Cognitive DysfunctionMTT245CogNCT06549517
Study on the Effectiveness of the MTT24.5 Cognitive Training Program on Cognitive Skills, Brain Volume, and Activation
A study testing Cognitive training in people with Cognitive Dysfunction, run by Institute for Biomedical Research, CONICET at 1 site in Argentina.
Trial summary
The goal of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a cognitive training program called Mental Training Tech 24.5 (MTT24.5). The program aims to enhance brain function and neuronal plasticity in adults who do not have any clinical cognitive impairment. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 30 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Cognitive Dysfunction
- What is being tested?
- Cognitive training
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 75 participants
- Where
- 1 siteArgentina
- Study dates
- 2 Mar 2023to 30 Oct 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 30 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adults aged 21 years and above.
- Ability to understand instructions for the training tasks.
- Addenbrooke Cognitive Examination score >70.
Who cannot join
- Planned absences that would hinder participation in the program.
- Hearing, visual, or motor deficits that would impede participation in the program.
- History of severe degenerative neurological diseases, as these conditions may significantly impact brain plasticity and cognitive abilities.
- History of severe psychiatric disorders, as they may influence brain reorganization and complicate the interpretation of results.
- Unstable treatment or planned changes in medication that may affect brain function and alter results.
- History of current or recent excessive substance use (within the past 6 months), including alcohol or drugs, as these substances may influence brain function and neuroplasticity.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Analysis of Efficacy of the Mental Training Tech 245: a Novel Method of Cognitive Stimulation Based on Brain Neuroplastic Ability
The goal of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a cognitive training program called Mental Training Tech 24.5 (MTT24.5). The program aims to enhance brain function and neuronal plasticity in adults who do not have any clinical cognitive impairment. This study will help determine if MTT24.5 improves cognitive abilities and affects brain volume and activation.
The Main Questions it aims to answer are:
Read more
Does MTT24.5 improve overall cognitive performance and specific areas like memory, attention, and language skills? What effects does MTT24.5 have on brain volume and activation? How well do participants follow the program, and what are their response patterns?
Study Design
- Researchers will compare the results of participation in the MTT24.5 training versus a control group with no intervention. Participants will be randomly assigned to either the MTT24.5 program or the control group.
- The study involves adults aged 30 and older from the general population who do not have clinical cognitive impairment.
- The intervention includes attending 12 weekly in-person sessions, each lasting about 2 hours, for a total of 24.5 hours.
- The study will assess cognitive performance, brain volume, and activation, as well as monitor adherence to the program and response patterns.
Participants will:
- Engage in the MTT24.5 program or the control condition as assigned.
- Complete cognitive assessments to measure performance in various domains.
- Undergo brain imaging to evaluate changes in brain volume and activation.
Read the detailed description
Neuronal plasticity presents a promising approach to addressing a pressing contemporary challenge: the intersection of increased life expectancy with the risks of cognitive decline, dementia, and loss of independence. A wealth of literature highlights the potential of various neuronal plasticity stimulation strategies in bolstering cognitive abilities. However, while much focus has been dedicated to using these techniques for neurological rehabilitation, there remains a paucity of evidence regarding their efficacy in maintaining and enhancing cognitive functions in the generally healthy population. In line with this, the cognitive training protocol 'Mental Training Tech 24.5' (MTT24.5) is grounded in the principles of neuronal plasticity and aims to improve cognitive development. It specifically focuses on enhancing memory, reasoning speed, and attention in adults through a conceptual model that posits explicit learning as a direct stimulus for neuronal plasticity.
II) AIMS:
Primary Objectives:
Evaluate the effects of MTT24.5 on cognitive abilities such as memory, attention, orientation, verbal fluency, language, and visuospatial skills.
Assess the effects of MTT24.5 on brain structure and activation, including brain volumes in globally standardized areas and those associated with cognitive abilities, according to cognitive brain areas with taxonomic mapping.
Determine if there are response phenotypes based on individual baseline characteristics, such as age, gender, lifestyle factors, medical history, medications, family history of dementia, diet, and baseline cognitive reserve score.
Secondary Objective:
Analyze the tolerance and adherence to MTT24.5 and its association with outcomes related to cognitive variables, as well as structural and/or functional brain changes.
III) METHODS
Design:
This is a multisite, prospective, randomized open clinical study conducted between March and October 2023.
Regulatory Approvals:
The trial was approved by the review board and the local ethics committee. All participants provided written consent. This study followed the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) reporting guideline.
