Work Related Musculoskeletal Injuries (WRMSIs)NCT06534203
Physical Task Demands of Caregivers Working in a Long-Term Care Facility
An observational study of Work Related Musculoskeletal Injuries (WRMSIs), run by Universite de Moncton at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
Providing care to residents and patients significantly contributes to work-related injuries among healthcare personnel, particularly those responsible for transferring and handling residents, who face a higher risk of injury due to the physical demands of their work and other environmental factors. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 19 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Work Related Musculoskeletal Injuries (WRMSIs)
- What is being tested?
- Investigation - Observational Study
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 25 Jul 2024to 30 Dec 2024
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 19 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Full time caregivers working in a long term care facility responsable of resident care in New-Brunswick, Canada
Who may be able to join
- Full-time caregivers
- Caregivers responsible for the care and handling of residents
- Aged 19 or over
Who cannot join
- Part-time caregivers
- Caregivers not responsible for residents care and handling
- Caregivers under 19 years of age
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Canada1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Université de Moncton
Moncton, New Brunswick, E1A 3E9
Alexis D Dubé, BScKin, 863-4342 ext. 506, ead7300@umoncton.ca
Michelle R Cardoso, PhD, 470-3979 ext. 506, michelle.cardoso@umoncton.ca
About this study
Official title: An Investigation of the Physical Task Demands of Caregivers Working in a Long-Term Care Facility in New Brunswick
Providing care to residents and patients significantly contributes to work-related injuries among healthcare personnel, particularly those responsible for transferring and handling residents, who face a higher risk of injury due to the physical demands of their work and other environmental factors.
The purpose of this project is to better understand the daily work requirements, identify their physical demands, and assess injury risk of caregivers. Data will be collected using a new pen-and-paper-based ergonomic surveying tool, a series of questionnaires, and measurements of physiological demands such as heart rate and galvanic skin response.
Collecting this data will enable the investigators and others to create new interventions better tailored to this working population, with a focus on injury prevention. These interventions may include warm-up routines, stretching exercises, training programs, and/or technological advancements.
Read the detailed description
Purposes/Objectives:
The overall aim of this study is to establish a database on the physical requirements of caregivers working in long-term care homes.
This study will highlight the support needed for caregivers in long term care facilities, aiming to improve their working conditions through interventions and strategies that ensure their physical and mental well-being.
Research Questions:
The research question for this study is as follows:
- What are the physical/musculoskeletal demands and motor movement patterns performed by caregivers in residential settings, and what does a typical workday entail for this population?
- Is there a significant increase in perceived discomfort levels among caregivers throughout their workday?
- What are the lifestyle habits of caregivers, and what is the prevalence and history of musculoskeletal injuries among caregivers?
- Is there an increase in the fluctuations of their stress levels and heart rate throughout their workday?
Hypotheses:
The hypotheses for this study are as follows:
- Caregivers spend a significant portion of their workday transferring residents or engaging in various repetitive motor tasks.
- Caregivers experience significant increases in perceived discomfort in most areas of the body, which will be exacerbated throughout their shift.
- There will be a correlation between lifestyle habits and injury history among caregivers.
- Physiological stress levels will increase over the course of a caregiver's workday.
Introduction:
One of the key objectives of this study is to identify the physical demands and requirements of caregivers working in long-term care facilities. The first step involved creating an ergonomic tool tailored to the assessment of caregivers (See appendix A). This tool enables the recording of various motor tasks, behaviors and habits performed repetitively during a typical workday. Additionally, it facilitates the quantification of data to gain a better understanding of the physical demands of their work. This tool will allow investigators to determine the total time spent on specific motor tasks during a workday for this population.
In conjunction with the ergonomic tool, the investigators will administer questionnaires to gather information on lifestyle habits, work-related injury history, perceptions of job-related physical demands (using the Health and Lifestyle Questionnaire), and levels of discomfort during a workday (using the Rate of Perceived Discomfort Questionnaire (RPD-Q)). Additionally, physiological changes, such as galvanic skin response and heart rate fluctuations, will be recorded during data collection to monitor caregivers' physiological responses throughout the workday. This research approach will provide a comprehensive overview of the physical demands and injury risks amongst caregivers working in a long-term care facility. Collecting this data, will enable researchers and others in creating new interventions better tailored to this working population, such as warm-up routines, stretching exercises, training programs and/or technological advancements.
