AzTrials
AzTrials

Ischemic Heart DiseasesRACAT-COVIDNCT06530472

The Relationship Between Belief, Expectation, and Adherence to Therapy During COVID-19 Pandemic

An observational study of Ischemic Heart Diseases, run by Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ETS at 1 site in Italy.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this [type of study: observational study or clinical trial ] is to learn about, test, compare etc.] in [ describe participant population/health conditions ]. The main question [ it aims to answer are: [question [question Participants will [describe the main tasks participants will be asked to do… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Ischemic Heart Diseases
What is being tested?
Monitoring
How many people
196 participants
Where
1 siteItaly
Study dates
18 May 2021to 30 Jun 2025
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: All patients diagnosed with ischaemic heart disease established by angiography

Who may be able to join

  • all patients diagnosed with ischaemic heart disease established by angiography;
  • reaching the age of majority;
  • score >= 26 on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test (Nasreddine et al., 2005).

Who cannot join

  • presence of comorbidity with other pathologies in an active or advanced phase; -patients with a prognosis to be defined;
  • pregnancy;
  • participants with neurological pathologies that significantly impair their cognitive functions (e.g. advanced Parkinson's disease; Alzheimer's dementia...cardiac arrest with hypoxic damage);
  • participants with cognitive impairments that compromise comprehension and sharing of the contents of the questions, detected through the administration of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test (Nasreddine et al., 2005).

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Italy1 site
  • IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi

    Milan, MI, 20148

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: The Relationship Between Belief, Expectation, and Adherence to Therapy During COVID-19 Pandemic: a Multigroup Cohort Study in Patients With Ischemic Heart Disease

The goal of this [type of study: observational study or clinical trial ] is to learn about, test, compare etc.] in [ describe participant population/health conditions ]. The main question [ it aims to answer are:

  • [question
  • [question Participants will [describe the main tasks participants will be asked to do, treatments they'll be given and use bullets if it is more than 2 items ].

If there is a comparison group: Researchers will compare insert groups ] to see if insert effects

Being tested
Monitoring
Keywords
Ischemic Heart Disease, Adherence, Belief, Acceptance, COVID-19
Medical subject headings
Myocardial Ischemia, COVID-19

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • MonitoringOther

    At baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months, people will undergo to both a psychological and cardiological assessment.

Study groups in NCT06530472
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Fondazione Don Carlo GnocchiAll patients diagnosed with ischaemic heart disease established by angiography; attained age of majority; Score >= 26 on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test. At baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months, people will undergo to both a psychological and cardiological assessment.
Receives: Other: Monitoring
Ospedale ValduceAll patients diagnosed with ischaemic heart disease established by angiography; attained age of majority; Score >= 26 on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test. At baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months, people will undergo to both a psychological and cardiological assessment.
Receives: Other: Monitoring
Ospedale Cà Granda NiguardaAll patients diagnosed with ischaemic heart disease established by angiography; attained age of majority; Score >= 26 on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test. At baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months, people will undergo to both a psychological and cardiological assessment.
Receives: Other: Monitoring

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Adherence

    Measured by the percentage of days covered (Percentage of Days Covered, PDC) by antiplatelet therapy, beta-blockers, statins, ACE-I/Sartan, hypoglycaemic drugs, psychotropic drugs (anxiolytics; antidepressants).

    The PDC is defined as the proportion of days for which a patient has a supply of medication available. When multiple prescriptions are for the same day, reference is made to the maximum duration, and for overlapping prescriptions, sequential use of the two prescriptions is assumed by summing the days of supply for each. Any interruptions in therapy are also taken into account. Non-adherence is defined as a PDC of less than 80%, while non-persistence is defined as a gap in prescriptions of (Direct Oral Anticoagulants or Direct Oral Anticoagulants) DOACs ≥14 days (Yu et al., 2020).

    Measured: At baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months from the recruitment

  2. NACE

    Net adverse clinical event or NACE, defined as a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke or major haemorrhage. In this case, bleeding is definitive according to the BARC (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium) scale (Mehran et al., 2011).

    Measured: At baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months from the recruitment

  3. MARS-i

    Measure with theMARS-5-i questionnaire consists of five questions on forgetting, changing dosage, stopping, skipping, and taking less medication . The score ranges from 5 to 25, where a higher MARS-5-i score indicates higher self-reported adherence. One item assesses unintentional non-adherence and four items assess intentional non-adherence

    Measured: At baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months from the recruitment

Secondary outcomes (11)
  1. Extra visits

    Number of extra (unplanned) visits, frequency of planned follow-up visits

    Measured: At baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months from the recruitment

  2. Adherence to pharmacotherapy

    Measured as difference between number of pills taken and number of pills prescribed.

    At each time of data collection, monitoring will be carried out for all four recommended therapies in patients with reduced ejection fraction (entero, jardiance, beta blockade, anti-aldosterone).

    It is also intended to detect how many patients, at one year, have optimal control of risk factors, in terms of lipid profile at target, glycaemic control, smoking cessation, maintenance of regular physical activity, BMI improvement (considering LDL value, fasting blood glucose, HbA1 for diabetics).

