AnesthesiaNCT06552351
Needle-Free Lidocaine Injection vs Traditional Local Anesthesia in Infant Lumbar Puncture
A study testing Needle-Free Jet Injection of 1 % lidocaine and traditional needle infiltration of 1% lidocaine in people with Anesthesia, run by University of Oklahoma at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
We hypothesize that the J-Tip needle-free jet-injection system offers comparable pain control and greater provider satisfaction due to its less invasive nature compared to traditional needle infiltration of 1% lidocaine in infants undergoing lumbar punctures. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 1 day to 3 months
- Conditions the study is for
- Anesthesia
- What is being tested?
- Needle-Free Jet Injection of 1 % lidocaine and traditional needle infiltration of 1% lidocaine
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Nov 2024to 1 Aug 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 1 day to 3 months
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
None listed.
Who cannot join
- Infants with known allergy or hypersensitivity to lidocaine or components of the needle-free jet injection device
- Infants with significant skin infection or dermatitis at the site of injection
- Infants with coagulopathy or any bleeding disorder
- Infants with any other condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would make participation in the study unsafe or not in the best interest of the infant
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States1 site
Oklahoma Children's Hospital
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104
Valorie Owens, 405-271-2429 ext. 44249, valorie-owens@ouhsc.edu
Olena Kostyuk, MD, 6466434355, olena-kostyuk@ouhsc.edu
About this study
Official title: Needle-Free Jet Injection Versus Traditional Lidocaine Needle Infiltration for Local Anesthesia in Infant Lumbar Puncture
We hypothesize that the J-Tip needle-free jet-injection system offers comparable pain control and greater provider satisfaction due to its less invasive nature compared to traditional needle infiltration of 1% lidocaine in infants undergoing lumbar punctures.
Our aim is to evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of different local anesthetic techniques in the ED setting by comparing traditional lidocaine needle infiltration with J-tip.
Read the detailed description
Lumbar punctures (LPs) play a key role in diagnosing meningitis in febrile infants. The use of local anesthesia is critical to the success of these procedures. Traditional anesthesia techniques, including needle injections and the application of topical anesthetic creams, have been effective in managing pain and enhancing the outcomes of LPs. Recently, the introduction of needle-free jet injection technology, such as the J-Tip system, offers a quicker and less invasive method for delivering local anesthesia.
This research compares the effectiveness of the J-Tip with that of traditional 1% lidocaine infiltration for local anesthesia during LPs in infants.
The investigators hypothesize that the J-Tip needle-free jet-injection system offers comparable pain control and greater provider satisfaction due to its less invasive nature compared to traditional needle infiltration of 1% lidocaine in infants undergoing lumbar punctures.
The aim is to evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of different local anesthetic techniques in the ED setting by comparing traditional 1% lidocaine needle infiltration with administration of 1% lidocaine the J-Tip.
Secondary outcomes include the number of attempts to successfully perform the LP, perceptions of pain management effectiveness by ED providers, the need for additional lidocaine, skin condition at the LP site, and the overall success rate of the LP procedures.
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN:
A single-center, randomized, controlled trial will compare the efficacy of J-Tip-injected lidocaine with conventional needle-injected lidocaine in providing anesthesia for infants undergoing lumbar punctures.
PROPOSED PROCEDURE:
Infants aged 0 to 3 months presenting to the Oklahoma Children's Hospital Emergency Department between July 1, 2024, through June 30, 2025, who require an LP as part of their ED evaluation will be recruited.
Randomization Strategy:
Participants who consent will be randomly divided into two groups: one receiving local anesthesia via the J-Tip syringe containing 1% lidocaine (experimental group) and the other through needle infiltration with the same concentration of lidocaine (control group). Randomization assignments will be provided in sealed envelopes and kept with the study team to be included in a study packet along with the consent forms to be reviewed at the time of enrollment.
The ED provider performing the LP will independently evaluate pain levels using the Neonatal Infant Pain Scale (NIPS) immediately before the LP begins and at the time of needle insertion.
A brief period of up to 5 minutes will follow the topical anesthesia application to allow infants to calm and reach a steady state, accounting for any initial discomfort or startle response.
After the LP, attending providers will complete a questionnaire detailing the number of attempts, any encountered difficulties, additional lidocaine usage, their assessment of pain control during the procedure, any skin changes at the LP site, and LP success, defined as obtaining cerebrospinal fluid.
