Diabetic Macular EdemaPhase 1/2BETTIS-1NCT06536491
EC-104 Intravitreal Implant for the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema
A Phase 1/2 study testing EC-104 high dose, EC-104 low dose and Dexamethasone intravitreal implant in people with Diabetic Macular Edema, run by Eclipse Life Sciences, Inc. at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This is a prospective, randomized, subject- and evaluator-masked, Phase 2, multicenter study comparing the safety and efficacy of EC-104-6M high-dose (fluocinolone acetonide [FA] 0.14 mg) implant and EC-104-4M low-dose (FA 0.092 mg) implant to Ozurdex® (dexamethasone intravitreal (IVT) implant, 0.7 mg) in subjects… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Diabetic Macular Edema
- What is being tested?
- EC-104 high dose, EC-104 low dose and Dexamethasone intravitreal implant
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 75 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 19 Aug 2024to 31 Dec 2026
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Males or females who are at least 18 years of age at the time of informed consent
- Willing and able to provide signed informed consent (participant or legally authorized representative) prior to any study-related procedures and to comply with all study visits and cooperate with all examinations
- Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (Type 1 or Type 2), with history of diabetic macular edema (DME) < = years duration prior to Screening Visit 1
- Currently monitored hemoglobin A1c values ≤ 10.0 while under the care of a qualified medical provider for diabetes mellitus management, unless provider allows value variance
- Inclusion criteria for the study eye (all of the below criteria must be met in the same eye):
- Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study BCVA score ≤ 70 letters (Snellen equivalent 20/40 or worse) and ≥ 20 letters (Snellen equivalent 20/400) in at least 1 eye
Who cannot join
- Previous or current diagnosis of any form of glaucoma (defined as cup-to-disc ratio > 0.7) or ocular hypertension (documented intraocular pressure (IOP) > 21 mm Hg without glaucomatous disc damage) requiring medical or surgical intervention
- History of steroid-induced IOP elevation > 25 mm Hg
- Presence of active proliferative diabetic retinopathy, defined as active neovascularization of disc (NVD), neovascularization elsewhere (NVE), neovascularization of iris (NVI), neovascularization of angle (NVA), or vitreous hemorrhage in the setting of active NVD or NVE
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Retina Associates of Florida, LLC
Tampa, Florida, 33609
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Controlled, Subject- and Evaluator-Masked, Phase 2 Clinical Trial Comparing EC-104 Intravitreal Implant to Ozurdex® for the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema (BETTIS-1)
This is a prospective, randomized, subject- and evaluator-masked, Phase 2, multicenter study comparing the safety and efficacy of EC-104-6M high-dose (fluocinolone acetonide [FA] 0.14 mg) implant and EC-104-4M low-dose (FA 0.092 mg) implant to Ozurdex® (dexamethasone intravitreal (IVT) implant, 0.7 mg) in subjects with diabetic retinopathy (DR) and center-involving diabetic macular edema (DME), with prior suboptimal clinical response to IVT anti-VEGF therapy who have been previously treated with locally administered corticosteroids without a clinically significant rise in intraocular pressure (IOP).
Read the detailed description
Approximately 75 subjects who meet entry criteria will be randomized 1:1:1 to EC-104-6M high-dose (FA 0.14 mg) implant or EC-104-4M low-dose (FA 0.092 mg) implant or Ozurdex® (dexamethasone IVT implant 0.7 mg), with the goal of achieving approximately 20 subjects per group with a positive therapeutic response in their study eyes, who are evaluable in the primary endpoint analysis to assess efficacy. Subjects with a positive therapeutic response at Week 4 will be included in the primary and secondary endpoint analyses to assess efficacy for "Time to recurrent disease." Subjects who do not achieve a positive therapeutic response will be classified as suboptimal responders. While suboptimal responders will not be included in the primary and the secondary endpoint analyses to assess efficacy for "Time to recurrent disease," they will remain in the study and will be followed prospectively, with inclusion in the remaining endpoints to assess efficacy and all safety endpoint analyses
- Conditions
- Diabetic Macular Edema
- Being tested
- EC-104 high dose, EC-104 low dose, Dexamethasone intravitreal implant
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
EC-104 high doseDrug
Intravitreal injection
EC-104 low doseDrug
Intravitreal injection
Dexamethasone intravitreal implantDrug
Marketed product intravitreal injection
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| EC-104 high dose | Experimental | Intravitreal implant of fluocinolone acetonide Receives: Drug: EC-104 high dose |
| EC-104 low dose | Experimental | Intravitreal implant of fluocinolone acetonide Receives: Drug: EC-104 low dose |
| Dexamethasone intravitreal implant | Active comparator | Marketed product Receives: Drug: Dexamethasone intravitreal implant |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Ocular and Systemic Safety
Incidence of Adverse events
Measured: Through Week 24
Secondary outcomes (1)
Diabetic macular edema recurrence
Time (days) to recurrence
Measured: Through Week 24
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Aug 2024
- Study start19 Aug 2024
- Primary completion15 Oct 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Diabetic Macular EdemaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Computer generated equal randomization
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 75 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Eclipse Life Sciences, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06536491
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EC104-CS-201
- Acronym
- BETTIS-1
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 31 Jul 2024
- Last updated
- 15 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Controlled, Subject- and Evaluator-Masked, Phase 2 Clinical Trial Comparing EC-104 Intravitreal Implant to Ozurdex® for the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema (BETTIS-1)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06536491
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BETTIS-1 / EC104-CS-201
- Conditions
- Diabetic Macular Edema
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 75 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Eclipse Life Sciences, Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 19 Aug 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Oct 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 5 Aug 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a prospective, randomized, subject- and evaluator-masked, Phase 2, multicenter study comparing the safety and efficacy of EC-104-6M high-dose (fluocinolone acetonide [FA] 0.14 mg) implant and EC-104-4M low-dose (FA 0.092 mg) implant to Ozurdex® (dexamethasone intravitreal (IVT) implant, 0.7 mg) in subjects with diabetic retinopathy (DR) and center-involving diabetic macular edema (DME), with prior suboptimal clinical response to IVT anti-VEGF therapy who have been previously treated with locally administered corticosteroids without a clinically significant rise in intraocular pressure (IOP).
