AzTrials
AzTrials

Treatment Resistant DepressionDBS for TRDNCT06542900

Efficacy of Deep Brain Stimulation(DBS) for Treatment-Resistant Depression(TRD)

A study testing Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) in people with Treatment Resistant Depression, run by Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing at 1 site in China.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of deep brain stimulation (DBS) implantation in patients with Treatment-resistant Depression (TRD) targeting the ventral capsule/ventral striatum (VC/VS), Brodmann area 25/subcallosal cingulate (SCC), Anterior Limb of Internal Capsule (ALIC), inferior… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Treatment Resistant Depression
What is being tested?
Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
10 Aug 2024to 31 Dec 2029
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • male or female, 18-65 years old;
  • able to provide written informed consent voluntarily;
  • had a diagnosis of major depression disorder (MDD) (recurrent episodes) without psychotic features in compliance with the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders -Fourth Edition -Text Revised (DSM-IV-TR) and confirmed by the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview Chinese version 5.0;
  • failure of response to at least two antidepressant medication trials based on the Massachusetts General Hospital antidepressant treatment response questionnaire (MGH-ATRQ);
  • ongoing antidepressant(s) at a fixed dose for at least four weeks before baseline assessment;
  • had a score of ≥201 on the Hamilton Depression Scale- item 17 (HAMD-17) at baseline.

Who cannot join

  • presence of other psychotic disorders;
  • have a treatment history that includes electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), modified electroconvulsive therapy (MECT), transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), DBS, and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS);
  • presents a suicide risk (defined as a HAMD-17 score of ≥3 on suicide-related items);
  • experience difficulty in effectively communicating with investigators;
  • with a history of traumatic brain injury (TBI);
  • with intracranial or cardiovascular stents;
Show all 11Show fewer
  • substance abuse within the past six months;
  • unstable neurological or coagulation disorders;
  • women who are pregnant, lactating, or of childbearing potential who refuse the use of reliable contraception during the study;
  • have been involved in other clinical studies within three months before enrollment in this study;
  • any conditions considered by the study group.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Xiaolei Liu, MD & PhD contact

+86 10 83198650

ring@vip.163.com

China1 site
  • Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University

    Beijing, 100053

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Effectiveness and Safety of Deep Brain Stimulation(DBS) in Treatment-Resistant Depression(TRD)

The primary purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of deep brain stimulation (DBS) implantation in patients with Treatment-resistant Depression (TRD) targeting the ventral capsule/ventral striatum (VC/VS), Brodmann area 25/subcallosal cingulate (SCC), Anterior Limb of Internal Capsule (ALIC), inferior thalamic peduncle (ITP), nucleus accumbens (NAc), lateral habenula (LHb), medial forebrain bundle (MFB), or other unreported nuclei targets.

Read the detailed description

At least 40-60% of people with major depressive disorders (MDD) continue to have symptoms after treatment. The pharmacology treatment cannot produce sustained antidepressant effects in 50% of patients with depression. Therefore, more effective therapeutic methods are urgently needed. In a comprehensive survey of diverse neuromodulation therapies, targeting specific nuclei with deep brain stimulation (DBS) has the most potential for Treatment-resistant Depression (TRD) with apparent symptoms. The stimulation targets of DBS for patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder include the ventral capsule/ventral striatum (VC/VS), Brodmann area 25/subcallosal cingulate (SCC), Anterior Limb of Internal Capsule (ALIC), inferior thalamic peduncle (ITP), nucleus accumbens (NAc), lateral habenula (LHb), and medial forebrain bundle (MFB). However, the DBS case reports are limited and lack high-quality, evidence-based medical evidence. So, this cohort study focuses on the effectiveness of DBS-targeted VC/VS, SCC, ALIC, ITP, NAc, LHb, MFB, or other unreported nuclei targets on TRD.

