Parkinson DiseaseNCT06536478
The Effect of Exercise Intervention on Posture, Trunk Flexibility and Spine Function in Patients With Parkinson's Disease
A study testing exercise and education in people with Parkinson Disease, run by National Taiwan University Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.
Trial summary
The primary goal of this clinical trail is to compare the effect of a five-week specific motor interventions on the postural alignment, trunk range of motion and spine function in patients with Parkinson's disease. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 30 to 85 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Parkinson Disease
- What is being tested?
- exercise and education
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTaiwan
- Study dates
- 28 Sep 2023to 31 Jul 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 30 to 85 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Hoehn-Yahr classification 2 to 3
- Regular compliance with medication program
- Stable medical condition and vital signs, conscious
- Be able to follow instructions.
Who cannot join
- Cognitive impairment or dementia who are unable to cooperate with therapy or functional assessment
- Patients with musculoskeletal injuries or surgeries that have resulted in limited mobility
- Patients with physician-diagnosed cardiorespiratory disorders with activity limitations
- Patients with acute neurological disorders.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Taiwan1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
National Taiwan University Hospital Hsinchu Branch
Hsinchu
Jui-chi Hsu, +886-3526151 ext. 523504, jchsu@hch.gov.tw
About this study
The primary goal of this clinical trail is to compare the effect of a five-week specific motor interventions on the postural alignment, trunk range of motion and spine function in patients with Parkinson's disease. The secondary goal is to investigate the effect of specific motor interventions on pain, balance, gait, and quality of life.
Participants will:
be randomly allocated to a control group or an exercise group and will perform 50 minutes of exercise twice a week, including stretching, core exercises, gross motor movements and balance exercises for 5 weeks. Each group will be assessed for posture, trunk range of motion, spine function, pain, balance, gait, and quality of life before and after the intervention.
Read the detailed description
Participants will be randomly allocated to a control group or an exercise group and will perform 50 minutes of exercise twice a week, including stretching, core exercises, gross motor movements and balance exercises for 5 weeks. Each group will be assessed for posture, trunk range of motion, spine function, pain, balance, gait and quality of life before and after the intervention.
Posture evaluation was performed by measuring the angles of Flexion and Side-bending, by placing marks on the Spinal process of 7th cervical spine and the Spinal process of 5th lumbar spine, and by taking images of the Sagittal plane and Frontal plane. A digital flat-panel camera was used to take images in the sagittal plane and the coronal plane, and the angle between the line connecting the seventh cervical process of the spine and the fifth lumbar process of the lumbar spine and the vertical line was measured on the images; the angle in the coronal plane was defined as the anterior tilt angle, and that in the coronal plane was defined as the lateral bending angle.
Trunk flexion range of motion is measured using a goniometer and a tape measure in the following manner: Trunk flexion range of motion is measured with the trunk flexed anteriorly: the starting position of the case is standing in an upright position, and the tape measure is fixed to the seventh cervical vertebrae and the first vertebrae on the spinous processes, then the case is asked to relax the trunk forward to the end of the flexion without anteriorly tilting the pelvis. The difference between the tape measure in forward bending and upright position was taken as the value of trunk anterior tilt mobility. Trunk extension range of motion: The starting position of the case was standing in an upright position, and a tape measure was fixed on the spinous processes of the seventh cervical vertebrae and the first vertebrae of the recommended vertebrae. After the case was asked to relax the trunk with both hands and bend the trunk back to the bottom without tilting the pelvis posteriorly, and the difference between the posterior bending and the tape measure in the upright position was used as a value of the trunk extension range of motion. Trunk side-bending range of motion: The starting position of the case was standing upright, the center of the joint goniometer was aligned with the spinal process of the first segment of the recommended vertebrae of the case, one side of the goniometer was perpendicular to the floor, and the other side was aligned with the seventh segment of the cervical vertebrae of the case, the case was asked to make a left/right side-bending motion, and the angle between the left/right side-bending and the upright position was subtracted as the value of trunk side-bending range of motion. The angle between the left/right lateral bend and the upright position was subtracted to obtain the value of trunk lateral bending activity. Trunk rotation range of motion: With the case in a seated but not reclined position, the center of the joint goniometer was aligned with the center of the case's head, with one side of the goniometer parallel to the line of the iliac crest of the pelvis, and the other side parallel to the line of the shoulder crests on both sides. One side of the goniometer was parallel to the line of the iliac crest of the pelvis and the other side was parallel to the line of the shoulder crests on both sides of the body. The case was asked to perform a left/right rotation, and the angle between the left/right rotation and the seated position was subtracted to obtain a value for the degree of torso rotation.