Detailed description
Approximately 75 subjects who meet entry criteria will be randomized 1:1:1 to EC-104-6M high-dose (FA 0.14 mg) implant or EC-104-4M low-dose (FA 0.092 mg) implant or Ozurdex® (dexamethasone IVT implant 0.7 mg), with the goal of achieving approximately 20 subjects per group with a positive therapeutic response in their study eyes, who are evaluable in the primary endpoint analysis to assess efficacy. Subjects with a positive therapeutic response at Week 4 will be included in the primary and secondary endpoint analyses to assess efficacy for "Time to recurrent disease." Subjects who do not achieve a positive therapeutic response will be classified as suboptimal responders. While suboptimal responders will not be included in the primary and the secondary endpoint analyses to assess efficacy for "Time to recurrent disease," they will remain in the study and will be followed prospectively, with inclusion in the remaining endpoints to assess efficacy and all safety endpoint analyses
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- Computer generated equal randomization
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| EC-104 high dose | Experimental | Drug: EC-104 high doseIntravitreal implant of fluocinolone acetonide |
| EC-104 low dose | Experimental | Drug: EC-104 low doseIntravitreal implant of fluocinolone acetonide |
| Dexamethasone intravitreal implant | Active comparator | Drug: Dexamethasone intravitreal implantMarketed product |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Males or females who are at least 18 years of age at the time of informed consent
- Willing and able to provide signed informed consent (participant or legally authorized representative) prior to any study-related procedures and to comply with all study visits and cooperate with all examinations
- Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (Type 1 or Type 2), with history of diabetic macular edema (DME) < = years duration prior to Screening Visit 1
- Currently monitored hemoglobin A1c values ≤ 10.0 while under the care of a qualified medical provider for diabetes mellitus management, unless provider allows value variance
- Inclusion criteria for the study eye (all of the below criteria must be met in the same eye):
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Previous or current diagnosis of any form of glaucoma (defined as cup-to-disc ratio > 0.7) or ocular hypertension (documented intraocular pressure (IOP) > 21 mm Hg without glaucomatous disc damage) requiring medical or surgical intervention
- History of steroid-induced IOP elevation > 25 mm Hg
- Presence of active proliferative diabetic retinopathy, defined as active neovascularization of disc (NVD), neovascularization elsewhere (NVE), neovascularization of iris (NVI), neovascularization of angle (NVA), or vitreous hemorrhage in the setting of active NVD or NVE
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| EC-104 high doseIntravitreal injection | Drug | EC-104 high dose |
| EC-104 low doseIntravitreal injection | Drug | EC-104 low dose |
| Dexamethasone intravitreal implantMarketed product intravitreal injection | Drug | Dexamethasone intravitreal implant |
Primary outcome
Ocular and Systemic Safety
Time frame: Through Week 24
Incidence of Adverse events
1 secondary outcome
Diabetic macular edema recurrence
Time frame: Through Week 24
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Sep 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Diabetic Macular Edema
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Real World Evidence in China: Faricimab Use in Diabetic Macular Edema, Retinal Vein Occlusion, and Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (The Farseeing Study)
Diabetic Macular Edema, Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Long-Term Follow-Up Study of RGX-314 Administered in the Suprachoroidal Space for Participants With and Without Diabetic Retinopathy
Diabetic Retinopathy, DR
RecruitingPhase 3
A Phase 3 Trial for Intravitreal Injection of 4D-150 in Adults With Diabetic Macular Edema (DME).
Diabetic Macular Edema (DME)
RecruitingPhase 2
Oral N-Acetylcysteine on Diabetic Macular Edema
Diabetic Macular Edema (DME)
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
COMO: A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-Masked Study Comparing the Efficacy of EYP-1901 Against Aflibercept in DME
Diabetic Macular Edema, DME
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1/2 study testing EC-104 high dose, EC-104 low dose and Dexamethasone intravitreal implant in people with Diabetic Macular Edema, run by Eclipse Life Sciences, Inc. at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Ocular and Systemic Safety (time frame: Through Week 24). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Sep 2026.