AzTrials
AzTrials

Colorectal DisordersNCT06531226

Difficult Colonoscopy and Personality Traits

An observational study of Colorectal Disorders, run by Qilu Hospital of Shandong University at 1 site in China.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The cecal intubation time (CIT) refers to the time required for the tip of the colonoscope to reach the cecum from passing through the anus. A prolonged CIT is considered a marker of difficulty in colonoscopy. CIT greater than 10 minutes is considered a difficult colonoscopy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 60 years
Conditions the study is for
Colorectal Disorders
What is being tested?
Fill in personality questionnaires
How many people
450 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
30 Jul 2024to 1 May 2025
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 60 years
  • All sexes
  • Adult

Study population: The study population consisted of patients who underwent colonoscopy at our hospital. They should meet the aforementioned inclusion criteria did not meet the exclusion criteria. Due to the widespread application of colonoscopy, the above patients may include patients suspected of having various organic or non-organic basic intestinal diseases, as well as health check-up patients.

Who may be able to join

  • Colonoscopy patients tested 18 to 60 years old, men and women there is no limit
  • Insert the cecum complete colonoscopy examination (successfully)
  • Agree and complete personality questionnaire and anxiety depression

Who cannot join

  • Maternal/pregnancy/lactation
  • Has a history of colorectal resection of colorectal surgery
  • Have organic diseases such as severe ulcerative colitis or intestinal tumors
  • Inadequate bowel preparation (bowel with feces and less than 90% visible area of mucosa)
  • Confirmed with the immune system (SLE), nervous system (Alzheimer's disease), mental system (such as schizophrenia, depression), urinary system disease (CKD), and other digestive system disease
  • Unable or unwilling to sign informed consent

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Feixue Chen, Doctor of Medicine contact

18560086108

chenfeixue@email.sdu.edu.cn

yf wu, Master of Medicine contact

13563419287

707932001@qq.com

China1 site
  • Qilu Hospital of Shandong University

    Jinan, Shandong, 250000

    Feixue Chen, +8618560086108, chenfeixue@email.sdu.edu.cn

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Personality Traits and Colonoscopy Insertion Time: Applying Machine Learning to Predict the Colonoscopy Time and Difficult Colonoscopy

The cecal intubation time (CIT) refers to the time required for the tip of the colonoscope to reach the cecum from passing through the anus. A prolonged CIT is considered a marker of difficulty in colonoscopy. CIT greater than 10 minutes is considered a difficult colonoscopy. Studies have identified factors that influence CIT, including age, gender, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, bowel preparation, prior abdominal surgery, etc. Personality traits have been found to be associated with the onset of many diseases, such as hypertension and A-type personality, depression and neurotic personality. According to the Big Five personality theory, personality can be decomposed into five dimensions: openness (O), conscientiousness (C), extraversion (E), agreeableness (A), and neuroticism (N). There is a lack of research on the association between personality traits and colonoscopy insertion time, and the purpose of this study is to investigate whether personality, BMI, age, gender, anxiety and depression index, metabolic diseases, and abdominal pelvic surgery history lead to prolonged colonoscopy insertion time and difficult colonoscopy, and to identify significant variables as predictors by using machine learning methods to build a clinical diagnostic model to predict colonoscopy insertion time and identify difficult colonoscopy patients.

Read the detailed description

The cecal intubation time (CIT) refers to the time required for the tip of the colonoscope to reach the cecum from passing through the anus. A prolonged CIT is considered a marker of difficulty in colonoscopy. A CIT greater than 10 minutes is considered a difficult colonoscopy. A longer CIT is associated with a lower adenoma detection rate, as it is an indicator of an ineffective colonoscopy, while a shorter CIT will provide the endoscopist with more time for colonoscope retrieval, increasing the likelihood of adenoma detection.

Research has identified factors that influence CIT, including age, gender, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, bowel preparation, and prior abdominal surgery history.

Personality traits have been found to be associated with the onset of many diseases, such as hypertension and A-type personality, depression, and neurotic personality. According to the Big Five personality theory, personality can be decomposed into five dimensions: openness (O), conscientiousness (C), extraversion (E), agreeableness (A), and neuroticism (N). The Big Five personality theory is a commonly used personality typology in scientific research and has been confirmed in numerous studies. The Big Five Personality Inventory (BFI) is a tool for detecting the classification of the Big Five personality traits. The Chinese version of the Big Five Personality Inventory and norms were jointly revised by Professor Li Jian from the Department of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, and the scale norms were constructed to include people of different age groups. The scale has shown excellent reliability and validity.