Evaluations:
- Cognitive Reserve Score (CRS): A validated cognitive reserve scale authorized from Roldan L. et al. The CRS records the frequency of cognitively stimulating activities carried out throughout life. It includes 24 items distributed across four aspects: activities of daily living, education/information, hobbies, and social life. The CRS will be obtained for each subject at baseline (pre-intervention) and after 12 weeks of participation.
- Medical and Lifestyle History Form: A self-administered medical and lifestyle history form called STEPS 5, adapted from www.who.int/chp/steps, and previously used in the Latin American OPTIMO study. This form will be administered to each subject at baseline (pre-intervention).
- The Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-III (ACE-III): A brief cognitive test that evaluates five cognitive abilities: attention, memory, verbal fluency, language, and visuospatial skills. The ACE-III score will be obtained for each subject at baseline (pre-intervention) and post-intervention.
- Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (BMRI): Brain volume and activation information will be obtained from this study, conducted on a subset of subjects at baseline (pre-intervention) and post-intervention.
Description of the Intervention:
MTT24.5 is a structured program consisting of 40 new pieces of knowledge and 100 learning techniques.developed as a binomial DATA/TECH program, provides the brain with new knowledge (DATA) classified into formal, natural, social, and cultural areas. The TECH consists of 100 high-impact cognitive stimulation modalities designed to enhance memory, attention, verbal fluency, and visuospatial skills. Techniques include methods such as learning to read the information in Braille, writing it with the non-dominant hand, or reinforcing the concept across various domains simultaneously. Each piece of new information and technique is codified and identified with a number throughout the protocol. This integration is intended to promotes changes in brain functionality, improves synaptic efficiency, and achieves permanent plastic changes. The program spans approximately 24.5 hours over 12 weeks, comprising weekly in-person training sessions of 1.5 hours each, supplemented by an additional average of 4 hours of weekly online activities.
The data or new knowledges were selected through an extensive search of relevant knowledge from the basic sciences (natural, cultural, formal, and social sciences). To be included, the data should be expressible in a concise concept stated in a maximum of 15 words, around which an explanation is built using visual animation and emotional aspects or experiential learning during a 10-minute session. The second part of the session aims to promote the integration of the new knowledge into an individual's cognitive reserve, employing cognitive TECHS, which consist of exercises designed for this purpose. TECHS selection was based on a review of peer-reviewed articles demonstrating the effectiveness of cognitive training in improving specific cognitive abilities investigated in the study. We identified 25 cognitive training studies with appropriate tools published between 2000 and 2022. The possible combinations of these tools yielded 75 possibilities regarding the association between 2 to 5 techniques for learning the same data, indicating either consecutive or simultaneous actions.
24.5 represents the total hours assigned to the program duration, based on similar training distributions reported in the ACTIVE TRIAL (The Advanced Cognitive Training for Independent and Vital Elderly).
Detailed descriptions of the statistical analysis plan can be found in the attached document, SA
- Conditions
- Cognitive Dysfunction
- Being tested
- Cognitive training
- Keywords
- ageing, cognitive dysfunction, cerebral neuroplasticiy
- Medical subject headings
- Cognitive Dysfunction
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Cognitive trainingBehavioural
Also called Mental Training Tech 245
MTT24.5 consists in the learning of 40 new datas or knowledges, along 24.5 hours distributted on classes or sessions, during which an average of 3.5 new pieces of knowledge are taught and reinforced through training. Participants are trained using 4 techniques assigned to each new piece of information from a total of 100 available techniques. These techniques include the use of non-dominant skills, literacy in Braille for sighted individuals, and performing 5 actions simultaneously. Each technique is designed to aid in the memorization and learning of new knowledge
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group-MTT24.5 | Active comparator | Subjects are assigned to 12 cognitive training in-person sessions of the MTT245 program by a validated trainer. Cognitive evaluations are made initially week 1 and at the end of the intervention at week 12. Receives: Behavioral: Cognitive training |
| Control group | No intervention | Subjects are assigned to a controlled arm whereas no intervention were done. They should underwent the same cognitive evaluations than active comparator at week 1 and 12. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Global Cognitive Ability
The primary study outcome, cognitive ability changes, was assessed through the difference between the post intervention Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination III (ACE) score and the pre intervention ACE score. This score ranges from 0 to 100. he ACE Score ranges from 0 to 100. A value less than 85 es considered as cognitive moderate impairment.
Measured: immediately after the intervention
Secondary outcomes (3)
Change in memory, and /or attention, and/or verbal fluency, and/or language, and/or visuospatial skills abilities.