Spinal function is assessed by evaluating the functional activities related to the spine, including Functional axial rotation and Supine to and from standing. The Functional Axial Rotation Test is performed by asking the patient to use a Cervical Range of Motion (CROM) device in a sitting position to measure the angle of rotation of the case when viewed from the left/right side. The lying to standing test is performed by asking the patient to use a Cervical Range of Motion (CROM) device to measure the angle of rotation of the case when viewed from the right/left side. The Lying to Standing Test measures the time taken by the case to move from standing to lying and lying to standing.
Pain was assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale , VAS, which asks the patient about the degree of low back pain.
The Shortened Version of the Balance Evaluation Systems Tests (Mini-BEST) is used to evaluate balance in cases of balance impairment (e.g., Parkinson's disease, brain injury, vestibular disorders, stroke, or multiple sclerosis). The assessment consists of four sub-balance systems with 14 items each scored 0, 1, or 2 depending on performance, ranging from 0 to 28, with higher scores indicating better balance. The four sub-balance systems included in the test are Anticipatory postural adjustments, Reactive postural control, Sensory orientation and Dynamic gait.
Walking speed was assessed using the 10 m walk test, which involves walking a distance of 14 meters at a comfortable speed and recording the time taken from the second to the twelfth meter in order to calculate the walking speed of the case, with the use of a walking aid if necessary.
The gait assessment will record the parameters of walking and assess them using the Tinetti Mobility Test (TMT). The TMT is used to assess the gait performance of elderly people, people with Parkinson's disease, brain injury, stroke or multiple sclerosis. The assessment is performed by asking the patient to walk a distance of 25 feet in a straight line at a comfortable speed. The administrator can either directly observe or video-record the gait of the patient, or use a walking aid if necessary. The assessment includes the observation of hesitancy to start walking, height of the raised foot, gait length, gait symmetry, continuity of stride, walking path, trunk stability, and width of stride, with a score of 0, 1, or 2 for each item. Each item was scored as 0, 1 or 2, ranging from 0 to 12, with higher scores indicating a more problem-free gait.
Quality of life is assessed using the short version of the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-8). The PDQ8 is a self-completion questionnaire with eight questions covering eight domains, including activities of daily living, exercise, cognition, social support, communication, emotional well-being, shame, and feelings of physical discomfort, with the lower the score, the better the quality of life and health.
- Conditions
- Parkinson Disease
- Being tested
- exercise, education
- Keywords
- Parkinson Disease, exercise, posture
- Medical subject headings
- Parkinson Disease, Motor Activity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
exerciseOther
50 minutes of exercise twice a week, including stretching, core exercises, gross motor movements and balance exercises for 5 weeks
educationOther
The patient will be given a one-time exercise education session and a 50-minute video that included stretching, core exercises, gross motor movements and balance exercises that could be practiced at home.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| exercise | Experimental | Exercise group will perform 50 minutes of exercise twice a week, including stretching, core exercises, gross motor movements and balance exercises for 5 weeks Receives: Other: exercise |
| education | Other | The patient will be given a one-time exercise education session and a 50-minute video that included stretching, core exercises, gross motor movements and balance exercises that could be practiced at home. Receives: Other: education |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
postural alignment of frontal and sagittal plance
The angles of Flexion and Side-bending of the trunk in degrees
Measured: before and immediately after the intervention
range of motion of trunk flexion and side-bending
The range of motion of trunk flexion and side-bending will be evaluated in degrees
Measured: before and immediately after the intervention
Supine to and from sitting
The time of supine to and from sitting is measured in seconds
Measured: before and immediately after the intervention
Secondary outcomes (6)
Visual Analogue Scale of low back pain
It is a scale from 0 to 10. The higher score means the patient has more severe pain.
