pain", 1-2 "very mild pain", 3-4 "mild pain", 5-6 "moderate pain", 7-8 " "severe pain" and 9-10 as "very severe unbearable pain".
5 secondary outcomes
Muscle strength assessment
Time frame: 2 mounth
sit and reach test battery
Time frame: 2 mounth
Timed get up and go test
Time frame: 2 mounth
WOMAC
Time frame: 2 mounth
Tampa kinesiophobia scale
Time frame: 2 mounth
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Jan 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Osteo Arthritis Knee
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Persona SoluTion PPS Femur PMCF
Rhematoid Arthritis, Osteo Arthritis of the Knee
Not yet recruiting
Total Hip Replacement: an Investigation of Robotic-assisted Versus conVentional Surgery and Patient-centred outcomEs
Osteo Arthritis Knee and Hip
Active, not recruiting
SakuraBead Used as Resorbable Embolic for Genicular Artery Embolization
Osteo Arthritis Knee, Joint Diseases
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of a Single Intra-Articular Injection of HL-01 in the Treatment of Pain in Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis
Osteo Arthritis of the Knee
Recruiting
Total Versus Robotic Assisted Unicompartmental Knee Replacement
Osteo Arthritis Knee, Arthritis Knee
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Movement Mobilization Concept, Exercise and Tape and Special Exercises in people with Osteo Arthritis Knee and Movement Disorders, run by Istinye University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Evaluation of muscle activation: (time frame: 2 mounth). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Jan 2026.