AzTrials
AzTrials

Burnout, ProfessionalNCT06536387

Storytelling Through Music to Improve Well-being Among Homeless Service Providers

A study testing Storytelling Through Music in people with Burnout, Professional and Anxiety, run by University of Texas at Austin at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Homelessness is a complex social issue and requires a dedicated workforce of helping professionals, including nurses and social workers. Secondary traumatic stress is common in this workforce and contributes to poor professional quality of life, burnout, and job turnover. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Burnout, Professional, Anxiety, Depression
What is being tested?
Storytelling Through Music
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
14 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
1 Jul 2024to 14 Nov 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • >18 years old
  • employed in a homeless services organization in Austin/Travis County for at least 6 months
  • licensed as a nurse or social worker
  • ability to read and speak English
  • access to computer, internet, and zoom.

Who cannot join

  • previous participation in the STM intervention

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of Texas at Austin

    Austin, Texas, 78712

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Storytelling Through Music: a Novel Approach to Improve Well-being Among Homeless Service Providers

Homelessness is a complex social issue and requires a dedicated workforce of helping professionals, including nurses and social workers. Secondary traumatic stress is common in this workforce and contributes to poor professional quality of life, burnout, and job turnover. These factors undermine the health and well-being of homeless service providers and threaten the stability of this critical workforce. The purpose of this study is to evaluate "Storytelling Through Music," an innovative 6-week, multi-dimensional intervention, to improve well-being among homeless service providers.

Read the detailed description

Research has found that the burden of secondary traumatic stress among homeless service providers (HSP) is similar to that among other healthcare professionals, including nurses working in urban emergency departments and in inpatient psychiatric hospitals. Left unaddressed, secondary traumatic stress can cause compassion fatigue and emotional exhaustion, furthering a cycle of poor professional quality of life (QoL), burnout, and job turnover. Research has identified that arts-based interventions have promise in helping healthcare professionals cope with work-related emotions, assist in revealing genuine emotions linked to work-related stress, and in improving professional QoL. What remains unclear is if arts-based interventions can yield similar benefits amongst HSPs.

The purpose of this study, therefore, is to evaluate the feasibility of implementing Storytelling Through Music (STM) with HSPs working with the homeless population in Austin, Texas. STM is a six-week intervention that combines storytelling, reflective writing, song-writing, and self-care skills to improve emotion regulation through affective and cognitive coping skills. Our preliminary data suggests STM to be feasible and acceptable, and preliminary evidence demonstrates improved coping, psychosocial well-being, and burnout in nurses. Specifically, this project aims to:

Aim 1: Explore the contextual factors impacting the well-being of frontline HSPs.

Aim 2: Examine the feasibility of implementing Storytelling Through Music with HSPs.

Aim 3: Investigate the preliminary intervention effect on coping (emotion regulation, self-compassion); well-being (anxiety, depressive symptoms, loneliness, post-traumatic growth, insomnia); and work-related factors (secondary traumatic stress, burnout, compassion satisfaction, and intent to leave).

Being tested
Storytelling Through Music
Keywords
burnout, music intervention, emotional well-being, work-related stress
Medical subject headings
Burnout, Professional, Anxiety Disorders, Depression, Compassion Fatigue, Burnout, Psychological, Occupational Stress

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Storytelling Through MusicBehavioural

    Storytelling Through Music is a six-week intervention that combines storytelling, reflective writing, song-writing, and self-care skills to improve emotion regulation through affective and cognitive coping skills.

Study groups in NCT06536387
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Storytelling Through MusicExperimentalStorytelling Through Music is a six-week intervention that utilizes storytelling, reflective writing, self-care skills, and song-writing. The intervention will be administered in small groups of 4-6 participants/group and with a hybrid approach. The writing workshops will occur online, and the share circle (stories and songs shared with the group) will occur in person. The group sizes will be kept small to ensure that each participant has adequate time to share their writing during the group sessions.
Receives: Behavioral: Storytelling Through Music

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Study Feasibility

    Feasibility will be evaluated by tracking the percentage of participants screened and enrolled. The study will be deemed feasible with a 60% enrollment rate.