Measured: before and immediately after the intervention
The Shortened Version of the Balance Evaluation Systems Tests (Mini-BEST)
It is a scale from 0 to 28. The higher score means the patient has no impairment in their balance.
Measured: before and immediately after the intervention
10 meter gait speed
the speed of gait is measured in meters per second
Measured: before and immediately after the intervention
Tinetti Mobility Test (TMT)
It is a scale from 0 to 12. The higher score means the patient has a better gait pattern.
Measured: before and immediately after the intervention
the short version of the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-8)
quality of life will be measured by the PDQ-8. It is a scale from 0-32. The higher scale means the patient has worse quality of life.
Measured: before and immediately after the intervention
Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I)
It is a scale from 16 to 64. The higher score means the patient is more afraid of falling down.
Measured: before and immediately after the intervention
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Aug 2024
- Study start28 Sep 2023
- Primary completion31 Jul 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Jul 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Parkinson DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by National Taiwan University HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- National Taiwan University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06536478
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 202307076RIND
- Status last verified
- Sep 2023
- First submitted
- 29 Jul 2024
- Last updated
- 7 Aug 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Barone P, Santangelo G, Amboni M, Pellecchia MT, Vitale C. Pisa syndrome in Parkinson's disease and parkinsonism: clinical features, pathophysiology, and treatment. Lancet Neurol. 2016 Sep;15(10):1063-74. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)30173-9. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
PubMed 27571158Norkin, C.C. and D.J. White, Measurement of Joint Motion: A Guide to Goniometry. 5th ed. 2017: F.A.Davis.
Vaugoyeau M, Viallet F, Aurenty R, Assaiante C, Mesure S, Massion J. Axial rotation in Parkinson's disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2006 Jul;77(7):815-21. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2004.050666. Epub 2006 Mar 30.
PubMed 16574736Schenkman M, Cutson TM, Kuchibhatla M, Chandler J, Pieper CF, Ray L, Laub KC. Exercise to improve spinal flexibility and function for people with Parkinson's disease: a randomized, controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1998 Oct;46(10):1207-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1998.tb04535.x.
PubMed 9777901Delgado DA, Lambert BS, Boutris N, McCulloch PC, Robbins AB, Moreno MR, Harris JD. Validation of Digital Visual Analog Scale Pain Scoring With a Traditional Paper-based Visual Analog Scale in Adults. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2018 Mar 23;2(3):e088. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-17-00088. eCollection 2018 Mar.
PubMed 30211382Duncan RP, Leddy AL, Cavanaugh JT, Dibble LE, Ellis TD, Ford MP, Foreman KB, Earhart GM. Comparative utility of the BESTest, mini-BESTest, and brief-BESTest for predicting falls in individuals with Parkinson disease: a cohort study. Phys Ther. 2013 Apr;93(4):542-50. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20120302. Epub 2012 Nov 21.
PubMed 23174567Lindholm B, Nilsson MH, Hansson O, Hagell P. The clinical significance of 10-m walk test standardizations in Parkinson's disease. J Neurol. 2018 Aug;265(8):1829-1835. doi: 10.1007/s00415-018-8921-9. Epub 2018 Jun 6.
PubMed 29876762Kegelmeyer DA, Kloos AD, Thomas KM, Kostyk SK. Reliability and validity of the Tinetti Mobility Test for individuals with Parkinson disease. Phys Ther. 2007 Oct;87(10):1369-78. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20070007. Epub 2007 Aug 7.
PubMed 17684089Peto V, Jenkinson C, Fitzpatrick R. PDQ-39: a review of the development, validation and application of a Parkinson's disease quality of life questionnaire and its associated measures. J Neurol. 1998 May;245 Suppl 1:S10-4. doi: 10.1007/pl00007730.
