Chronic DiseaseNCT06558591
Feasibility and Potential Impact of an Individualized Exercise Program Via a Telerehabilitation Device in Chronic Patients: A Pilot Study
A study testing Telerehabilitation intervention in people with Chronic Disease and Chronic Condition, run by Limoges University.
Trial summary
Exercise Rehabilitation (ER) is widely used and effective in the treatment of chronic diseases; however, patients do not adhere to ER programs. Tele-rehabilitation is effective and often used to support and improve patient adherence. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Disease, Chronic Condition, Stroke Sequelae
- What is being tested?
- Telerehabilitation intervention
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Jan 2025to Jul 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Be 18 years of age or older,
- Be able to walk with or without assistives devices
- Be capable of giving informed consent,
- Be registered with the French health social security system,
- Be under the care of a rehabilitation exercise professional.
- Non-inclusion criteria for patients :
Show all 9Show fewer
- Have an intolerance or inability to use digital tools,
- Have a cognitive impairment,
- Have contraindications to physical activity (unstable diabetes, unstable hypertension, unstable angina, intracardiac thrombus).
Who cannot join
None listed.
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
About this study
Exercise Rehabilitation (ER) is widely used and effective in the treatment of chronic diseases; however, patients do not adhere to ER programs. Tele-rehabilitation is effective and often used to support and improve patient adherence. Thus, the ADEPINA device could be a promising solution for the individualized management of patients by their therapists. The aim of the study will be: a) To assess functional improvement, measured by the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) after the 12 weeks ER program in people with chronic disease. Additionally, the study will assess the individualized program' adherence and his effect on patients' physical fitness and quality of life. Methods: Fifty patients will follow individualized ER sessions to their patients (with chronic diseases) using the ADEPINA device, 2 to 3 times per week for 12 weeks. At the end of the intervention, the investigator will assess patients' lower limb strength (with sit to stand test), dynamic balance (Timed up and go test), patients' adherence to the ER program by evaluating the usage time of the system by participants, the treatment credibility and participant expectations for improvement will be assessed with the French version of the Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire. The investigator will also evaluate the patients' quality of life (using the "World Health Organization Quality of Life" (WHOQOL) scale) at the beginning and end of the intervention. Discussion: This interventional pilot study could have positive impacts for participants and explore gaps in the current literature regarding the individualized telerehabilitation program' feasibility.
Read the detailed description
The ADEPINA project is a 12- week prospective multicentric pilot study. The project will be conducted by the HAVAE laboratory and the Limoges university will be the promoter. The study protocol is in accordance with the Standard Protocol Items Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) guidelines. Patients will perform ER program proposed by their professionals (as part of their routine care) through ADEPINA web platform for 12 weeks with evaluations before and after the intervention.
Participants recruitment:
The principal investigator will recruit ER therapists working in the private sector, public sector, or both. The investigator will present the study to potential participants. This study will be conducted with ER professionals (physiotherapists, kinesiologists) and their patients with chronic conditions. Volunteers who meet the inclusion criteria below and provide written consent will be included and will then receive an information notice.
Inclusion will take place within the framework of routine care for individuals with chronic diseases in rehabilitation services, hospitals, institutions, etc. The study will be offered to patients with chronic conditions who are being cared for by their therapists. Data collection will be conducted in two sessions. The period between the two sessions will be determined based on the patient's availability, not exceeding a period of 12 weeks:
- 1st session at Day 0: Conducting activities and initial evaluation at their usual care center. Therapists will perform the various planned tests and evaluations.
- 2nd session at 12 weks: This session will take place under the same conditions as the first one and without any potential health risks to the participants.
- A final follow up session will be carried out at 18 weeks. A telephone call will be made between the two sessions to check in and assist participants (both therapists and patients with chronic illnesses) in case of any issues during the study. Recruitment will be coordinated by the clinical investigation center of the University Hospital of Limoges.
Eligibility:
Participants must meet the following criteria before being included in the present study. Professionals must: a) Be a physiotherapist or kinesiologist working in the public sector, private sector, or in a mixed capacity, b) Have been graduated for at least one year, c) Conduct RE with their patients and provide written consent.
