Neck PainNCT06549166
Virtual Reality in Chronic Neck Pain
A study testing Experimental: VR and exercise in people with Neck Pain, run by Koç University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of virtual reality, which encourages active neck movements, in individuals with chronic neck pain, with the control group receiving only neck exercises. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 45 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Neck Pain
- What is being tested?
- Experimental: VR and exercise
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 46 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- Sep 2024to Dec 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 45 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Ages 18 to 45
- Having a history of non-traumatic neck pain persisting for more than three months
- Having a Neck Disability Index score greater than 5 points
- Not having participated in a physiotherapy program for at least 3 months
- Being able to read and write in Turkish to understand, interpret, and respond to the questionnaires
Who cannot join
- Having a surgical history in the neck region
- Having cervical spine flexion, extension, and rotation range of motion <10 degrees
- Having a history of rheumatologic, vestibular, neurological, or cardiopulmonary diseases
- Vertigo associated with neck pain
- Osteoporosis, vertebral fractures,spinal tumors
- Presence of radiculopathy or myelopathy
- Traumatic spinal cord injury
- Neck pain associated with progressive neurological deficits or loss of strength
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
Koc University School of Medicine
Istanbul, 34010
Yasemin Gursoy Ozdemir, Prof, +908502508250, ygursoy@ku.edu.tr
Ecenur Atli, PhD(c)
About this study
Official title: Effectiveness of Exercise Training and Virtual Reality on Disability, Pain and Joint Position Sense in Individuals With Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Study
The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of virtual reality, which encourages active neck movements, in individuals with chronic neck pain, with the control group receiving only neck exercises. Participants will be randomly divided into two groups; Half of them will be given only a neck exercises program, and the other half will be given neck exercises and virtual reality.
Read the detailed description
Individuals with chronic neck pain tend to have low levels of endurance in deep neck flexor muscles. Conservative treatments for neck pain, including posture education, strengthening, range of motion, motor control, flexibility, and proprioceptive training, are recommended in clinical guidelines. Virtual reality has been shown to be beneficial in the treatment of various issues related to pain in previous systematic reviews. Distracting attention is one of the mechanisms explaining the impact of virtual reality on pain. It is believed that virtual reality reduces pain perception by influencing pain pathways.
- Conditions
- Neck Pain
- Being tested
- Experimental: VR and exercise, Sham Comparator: exercise
- Keywords
- virtual reality, exercise, neck pain
- Medical subject headings
- Neck Pain, Motor Activity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Experimental: VR and exerciseOther
Participants will perform a 20-minute exercise program consisting of neck joint mobility exercises, neck and scapulothoracic muscle strengthening exercises, and stretching exercises. Then, for the next 20 minutes, they will engage in active neck movements using the Oculus Quest2 headset with the Ocean Rift game.
Sham Comparator: exerciseOther
The control group will perform a 40-minute same neck exercises.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| VR and exercise | Experimental | virtual reality and neck exercises Receives: Other: Experimental: VR and exercise |
| exercise | Sham comparator | only neck exercise Receives: Other: Sham Comparator: exercise |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Neck disability index
Neck disability index was used to determine the pain experience and functional disability of the participants. It consists of 10 questions concern of the pain severity, ability for personal care, lifting weight, job capability headache intensity, concentration, quality of sleeping and driving and recreation activities. Total score ranges between 0 to 50 points. Zero to four points mean "no disability", 5 to 14 points mean "light disability", 15 to 24 points mean "moderate disability", 25 to 34 points mean "severe disability", and 35 to 50 points mean "complete disability".
Measured: 8 weeks
Secondary outcomes (7)
Visual analog scale
Visual analog scale is a self-reported scale consisting of a horizontal line (10 cm long) with anchor points of zero for "no pain" and ten for "worst possible pain." The patient was asked to put a mark on the line that best described the severity of his or her pain between zero and ten.
Measured: 8 weeks
Joint position sense error
The sense of joint position error will be measured using the Cervical Range of Motion Device. The individual's head will be passively brought to 50% of the joint's range of motion, and the individual will be asked to wait for three seconds to feel the position. Then, the individual will be asked to bring their head to that position with their eyes closed. This process will be repeated three times for all directions.
Measured: 8 weeks
Pressure pain threshold
A pressure algometer with a round tip measuring 1 cm² surface area will be used to assess pressure pain threshold. The sternum will be used as a reference point, and the trapezius and levator scapula muscles will be evaluated. The tip of the algometer probe will be applied to the skin perpendicular to it at a rate of 1 kg/cm² per second. The patient will be asked to indicate when the pressure sensation turns into pain. There will be a 30-second rest period between measurements, and bilateral evaluation will be performed, starting with the right side followed by the left side.
