AzTrials
AzTrials

Dialysis; ComplicationsNCT06550479

Comparison of Three Types of Distal Arteriovenous Fistulas: SBAVF, RCAVF, and RCAVF With Venous Branch Patch.

A study testing AVF in people with Dialysis; Complications and Vascular Access Complication, run by Wroclaw Medical University at 1 site in Poland.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study aims to determine which type of distal arteriovenous fistula (SBAVF, RCAVF, and RCAVF with venous branch patch) is most clinically favorable. The recommendations and scientific evidence do not suggest which option should be chosen initially. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
AVF
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
180 participants
Where
1 sitePoland
Study dates
1 Jan 2024to 31 Jul 2030
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Aged >18 years
  • Chronic kidney disease with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <20 mL/min/1.73 m2

Who cannot join

  • Heart failure of New York Heart Association functional class III or IV,
  • Episode of cardio- or cerebrovascular event or receiving intervention therapy within 3 months prior to screening.
  • The patient had the primary anastomosis in the past on ipsilateral extremity

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Poland1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Department of Nephrology and Transplantation Medicine

    Wroclaw, 50-556

    Tomasz Gołębiowski, MD, PhD, +48 71 7332546, tgolebiowski@op.pl

    Mariia Chumadevska, MD, +48 71 7332500, chumadevska28@gmail.com,

    Recruiting

Other trials in Poland

About this study

Official title: Comparison of Tree Types of Distal Arteriovenous Fistulas: Snuffbox Fistula (SBAVF), Radiocephalic Fistula (RCAVF) and RCAVF With Venous Branch Patch.

This study aims to determine which type of distal arteriovenous fistula (SBAVF, RCAVF, and RCAVF with venous branch patch) is most clinically favorable.

The recommendations and scientific evidence do not suggest which option should be chosen initially.

The investigators expect that results will show which type of the anastomosis should be preferred.

Read the detailed description

Research Project Objectives An important aspect in maintaining hemodialysis therapy is an optimal vascular access (AV) in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The radiocephalic arteriovenous (RCAVF), at the level of the wrist, or snuffbox fistula SBAVF stands out as the preferred vascular access (VA) for hemodialysis, due to its lower risk of infection and mortality compared to alternative options. The inherent properties of AVFs contributes not only to improved patient's safety but also to more efficient hemodialysis procedures. Despite this, AVFs has two disadvantages: a high early failure rate, occurring within one month after access creation, and a high failure rate during a maturation. Early failure rates differ between groups, ranging from 2-23% in brachiocephalic AVF (BCAVF) to up to 5-46%, in RCAVFs.[1] In the Jemcow study , a fistula was defined as mature when blood flow was greater than 500 ml/min and diameter of the cephalic vein exceeded 5 mm. Depending on when AVFs attained maturity, 53% of patients had successful AVF maturation, 36% had prolonged maturation i.e., within eight weeks, and 11% of AVFs failed to mature. Female sex, older patients, poor upper extremity vessels, distal placements and accesses with smaller diameter artery and vein are risk factors for failure to mature.

Despite advances in surgical techniques and perioperative care, fistula maturation remains a challenging part of hemodialysis access. This was shown by Bylsma et al., who conducted a meta-analysis that raised doubt on the AVF's utility in addressing ESRD.3 They evaluated the outcomes of more than 60.000 AVF access formations and found 1-year primary, primary assisted, and secondary patency rates of 64%, 73%, and 79%, respectively. However, only 26% of created fistulas were reported as mature at 6 months and 21% of fistulas were abandoned without use. In another meta-analysis study by Al-Jaishi, based on 37 studies, the risk of primary failure was 23% and primary patency rate was 60% at 1 year and 51% at 2 years.4 Clinical fistula maturation is the result of a crucial process in establishing functional VA for hemodialysis patients. It refers to the formation of a mature, useable AVF supplying the necessary blood volume for efficient dialysis. Data from a multicentre perspective cohort study by Robbin et al. of 602 patients who received a new single-stage AVF, demonstrated that unassisted and overall AVF clinical maturation can be predicted by three ultrasound parameters, fistula blood flow, diameter and depth. Performing such assessment, 6 weeks after surgery, provides valuable guidance regarding early intervention to facilitate maturation (e.g., percutaneous angioplasty or early planning of a second anastomosis) may increase maturation/utilization of the fistula and reduce exposure to central venous catheters.

