Chronic Incomplete Cervical Spinal Cord Injury (SCI)NCT06543277
Safety and Feasibility of Paired Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation (taVNS) With Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury
A study testing Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation (taVNS) in people with Chronic Incomplete Cervical Spinal Cord Injury (SCI), run by The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston at 2 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and feasibility of transcutaneous auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation (taVNS) paired with upper-limb rehabilitation in adults with tetraplegia caused by cervical spinal cord injury. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Incomplete Cervical Spinal Cord Injury (SCI)
- What is being tested?
- Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation (taVNS)
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 12 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 15 Aug 2025to 30 Dec 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- diagnosis of traumatic incomplete (AIS B-D) cervical spinal cord injury (C8 and above)
- at least 12 months post-traumatic SCI but less than 10 years post-SCI
- demonstrate some residual movement in the upper limb (e.g., able to perform pinch movement with thumb and index finger sufficient to grip small objects such as marble)
Who cannot join
- non-traumatic SCI
- recent ear trauma and skin lesions at the site of stimulation, such as sunburn, cuts, and open sores,
- facial or ear pain,
- allergic reaction to adhesives and electrodes,
- any current or past history of cardiovascular disorders,
- intracranial metal implants, pacemakers,
Show all 11Show fewer
- concomitant clinically significant brain injury,
- receiving medication that may significantly interfere with the actions of VNS on neurotransmitter systems at study entry
- If there is a plan for alteration in upper-extremity therapy or medication for muscle tone during the course of the study;
- medical or mental instability;
- pregnancy or plans to become pregnant during the study period
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Recruiting
Neurorecovery Research Center, TIRR MHH
Houston, Texas, 77030
Alyssa Miller, BS, 7137977132, VNS.SCI@uth.tmc.edu
- Not yet recruiting
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Houston, Texas, 77030
Radha Korupolu, MD, 713-797-5233, Radha.Korupolu@uth.tmc.edu
Shrasti Lohiya, (713) 797-7132, Shrasti.Lohiya@uth.tmc.edu
About this study
Official title: Safety and Feasibility of Paired taVNS With Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and feasibility of transcutaneous auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation (taVNS) paired with upper-limb rehabilitation in adults with tetraplegia caused by cervical spinal cord injury.
- Being tested
- Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation (taVNS)
- Keywords
- spinal cord injury (SCI), upper arm rehabilitation
- Medical subject headings
- Spinal Cord Injuries
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation (taVNS)Device
Participants will receive 18 goal-directed upper extremity rehabilitation therapy sessions with paired taVNS over six weeks, followed by a 90-day home exercise program.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation (taVNS) | Experimental | Not described Receives: Device: Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation (taVNS) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Safety as assessed by number of subjects with change in systolic blood pressure
Measured: Immediately after completing in-clinic 18 sessions (6-8 weeks)
Safety as assessed by number of subjects with change in diastolic blood pressure
Measured: Immediately after completing in-clinic 18 sessions (6-8 weeks)
Safety as assessed by number of subjects with change in heart rate
Measured: Immediately after completing in-clinic 18 sessions (6-8 weeks)
Safety as assessed by number of subjects with change in respiratory rate
Measured: Immediately after completing in-clinic 18 sessions (6-8 weeks)
Safety as assessed by number of subjects with change in autonomic dysreflexia
Measured: Immediately after completing in-clinic 18 sessions (6-8 weeks)
Safety as assessed by number of subjects with worsening spasticity
Measured: Immediately after completing in-clinic 18 sessions (6-8 weeks)
Safety as assessed by number of subjects with change in pain at stimulation site
Measured: Immediately after completing in-clinic 18 sessions (6-8 weeks)
Safety as assessed by number of adverse events that occurred during the study period
Measured: post therapy 30 days
Feasibility as assessed by the number of treatment sessions attended by each participant . The intervention is considered feasible if at least 80% adherence rate is achieved and no serious adverse events occurred.
80% adherence rate is defined as completing ≥ 16 out of 18 sessions
Measured: from baseline through completion of 18 sessions (about 6-8 weeks)
Feasibility as assessed by the participants' perceptions of the study procedures
This includes implementation using the paired taVNS with rehabilitation. This is numerically rated from 'not difficult at all' at 0, and 'very difficult' at 10, higher score indicating worse outcome
Measured: from baseline through completion of 18 sessions (about 6-8 weeks)
Feasibility as assessed by the participants' perceptions of the usefulness of the intervention
This is numerically rated from ''not at all useful' at 0 and 'very useful' at 10 , higher score indicating better outcome
Measured: from baseline through completion of 18 sessions (about 6-8 weeks)
Secondary outcomes (7)
Change in degree of upper limb impairment as assessed by the Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP) assessment
The 3 measured domains are as follows:
- Strength: Motor grading of 10 arm and hand muscles for right and left arm will be performed. Each muscle is graded from 0 to 5 for a maximum score of 50, a higher number indicating more strength.