Measured: 8 weeks
joint range of motion
Neck flexion, extension, right and left rotation, and right and left lateral flexion will be measured using the Cervical Range of Motion Device.
Measured: 8 weeks
Bournemouth Neck Questionnaire
The Bournemouth Neck Questionnaire, individuals rank the following 7 dimensions of pain and function on a scale of 0 to 10: pain severity, physical disability, social disability, anxiety, depression, employment, and ability to control their pain.
Measured: 8 weeks
Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia
The Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia was used to measure the kinesiophobia related to the pain. It is a scale with 17 items, and the scores range from 17 to 68. The higher the score is, the greater the kinesiophobia.
Measured: 8 weeks
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index is a self-report assessment tool that evaluates sleep quality over a one-month period. A global score and seven component scores can be derived from the scale. The component scores are the following: Subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleeping medications and daytime dysfunction. Each component is scored on a scale from 0-3, with the total score ranging from 0-21; where a higher score describes poorer sleep quality.
Measured: 8 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Aug 2024
- Study startSep 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completionJul 2025 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (13)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Neck PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 46 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Koç University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Biruni University
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06549166
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2023.311.IRB1.107
- Status last verified
- Aug 2024
- First submitted
- 8 Aug 2024
- Last updated
- 15 Aug 2024
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Ghamkhar L, Kahlaee AH. Are Ultrasonographic Measures of Cervical Flexor Muscles Correlated With Flexion Endurance in Chronic Neck Pain and Asymptomatic Participants? Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Dec;96(12):874-880. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000778.
PubMed 28644248Childs JD, Cleland JA, Elliott JM, Teyhen DS, Wainner RS, Whitman JM, Sopky BJ, Godges JJ, Flynn TW; American Physical Therapy Association. Neck pain: Clinical practice guidelines linked to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health from the Orthopedic Section of the American Physical Therapy Association. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008 Sep;38(9):A1-A34. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2008.0303. Epub 2008 Sep 1.
PubMed 18758050Audette I, Dumas JP, Cote JN, De Serres SJ. Validity and between-day reliability of the cervical range of motion (CROM) device. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010 May;40(5):318-23. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2010.3180.
PubMed 20436238Tousignant M, Smeesters C, Breton AM, Breton E, Corriveau H. Criterion validity study of the cervical range of motion (CROM) device for rotational range of motion on healthy adults. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006 Apr;36(4):242-8. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2006.36.4.242.
PubMed 16676874Reddy RS, Meziat-Filho N, Ferreira AS, Tedla JS, Kandakurti PK, Kakaraparthi VN. Comparison of neck extensor muscle endurance and cervical proprioception between asymptomatic individuals and patients with chronic neck pain. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2021 Apr;26:180-186. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2020.12.040. Epub 2020 Dec 31.
PubMed 33992242Wibault J, Vaillant J, Vuillerme N, Dedering A, Peolsson A. Using the cervical range of motion (CROM) device to assess head repositioning accuracy in individuals with cervical radiculopathy in comparison to neck- healthy individuals. Man Ther. 2013 Oct;18(5):403-9. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2013.02.004. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
PubMed 23473752Clark P, Lavielle P, Martinez H. Learning from pain scales: patient perspective. J Rheumatol. 2003 Jul;30(7):1584-8.
PubMed 12858463Bolton JE, Humphreys BK. The Bournemouth Questionnaire: a short-form comprehensive outcome measure. II. Psychometric properties in neck pain patients. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2002 Mar-Apr;25(3):141-8. doi: 10.1067/mmt.2002.123333.
PubMed 11986574Ylinen J, Takala EP, Kautiainen H, Nykanen M, Hakkinen A, Pohjolainen T, Karppi SL, Airaksinen O. Effect of long-term neck muscle training on pressure pain threshold: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Pain. 2005 Dec;9(6):673-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.01.001.
PubMed 16246820Tejera DM, Beltran-Alacreu H, Cano-de-la-Cuerda R, Leon Hernandez JV, Martin-Pintado-Zugasti A, Calvo-Lobo C, Gil-Martinez A, Fernandez-Carnero J. Effects of Virtual Reality versus Exercise on Pain, Functional, Somatosensory and Psychosocial Outcomes in Patients with Non-specific Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 16;17(16):5950. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17165950.