Methods:
This study employs mixed methods research, gathering both quantitative and qualitative data to comprehensively understand the issues surrounding Work Related Musculoskeletal Injuries (WRMSI) among caregivers in long-term care facilities in New Brunswick.
30 full-time caregivers from the York Care Center Nursing Home in Fredericton, Kenneth E Spencer Memorial Nursing Home in Moncton and Westford Nursing Home in Port Elgin will be recruited for this research project.
The participants will be caregivers working with residents with a level three classification. This means that the residents require constant supervision, may or may not be living with a stable chronic condition, and require assistance with personal care, sanitation, and mobility. All participants will be assessed for an 8 to 12-hour workday in a single experimental session.
The equipment used in this study includes:
- A newly developed Pen-and-Paper based Ergonomic monitoring tool, designed by the researchers to identify the physical demands of caregivers' work, will be utilized in this study (see appendix A). The main objective of this research is to identify the different motor tasks, transfer procedures, positions and behaviors that pose risks of developing WRMSI in caregivers. The researchers will monitor and manually input each task performed by the caregivers.
- The Rate of Perceived Discomfort Questionnaire (RPD-Q) (see appendix B) will be administered to track the progression of caregivers' discomfort during their workday. The RPD-Q is a self-reported questionnaire with a 100-point visual analogue scale that indicates the level of discomfort relative to specific body parts. A scale of point 0 corresponds to no discomfort and point 100 represents the worst discomfort imaginable; each point is the equivalent of one millimeter. Twenty-four different body parts will be measured in the RPD questionnaire on both the right and left sides of the body. The RPD questionnaire will be administered 3 times throughout the shift: Prior to the start of the shift, at the midpoint, and at the end of the caregiver's workday. Recording the RPD questionnaire at these specific timepoints will provide a snapshot on how discomfort levels develop throughout a typical working shift.
- A questionnaire on lifestyle habits and work-related injury history (see appendix C) will be administered during data collection to gain insights into current lifestyle and previous workplace injury history of participants. The questionnaire is composed of short-answer, multiple-choice and open-ended questions that can be used as a journal during data collection. The H\&L questionnaire will be filled out once during the workday of data collection. The objective of this questionnaire is to further understand the relationship between current lifestyle of the workers and the development of workplace injuries. The questionnaire is divided into three different subsections:
- The amount of time spent in sedentary behavior, the amount of physical activity performed, and the amount of alcohol and tobacco consumed by participants in a typical week.
- The number of years of experience in the sector, and participants' subjective perception of the physical demands imposed by their work.
- The occurrence or non-occurrence of persistent work-related musculoskeletal injuries or discomfort, and the limitations these injuries impose on individuals' ability to work and their overall well-being.
- Physiological Measures: An Empatica EmbracePlus watch, a galvanic skin response system, will be used to assess and quantify the participants' stress levels throughout their workday. Additionally, the Polar H10 heart rate monitor will enable the observation of caregivers' heart rate fluctuations during their workday. Data collection will follow a baseline measurement of participants heart rate and stress level, which will be taken after 5 minutes in a seated position, in a quiet area and with eyes closed prior to the start of their shift. Field notes will also be taken to facilitate the identification of the periods of the day when physiological stress levels are highest during data collection.
Statistical Analysis/Data Processing:
Descriptive Statistics:
Descriptive statistics using the software IMB SPSS, Version 29 (mean, median, standard deviation, etc.) will be used to evaluate quantitative values derived from the newly developed ergonomic tool.
Cross Correlations:
A series of cross correlations will be run on the Health and Lifestyle Questionnaire to identify correlations between different Work-Related Musculoskeletal Injury (WRMSI) risk factors. The correlation coefficient will enable the investigators to identify whether the relationships are inversely proportional or directly proportional. For example, it will be possible to examine the correlation between physical activity levels and WRMSI history, as well as whether there is a relationship between increases in smoking and alcohol consumption and WRMSI.