- Dorsal and palmar sensation: Each test location is scored from 0 to 4. Three locations for the dorsal side of each hand and 3 for palmer location of each hand are summed to render a subtest total score between 0 and 12 a higher score indicating more sensation.
- Prehension:
- Qualitative prehension: The participant performs 3 tasks using each hand and is scored from 0-12 a higher number indicating a better outcome
- Quantitative prehension: he participant performs 6 tasks using each hand and is scored from 0-30 a higher number indicating a better outcome
Measured: Baseline, immediately after completing in-clinic 18 sessions (6-8 weeks), post- therapy 30 days, and posttherapy 90 days]
Change in hand function as assessed by the Toronto Rehab Institute Hand Function Test (TRI-HFT)
This is a 14 item questionnaire and each is scored from 1(no movement elicited) to 8(normal grasp) a higher number indicating better hand function
Measured: Baseline, immediately after completing in-clinic 18 sessions (6-8 weeks), post- therapy 30 days, and posttherapy 90 days]
Change in capability of using arms and hands as assessed by the Capabilities of Upper Extremity Questionnaire (CUE-Q)
This is a 17 item questionnaire and each is scored from 1(totally limited) to 7(not at all limited), a higher number indicating better outcome
Measured: Baseline, immediately after completing in-clinic 18 sessions (6-8 weeks), post- therapy 30 days, and posttherapy 90 days]
Change in self care independence as assessed by the Spinal Cord Injury Independence Measure-III (SCIM-III) self-care subscore
This is a 4 item questionnaire and each is scored from 0(need total assistance) to 3(completely independent), higher score indicating more independence.
Measured: Baseline, immediately after completing in-clinic 18 sessions (6-8 weeks), post- therapy 30 days, and posttherapy 90 days]
Change in Quality of Life as assessed by the Spinal Cord Injury- Quality of Life (SCI-QoL) questionnaire
This questionnaire has 3 parts:
basic mobility: this is a 11 item questionnaire and each is scored from 1(unable to do) to 5(can do without difficulty)higher score indicating more mobility Fine Motor: This is a 9 item questionnaire and each is scored from 1(unable to do) to 5(can do without difficulty)higher score indicating better outcome self care: This is a 11 item questionnaire and each is scored from 1(unable to do) to 5(can do without difficulty)higher score indicating better outcome
Measured: Baseline, immediately after completing in-clinic 18 sessions (6-8 weeks), post- therapy 30 days, and posttherapy 90 days]
Change in Pain as assessed by the International SCI pain basic data subset (version 2)
This is an 6 item questionnaire and each is scored from 0 (no pain) -10 (pain as bad as you can imagine), a higher score indicating more pain.
Measured: Baseline, immediately after completing in-clinic 18 sessions (6-8 weeks), post- therapy 30 days, and posttherapy 90 days]
Change in Depression as assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8)
This is an eight item questionnaire and each is scored from 0(not at all) to 3(nearly every day) a higher score indicating worse outcome
Measured: Baseline, immediately after completing in-clinic 18 sessions (6-8 weeks), post- therapy 30 days, and posttherapy 90 days]
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Aug 2024
- Study start15 Aug 2025
- Primary completion30 Jun 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Dec 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Chronic Incomplete Cervical Spinal Cord Injury (SCI)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by The University of Texas Health Science Center, HoustonThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 12 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Mission Connect
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Radha Korupolu, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
- Investigators
- Radha Korupolu, Principal investigator, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06543277
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HSC-MS-24-0346
- Status last verified
- Sep 2025
- First submitted
- 2 Aug 2024
- Last updated
- 19 Sep 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Sep 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Safety and Feasibility of Paired taVNS With Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06543277
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HSC-MS-24-0346
- Keywords
- spinal cord injury (SCI), upper arm rehabilitation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 12 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- The University of Texas Health Science Center, HoustonUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Mission Connect
- Study start
- 15 Aug 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Dec 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 7 Aug 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and feasibility of transcutaneous auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation (taVNS) paired with upper-limb rehabilitation in adults with tetraplegia caused by cervical spinal cord injury.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation (taVNS) | Experimental | Device: Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation (taVNS) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- diagnosis of traumatic incomplete (AIS B-D) cervical spinal cord injury (C8 and above)
- at least 12 months post-traumatic SCI but less than 10 years post-SCI
- demonstrate some residual movement in the upper limb (e.g., able to perform pinch movement with thumb and index finger sufficient to grip small objects such as marble)