The study will enroll individuals with and chronic kidney disease (CKD) in stage G4 and G5 including hemodialysis (HD) patients.

Clinical practice guidelines recommend distal arteriovenous fistula (AVF) RCAVF or SBAVF, rather than proximal arteriovenous anastomosis involving the brachial artery due to high risk of hemodialysis access hand ischemia and high flow heart failure. There have been no studies comparing the three aforementioned distal anastomosis in a single project.

Research hypothesis: There are differences between various types of AVF with regard to of early and late patency rates. The investigators also suppose that the type of AVFs may influence the postoperative increase in arteriovenous fistula diameter, blood flow, and, finally, AVF maturation.

Working second hypothesis: Demographical and clinical characteristic of the patients may have impact on AVF success rate and maturation.

Secondary objective of this study is to perform enhanced assessments of arterial health preoperatively and correlate these measurements with vascular lesions.

Work plan Participants will be subjects of a thorough evaluation of the morphological state of upper limb vessels by the techniques presented in the methodology of the study. The study plan foresees the recruitment of patients, whose will have their vessels of the upper limbs carried out in-depth assessment. Then creation of the vascular access - arteriovenous fistula for dialysis, will be performed. The choice of arteriovenous fistula type (SBAVF, RCAVF, and RCAVF with venous branch patch) will depend on the vascular anatomy obtained by Doppler ultrasonography.

AVF maturation will be evaluated after 6 weeks post-surgery using Doppller ultrasound. A fistula was considered mature when the blood flow exceeded 500 ml/min and the diameter of the cephalic vein exceeded 5 mm.

Study design Prospective study with recruitment of consecutive approximately 3 x 60 patients with chronic kidney disease stage 4 or 5, who will be referred for vascular access creation for hemodialysis.

Inclusion: (1) Aged >18 years, (2) has chronic kidney disease with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <20 mL/min/1.73 m2 , (3) is undergoing AVF creation with venous end-to-arterial side anastomosis in the upper extremity.

Exclusion: (1) Heart failure of New York Heart Association functional class III or IV, and (2) episode of cardio- or cerebrovascular event or receiving intervention therapy within 3 months prior to screening. (3) had the primary anastomosis in the past on ipsilateral extremity After obtaining an informed consent to participate in the study each participant will be tested with followed measures.

Study measures Demographic and clinical characteristic will be collected during interview (family longevity, hospitalizations, history of vein cannulation) and based on medical records (cardiac events including angiographic studies, cancer, diabetes, peripheral artery diseases, dementia and other co-morbidities). Physical examination focused on heart function (blood pressure in two positions, heart rate, congestion in auscultation and chest as well as vascular anatomy examination with Allen test (patency of palmar arch), pulse presence, veins patency with and without stasis.

Imaging studies Ultrasound condition of vessel will be evaluated prior AVF creation (upper arms flow, diameter of arteries and veins, possible stenosis, etc) and in follow up period (day -1, 1 and 6 weeks). In selected cases (history of previous subclavian vein catheterization, collateral circulation developed) venography will be performed.

Whole blood parameters.

Blood samples will be taken at routine control, or before routine dialysis session in HD patients (referred for AVF placement).

Routine laboratory parameters collected at baseline and during follow-up (14-28, 56-60, 90 day): Complete blood counts with focus on neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), phosphorus, calcium, parathormone, C-reactive protein (CRP), urea acid, lipids (cholesterol fractions, triglycerides).