Each ability outcome was assessed using the respective sub-dimensions of the ACE score and computing the difference between post intervention and pre intervention sub-score:
- Memory ability sub-score
- Attention ability sub-score
- Orientation ability sub-score
- Verbal fluency ability sub-score
- Language ability sub-score
- Visuospatial skills ability sub-score The memory ability sub-score ranges from 0 to 26, the attention abilities sub-score ranges from 0 to 8, the attention abilities sub-score ranges from 0 to 10, the verbal fluency sub-score ranges from 0 to 14, the language sub-score ranges from 0 to 16, and the visuospatial skills abilities sub-score ranges
Measured: immediately after the intervention
Rate of Adherence
Adherence or compliance with the study protocol was assessed through the number of days that participant completed ("on site days"); as participants were instructed and reminded to complete weekly sessions, the number of active days was used as the primary measure of a participant's ongoing engagement and compliance with the study protocol.
Measured: immediately after the intervention
Change in Brain Volume and Activation
Changes are reported as the volumes and/or activation obtained values of different structures of the brain, both in absolute terms (cm3) and relative (% of the total), and values reference of normal populations corrected for age and sex.
Measured: immediately after the intervention
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Aug 2024
- Study start2 Mar 2023
- Primary completion1 Aug 2023
- Study completion30 Oct 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cognitive DysfunctionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Multisite, prospective, and open-label study involving two arms. Subjects from the general adult population were randomly assigned to either a cognitive intervention group or a no-intervention control group. The intervention consisted of in-person cognitive training over 12 weeks, with baseline and final cognitive evaluations. A sub-study will investigate neuroimaging changes in brain volume and activation as parameters of neuroplasticity stimulation
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 75 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Institute for Biomedical Research, CONICET
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Carol Kotliar, Institute for Biomedical Research, CONICET
- Investigators
- Carol V Kotliar, PhD, Principal investigator, BIOCarol V Kotliar, PhD, Principal investigator, Institute for Biomedical Research, CONICET
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06549517
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MTT245Cog
- Acronym
- MTT245Cog
- Status last verified
- Aug 2024
- First submitted
- 3 Aug 2024
- Last updated
- 14 Aug 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: At the time of publication, and upon aproval of the request by a scientific board, all IPD that underlie results in a publication will be shared.
Publications
Livingston G, Huntley J, Sommerlad A, Ames D, Ballard C, Banerjee S, Brayne C, Burns A, Cohen-Mansfield J, Cooper C, Costafreda SG, Dias A, Fox N, Gitlin LN, Howard R, Kales HC, Kivimaki M, Larson EB, Ogunniyi A, Orgeta V, Ritchie K, Rockwood K, Sampson EL, Samus Q, Schneider LS, Selbaek G, Teri L, Mukadam N. Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2020 report of the Lancet Commission. Lancet. 2020 Aug 8;396(10248):413-446. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30367-6. Epub 2020 Jul 30. No abstract available.
PubMed 32738937Lindenberger U. Human cognitive aging: corriger la fortune? Science. 2014 Oct 31;346(6209):572-8. doi: 10.1126/science.1254403.
PubMed 25359964Ball K, Berch DB, Helmers KF, Jobe JB, Leveck MD, Marsiske M, Morris JN, Rebok GW, Smith DM, Tennstedt SL, Unverzagt FW, Willis SL; Advanced Cognitive Training for Independent and Vital Elderly Study Group. Effects of cognitive training interventions with older adults: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002 Nov 13;288(18):2271-81. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.18.2271.
PubMed 12425704Snowdon DA; Nun Study. Healthy aging and dementia: findings from the Nun Study. Ann Intern Med. 2003 Sep 2;139(5 Pt 2):450-4. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-139-5_part_2-200309021-00014.
PubMed 12965975Rebok GW, Ball K, Guey LT, Jones RN, Kim HY, King JW, Marsiske M, Morris JN, Tennstedt SL, Unverzagt FW, Willis SL; ACTIVE Study Group. Ten-year effects of the advanced cognitive training for independent and vital elderly cognitive training trial on cognition and everyday functioning in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014 Jan;62(1):16-24. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12607. Epub 2014 Jan 13.
PubMed 24417410Feingold A. New Approaches for Estimation of Effect Sizes and their Confidence Intervals for Treatment Effects from Randomized Controlled Trials. Quant Method Psychol. 2019;15(2):96-111. doi: 10.20982/tqmp.15.2.p096.