The discovery of the brain-gut axis suggests that neural activity can affect the intestinal activity in various ways directly or indirectly, thereby affecting the difficulty of colonoscopy, but there is still a lack of research on the relationship between personality types and difficult colonoscopy, and the specific correlation has not been clarified. What's more important is that previous studies often used ordinary least squares regression (OLS regression) or logistic regression The purpose of this study is to investigate whether personality, BMI, age, gender, anxiety and depression index, metabolic diseases, and history of abdominal and pelvic surgery are associated with prolonged colonoscopy insertion time and difficult colonoscopy, and to construct a clinical diagnostic model by using machine learning methods to predict colonoscopy insertion time and identify difficult colonoscopy patients based on significant variables.

The basic research framework is designed as follows:

Invite patients scheduled for colonoscopy to fill out the "Personality Tendency and Colonoscopy Survey Questionnaire" before colonoscopy.

Record the completion of colonoscopy and CIT for patients during colonoscopy and record the preparation of the colon and the presence of serious organic diseases.

Collect other patient information, including age, gender, and history of major diseases.

All patients included in the study should meet the inclusion criteria and not meet the exclusion criteria.

Organize the data and divide the patients into two groups based on whether their CIT time is greater than 10 minutes.

Use t-tests and chi-square analysis to determine whether each factor is related to difficult colonoscopy, with a significance threshold of P<0.05.

Include significant variables in logistic regression for initial analysis and calculate OR.

Use LASSO regression for sparse selection and include non-zero features in the machine learning model construction.

Divide the data into training set and test set and construct random forest models, artificial neural network models, and support vector machine models, etc. Through receiver operating curve (ROC), precision, accuracy, recall rates, etc., the model's error can be evaluated, and the model's generalization ability can be compared.

Being tested
Fill in personality questionnaires
Keywords
machine learning, difficult colonoscopy

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Fill in personality questionnairesOther

    For patients who need to undergo colonoscopy, we invite them to fill out a personality survey questionnaire after obtaining their informed consent. The questionnaire contains 60 survey questions, which cover the five dimensions of the Big Five personality traits. Each question has five options, corresponding to the five states of very disagree to very agree. The questionnaire was developed based on the Chinese population and has four norms applicable to different age groups to ensure the reliability of the questionnaire.

Study groups in NCT06531226
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
High neuroticism score groupThe neuroticism score was higher than the average score identified by the norm
Receives: Other: Fill in personality questionnaires
Low neuroticism score groupThe neuroticism score was lower than the average score identified by the norm
Receives: Other: Fill in personality questionnaires

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The occurrence of difficult colonoscopy

    CIT(cecum insertion time) was applied to evaluate difficult colonoscopy, a prolonged CIT (>10min) was considered difficult colonoscopy

    Measured: The evaluation of difficult colonoscopies was performed immediately after the patient completed the questionnaire at the next colonoscopy

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted31 Jul 2024
  2. Study start30 Jul 2024 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion30 Dec 2024 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 May 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrolment
450 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06531226
Sponsor's protocol ID
KYLL-202406-030
Status last verified
Jul 2024
First submitted
28 Jul 2024
Last updated
31 Jul 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015 Mar;65(2):87-108. doi: 10.3322/caac.21262. Epub 2015 Feb 4.

    PubMed 25651787
  • Center MM, Jemal A, Smith RA, Ward E. Worldwide variations in colorectal cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009 Nov-Dec;59(6):366-78. doi: 10.3322/caac.20038.

    PubMed 19897840
  • Brenner H, Chang-Claude J, Rickert A, Seiler CM, Hoffmeister M. Risk of colorectal cancer after detection and removal of adenomas at colonoscopy: population-based case-control study. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Aug 20;30(24):2969-76. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.41.3377. Epub 2012 Jul 23.

    PubMed 22826281
  • Jaruvongvanich V, Sempokuya T, Laoveeravat P, Ungprasert P. Risk factors associated with longer cecal intubation time: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018 Apr;33(4):359-365. doi: 10.1007/s00384-018-3014-x. Epub 2018 Mar 9.

    PubMed 29520457
  • Terracciano A. The Italian version of the NEO PI-R: Conceptual and empirical support for the use of targeted rotation. Pers Individ Dif. 2003;35(8):1859-1872. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00035-7.

    PubMed 19002272
  • Zhang B, Li YM, Li J, Luo J, Ye Y, Yin L, Chen Z, Soto CJ, John OP. The Big Five Inventory-2 in China: A Comprehensive Psychometric Evaluation in Four Diverse Samples. Assessment. 2022 Sep;29(6):1262-1284. doi: 10.1177/10731911211008245. Epub 2021 Apr 22.

    PubMed 33884926

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Colorectal Disorders, run by Qilu Hospital of Shandong University at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Jul 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Feixue Chen, Doctor of Medicine (18560086108, chenfeixue@email.sdu.edu.cn), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The occurrence of difficult colonoscopy (time frame: The evaluation of difficult colonoscopies was performed immediately after the patient completed the questionnaire at the next colonoscopy). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06531226, which also lists 6 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Jul 2024; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 27 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in