Statistical analysis All participants data from recruitment and follow up will be collected in special designed computer program. The primary outcome of this study is AVF success (patent and mature) at 6 weeks post creation. Baseline patient characteristics including age, gender and co-morbidities will be compared between the patients with successful AVF and those with unsuccessful AVF. Categorical variables will be presented by frequency (percentage) and comparisons will be made via the Chi-square or Fisher's Exact test. Underlying distributions of continuous variables will be tested for normality using the Shapiro-Wilk test and then analyzed with appropriate tests. Kaplan-Meier analysis will be performed for primary, secondary and functional patency rate. All analyses will be performed by external statistical laboratory with high references. The professional statistical expertise is planned (PREST laboratory at Mathematical Institute in Wroclaw) with utilization of R package and Statistica 13 software.

Being tested
AVF

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • AVFProcedure or surgery

    Distal forearm AVF for hemodialysis.

Study groups in NCT06550479
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
SBAVFExperimentalPatients enrolled for snuffbox fistula creation.
Receives: Procedure: AVF
RCAVFExperimentalPatients enrolled for RCAVF
Receives: Procedure: AVF
RCAVF with venous branch patchExperimentalPatients enrolled for RCAVF with venous branch patch
Receives: Procedure: AVF

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Primary patency:

    The interval between VA creation and the first re-intervention (intervention free VA survival) for VA dysfunction or thrombosis, the time of measurement of patency or the time of its abandonment

    Measured: 12 months

  2. Assisted primary patency:

    The interval between VA creation and the first occlusion (thrombosis free VA survival) or measurement of patency including operative/endovascular interventions to maintain the VA.

    Measured: 36 months

  3. Secondary patency

    The interval between VA creation and the abandonment of this VA (i.e. thrombosis) after one or more interventions or the time of measurement of patency including achievement of a censored event (death, change of HD modality, loss of follow-up).

    Measured: 36 months

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Mature VA

    A fistula was considered mature when the blood flow exceeded 500 ml/min and the diameter of the cephalic vein exceeded 5 mm.

    Measured: 6 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Aug 2024
  2. Study start1 Jan 2024
  3. Primary completion31 Jul 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Jul 2030 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Comparison of three different distal AVF types
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
180 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06550479
Sponsor's protocol ID
WMU
Status last verified
Aug 2024
First submitted
30 Jul 2024
Last updated
13 Aug 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Tordoir J, Canaud B, Haage P, Konner K, Basci A, Fouque D, Kooman J, Martin-Malo A, Pedrini L, Pizzarelli F, Tattersall J, Vennegoor M, Wanner C, ter Wee P, Vanholder R. EBPG on Vascular Access. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2007 May;22 Suppl 2:ii88-117. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfm021. No abstract available.

    PubMed 17507428
  • Roy-Chaudhury P, Kelly BS, Melhem M, Zhang J, Li J, Desai P, Munda R, Heffelfinger SC. Vascular access in hemodialysis: issues, management, and emerging concepts. Cardiol Clin. 2005 Aug;23(3):249-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ccl.2005.04.004.

    PubMed 16084276
  • Stoner L, Sabatier MJ. Use of ultrasound for non-invasive assessment of flow-mediated dilation. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2012;19(5):407-21. doi: 10.5551/jat.11395. Epub 2012 Mar 1.

    PubMed 22659525
  • Jemcov TK. Morphologic and functional vessels characteristics assessed by ultrasonography for prediction of radiocephalic fistula maturation. J Vasc Access. 2013 Oct-Dec;14(4):356-63. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000163. Epub 2013 Jul 1.

    PubMed 23817950
  • Bylsma LC, Gage SM, Reichert H, Dahl SLM, Lawson JH. Arteriovenous Fistulae for Haemodialysis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Efficacy and Safety Outcomes. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017 Oct;54(4):513-522. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.06.024. Epub 2017 Aug 23.

    PubMed 28843984
  • Al-Jaishi AA, Oliver MJ, Thomas SM, Lok CE, Zhang JC, Garg AX, Kosa SD, Quinn RR, Moist LM. Patency rates of the arteriovenous fistula for hemodialysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2014 Mar;63(3):464-78. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2013.08.023. Epub 2013 Oct 30.

    PubMed 24183112

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing AVF in people with Dialysis; Complications and Vascular Access Complication, run by Wroclaw Medical University at 1 site in Poland.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Aug 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Poland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Primary patency: (time frame: 12 months). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06550479, which also lists 6 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Aug 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in