Outcome Measures:
Primary Outcome: Pain levels, as measured by NIPS scores, immediately before the LP and at needle insertion.
The NIPS (Neonatal Infant Pain Scale) is a scoring system used to assess pain in newborns and infants up to 1 year of age. It is a behavioral scale that evaluates specific criteria to determine the level of pain the infant may be experiencing.
NIPS Scoring System:
Facial Expression (0-1 points) 0: Relaxed facial expression
1: Grimace Cry (0-2 points) 0: No cry
- Whimper
- Vigorous cry Breathing Patterns (0-1 points)
0: Relaxed breathing
1: Change in breathing patterns (e.g., irregular, fast, or slow breathing) Arm Movements (0-1 points) 0: Relaxed, no movement or only gentle movements
1: Flexed or extended movements (restless, jerking) Leg Movements (0-1 points) 0: Relaxed, no movement or only gentle movements
1: Flexed or extended movements (restless, jerking) State of Arousal (0-1 points) 0: Sleeping or calm
1: Fussy
Scoring Interpretation:
0-2 points: Mild or no pain 3-4 points: Moderate pain 5-7 points: Severe pain
Secondary Outcomes: Include the number of LP attempts, any difficulties encountered (open-ended), provider's perception of pain control (1-5 scale), additional lidocaine use, post-procedure skin reactions (classified as minor/moderate or severe induration, bleeding), and LP success. Additionally, it will be determined if the LP was traumatic by reviewing patient charts, defined as having a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) red blood cell (RBC) count of ≥ 1000 cells/mm³.
Provider Information: Details about the providers performing the LP, including their level of training (APP, fellow, attending, resident) and prior experience with LPs (categorized as 0-5, 6-10, 11-20, >20 attempts), will be documented.
Data will be entered into REDCap and only authorized key study personnel will have access. Identifiers will be removed, and the de-identified information may be used for future research without additional informed consent from the participant.
- Conditions
- Anesthesia
- Being tested
- Needle-Free Jet Injection of 1 % lidocaine, traditional needle infiltration of 1% lidocaine
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Needle-Free Jet Injection of 1 % lidocaineDevice
Also called Jet Injection Device, J-tip injection of 1 % lidocaine
The needle-free jet injection device delivers 1% lidocaine through high-pressure fluid without the use of a needle. This method aims to reduce the pain associated with needle-based anesthesia during infant lumbar punctures.
traditional needle infiltration of 1% lidocaineOther
Traditional needle infiltration involves injecting 1% lidocaine with a needle to provide local anesthesia before an infant lumbar puncture. This method is the standard practice for pain management in such procedures.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Needle-Free Jet Injection of 1 % lidocaine | Experimental | Device: Needle-Free Jet Injection The needle-free jet injection device delivers 1 % Lidocaine through high-pressure fluid without the use of a needle. This method aims to reduce the pain associated with needle-based anesthesia during infant lumbar punctures.
Other Names:
• Jet Injection Device, J-tip Receives: Device: Needle-Free Jet Injection of 1 % lidocaine |
| Traditional needle infiltration of 1% lidocaine | Experimental | Traditional needle infiltration involves injecting 1% lidocaine with a needle to provide local anesthesia before an infant lumbar puncture. This method is the standard practice for pain management in such procedures.
Other Names:
• traditional needle infiltration of 1% lidocaine Receives: Other: traditional needle infiltration of 1% lidocaine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Pain Score
The primary outcome measure will be the pain score of infants undergoing lumbar punctures, assessed using a validated pain scale appropriate for infants.
Measured: Immediately post-procedure (within 5 minutes after the lumbar puncture)
Procedure Success Rate
The success rate of the lumbar puncture procedure, defined as obtaining an adequate CSF sample on the first attempt without the need for additional anesthesia.
Measured: During the procedure
Caregiver Satisfaction
Caregiver satisfaction with the anesthesia method used, measured using a standardized survey or questionnaire completed after the procedure.
Measured: Within 1 hour post-procedure
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Aug 2024
- Study startNov 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completion1 Aug 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Aug 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for AnesthesiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either needle-free jet injection or traditional lidocaine needle infiltration for local anesthesia during infant lumbar puncture
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Oklahoma
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Jamie Laughy, MD, Principal investigator, University of Oklahoma
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06552351
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 17204
- Status last verified
- Oct 2024
- First submitted
- 29 Jul 2024
- Last updated
- 10 Oct 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No: There are no plans to make individual participant data (IPD) available to other researchers.