Another goal of this program is to study the neuronal activity of the VC/VS, SCC, ALIC, ITP, NAc, LHb, MFB, or other unreported nuclei targets, respectively. At the same time, some subjects are presented with a task involving an unexpected reward. This separate study is an option and will not affect current study participation.

Some participants will also be invited to join a related study that involves positron emission tomography (PET) scanning to determine how the stimulation changes activity in the brain. Participation in the separate PET study is optional and will not affect current study participation.

Being tested
Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS)
Keywords
TRD, DBS
Medical subject headings
Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS)Device

    The DBS lead is stereotactically introduced into the target in the brain (SCC, VC/VS, ALIC, ITP, NAc, LHb, MFB, or other unreported nuclei targets) and fixed to the skull; the lead is then connected to a neurostimulator implanted subcutaneously in the subclavicular region.

Study groups in NCT06542900
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Patients with Treatment-Resistant Depression (TRD)ExperimentalPatients will undergo bilateral DBS lead implantation.
Receives: Device: Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The change from baseline to 12 months in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score.

    MADRS is an established instrument to rate symptoms of depression. The range of the total score is thus 0 to 60; higher total scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms.

    Usual cutoff points are: 0 to 6: normal/symptom absent; 7 to 19: mild depression; 20 to 34: moderate depression; >34: severe depression.

    Measured: Baseline to 12 months post-surgery

Secondary outcomes (12)
  1. Remission, and response rate at week 2, month 3, month 6, and month 12, revealed by Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)

    the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score (range, 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating more severe depression.

    Remission and response were defined as a MADRS score ≤10 and a >50% reduction from the baseline MADRS score, respectively.

    Measured: Baseline to week 2, month 3, month 6, and month 12

  2. the change from baseline to 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months in the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA) total score.

    HAMA is a 14-item test measuring the severity of anxiety symptoms. The total anxiety score ranges from zero to 56, with higher scores indicating more anxiety. The seven psychic anxiety items elicit a psychic anxiety score that ranges from 0 to 28. The remaining seven items yield a somatic anxiety score ranging from 0 to 28.

    Measured: Baseline to week 2, month 3, month 6, and month 12

  3. the changes of Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, 17 item (HAMD-17) scores and its subscales from baseline to 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months.

    HAMD-17 ranges from 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating more depression; a score of 20 or more indicates moderate to severe depression.

    Measured: Baseline to week 2, month 3, month 6, and month 12

  4. the change of Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) from baseline to Week 2, Month 3, Month 6, and Month 12.

    PSQI is a 19 items measurement of several aspects of sleep, offering seven component scores and one composite score. The component scores consist of subjective sleep quality, sleep latency (i.e., how long it takes to fall asleep), sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency (i.e., the percentage of time in bed that one is asleep), sleep disturbances, use of sleeping medication, and daytime dysfunction.

    Each item is weighted on a 0-3 interval scale. The global PSQI score is then calculated by totaling the seven component scores, providing an overall score ranging from 0 to 21, where lower scores denote a healthier sleep quality.

    Measured: Baseline to week 2, month 3, month 6, and month 12

  5. the change from baseline to 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months in Clinical Global Impression-Severity scale (CGI-S)

    The Clinical Global Impression-Severity scale (CGI-S) is a 7-point scale that requires the clinician to rate the severity of the patient's illness at the time of assessment. Score 1 presents normal, not at all ill, and score 7 presents among the most extremely ill patients.

    Measured: Baseline to week 2, month 3, month 6, and month 12

  6. the change of Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scale (CGI-I) at Week 2, Month 1, Month 3, Month 6, and Month 12.

    The Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scale (CGI-I) is a 7-point scale that requires the clinician to assess how much the patient's illness has improved or worsened relative to a baseline state at the beginning of the intervention. Score 1 presents the patient as much improved, and score 7 presents much worse.

    Measured: Baseline to week 2, month 3, month 6, and month 12

  7. the change from baseline to Week 2, Month 3, Month 6, and Month 12 in EuroQol-5 Dimension-level Scale (EQ-5D-5L).