Repeated Measures ANOVA:
A Repeated Measure ANOVA will be used to interpret the results obtained from the RPD-Q. The data will be compared at three different time points: the beginning, middle and end of the caregiver's shift. During analysis, it will be possible to observe whether there has been a significant increase in perceived discomfort during the workday and which areas of the body experienced the most significant increase. Prior to running the repeated measures ANOVA, each data point will be plotted to observe if it is normally distributed. Mauchly's test will be used to assess the sphericity assumption. If the sphericity assumption is violated, the Greenhouse-Geisser correction will be used. The alpha level will be set at p < .05, and if any significant interactions are found, Tukey and Bonferroni post hoc analyses will be used.
The same approach will be used for the physiological outcome measures: heart rate monitor and the galvanic skin response system. Repeated Measures ANOVA will be utilized to compare the data collected at the beginning, middle and end of the caregiver's shift. The outcome measure will be to quantify whether stress levels and fluctuations of heart rate increased throughout the workday. If any significance is found, a Tukey and Bonferroni correction will be applied.
Qualitative Results:
A qualitative approach will be used to synthesize information gathered from the workers through the use of field notes. This will include documenting the circumstances surrounding their previous injuries and other relevant details.
- Being tested
- Investigation - Observational Study
- Keywords
- Musculoskeletal Injuries, Healthcare, Patient Handling, Nursing Homes, Injury Prevention
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Investigation - Observational StudyOther
In this study, there will be no intervention, instead, it will be an observational study aimed at identifying the specific physical demands of caregivers working in long-term care facilities. This information will inform future interventions that can help reduce the occurrence of work-related musculoskeletal injuries.
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Pen and Paper Ergonomic Tool - Part 1A : "The caregiver did NOT use any tools or aids while performing the following transfer tasks"
Each participant will be observed throughout an entire workday using a new pen-and-paper-based ergonomic tool developed in the lab. This assessment tool (see Appendix A) is a comprehensive document designed to record the various physical tasks and demands encountered during a typical workday for caregivers in long-term care facilities. The tool was developed based on standardized task analysis tools widely used in ergonomic practices (OHCOW, 2023).
Part 1A of this tool will identify the number of transfers performed by caregivers during a workday, specifying the frequency (number of times this task was performed) and time (seconds) of each type of transfer WITHOUT the use of tools or aids.
Measured: One experimental session (8 to 12 hours)
Pen and Paper Ergonomic Tool - Part 1B : "The caregiver used tools and/or aids while performing the following transfer tasks"
Part 1B of this tool will identify the number of transfers performed by caregivers during a workday, specifying the frequency (number of times this task was performed) and time (seconds) for each type of transfer WITH the use of tools or aids.
Measured: One experimental session (8 to 12 hours)
Pen and Paper Ergonomic Tool - Part 1C: "Tools used for resident transfers"
The purpose of Part 1C is to determine how many transfers each type of equipment was used for by caregivers on a workday. It identifies the frequency of use for both mechanical and non-mechanical tools.
Measured: One experimental session (8 to 12 hours)
Pen and Paper Ergonomic Tool - Part 2A: "Number of resident handling in Bed"
Part 2A of this tool will identify the number of resident handling tasks performed by caregivers in bed during a workday, specifying the frequency (i.e., the number of times this task was performed). This section is also subdivided to identify not only the number of manipulations but also the types of manipulations performed.
Measured: One experimental session (8 to 12 hours)
Pen and Paper Ergonomic Tool - Part 2B: "Number of resident handling in Wheelchair - Sitting"
Part 2B of this tool will identify the number of resident handling tasks performed by caregivers in a wheelchair or sitting position during a workday, specifying the frequency (i.e., the number of times this task was performed). This section is also subdivided to identify not only the number of manipulations but also the types of manipulations performed.