PubMed 32824394Hanney WJ, Kolber MJ, George SZ, Young I, Patel CK, Cleland JA. Development of a preliminary clinical prediction rule to identify patients with neck pain that may benefit from a standardized program of stretching and muscle performance exercise: a prospective cohort study. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2013 Dec;8(6):756-76.
PubMed 24377062Peolsson A, Landen Ludvigsson M, Tigerfors AM, Peterson G. Effects of Neck-Specific Exercises Compared to Waiting List for Individuals With Chronic Whiplash-Associated Disorders: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Feb;97(2):189-95. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.10.087. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
PubMed 26514296Falla D, Lindstrom R, Rechter L, Boudreau S, Petzke F. Effectiveness of an 8-week exercise programme on pain and specificity of neck muscle activity in patients with chronic neck pain: a randomized controlled study. Eur J Pain. 2013 Nov;17(10):1517-28. doi: 10.1002/j.1532-2149.2013.00321.x. Epub 2013 May 6.
PubMed 23649799
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Aug 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effectiveness of Exercise Training and Virtual Reality on Disability, Pain and Joint Position Sense in Individuals With Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06549166
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2023.311.IRB1.107
- Conditions
- Neck Pain
- Keywords
- virtual reality, exercise, neck pain
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 46 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Koç UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Biruni University
- Study start
- Sep 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Jul 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 12 Aug 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of virtual reality, which encourages active neck movements, in individuals with chronic neck pain, with the control group receiving only neck exercises. Participants will be randomly divided into two groups; Half of them will be given only a neck exercises program, and the other half will be given neck exercises and virtual reality.
Detailed description
Individuals with chronic neck pain tend to have low levels of endurance in deep neck flexor muscles. Conservative treatments for neck pain, including posture education, strengthening, range of motion, motor control, flexibility, and proprioceptive training, are recommended in clinical guidelines. Virtual reality has been shown to be beneficial in the treatment of various issues related to pain in previous systematic reviews. Distracting attention is one of the mechanisms explaining the impact of virtual reality on pain. It is believed that virtual reality reduces pain perception by influencing pain pathways.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| VR and exercise | Experimental | Other: Experimental: VR and exercisevirtual reality and neck exercises |
| exercise | Sham comparator | Other: Sham Comparator: exerciseonly neck exercise |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 45 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Ages 18 to 45
- Having a history of non-traumatic neck pain persisting for more than three months
- Having a Neck Disability Index score greater than 5 points
- Not having participated in a physiotherapy program for at least 3 months
- Being able to read and write in Turkish to understand, interpret, and respond to the questionnaires
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Having a surgical history in the neck region
- Having cervical spine flexion, extension, and rotation range of motion <10 degrees
- Having a history of rheumatologic, vestibular, neurological, or cardiopulmonary diseases
- Vertigo associated with neck pain
- Osteoporosis, vertebral fractures,spinal tumors
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental: VR and exerciseParticipants will perform a 20-minute exercise program consisting of neck joint mobility exercises, neck and scapulothoracic muscle strengthening exercises, and stretching exercises. Then, for the next 20 minutes, they will engage in active neck movements using the Oculus Quest2 headset with the Ocean Rift game. | Other | VR and exercise |
| Sham Comparator: exerciseThe control group will perform a 40-minute same neck exercises. | Other | exercise |
Primary outcome
Neck disability index
Time frame: 8 weeks
Neck disability index was used to determine the pain experience and functional disability of the participants. It consists of 10 questions concern of the pain severity, ability for personal care, lifting weight, job capability headache intensity, concentration, quality of sleeping and driving and recreation activities. Total score ranges between 0 to 50 points. Zero to four points mean "no disability", 5 to 14 points mean "light disability", 15 to 24 points mean "moderate disability", 25 to 34 points mean "severe disability", and 35 to 50 points mean "complete disability".
7 secondary outcomes
Visual analog scale
Time frame: 8 weeks
Joint position sense error
Time frame: 8 weeks
Pressure pain threshold
Time frame: 8 weeks
joint range of motion
Time frame: 8 weeks
Bournemouth Neck Questionnaire
Time frame: 8 weeks
Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia
Time frame: 8 weeks
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
Time frame: 8 weeks
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Aug 2024.
- Background: PubMed 28644248Ghamkhar L, Kahlaee AH. Are Ultrasonographic Measures of Cervical Flexor Muscles Correlated With Flexion Endurance in Chronic Neck Pain and Asymptomatic Participants? Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Dec;96(12):874-880. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000778.