PubMed 32775313Masic V, Secic A, Trost Bobic T, Femec L. Neuroplasticity and Braille reading. Acta Clin Croat. 2020 Mar;59(1):147-153. doi: 10.20471/acc.2020.59.01.18.
PubMed 32724286Kotliar C, Olmos L, Koretzky M, Jauregui R, Delia T, Cingolani O. A new program for systematically enhancing cognitive reserve in healthy adults: A pilot randomized active-controlled clinical trial. PLoS One. 2025 Oct 1;20(10):e0331193. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0331193. eCollection 2025.
PubMed 41032503
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Aug 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Analysis of Efficacy of the Mental Training Tech 245: a Novel Method of Cognitive Stimulation Based on Brain Neuroplastic Ability
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06549517
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MTT245Cog / MTT245Cog
- Conditions
- Cognitive Dysfunction
- Keywords
- ageing, cognitive dysfunction, cerebral neuroplasticiy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 75 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Institute for Biomedical Research, CONICETUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 2 Mar 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Aug 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Oct 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Aug 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a cognitive training program called Mental Training Tech 24.5 (MTT24.5). The program aims to enhance brain function and neuronal plasticity in adults who do not have any clinical cognitive impairment. This study will help determine if MTT24.5 improves cognitive abilities and affects brain volume and activation.
The Main Questions it aims to answer are:
Does MTT24.5 improve overall cognitive performance and specific areas like memory, attention, and language skills? What effects does MTT24.5 have on brain volume and activation? How well do participants follow the program, and what are their response patterns?
Study Design
- Researchers will compare the results of participation in the MTT24.5 training versus a control group with no intervention. Participants will be randomly assigned to either the MTT24.5 program or the control group.
- The study involves adults aged 30 and older from the general population who do not have clinical cognitive impairment.
- The intervention includes attending 12 weekly in-person sessions, each lasting about 2 hours, for a total of 24.5 hours.
- The study will assess cognitive performance, brain volume, and activation, as well as monitor adherence to the program and response patterns.
Participants will:
- Engage in the MTT24.5 program or the control condition as assigned.
- Complete cognitive assessments to measure performance in various domains.
- Undergo brain imaging to evaluate changes in brain volume and activation.
Detailed description
Neuronal plasticity presents a promising approach to addressing a pressing contemporary challenge: the intersection of increased life expectancy with the risks of cognitive decline, dementia, and loss of independence. A wealth of literature highlights the potential of various neuronal plasticity stimulation strategies in bolstering cognitive abilities. However, while much focus has been dedicated to using these techniques for neurological rehabilitation, there remains a paucity of evidence regarding their efficacy in maintaining and enhancing cognitive functions in the generally healthy population. In line with this, the cognitive training protocol 'Mental Training Tech 24.5' (MTT24.5) is grounded in the principles of neuronal plasticity and aims to improve cognitive development. It specifically focuses on enhancing memory, reasoning speed, and attention in adults through a conceptual model that posits explicit learning as a direct stimulus for neuronal plasticity.
II) AIMS:
Primary Objectives:
Evaluate the effects of MTT24.5 on cognitive abilities such as memory, attention, orientation, verbal fluency, language, and visuospatial skills.
Assess the effects of MTT24.5 on brain structure and activation, including brain volumes in globally standardized areas and those associated with cognitive abilities, according to cognitive brain areas with taxonomic mapping.
Determine if there are response phenotypes based on individual baseline characteristics, such as age, gender, lifestyle factors, medical history, medications, family history of dementia, diet, and baseline cognitive reserve score.
Secondary Objective:
Analyze the tolerance and adherence to MTT24.5 and its association with outcomes related to cognitive variables, as well as structural and/or functional brain changes.
III) METHODS
Design:
This is a multisite, prospective, randomized open clinical study conducted between March and October 2023.
Regulatory Approvals:
The trial was approved by the review board and the local ethics committee. All participants provided written consent. This study followed the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) reporting guideline.
Evaluations:
- Cognitive Reserve Score (CRS): A validated cognitive reserve scale authorized from Roldan L. et al. The CRS records the frequency of cognitively stimulating activities carried out throughout life. It includes 24 items distributed across four aspects: activities of daily living, education/information, hobbies, and social life. The CRS will be obtained for each subject at baseline (pre-intervention) and after 12 weeks of participation.
- Medical and Lifestyle History Form: A self-administered medical and lifestyle history form called STEPS 5, adapted from www.who.int/chp/steps, and previously used in the Latin American OPTIMO study. This form will be administered to each subject at baseline (pre-intervention).