Publications
Baxter AL, Welch JC, Burke BL, Isaacman DJ. Pain, position, and stylet styles: infant lumbar puncture practices of pediatric emergency attending physicians. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2004 Dec;20(12):816-20. doi: 10.1097/01.pec.0000148030.99339.fe.
PubMed 15572969Caltagirone R, Raghavan VR, Adelgais K, Roosevelt GE. A Randomized Double Blind Trial of Needle-free Injected Lidocaine Versus Topical Anesthesia for Infant Lumbar Puncture. Acad Emerg Med. 2018 Mar;25(3):310-316. doi: 10.1111/acem.13351. Epub 2017 Dec 26.
PubMed 29160002Use of Jet-Injected Lidocaine to Reduce Venipuncture Pain. AAP Grand Rounds, 2016. 35(2): p. 13-13.
Hajimaghsoudi M, Vahidi E, Momeni M, Arabinejhad A, Saeedi M. Comparison of local anesthetic effect of lidocaine by jet injection vs needle infiltration in lumbar puncture. Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Jul;34(7):1225-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.03.030. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
PubMed 27055606Nigrovic LE, Kuppermann N, Neuman MI. Risk factors for traumatic or unsuccessful lumbar punctures in children. Ann Emerg Med. 2007 Jun;49(6):762-71. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.10.018. Epub 2007 Feb 23.
PubMed 17321005Fein D, Avner JR, Khine H. Pattern of pain management during lumbar puncture in children. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2010 May;26(5):357-60. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3181db2026.
PubMed 20404782Ferayorni A, Yniguez R, Bryson M, Bulloch B. Needle-free jet injection of lidocaine for local anesthesia during lumbar puncture: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2012 Jul;28(7):687-90. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31825d210b.
PubMed 22743744Hoyle JD Jr, Rogers AJ, Reischman DE, Powell EC, Borgialli DA, Mahajan PV, Trytko JA, Stanley RM. Pain intervention for infant lumbar puncture in the emergency department: physician practice and beliefs. Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Feb;18(2):140-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00970.x.
PubMed 21314772
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Oct 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Needle-Free Jet Injection Versus Traditional Lidocaine Needle Infiltration for Local Anesthesia in Infant Lumbar Puncture
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06552351
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 17204
- Conditions
- Anesthesia
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of OklahomaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Nov 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 1 Aug 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Aug 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 14 Aug 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
We hypothesize that the J-Tip needle-free jet-injection system offers comparable pain control and greater provider satisfaction due to its less invasive nature compared to traditional needle infiltration of 1% lidocaine in infants undergoing lumbar punctures.
Our aim is to evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of different local anesthetic techniques in the ED setting by comparing traditional lidocaine needle infiltration with J-tip.
Detailed description
Lumbar punctures (LPs) play a key role in diagnosing meningitis in febrile infants. The use of local anesthesia is critical to the success of these procedures. Traditional anesthesia techniques, including needle injections and the application of topical anesthetic creams, have been effective in managing pain and enhancing the outcomes of LPs. Recently, the introduction of needle-free jet injection technology, such as the J-Tip system, offers a quicker and less invasive method for delivering local anesthesia.
This research compares the effectiveness of the J-Tip with that of traditional 1% lidocaine infiltration for local anesthesia during LPs in infants.
The investigators hypothesize that the J-Tip needle-free jet-injection system offers comparable pain control and greater provider satisfaction due to its less invasive nature compared to traditional needle infiltration of 1% lidocaine in infants undergoing lumbar punctures.
The aim is to evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of different local anesthetic techniques in the ED setting by comparing traditional 1% lidocaine needle infiltration with administration of 1% lidocaine the J-Tip.
Secondary outcomes include the number of attempts to successfully perform the LP, perceptions of pain management effectiveness by ED providers, the need for additional lidocaine, skin condition at the LP site, and the overall success rate of the LP procedures.
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN:
A single-center, randomized, controlled trial will compare the efficacy of J-Tip-injected lidocaine with conventional needle-injected lidocaine in providing anesthesia for infants undergoing lumbar punctures.
PROPOSED PROCEDURE:
Infants aged 0 to 3 months presenting to the Oklahoma Children's Hospital Emergency Department between July 1, 2024, through June 30, 2025, who require an LP as part of their ED evaluation will be recruited.
