AzTrials
AzTrials

IVFNCT06551376

LATE LUTEAL PHASE VS. CONVENTIONAL EARLY FOLLICULAR PHASE START IN IVF

A study testing Ovarian Stimulation Start in people with IVF, run by Clinia de fertilización Asistida en el Hospital ABC.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To compare cycle outcomes after scheduling with the standard early follicular phase (EFP) versus late luteal phase (LLP) in patients undergoing GnRH antagonist cycles. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 to 42 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
IVF
What is being tested?
Ovarian Stimulation Start
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
40 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
1 Sep 2024to 31 Jan 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 to 42 years
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Regularly cycling women aged ≤40 years with fewer than one previous IVF attempts were enrolled

Who cannot join

  • Previous low responses to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation, ovarian surgery, or polycystic ovary were exclusion criteria

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet.

Jorge Rodriguez-Purata, MD contact

55 4246 9686

jorge@ovulsans.com

About this study

Official title: IVF CYCLE SCHEDULING WITH LATE LUTEAL PHASE VS. CONVENTIONAL EARLY FOLLICULAR PHASE START TO AVOID WEEKENDS RETRIEVALS: PROOF OF CONCEPT

To compare cycle outcomes after scheduling with the standard early follicular phase (EFP) versus late luteal phase (LLP) in patients undergoing GnRH antagonist cycles.

Read the detailed description

Objective To compare cycle outcomes after scheduling with the standard early follicular phase (EFP) versus late luteal phase (LLP) in patients undergoing GnRH antagonist cycles.

Design Multicentric prospective non-randomized study

Setting Two university-affiliated private assisted reproduction centers.

Patient(s) Regularly cycling women aged ≤40 years with fewer than one previous IVF attempts were enrolled. Previous low responses to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation, ovarian surgery, or polycystic ovary were exclusion criteria.

Intervention(s) Twenty patients started controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) after spontaneous menses; similarly, twenty patients started stimulation on the Friday previous to a spontaneous menses (at the end of late luteal phase), regardless of cycle day.

Main Outcome Measure(s) Primary outcome: number of mature oocytes retrieved. Secondary outcomes: fertilization rate, viable embryo rate per oocyte retrieved, cancellation rate, and clinical pregnancy outcomes from FET cycles.

Conditions
IVF
Being tested
Ovarian Stimulation Start
Keywords
Ovarian Stimulation, luteal phase start, early follicular phase start, ovarian response

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Ovarian Stimulation StartOther

    To compare ovarian response accordin to ovarian stimualtion start

Study groups in NCT06551376
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Early Follicular Phase ovarian stimulationPlacebo comparatorTwenty patients started controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) after spontaneous menses
Receives: Other: Ovarian Stimulation Start
Late Luteal Phase ovarian stimulationActive comparatorTwenty patients started stimulation on the Friday previous to a spontaneous menses (at the end of late luteal phase), regardless of cycle day.
Receives: Other: Ovarian Stimulation Start

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. mature oocytes retrieved

    Measured: At retrieval

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. fertilization rate

    Measured: 24 hours after retrieval

  2. viable embryo rate per oocyte retrieved

    Measured: 5 days after retrieval

  3. cancellation rate

    Measured: 14 days after cycle start

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Aug 2024
  2. Study start1 Sep 2024 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion31 Jan 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Jan 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
40 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06551376
Sponsor's protocol ID
NPI010924
Status last verified
Aug 2024
First submitted
9 Aug 2024
Last updated
13 Aug 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Ovarian Stimulation Start in people with IVF, run by Clinia de fertilización Asistida en el Hospital ABC.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Aug 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Jorge Rodriguez-Purata, MD (55 4246 9686, jorge@ovulsans.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

mature oocytes retrieved (time frame: At retrieval). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Aug 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in