Measured: One experimental session (8 to 12 hours)
Pen and Paper Ergonomic Tool - Part 3: "Motor tasks - Housework - Sanitary"
Sanitary services and needs, such as bending down to clean or pick up objects, can expose caregivers to risks of WRMSIs, especially if they are in a vulnerable position while performing motor tasks. Assisting residents with hygiene care and clothing changes can also vary in terms of time and complexity, which can present challenges for caregivers and increase their risk of injury. This section of the tool will provide an overview of the frequency with which these types of motor tasks are performed during a workday.
Measured: One experimental session (8 to 12 hours)
Pen and Paper Ergonomic Tool - Part 4: "Time spent under different type of behavior"
Extended periods of standing and walking can have significant long-term effects on health. Therefore, this section is crucial as it allows for the recording of the approximate time (in minutes) spent on various activities, such as standing, sitting, and walking, throughout a workday.
Measured: One experimental session (8 to 12 hours)
Pen and Paper Ergonomic Tool - Part 5: "Additional information"
This section of the tool will identify several important factors that can influence the risk of injury to caregivers, including the total time worked during the shift, rest periods, and the longest continuous period worked without rest (in minutes).
Measured: One experimental session (8 to 12 hours)
Pen and Paper Ergonomic Tool - Part 6: "Field observations"
This section of the tool will be used to record any additional behaviors, factors, or obstacles that may increase the risk of injury to caregivers and that have not been covered elsewhere in the tool. It will serve as a journal for the investigators to track valuable information during data collection.
Measured: One experimental session (8 to 12 hours)
Secondary outcomes (1)
Rate of Perceived Discomfort Questionnaire (RPD-Q)
The RPD-Q will be administered to provide an overview of the progression of caregivers' discomfort during their workday. This questionnaire will quantify the discomfort felt by the participants at the beginning, during, and after their workday during data collection. This self-administered questionnaire is based on a visual analogue scale of 0 to 100 points. Zero points represent no discomfort at all, while 100 points represent the maximal level of discomfort. Additionally, the RPD-Q will make it possible to identify whether the level of discomfort increases as the workday progresses, as well as the areas of the body most affected by such changes.
Measured: One experimental session (8 to 12 hours)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Aug 2024
- Study start25 Jul 2024
- Primary completion30 Sep 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Dec 2024 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Work Related Musculoskeletal Injuries (WRMSIs)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Other
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Universite de Moncton
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of New Brunswick
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Michelle Cardoso, Universite de Moncton
- Investigators
- Michelle Cardoso, PhD, Principal investigator, Université de MonctonWayne Albert, PhD, Principal investigator, University of New Brunswick
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06534203
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- UMoncton
- Status last verified
- Jul 2024
- First submitted
- 3 Jun 2024
- Last updated
- 2 Aug 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Aug 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- An Investigation of the Physical Task Demands of Caregivers Working in a Long-Term Care Facility in New Brunswick
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06534203
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- UMoncton
- Keywords
- Musculoskeletal Injuries, Healthcare, Patient Handling, Nursing Homes, Injury Prevention
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Universite de MonctonUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of New Brunswick
- Study start
- 25 Jul 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Sep 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Dec 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 2 Aug 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Providing care to residents and patients significantly contributes to work-related injuries among healthcare personnel, particularly those responsible for transferring and handling residents, who face a higher risk of injury due to the physical demands of their work and other environmental factors.
The purpose of this project is to better understand the daily work requirements, identify their physical demands, and assess injury risk of caregivers. Data will be collected using a new pen-and-paper-based ergonomic surveying tool, a series of questionnaires, and measurements of physiological demands such as heart rate and galvanic skin response.
Collecting this data will enable the investigators and others to create new interventions better tailored to this working population, with a focus on injury prevention. These interventions may include warm-up routines, stretching exercises, training programs, and/or technological advancements.
Detailed description
Purposes/Objectives:
The overall aim of this study is to establish a database on the physical requirements of caregivers working in long-term care homes.
This study will highlight the support needed for caregivers in long term care facilities, aiming to improve their working conditions through interventions and strategies that ensure their physical and mental well-being.