PubMed 9617716
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Aug 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of Exercise Intervention on Posture, Trunk Flexibility and Spine Function in Patients With Parkinson's Disease
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06536478
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 202307076RIND
- Conditions
- Parkinson Disease
- Keywords
- Parkinson Disease, exercise, posture
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- National Taiwan University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 28 Sep 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Jul 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Jul 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 5 Aug 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary goal of this clinical trail is to compare the effect of a five-week specific motor interventions on the postural alignment, trunk range of motion and spine function in patients with Parkinson's disease. The secondary goal is to investigate the effect of specific motor interventions on pain, balance, gait, and quality of life.
Participants will:
be randomly allocated to a control group or an exercise group and will perform 50 minutes of exercise twice a week, including stretching, core exercises, gross motor movements and balance exercises for 5 weeks. Each group will be assessed for posture, trunk range of motion, spine function, pain, balance, gait, and quality of life before and after the intervention.
Detailed description
Participants will be randomly allocated to a control group or an exercise group and will perform 50 minutes of exercise twice a week, including stretching, core exercises, gross motor movements and balance exercises for 5 weeks. Each group will be assessed for posture, trunk range of motion, spine function, pain, balance, gait and quality of life before and after the intervention.
Posture evaluation was performed by measuring the angles of Flexion and Side-bending, by placing marks on the Spinal process of 7th cervical spine and the Spinal process of 5th lumbar spine, and by taking images of the Sagittal plane and Frontal plane. A digital flat-panel camera was used to take images in the sagittal plane and the coronal plane, and the angle between the line connecting the seventh cervical process of the spine and the fifth lumbar process of the lumbar spine and the vertical line was measured on the images; the angle in the coronal plane was defined as the anterior tilt angle, and that in the coronal plane was defined as the lateral bending angle.
Trunk flexion range of motion is measured using a goniometer and a tape measure in the following manner: Trunk flexion range of motion is measured with the trunk flexed anteriorly: the starting position of the case is standing in an upright position, and the tape measure is fixed to the seventh cervical vertebrae and the first vertebrae on the spinous processes, then the case is asked to relax the trunk forward to the end of the flexion without anteriorly tilting the pelvis. The difference between the tape measure in forward bending and upright position was taken as the value of trunk anterior tilt mobility. Trunk extension range of motion: The starting position of the case was standing in an upright position, and a tape measure was fixed on the spinous processes of the seventh cervical vertebrae and the first vertebrae of the recommended vertebrae. After the case was asked to relax the trunk with both hands and bend the trunk back to the bottom without tilting the pelvis posteriorly, and the difference between the posterior bending and the tape measure in the upright position was used as a value of the trunk extension range of motion. Trunk side-bending range of motion: The starting position of the case was standing upright, the center of the joint goniometer was aligned with the spinal process of the first segment of the recommended vertebrae of the case, one side of the goniometer was perpendicular to the floor, and the other side was aligned with the seventh segment of the cervical vertebrae of the case, the case was asked to make a left/right side-bending motion, and the angle between the left/right side-bending and the upright position was subtracted as the value of trunk side-bending range of motion. The angle between the left/right lateral bend and the upright position was subtracted to obtain the value of trunk lateral bending activity. Trunk rotation range of motion: With the case in a seated but not reclined position, the center of the joint goniometer was aligned with the center of the case's head, with one side of the goniometer parallel to the line of the iliac crest of the pelvis, and the other side parallel to the line of the shoulder crests on both sides. One side of the goniometer was parallel to the line of the iliac crest of the pelvis and the other side was parallel to the line of the shoulder crests on both sides of the body. The case was asked to perform a left/right rotation, and the angle between the left/right rotation and the seated position was subtracted to obtain a value for the degree of torso rotation.