Randomization Strategy:
Participants who consent will be randomly divided into two groups: one receiving local anesthesia via the J-Tip syringe containing 1% lidocaine (experimental group) and the other through needle infiltration with the same concentration of lidocaine (control group). Randomization assignments will be provided in sealed envelopes and kept with the study team to be included in a study packet along with the consent forms to be reviewed at the time of enrollment.
The ED provider performing the LP will independently evaluate pain levels using the Neonatal Infant Pain Scale (NIPS) immediately before the LP begins and at the time of needle insertion.
A brief period of up to 5 minutes will follow the topical anesthesia application to allow infants to calm and reach a steady state, accounting for any initial discomfort or startle response.
After the LP, attending providers will complete a questionnaire detailing the number of attempts, any encountered difficulties, additional lidocaine usage, their assessment of pain control during the procedure, any skin changes at the LP site, and LP success, defined as obtaining cerebrospinal fluid.
Outcome Measures:
Primary Outcome: Pain levels, as measured by NIPS scores, immediately before the LP and at needle insertion.
The NIPS (Neonatal Infant Pain Scale) is a scoring system used to assess pain in newborns and infants up to 1 year of age. It is a behavioral scale that evaluates specific criteria to determine the level of pain the infant may be experiencing.
NIPS Scoring System:
Facial Expression (0-1 points) 0: Relaxed facial expression
1: Grimace Cry (0-2 points) 0: No cry
- Whimper
- Vigorous cry Breathing Patterns (0-1 points)
0: Relaxed breathing
1: Change in breathing patterns (e.g., irregular, fast, or slow breathing) Arm Movements (0-1 points) 0: Relaxed, no movement or only gentle movements
1: Flexed or extended movements (restless, jerking) Leg Movements (0-1 points) 0: Relaxed, no movement or only gentle movements
1: Flexed or extended movements (restless, jerking) State of Arousal (0-1 points) 0: Sleeping or calm
1: Fussy
Scoring Interpretation:
0-2 points: Mild or no pain 3-4 points: Moderate pain 5-7 points: Severe pain
Secondary Outcomes: Include the number of LP attempts, any difficulties encountered (open-ended), provider's perception of pain control (1-5 scale), additional lidocaine use, post-procedure skin reactions (classified as minor/moderate or severe induration, bleeding), and LP success. Additionally, it will be determined if the LP was traumatic by reviewing patient charts, defined as having a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) red blood cell (RBC) count of ≥ 1000 cells/mm³.
Provider Information: Details about the providers performing the LP, including their level of training (APP, fellow, attending, resident) and prior experience with LPs (categorized as 0-5, 6-10, 11-20, >20 attempts), will be documented.
Data will be entered into REDCap and only authorized key study personnel will have access. Identifiers will be removed, and the de-identified information may be used for future research without additional informed consent from the participant.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either needle-free jet injection or traditional lidocaine needle infiltration for local anesthesia during infant lumbar puncture
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Needle-Free Jet Injection of 1 % lidocaine | Experimental | Device: Needle-Free Jet Injection of 1 % lidocaineDevice: Needle-Free Jet Injection The needle-free jet injection device delivers 1 % Lidocaine through high-pressure fluid without the use of a needle. This method aims to reduce the pain associated with needle-based anesthesia during infant lumbar punctures. Other Names: • Jet Injection Device, J-tip |
| Traditional needle infiltration of 1% lidocaine | Experimental | Other: traditional needle infiltration of 1% lidocaineTraditional needle infiltration involves injecting 1% lidocaine with a needle to provide local anesthesia before an infant lumbar puncture. This method is the standard practice for pain management in such procedures. Other Names: • traditional needle infiltration of 1% lidocaine |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 1 day to 3 months
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (0 listed)
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Infants with known allergy or hypersensitivity to lidocaine or components of the needle-free jet injection device
- Infants with significant skin infection or dermatitis at the site of injection
- Infants with coagulopathy or any bleeding disorder
- Infants with any other condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would make participation in the study unsafe or not in the best interest of the infant
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Needle-Free Jet Injection of 1 % lidocaineAlso: Jet Injection Device, J-tip injection of 1 % lidocaineThe needle-free jet injection device delivers 1% lidocaine through high-pressure fluid without the use of a needle. This method aims to reduce the pain associated with needle-based anesthesia during infant lumbar punctures. | Device | Needle-Free Jet Injection of 1 % lidocaine |
| traditional needle infiltration of 1% lidocaineTraditional needle infiltration involves injecting 1% lidocaine with a needle to provide local anesthesia before an infant lumbar puncture. This method is the standard practice for pain management in such procedures. | Other | Traditional needle infiltration of 1% lidocaine |
Primary outcome
Pain Score
Time frame: Immediately post-procedure (within 5 minutes after the lumbar puncture)
The primary outcome measure will be the pain score of infants undergoing lumbar punctures, assessed using a validated pain scale appropriate for infants.