Research Questions:
The research question for this study is as follows:
- What are the physical/musculoskeletal demands and motor movement patterns performed by caregivers in residential settings, and what does a typical workday entail for this population?
- Is there a significant increase in perceived discomfort levels among caregivers throughout their workday?
- What are the lifestyle habits of caregivers, and what is the prevalence and history of musculoskeletal injuries among caregivers?
- Is there an increase in the fluctuations of their stress levels and heart rate throughout their workday?
Hypotheses:
The hypotheses for this study are as follows:
- Caregivers spend a significant portion of their workday transferring residents or engaging in various repetitive motor tasks.
- Caregivers experience significant increases in perceived discomfort in most areas of the body, which will be exacerbated throughout their shift.
- There will be a correlation between lifestyle habits and injury history among caregivers.
- Physiological stress levels will increase over the course of a caregiver's workday.
Introduction:
One of the key objectives of this study is to identify the physical demands and requirements of caregivers working in long-term care facilities. The first step involved creating an ergonomic tool tailored to the assessment of caregivers (See appendix A). This tool enables the recording of various motor tasks, behaviors and habits performed repetitively during a typical workday. Additionally, it facilitates the quantification of data to gain a better understanding of the physical demands of their work. This tool will allow investigators to determine the total time spent on specific motor tasks during a workday for this population.
In conjunction with the ergonomic tool, the investigators will administer questionnaires to gather information on lifestyle habits, work-related injury history, perceptions of job-related physical demands (using the Health and Lifestyle Questionnaire), and levels of discomfort during a workday (using the Rate of Perceived Discomfort Questionnaire (RPD-Q)). Additionally, physiological changes, such as galvanic skin response and heart rate fluctuations, will be recorded during data collection to monitor caregivers' physiological responses throughout the workday. This research approach will provide a comprehensive overview of the physical demands and injury risks amongst caregivers working in a long-term care facility. Collecting this data, will enable researchers and others in creating new interventions better tailored to this working population, such as warm-up routines, stretching exercises, training programs and/or technological advancements.
Methods:
This study employs mixed methods research, gathering both quantitative and qualitative data to comprehensively understand the issues surrounding Work Related Musculoskeletal Injuries (WRMSI) among caregivers in long-term care facilities in New Brunswick.
30 full-time caregivers from the York Care Center Nursing Home in Fredericton, Kenneth E Spencer Memorial Nursing Home in Moncton and Westford Nursing Home in Port Elgin will be recruited for this research project.
The participants will be caregivers working with residents with a level three classification. This means that the residents require constant supervision, may or may not be living with a stable chronic condition, and require assistance with personal care, sanitation, and mobility. All participants will be assessed for an 8 to 12-hour workday in a single experimental session.
The equipment used in this study includes:
- A newly developed Pen-and-Paper based Ergonomic monitoring tool, designed by the researchers to identify the physical demands of caregivers' work, will be utilized in this study (see appendix A). The main objective of this research is to identify the different motor tasks, transfer procedures, positions and behaviors that pose risks of developing WRMSI in caregivers. The researchers will monitor and manually input each task performed by the caregivers.
- The Rate of Perceived Discomfort Questionnaire (RPD-Q) (see appendix B) will be administered to track the progression of caregivers' discomfort during their workday. The RPD-Q is a self-reported questionnaire with a 100-point visual analogue scale that indicates the level of discomfort relative to specific body parts. A scale of point 0 corresponds to no discomfort and point 100 represents the worst discomfort imaginable; each point is the equivalent of one millimeter. Twenty-four different body parts will be measured in the RPD questionnaire on both the right and left sides of the body. The RPD questionnaire will be administered 3 times throughout the shift: Prior to the start of the shift, at the midpoint, and at the end of the caregiver's workday. Recording the RPD questionnaire at these specific timepoints will provide a snapshot on how discomfort levels develop throughout a typical working shift.