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- non-traumatic SCI
- recent ear trauma and skin lesions at the site of stimulation, such as sunburn, cuts, and open sores,
- facial or ear pain,
- allergic reaction to adhesives and electrodes,
- any current or past history of cardiovascular disorders,
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation (taVNS)Participants will receive 18 goal-directed upper extremity rehabilitation therapy sessions with paired taVNS over six weeks, followed by a 90-day home exercise program. | Device | Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation (taVNS) |
Primary outcome
Safety as assessed by number of subjects with change in systolic blood pressure
Time frame: Immediately after completing in-clinic 18 sessions (6-8 weeks)
Safety as assessed by number of subjects with change in diastolic blood pressure
Time frame: Immediately after completing in-clinic 18 sessions (6-8 weeks)
Safety as assessed by number of subjects with change in heart rate
Time frame: Immediately after completing in-clinic 18 sessions (6-8 weeks)
Safety as assessed by number of subjects with change in respiratory rate
Time frame: Immediately after completing in-clinic 18 sessions (6-8 weeks)
Safety as assessed by number of subjects with change in autonomic dysreflexia
Time frame: Immediately after completing in-clinic 18 sessions (6-8 weeks)
Safety as assessed by number of subjects with worsening spasticity
Time frame: Immediately after completing in-clinic 18 sessions (6-8 weeks)
Safety as assessed by number of subjects with change in pain at stimulation site
Time frame: Immediately after completing in-clinic 18 sessions (6-8 weeks)
Safety as assessed by number of adverse events that occurred during the study period
Time frame: post therapy 30 days
Feasibility as assessed by the number of treatment sessions attended by each participant . The intervention is considered feasible if at least 80% adherence rate is achieved and no serious adverse events occurred.
Time frame: from baseline through completion of 18 sessions (about 6-8 weeks)
80% adherence rate is defined as completing ≥ 16 out of 18 sessions
Feasibility as assessed by the participants' perceptions of the study procedures
Time frame: from baseline through completion of 18 sessions (about 6-8 weeks)
This includes implementation using the paired taVNS with rehabilitation. This is numerically rated from 'not difficult at all' at 0, and 'very difficult' at 10, higher score indicating worse outcome
Feasibility as assessed by the participants' perceptions of the usefulness of the intervention
Time frame: from baseline through completion of 18 sessions (about 6-8 weeks)
This is numerically rated from ''not at all useful' at 0 and 'very useful' at 10 , higher score indicating better outcome
7 secondary outcomes
Change in degree of upper limb impairment as assessed by the Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP) assessment
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after completing in-clinic 18 sessions (6-8 weeks), post- therapy 30 days, and posttherapy 90 days]
Change in hand function as assessed by the Toronto Rehab Institute Hand Function Test (TRI-HFT)
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after completing in-clinic 18 sessions (6-8 weeks), post- therapy 30 days, and posttherapy 90 days]
Change in capability of using arms and hands as assessed by the Capabilities of Upper Extremity Questionnaire (CUE-Q)
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after completing in-clinic 18 sessions (6-8 weeks), post- therapy 30 days, and posttherapy 90 days]
Change in self care independence as assessed by the Spinal Cord Injury Independence Measure-III (SCIM-III) self-care subscore
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after completing in-clinic 18 sessions (6-8 weeks), post- therapy 30 days, and posttherapy 90 days]
Change in Quality of Life as assessed by the Spinal Cord Injury- Quality of Life (SCI-QoL) questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after completing in-clinic 18 sessions (6-8 weeks), post- therapy 30 days, and posttherapy 90 days]
Change in Pain as assessed by the International SCI pain basic data subset (version 2)
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after completing in-clinic 18 sessions (6-8 weeks), post- therapy 30 days, and posttherapy 90 days]
Change in Depression as assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8)
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after completing in-clinic 18 sessions (6-8 weeks), post- therapy 30 days, and posttherapy 90 days]
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Sep 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Chronic Incomplete Cervical Spinal Cord Injury (SCI)
Enrolling by invitation
NeuroSuitUp: Neurorehabilitation Through Synergistic Man-machine Interfaces
Spinal Cord Injuries
Not yet recruiting
Combined rTMS and tSCS for Upper Limb Recovery in Cervical SCI
Spinal Cord Injuries (SCI)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Radha Korupolu principal investigator
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation (taVNS) in people with Chronic Incomplete Cervical Spinal Cord Injury (SCI), run by The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston at 2 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Sep 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Radha Korupolu, MD (713-797-5233, Radha.Korupolu@uth.tmc.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Safety as assessed by number of subjects with change in systolic blood pressure (time frame: Immediately after completing in-clinic 18 sessions (6-8 weeks)). The study lists 11 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Sep 2025.