Procedure Success Rate
Time frame: During the procedure
The success rate of the lumbar puncture procedure, defined as obtaining an adequate CSF sample on the first attempt without the need for additional anesthesia.
Caregiver Satisfaction
Time frame: Within 1 hour post-procedure
Caregiver satisfaction with the anesthesia method used, measured using a standardized survey or questionnaire completed after the procedure.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Oct 2024.
- Background: PubMed 15572969Baxter AL, Welch JC, Burke BL, Isaacman DJ. Pain, position, and stylet styles: infant lumbar puncture practices of pediatric emergency attending physicians. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2004 Dec;20(12):816-20. doi: 10.1097/01.pec.0000148030.99339.fe.
- Background: PubMed 29160002Caltagirone R, Raghavan VR, Adelgais K, Roosevelt GE. A Randomized Double Blind Trial of Needle-free Injected Lidocaine Versus Topical Anesthesia for Infant Lumbar Puncture. Acad Emerg Med. 2018 Mar;25(3):310-316. doi: 10.1111/acem.13351. Epub 2017 Dec 26.
- BackgroundUse of Jet-Injected Lidocaine to Reduce Venipuncture Pain. AAP Grand Rounds, 2016. 35(2): p. 13-13.
- Background: PubMed 27055606Hajimaghsoudi M, Vahidi E, Momeni M, Arabinejhad A, Saeedi M. Comparison of local anesthetic effect of lidocaine by jet injection vs needle infiltration in lumbar puncture. Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Jul;34(7):1225-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.03.030. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
- Background: PubMed 17321005Nigrovic LE, Kuppermann N, Neuman MI. Risk factors for traumatic or unsuccessful lumbar punctures in children. Ann Emerg Med. 2007 Jun;49(6):762-71. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.10.018. Epub 2007 Feb 23.
- Background: PubMed 20404782Fein D, Avner JR, Khine H. Pattern of pain management during lumbar puncture in children. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2010 May;26(5):357-60. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3181db2026.
- Background: PubMed 22743744Ferayorni A, Yniguez R, Bryson M, Bulloch B. Needle-free jet injection of lidocaine for local anesthesia during lumbar puncture: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2012 Jul;28(7):687-90. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31825d210b.
- Background: PubMed 21314772Hoyle JD Jr, Rogers AJ, Reischman DE, Powell EC, Borgialli DA, Mahajan PV, Trytko JA, Stanley RM. Pain intervention for infant lumbar puncture in the emergency department: physician practice and beliefs. Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Feb;18(2):140-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00970.x.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. There are no plans to make individual participant data (IPD) available to other researchers.
Related trials for Anesthesia
Recruiting
Platelet-Rich Fibrin in Revision Cartilage Tympanoplasty
Tympanic Membrane Perforation, Chronic Otitis Media
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Effect of Neuromuscular Blocking Agent Use on Video Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion
Airway Management, Supraglottic Airway Device Insertion
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Dexmedetomidine Nasal Spray and Postoperative Sore Throat After Bronchoscopy
Postoperative Sore Throat, Bronchoscopy
Recruiting
Buzzy Bee for Pain and Anxiety Control During Pediatric Dental Local Anesthesia
Anesthesia, Anxiety
Recruiting
Conscious Sedation Versus General Anesthesia for Pulsed Field Ablation in Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Jamie Laughy, MD principal investigator
University of Oklahoma
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Needle-Free Jet Injection of 1 % lidocaine and traditional needle infiltration of 1% lidocaine in people with Anesthesia, run by University of Oklahoma at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 0 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Oct 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Valorie Owens, MSW (405-271-2429 ext. 44249, Valorie-Owens@ouhsc.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Pain Score (time frame: Immediately post-procedure (within 5 minutes after the lumbar puncture)). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06552351, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Oct 2024.