    EQ-5D-5L is an instrument that evaluates the generic quality of life. The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems. The score ranges from 5 (having no problems) to 25 (being unable to do/having extreme problems).

    Measured: Baseline to week 2, month 3, month 6, and month 12

  8. the change from baseline to Week 2, Month 1, Month 3, Month 6, and Month 12 in Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS).

    This scale has 11 items and is based on the patient's subjective report of his or her clinical condition over the previous 48 hours. There are four items that are graded on a 0 to 8 scale (irritability, speech, thought content, and disruptive/aggressive behavior), while the remaining seven items are graded on a 0 to 4 scale. Scores range from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating more severe mania. A score of 0 to 5 means no obvious manic symptoms; a score of 6 to 10 means definite manic symptoms; a score of 22 or above means severe manic symptoms. It will be used as a systematic screen for DBS-induced mania or hypomania. Although scores above 8 have been considered evidence of manic symptomatology in bipolar patients, the unmasked physician will use this scale and screening questions to assess whether any hypomanic symptoms require clinical intervention including DBS adjustment.

    Measured: Baseline to week 2, month 3, month 6, and month 12

  9. Safety as indicated by the number of Adverse Events at Week 2, Month 3, Month 6, and Month 12.

    Possible Adverse Events include:

    Major and minor adverse events will be evaluated by Adverse Events Questionnaire (AEQ) and accompanying Case Report Form (AEQ CRF) in multiple domains, including psychiatric, neurological, and cognitive effects. The AEQ includes cognitive and behavioral screening items used in the Xuanwu DBS clinic for movement disorder patients. Additionally, we have added items for the adverse events observed in pilot DBS for TRD.

    Measured: Baseline to week 2, month 3, month 6, and month 12

  10. the change from baseline to Month 12 in the Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT).

    During the Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT), individuals are tasked with verbally generating words starting with different letters of the alphabet. They have 60 seconds for each letter to retrieve and articulate as many words as possible. The test involves presenting three letters, each progressively more challenging in associative difficulty. Scores are derived by summing the total words produced across the three letter trials. The lowest achievable score is zero, indicating an inability to generate any words. There is no upper limit to the score as participants can produce numerous words for each letter. Higher scores reflect superior word retrieval and cognitive function.

    Measured: 1 year after neurostimulator implantation.

  11. the change from baseline to Month 12 in the Trail-Making Test A&B

    The Trail-Making Test A and B assess cognitive shifting, visual search speed, scanning, processing speed, mental flexibility, and executive functioning. It evaluates the participant's capacity for sequencing (Parts A and B), cognitive set shifting (Part B), and processing speed (Parts A and B). Scores for Part A and Part B are calculated independently, indicating the number of seconds required for the participant to finish each section. Higher scores denote longer durations for completing the test.

    Measured: 1 year after neurostimulator implantation.

  12. the change from baseline to Month 12 in Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test (ROCF).

    The Rey-Osterrieth complex figure test (ROCF) is a neuropsychological assessment in which patients are asked to reproduce a complicated line drawing, first by copying it freehand (recognition), and then drawing from memory (recall). Scoring of drawings is based on the widely used 36-point scoring system (0 being the worst score and 36 the best).

    Measured: 1 year after neurostimulator implantation.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Aug 2024
  2. Study start10 Aug 2024 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2028 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2029 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
60 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06542900
Sponsor's protocol ID
DBS for TRD
Acronym
DBS for TRD
Status last verified
Jan 2024
First submitted
29 Jan 2024
Last updated
7 Aug 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) in people with Treatment Resistant Depression, run by Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Aug 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Huang Wang, MD (+86 10 83198650, wanghuang118@mail.ccmu.edu.cn), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The change from baseline to 12 months in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score. (time frame: Baseline to 12 months post-surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Aug 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in