    Measured: Immediately post-intervention (6 weeks)

  2. Intervention Feasibility

    Feasibility will be evaluated by tracking the average number of sessions the participants complete. This intervention will be deemed feasible if 85% of the intervention is completed.

    Measured: Immediately post-intervention (6 weeks)

  3. Intervention Acceptability

    An additional primary endpoint is acceptability. Acceptability will be evaluated with semi-structured interview questions to understand the participant's perception of intervention delivery and content, as well as the perceived impact.

    Measured: Immediately post-intervention (6 weeks)

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Mean Change from Baseline in Anxiety Scores at 6 weeks and 10 weeks

    Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Emotional Distress-Anxiety Short-Form 8a will be used. The minimum score is 8, and the maximum score is 40. Higher scores indicate more anxiety.

    Measured: Immediately post-intervention and 1-month post-intervention

  2. Mean Change from Baseline in Depression Scores at 6 weeks and 10 weeks

    The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Depression Short-Form 8a will be used.The minimum score is 8, and the maximum score is 40. Higher scores indicate higher levels of depressive symptoms.

    Measured: Immediately post-intervention and 1-month post-intervention

  3. Mean Change from Baseline in Emotion Regulation Scores at 6 weeks and 10 weeks

    The Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire-Short Form (TEIQue-SF) will be used to assess trait emotional intelligence (EI). The questionnaire consists of 30 items rated on a 7-point scale, provides a global trait EI score, and scores for four subscales (i.e., well-being, self-control, emotionality, and sociability). Higher scores correspond to high levels of trait EI.

    Measured: Immediately post-intervention and 1-month post-intervention

  4. Mean Change from Baseline in Self-Compassion Scores at 6 weeks and 10 weeks

    Self-Compassion Scale; range is 26-130; higher score is better outcome.

    Measured: Immediately post-intervention and 1-month post-intervention

  5. Mean Change from Baseline in Loneliness Scores at 6 weeks and 10 weeks

    University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Loneliness Scale; range is 0-60; lower score is better outcome.

    Measured: Immediately post-intervention and 1-month post-intervention

  6. Mean Change from Baseline in Post-traumatic Growth Scores at 6 weeks and 10 weeks

    The Post-traumatic Growth Index (PTGI) consists of 21-items that measures the degree of positive changes in an individual's experience after a challenging life event. The PTGI consists of 5 dimensions: Relating to Others (7-items), New Possibilities (5-items), Personal Strength (4-items), Spiritual Change (2-items), and Appreciation of Life (3-items). Total scores can range from 0 to 105.

    Measured: Immediately post-intervention and 1-month post-intervention

  7. Mean Change from Baseline in Insomnia Scores at 6 weeks and 10 weeks

    The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Sleep Disturbance Short-Form 6a will be used. The minimum score is 6, and the maximum score is 30. Higher scores indicate more sleep disturbance.

    Measured: Immediately post-intervention and 1-month post-intervention

  8. Mean Change from Baseline in Professional Quality of Life Scores at 6 weeks and 10 weeks

    The Professional Quality of Life (ProQOL) has three subscales: Compassion Satisfaction, Burnout, and Secondary Traumatic Stress. Scores are reported on individual subscales and can range from 10 to 50. Higher levels indicate more of the construct.

    Measured: Immediately post-intervention and 1-month post-intervention

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Aug 2024
  2. Study start1 Jul 2024
  3. Primary completion14 Nov 2024
  4. Study completion14 Nov 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
14 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06536387
Sponsor's protocol ID
STUDY00006156
Status last verified
Nov 2024
First submitted
30 Jul 2024
Last updated
13 Mar 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Storytelling Through Music in people with Burnout, Professional and Anxiety, run by University of Texas at Austin at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Study Feasibility (time frame: Immediately post-intervention (6 weeks)). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Mar 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in