    Measured: At baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months from the recruitment

  3. CAS

    Measured by the Coronavirus Anxiety Scale (CAS) (Lee, 2020; Silva et al., 2020), which assesses dysfunctional anxiety associated with the Covid-19 crisis. Each item on the CAS is rated on a 5-point scale, from 0 (not at all) to 4 (almost every day), based on experiences over the past two weeks. This scale format is consistent with the DSM-5 measure of cross-sectional symptoms. A total CAS score ≥ 9 indicates probable coronavirus-related dysfunctional anxiety. High scores on a particular item or a high total scale score (≥ 9) may indicate problematic symptoms for the individual that may warrant further assessment and/or treatment. Clinical judgement should guide the interpretation of CAS results.

    Measured: At baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months from the recruitment

  4. CSS

    Measured by the Covid-19 Stress Scale (CSS) (Taylor et al., 2020), a 36-item scale developed to better understand and assess Covid-19-related distress. The subscales assess symptoms of Covid-related stress and anxiety: (1) fear of danger and contamination, (2) fear of economic consequences, (3) xenophobia, (4) compulsive control and reassurance seeking, and (5) symptoms of traumatic stress on Covid-19. The scales were found to be robust on various reliability and validity indices. The scales are intercorrelated, providing evidence of a Covid-19-related stress syndrome. The scales are promising as tools to better understand the distress associated with Covid-19 and to identify persons in need of mental health services.

    Measured: At baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months from the recruitment

  5. BIPQ

    Detected with the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIPQ) (Broadbent et al., 2006), a nine-item scale designed to rapidly assess cognitive and emotional representations of illness.

    Measured: At baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months from the recruitment

  6. ICQ

    Illness Cognition Questionnaire (ICQ) (Evers et al., 2001), which evaluates three ways of cognitively assessing the stressful and adverse nature of a chronic illness: helplessness, acceptance and perceived benefits.

    Measured: At baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months from the recruitment

  7. Anxiety

    Measured through the use of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) test (Zigmond \& Snaith, 1983), a widely used instrument to measure psychological morbidity in chronically ill patients, which consists of 14 items designed to detect the presence of anxiety and depression.

    Measured: At baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months from the recruitment

  8. Depression

    Measured through the use of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) test (Zigmond \& Snaith, 1983), a widely used instrument to measure psychological morbidity in chronically ill patients, which consists of 14 items designed to detect the presence of anxiety and depression.

    Measured: At baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months from the recruitment

  9. Illness Expectations

    Some questions specifically formulated to assess explicit disease expectations in heart disease are proposed. These questions will be integrated by the administration of a semi-structured interview.

    Measured: At baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months from the recruitment

  10. Socio-demographic data

    Date of birth, gender, education, current or previous occupation, marital status, presence of children, smoking, physical activity, presence of heart disease in the family.

    Measured: At baseline

  11. Clinical data

    Weight and height (for the calculation of Body Mass Index, BMI), blood pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation, blood test results (complete lipid profile, blood glucose, glycated haemoglobin), co-morbidities, perceived symptoms (breathlessness, chest pressure, angina pectoris, sweating, fainting, nausea, vomiting) acute or elective indication for surgery (specify if patient treated percutaneously or cardiac surgery); post-acute destination (patient discharged home, started on a rehabilitation programme, other); haemodialysis; PCSK9; left ventricular ejection fraction data; reports (coronary angiography, echocardiogram), having contracted Covid-19; presence of asthenia and/or dyspnoea.

    Measured: At baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months from the recruitment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted31 Jul 2024
  2. Study start18 May 2021
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2024 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Jun 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
196 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06530472
Sponsor's protocol ID
FDG_88-15
Acronym
RACAT-COVID
Status last verified
Feb 2024
First submitted
29 Jul 2024
Last updated
31 Jul 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: There is not a plan to make IPD available.

Publications

  • Broadbent E, Petrie KJ, Main J, Weinman J. The brief illness perception questionnaire. J Psychosom Res. 2006 Jun;60(6):631-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2005.10.020.

    PubMed 16731240
  • Evers AW, Kraaimaat FW, van Lankveld W, Jongen PJ, Jacobs JW, Bijlsma JW. Beyond unfavorable thinking: the illness cognition questionnaire for chronic diseases. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2001 Dec;69(6):1026-36.

    PubMed 11777106
  • Miyazaki M, Nakashima A, Nakamura Y, Sakamoto Y, Matsuo K, Goto M, Uchiyama M, Okamura K, Mitsutake R, Urata H, Kamimura H, Imakyure O. Association between medication adherence and illness perceptions in atrial fibrillation patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants: An observational cross-sectional pilot study. PLoS One. 2018 Sep 28;13(9):e0204814. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204814. eCollection 2018.

    PubMed 30265710
  • Osterberg L, Blaschke T. Adherence to medication. N Engl J Med. 2005 Aug 4;353(5):487-97. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra050100. No abstract available.

    PubMed 16079372

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Ischemic Heart Diseases, run by Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ETS at 1 site in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Jul 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Adherence (time frame: At baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months from the recruitment). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06530472, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Jul 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in