Spinal function is assessed by evaluating the functional activities related to the spine, including Functional axial rotation and Supine to and from standing. The Functional Axial Rotation Test is performed by asking the patient to use a Cervical Range of Motion (CROM) device in a sitting position to measure the angle of rotation of the case when viewed from the left/right side. The lying to standing test is performed by asking the patient to use a Cervical Range of Motion (CROM) device to measure the angle of rotation of the case when viewed from the right/left side. The Lying to Standing Test measures the time taken by the case to move from standing to lying and lying to standing.
Pain was assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale , VAS, which asks the patient about the degree of low back pain.
The Shortened Version of the Balance Evaluation Systems Tests (Mini-BEST) is used to evaluate balance in cases of balance impairment (e.g., Parkinson's disease, brain injury, vestibular disorders, stroke, or multiple sclerosis). The assessment consists of four sub-balance systems with 14 items each scored 0, 1, or 2 depending on performance, ranging from 0 to 28, with higher scores indicating better balance. The four sub-balance systems included in the test are Anticipatory postural adjustments, Reactive postural control, Sensory orientation and Dynamic gait.
Walking speed was assessed using the 10 m walk test, which involves walking a distance of 14 meters at a comfortable speed and recording the time taken from the second to the twelfth meter in order to calculate the walking speed of the case, with the use of a walking aid if necessary.
The gait assessment will record the parameters of walking and assess them using the Tinetti Mobility Test (TMT). The TMT is used to assess the gait performance of elderly people, people with Parkinson's disease, brain injury, stroke or multiple sclerosis. The assessment is performed by asking the patient to walk a distance of 25 feet in a straight line at a comfortable speed. The administrator can either directly observe or video-record the gait of the patient, or use a walking aid if necessary. The assessment includes the observation of hesitancy to start walking, height of the raised foot, gait length, gait symmetry, continuity of stride, walking path, trunk stability, and width of stride, with a score of 0, 1, or 2 for each item. Each item was scored as 0, 1 or 2, ranging from 0 to 12, with higher scores indicating a more problem-free gait.
Quality of life is assessed using the short version of the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-8). The PDQ8 is a self-completion questionnaire with eight questions covering eight domains, including activities of daily living, exercise, cognition, social support, communication, emotional well-being, shame, and feelings of physical discomfort, with the lower the score, the better the quality of life and health.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| exercise | Experimental | Other: exerciseExercise group will perform 50 minutes of exercise twice a week, including stretching, core exercises, gross motor movements and balance exercises for 5 weeks |
| education | Other | Other: educationThe patient will be given a one-time exercise education session and a 50-minute video that included stretching, core exercises, gross motor movements and balance exercises that could be practiced at home. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 30 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Hoehn-Yahr classification 2 to 3
- Regular compliance with medication program
- Stable medical condition and vital signs, conscious
- Be able to follow instructions.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Cognitive impairment or dementia who are unable to cooperate with therapy or functional assessment
- Patients with musculoskeletal injuries or surgeries that have resulted in limited mobility
- Patients with physician-diagnosed cardiorespiratory disorders with activity limitations
- Patients with acute neurological disorders.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| exercise50 minutes of exercise twice a week, including stretching, core exercises, gross motor movements and balance exercises for 5 weeks | Other | exercise |
| educationThe patient will be given a one-time exercise education session and a 50-minute video that included stretching, core exercises, gross motor movements and balance exercises that could be practiced at home. | Other | education |
Primary outcome
postural alignment of frontal and sagittal plance
Time frame: before and immediately after the intervention
The angles of Flexion and Side-bending of the trunk in degrees
range of motion of trunk flexion and side-bending
Time frame: before and immediately after the intervention
The range of motion of trunk flexion and side-bending will be evaluated in degrees
Supine to and from sitting
Time frame: before and immediately after the intervention
The time of supine to and from sitting is measured in seconds
6 secondary outcomes
Visual Analogue Scale of low back pain
Time frame: before and immediately after the intervention
The Shortened Version of the Balance Evaluation Systems Tests (Mini-BEST)
Time frame: before and immediately after the intervention
10 meter gait speed
Time frame: before and immediately after the intervention
Tinetti Mobility Test (TMT)
Time frame: before and immediately after the intervention
the short version of the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-8)
Time frame: before and immediately after the intervention
Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I)
Time frame: before and immediately after the intervention
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Aug 2024.