- The Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-III (ACE-III): A brief cognitive test that evaluates five cognitive abilities: attention, memory, verbal fluency, language, and visuospatial skills. The ACE-III score will be obtained for each subject at baseline (pre-intervention) and post-intervention.
- Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (BMRI): Brain volume and activation information will be obtained from this study, conducted on a subset of subjects at baseline (pre-intervention) and post-intervention.
Description of the Intervention:
MTT24.5 is a structured program consisting of 40 new pieces of knowledge and 100 learning techniques.developed as a binomial DATA/TECH program, provides the brain with new knowledge (DATA) classified into formal, natural, social, and cultural areas. The TECH consists of 100 high-impact cognitive stimulation modalities designed to enhance memory, attention, verbal fluency, and visuospatial skills. Techniques include methods such as learning to read the information in Braille, writing it with the non-dominant hand, or reinforcing the concept across various domains simultaneously. Each piece of new information and technique is codified and identified with a number throughout the protocol. This integration is intended to promotes changes in brain functionality, improves synaptic efficiency, and achieves permanent plastic changes. The program spans approximately 24.5 hours over 12 weeks, comprising weekly in-person training sessions of 1.5 hours each, supplemented by an additional average of 4 hours of weekly online activities.
The data or new knowledges were selected through an extensive search of relevant knowledge from the basic sciences (natural, cultural, formal, and social sciences). To be included, the data should be expressible in a concise concept stated in a maximum of 15 words, around which an explanation is built using visual animation and emotional aspects or experiential learning during a 10-minute session. The second part of the session aims to promote the integration of the new knowledge into an individual's cognitive reserve, employing cognitive TECHS, which consist of exercises designed for this purpose. TECHS selection was based on a review of peer-reviewed articles demonstrating the effectiveness of cognitive training in improving specific cognitive abilities investigated in the study. We identified 25 cognitive training studies with appropriate tools published between 2000 and 2022. The possible combinations of these tools yielded 75 possibilities regarding the association between 2 to 5 techniques for learning the same data, indicating either consecutive or simultaneous actions.
24.5 represents the total hours assigned to the program duration, based on similar training distributions reported in the ACTIVE TRIAL (The Advanced Cognitive Training for Independent and Vital Elderly).
Detailed descriptions of the statistical analysis plan can be found in the attached document, SA
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Multisite, prospective, and open-label study involving two arms. Subjects from the general adult population were randomly assigned to either a cognitive intervention group or a no-intervention control group. The intervention consisted of in-person cognitive training over 12 weeks, with baseline and final cognitive evaluations. A sub-study will investigate neuroimaging changes in brain volume and activation as parameters of neuroplasticity stimulation
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group-MTT24.5 | Active comparator | Behavioral: Cognitive trainingSubjects are assigned to 12 cognitive training in-person sessions of the MTT245 program by a validated trainer. Cognitive evaluations are made initially week 1 and at the end of the intervention at week 12. |
| Control group | No intervention | –Subjects are assigned to a controlled arm whereas no intervention were done. They should underwent the same cognitive evaluations than active comparator at week 1 and 12. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 30 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Adults aged 21 years and above.
- Ability to understand instructions for the training tasks.
- Addenbrooke Cognitive Examination score >70.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Planned absences that would hinder participation in the program.
- Hearing, visual, or motor deficits that would impede participation in the program.
- History of severe degenerative neurological diseases, as these conditions may significantly impact brain plasticity and cognitive abilities.
- History of severe psychiatric disorders, as they may influence brain reorganization and complicate the interpretation of results.
- Unstable treatment or planned changes in medication that may affect brain function and alter results.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive trainingAlso: Mental Training Tech 245MTT24.5 consists in the learning of 40 new datas or knowledges, along 24.5 hours distributted on classes or sessions, during which an average of 3.5 new pieces of knowledge are taught and reinforced through training. Participants are trained using 4 techniques assigned to each new piece of information from a total of 100 available techniques. These techniques include the use of non-dominant skills, literacy in Braille for sighted individuals, and performing 5 actions simultaneously. Each technique is designed to aid in the memorization and learning of new knowledge | Behavioural | Intervention group-MTT24.5 |
Primary outcome
Change in Global Cognitive Ability
Time frame: immediately after the intervention
The primary study outcome, cognitive ability changes, was assessed through the difference between the post intervention Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination III (ACE) score and the pre intervention ACE score. This score ranges from 0 to 100. he ACE Score ranges from 0 to 100. A value less than 85 es considered as cognitive moderate impairment.