- A questionnaire on lifestyle habits and work-related injury history (see appendix C) will be administered during data collection to gain insights into current lifestyle and previous workplace injury history of participants. The questionnaire is composed of short-answer, multiple-choice and open-ended questions that can be used as a journal during data collection. The H\&L questionnaire will be filled out once during the workday of data collection. The objective of this questionnaire is to further understand the relationship between current lifestyle of the workers and the development of workplace injuries. The questionnaire is divided into three different subsections:
- The amount of time spent in sedentary behavior, the amount of physical activity performed, and the amount of alcohol and tobacco consumed by participants in a typical week.
- The number of years of experience in the sector, and participants' subjective perception of the physical demands imposed by their work.
- The occurrence or non-occurrence of persistent work-related musculoskeletal injuries or discomfort, and the limitations these injuries impose on individuals' ability to work and their overall well-being.
- Physiological Measures: An Empatica EmbracePlus watch, a galvanic skin response system, will be used to assess and quantify the participants' stress levels throughout their workday. Additionally, the Polar H10 heart rate monitor will enable the observation of caregivers' heart rate fluctuations during their workday. Data collection will follow a baseline measurement of participants heart rate and stress level, which will be taken after 5 minutes in a seated position, in a quiet area and with eyes closed prior to the start of their shift. Field notes will also be taken to facilitate the identification of the periods of the day when physiological stress levels are highest during data collection.
Statistical Analysis/Data Processing:
Descriptive Statistics:
Descriptive statistics using the software IMB SPSS, Version 29 (mean, median, standard deviation, etc.) will be used to evaluate quantitative values derived from the newly developed ergonomic tool.
Cross Correlations:
A series of cross correlations will be run on the Health and Lifestyle Questionnaire to identify correlations between different Work-Related Musculoskeletal Injury (WRMSI) risk factors. The correlation coefficient will enable the investigators to identify whether the relationships are inversely proportional or directly proportional. For example, it will be possible to examine the correlation between physical activity levels and WRMSI history, as well as whether there is a relationship between increases in smoking and alcohol consumption and WRMSI.
Repeated Measures ANOVA:
A Repeated Measure ANOVA will be used to interpret the results obtained from the RPD-Q. The data will be compared at three different time points: the beginning, middle and end of the caregiver's shift. During analysis, it will be possible to observe whether there has been a significant increase in perceived discomfort during the workday and which areas of the body experienced the most significant increase. Prior to running the repeated measures ANOVA, each data point will be plotted to observe if it is normally distributed. Mauchly's test will be used to assess the sphericity assumption. If the sphericity assumption is violated, the Greenhouse-Geisser correction will be used. The alpha level will be set at p < .05, and if any significant interactions are found, Tukey and Bonferroni post hoc analyses will be used.
The same approach will be used for the physiological outcome measures: heart rate monitor and the galvanic skin response system. Repeated Measures ANOVA will be utilized to compare the data collected at the beginning, middle and end of the caregiver's shift. The outcome measure will be to quantify whether stress levels and fluctuations of heart rate increased throughout the workday. If any significance is found, a Tukey and Bonferroni correction will be applied.
Qualitative Results:
A qualitative approach will be used to synthesize information gathered from the workers through the use of field notes. This will include documenting the circumstances surrounding their previous injuries and other relevant details.
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Other
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 19 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Full time caregivers working in a long term care facility responsable of resident care in New-Brunswick, Canada
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Full-time caregivers
- Caregivers responsible for the care and handling of residents
- Aged 19 or over
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Part-time caregivers
- Caregivers not responsible for residents care and handling
- Caregivers under 19 years of age
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Investigation - Observational StudyIn this study, there will be no intervention, instead, it will be an observational study aimed at identifying the specific physical demands of caregivers working in long-term care facilities. This information will inform future interventions that can help reduce the occurrence of work-related musculoskeletal injuries. | Other | – |
Primary outcome
Pen and Paper Ergonomic Tool - Part 1A : "The caregiver did NOT use any tools or aids while performing the following transfer tasks"
Time frame: One experimental session (8 to 12 hours)
Each participant will be observed throughout an entire workday using a new pen-and-paper-based ergonomic tool developed in the lab. This assessment tool (see Appendix A) is a comprehensive document designed to record the various physical tasks and demands encountered during a typical workday for caregivers in long-term care facilities. The tool was developed based on standardized task analysis tools widely used in ergonomic practices (OHCOW, 2023). Part 1A of this tool will identify the number of transfers performed by caregivers during a workday, specifying the frequency (number of times this task was performed) and time (seconds) of each type of transfer WITHOUT the use of tools or aids.