- Results publication: PubMed 27571158Barone P, Santangelo G, Amboni M, Pellecchia MT, Vitale C. Pisa syndrome in Parkinson's disease and parkinsonism: clinical features, pathophysiology, and treatment. Lancet Neurol. 2016 Sep;15(10):1063-74. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)30173-9. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
- Results publicationNorkin, C.C. and D.J. White, Measurement of Joint Motion: A Guide to Goniometry. 5th ed. 2017: F.A.Davis.
- Results publication: PubMed 16574736Vaugoyeau M, Viallet F, Aurenty R, Assaiante C, Mesure S, Massion J. Axial rotation in Parkinson's disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2006 Jul;77(7):815-21. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2004.050666. Epub 2006 Mar 30.
- Results publication: PubMed 9777901Schenkman M, Cutson TM, Kuchibhatla M, Chandler J, Pieper CF, Ray L, Laub KC. Exercise to improve spinal flexibility and function for people with Parkinson's disease: a randomized, controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1998 Oct;46(10):1207-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1998.tb04535.x.
- Results publication: PubMed 30211382Delgado DA, Lambert BS, Boutris N, McCulloch PC, Robbins AB, Moreno MR, Harris JD. Validation of Digital Visual Analog Scale Pain Scoring With a Traditional Paper-based Visual Analog Scale in Adults. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2018 Mar 23;2(3):e088. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-17-00088. eCollection 2018 Mar.
- Results publication: PubMed 23174567Duncan RP, Leddy AL, Cavanaugh JT, Dibble LE, Ellis TD, Ford MP, Foreman KB, Earhart GM. Comparative utility of the BESTest, mini-BESTest, and brief-BESTest for predicting falls in individuals with Parkinson disease: a cohort study. Phys Ther. 2013 Apr;93(4):542-50. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20120302. Epub 2012 Nov 21.
- Results publication: PubMed 29876762Lindholm B, Nilsson MH, Hansson O, Hagell P. The clinical significance of 10-m walk test standardizations in Parkinson's disease. J Neurol. 2018 Aug;265(8):1829-1835. doi: 10.1007/s00415-018-8921-9. Epub 2018 Jun 6.
- Results publication: PubMed 17684089Kegelmeyer DA, Kloos AD, Thomas KM, Kostyk SK. Reliability and validity of the Tinetti Mobility Test for individuals with Parkinson disease. Phys Ther. 2007 Oct;87(10):1369-78. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20070007. Epub 2007 Aug 7.
- Results publication: PubMed 9617716Peto V, Jenkinson C, Fitzpatrick R. PDQ-39: a review of the development, validation and application of a Parkinson's disease quality of life questionnaire and its associated measures. J Neurol. 1998 May;245 Suppl 1:S10-4. doi: 10.1007/pl00007730.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Parkinson Disease
Recruiting
Automated Language Analysis in Neurodegenerative Diseases: Application of Artificial Intelligence Models
Alzheimer's Disease (AD), Frontotemporal Dementia (FTD)
Recruiting
Investigating Basal Ganglia-Cortical Physiology During Sleep and Its Modulation by Adaptive Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson Disease
Parkinson's Disease (PD)
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study to Evaluate Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Hydroxychloroquine in Subjects With Parkinson's Disease
Parkinson&Amp;#39;s Disease
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
STAR0602 With Nivolumab in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer and in Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer, and STAR0602 Alone in Thymic Carcinoma
NSCLC, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Not yet recruiting
Cognitive-Motor Training for Gait Adaptability in Parkinson Disease
Parkinson Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing exercise and education in people with Parkinson Disease, run by National Taiwan University Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Aug 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Jui-chi Hsu (+886-5326151 ext. 523504, jchsu@hch.gov.tw), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
postural alignment of frontal and sagittal plance (time frame: before and immediately after the intervention). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06536478, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Aug 2024.