3 secondary outcomes
Change in memory, and /or attention, and/or verbal fluency, and/or language, and/or visuospatial skills abilities.
Time frame: immediately after the intervention
Rate of Adherence
Time frame: immediately after the intervention
Change in Brain Volume and Activation
Time frame: immediately after the intervention
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Aug 2024.
- Background: PubMed 32738937Livingston G, Huntley J, Sommerlad A, Ames D, Ballard C, Banerjee S, Brayne C, Burns A, Cohen-Mansfield J, Cooper C, Costafreda SG, Dias A, Fox N, Gitlin LN, Howard R, Kales HC, Kivimaki M, Larson EB, Ogunniyi A, Orgeta V, Ritchie K, Rockwood K, Sampson EL, Samus Q, Schneider LS, Selbaek G, Teri L, Mukadam N. Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2020 report of the Lancet Commission. Lancet. 2020 Aug 8;396(10248):413-446. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30367-6. Epub 2020 Jul 30. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 25359964Lindenberger U. Human cognitive aging: corriger la fortune? Science. 2014 Oct 31;346(6209):572-8. doi: 10.1126/science.1254403.
- Background: PubMed 12425704Ball K, Berch DB, Helmers KF, Jobe JB, Leveck MD, Marsiske M, Morris JN, Rebok GW, Smith DM, Tennstedt SL, Unverzagt FW, Willis SL; Advanced Cognitive Training for Independent and Vital Elderly Study Group. Effects of cognitive training interventions with older adults: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002 Nov 13;288(18):2271-81. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.18.2271.
- Background: PubMed 12965975Snowdon DA; Nun Study. Healthy aging and dementia: findings from the Nun Study. Ann Intern Med. 2003 Sep 2;139(5 Pt 2):450-4. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-139-5_part_2-200309021-00014.
- Background: PubMed 24417410Rebok GW, Ball K, Guey LT, Jones RN, Kim HY, King JW, Marsiske M, Morris JN, Tennstedt SL, Unverzagt FW, Willis SL; ACTIVE Study Group. Ten-year effects of the advanced cognitive training for independent and vital elderly cognitive training trial on cognition and everyday functioning in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014 Jan;62(1):16-24. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12607. Epub 2014 Jan 13.
- Background: PubMed 32775313Feingold A. New Approaches for Estimation of Effect Sizes and their Confidence Intervals for Treatment Effects from Randomized Controlled Trials. Quant Method Psychol. 2019;15(2):96-111. doi: 10.20982/tqmp.15.2.p096.
- Background: PubMed 32724286Masic V, Secic A, Trost Bobic T, Femec L. Neuroplasticity and Braille reading. Acta Clin Croat. 2020 Mar;59(1):147-153. doi: 10.20471/acc.2020.59.01.18.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41032503Kotliar C, Olmos L, Koretzky M, Jauregui R, Delia T, Cingolani O. A new program for systematically enhancing cognitive reserve in healthy adults: A pilot randomized active-controlled clinical trial. PLoS One. 2025 Oct 1;20(10):e0331193. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0331193. eCollection 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. At the time of publication, and upon aproval of the request by a scientific board, all IPD that underlie results in a publication will be shared.
Related trials for Cognitive Dysfunction
Recruiting
Early Motor-Cognitive Integrative Training on Cognitive and Motor Performance in Patients With Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Subarachnoid Aneurysm Hemorrhage
Recruiting
HEARS-NPS: Addressing Hearing Loss as a Common Unmet Contributor of Neuropsychiatric Symptoms
Alzheimer Disease, Dementia
RecruitingObservational study
Locus Coeruleus and CCHS (Congenital Central Hypoventilation Syndrome)
Ondine Syndrome (Congenital Central Hypoventilation Syndrome)
RecruitingPhase 1
PET Imaging of Phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE4) in Volunteers With Alzheimer Disease (AD) or Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI)
Alzheimer s Disease, Mild Cognitive Impairment
RecruitingObservational study
Community-based Screening for Alzheimer's Disease
Alzheimer's Disease(AD), Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Carol V Kotliar, PhD principal investigator
BIO
Carol V Kotliar, PhD principal investigator
Institute for Biomedical Research, CONICET
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Cognitive training in people with Cognitive Dysfunction, run by Institute for Biomedical Research, CONICET at 1 site in Argentina.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Aug 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Argentina. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Global Cognitive Ability (time frame: immediately after the intervention). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06549517, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Aug 2024.