Pen and Paper Ergonomic Tool - Part 1B : "The caregiver used tools and/or aids while performing the following transfer tasks"
Time frame: One experimental session (8 to 12 hours)
Part 1B of this tool will identify the number of transfers performed by caregivers during a workday, specifying the frequency (number of times this task was performed) and time (seconds) for each type of transfer WITH the use of tools or aids.
Pen and Paper Ergonomic Tool - Part 1C: "Tools used for resident transfers"
Time frame: One experimental session (8 to 12 hours)
The purpose of Part 1C is to determine how many transfers each type of equipment was used for by caregivers on a workday. It identifies the frequency of use for both mechanical and non-mechanical tools.
Pen and Paper Ergonomic Tool - Part 2A: "Number of resident handling in Bed"
Time frame: One experimental session (8 to 12 hours)
Part 2A of this tool will identify the number of resident handling tasks performed by caregivers in bed during a workday, specifying the frequency (i.e., the number of times this task was performed). This section is also subdivided to identify not only the number of manipulations but also the types of manipulations performed.
Pen and Paper Ergonomic Tool - Part 2B: "Number of resident handling in Wheelchair - Sitting"
Time frame: One experimental session (8 to 12 hours)
Part 2B of this tool will identify the number of resident handling tasks performed by caregivers in a wheelchair or sitting position during a workday, specifying the frequency (i.e., the number of times this task was performed). This section is also subdivided to identify not only the number of manipulations but also the types of manipulations performed.
Pen and Paper Ergonomic Tool - Part 3: "Motor tasks - Housework - Sanitary"
Time frame: One experimental session (8 to 12 hours)
Sanitary services and needs, such as bending down to clean or pick up objects, can expose caregivers to risks of WRMSIs, especially if they are in a vulnerable position while performing motor tasks. Assisting residents with hygiene care and clothing changes can also vary in terms of time and complexity, which can present challenges for caregivers and increase their risk of injury. This section of the tool will provide an overview of the frequency with which these types of motor tasks are performed during a workday.
Pen and Paper Ergonomic Tool - Part 4: "Time spent under different type of behavior"
Time frame: One experimental session (8 to 12 hours)
Extended periods of standing and walking can have significant long-term effects on health. Therefore, this section is crucial as it allows for the recording of the approximate time (in minutes) spent on various activities, such as standing, sitting, and walking, throughout a workday.
Pen and Paper Ergonomic Tool - Part 5: "Additional information"
Time frame: One experimental session (8 to 12 hours)
This section of the tool will identify several important factors that can influence the risk of injury to caregivers, including the total time worked during the shift, rest periods, and the longest continuous period worked without rest (in minutes).
Pen and Paper Ergonomic Tool - Part 6: "Field observations"
Time frame: One experimental session (8 to 12 hours)
This section of the tool will be used to record any additional behaviors, factors, or obstacles that may increase the risk of injury to caregivers and that have not been covered elsewhere in the tool. It will serve as a journal for the investigators to track valuable information during data collection.
1 secondary outcome
Rate of Perceived Discomfort Questionnaire (RPD-Q)
Time frame: One experimental session (8 to 12 hours)
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Aug 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Michelle Cardoso, PhD principal investigator
Université de Moncton
Wayne Albert, PhD principal investigator
University of New Brunswick
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Work Related Musculoskeletal Injuries (WRMSIs), run by Universite de Moncton at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Aug 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Alexis Dube, B. Sc (2025) (863-4342 ext. 506, ead7300@umoncton.ca), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Pen and Paper Ergonomic Tool - Part 1A : "The caregiver did NOT use any tools or aids while performing the following transfer tasks" (time frame: One experimental session (8 to 12 hours)). The study lists 9 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Aug 2024.