- Background: PubMed 18758050Childs JD, Cleland JA, Elliott JM, Teyhen DS, Wainner RS, Whitman JM, Sopky BJ, Godges JJ, Flynn TW; American Physical Therapy Association. Neck pain: Clinical practice guidelines linked to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health from the Orthopedic Section of the American Physical Therapy Association. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008 Sep;38(9):A1-A34. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2008.0303. Epub 2008 Sep 1.
- Background: PubMed 20436238Audette I, Dumas JP, Cote JN, De Serres SJ. Validity and between-day reliability of the cervical range of motion (CROM) device. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010 May;40(5):318-23. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2010.3180.
- Background: PubMed 16676874Tousignant M, Smeesters C, Breton AM, Breton E, Corriveau H. Criterion validity study of the cervical range of motion (CROM) device for rotational range of motion on healthy adults. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006 Apr;36(4):242-8. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2006.36.4.242.
- Background: PubMed 33992242Reddy RS, Meziat-Filho N, Ferreira AS, Tedla JS, Kandakurti PK, Kakaraparthi VN. Comparison of neck extensor muscle endurance and cervical proprioception between asymptomatic individuals and patients with chronic neck pain. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2021 Apr;26:180-186. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2020.12.040. Epub 2020 Dec 31.
- Background: PubMed 23473752Wibault J, Vaillant J, Vuillerme N, Dedering A, Peolsson A. Using the cervical range of motion (CROM) device to assess head repositioning accuracy in individuals with cervical radiculopathy in comparison to neck- healthy individuals. Man Ther. 2013 Oct;18(5):403-9. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2013.02.004. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
- Background: PubMed 12858463Clark P, Lavielle P, Martinez H. Learning from pain scales: patient perspective. J Rheumatol. 2003 Jul;30(7):1584-8.
- Background: PubMed 11986574Bolton JE, Humphreys BK. The Bournemouth Questionnaire: a short-form comprehensive outcome measure. II. Psychometric properties in neck pain patients. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2002 Mar-Apr;25(3):141-8. doi: 10.1067/mmt.2002.123333.
- Background: PubMed 16246820Ylinen J, Takala EP, Kautiainen H, Nykanen M, Hakkinen A, Pohjolainen T, Karppi SL, Airaksinen O. Effect of long-term neck muscle training on pressure pain threshold: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Pain. 2005 Dec;9(6):673-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.01.001.
- Background: PubMed 32824394Tejera DM, Beltran-Alacreu H, Cano-de-la-Cuerda R, Leon Hernandez JV, Martin-Pintado-Zugasti A, Calvo-Lobo C, Gil-Martinez A, Fernandez-Carnero J. Effects of Virtual Reality versus Exercise on Pain, Functional, Somatosensory and Psychosocial Outcomes in Patients with Non-specific Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 16;17(16):5950. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17165950.
- Background: PubMed 24377062Hanney WJ, Kolber MJ, George SZ, Young I, Patel CK, Cleland JA. Development of a preliminary clinical prediction rule to identify patients with neck pain that may benefit from a standardized program of stretching and muscle performance exercise: a prospective cohort study. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2013 Dec;8(6):756-76.
- Background: PubMed 26514296Peolsson A, Landen Ludvigsson M, Tigerfors AM, Peterson G. Effects of Neck-Specific Exercises Compared to Waiting List for Individuals With Chronic Whiplash-Associated Disorders: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Feb;97(2):189-95. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.10.087. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Neck Pain
RecruitingObservational study
The Association Between Smartphone Overuse and Mechanical Neck Pain Among Galala University Students
Mechanical Neck Pain, Forward Head Posture (FHP)
Recruiting
Ameliorated Pap Tests and Cervical Cancer Screening Participation
Cervical Cancer Screening, Cervical Cancer Screening Methods
RecruitingObservational study
Upper Extremity Exercise Capacity in Chronic Non-specific Neck Pain
Neck Pain
RecruitingPhase 3
A Clinical Study to Compare BupiZenge With Lidocaine for Pain Due to Oral Mucositis in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer.
Head & Neck Cancer, Oral Mucositis
Recruiting
Effectiveness of Hydrogen Water Intervention on Acute Oral Inflammation, Oral Microbiota, and Pain Following Free Flap Reconstruction in Patients With Oral Cancer
Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma (OSCC), Postoperative Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Experimental: VR and exercise in people with Neck Pain, run by Koç University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Aug 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Yasemin Gursoy Ozdemir, Prof (08502508250, ygursoy@ku.edu.tr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Neck disability index (time frame: 8 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06549166, which also lists 13 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Aug 2024.