The patients of the professionals included in the study must: a) Be 18 years of age or older, b) Be capable of giving informed consent, c) Be registered with the French social security system, e) Be under the care of a rehabilitation exercise professional.
Non inclusion criteria We will not include patients who: a) Have an intolerance or inability to use digital tools, b) Have a cognitive impairment, c) Have contraindications to physical activity (unstable diabetes, unstable hypertension, unstable angina, intracardiac thrombus). In addition, we will not include professionals who refuse to participate in the study.
Exclusion Criteria Participants will be excluded from the study if: a) They (patients or professionals) withdraw their consent to participate in this study during or after data collection, b) A serious adverse event occurs to a patient being treated by a professional included in the study (deterioration of the participant's health, fall, injury). All participants who request to leave the study will be excluded. Similarly, participants who do not use the platform before the final evaluation after two reminders will be excluded from this study and the final analysis.
Sample size calculation :
The sample size calculation is based on a previous study by Hwang et al., that assessed efficacy and safety of a group-based heart failure rehabilitation program delivered into each participant's home via an online telerehabilitation system. Investigators hypothesized that the 12 weeks telerehabilitation program would improve the attendance rates among patients after the intervention by 10%. In addition, a personalized telerehabilitation program could improve clinical parameters such as physical conditions (Timed up and go, sit to stand tests …) and quality of life. Investigators performed an estimation with 0.80 power and 0.05 α risk. The sample size required was 35 patients. Investigators added 20% to ensure the statistical power of the study, considering possible drop-out. The total sample will consist in 50 patients.
Ethical approval and considerations:
All procedures will follow the recommendations of the Good Clinical Practice Guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki. This project will receive authorization from the ethics and individual protection committee (IFC) sud-est 2. Every significant amendment to the protocol will have to be approved by the Committee prior to its implementation. The study will also follow the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The results of the current study will be published in relevant scientific journals and be disseminated in international conferences. The consent form and the information notice will be drawn up in triplicate, one copy of which will be given to each participant. This study is part of routine care, and people with chronic diseases will be cared for in accordance with their usual care plan. Finally, the risks associated with this study are very low, because considering the "jardé law" in effect in France, this is interventional research on the human person with minor risk (RIPH3).
Intervention
ADEPINA device :
- Web-based Platform Therapists will create physical training sessions by compiling exercises into video capsules for the patients. Patients will find these sessions in their personal spaces and will perform the same movements requested by the therapist, adhering to safety instructions and the prescribed dosage (repetitions, sets, etc.). Therapists will use equipment regularly utilized in routine care. ii. Android Tablet All patients will have access to a tablet that allows them to view the sessions from their respective caregivers. They can also perform physical fitness tests by following the therapist's instructions. iii. Wearable Sensor The evaluation of physical activity levels is conducted using tools from the wearable sensor, which includes MEMS components commonly found in smartwatches and mobile phones (accelerometer, gyrometer, magnetometer). Participants will need to wear the sensor on their wrist during evaluations (Sit to stand, TUG, etc.).
Training program We conceptualized our telerehabilitation device based on our previous studies regarding the acceptability of the ADEPINA device. According to previous studies, patients prefer their care to be provided by their healthcare professionals. Therefore, rehabilitation exercise professionals have the opportunity to design their own personalized rehabilitation exercise sessions for their patients. These professionals are required to adhere to the World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations regarding the design of rehabilitation exercise sessions.
Outcomes and Evaluations:
Primary outcomes Over a 12-weeks period, participants will use the digital platform for their regular rehabilitation exercise sessions. This will be a pilot study based on the collection and analysis of quantitative data. The study will investigate the functional improvement, measured by the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) after the 12 weeks ER program in people with chronic disease.
Secondary outcomes
In addition, the study will assess:
- The adherence to the rehabilitation exercise program will be assessed by evaluating the system usage time by participants (professionals and their patients). Specifically, we will examine program adherence through the rate of professionals and patients who completed the intervention and both evaluations at Day 0, Week 12 and Week 18.
- Lower limb muscles strength using the Sit-to-Stand Test (STS). Participants will be instructed to stand up completely and then sit down on a chair with their back against the backrest as quickly as possible within 30 seconds, while keeping their arms crossed over their chest. The number of repetitions performed during the 30-second STS test will be simultaneously recorded by our custom sensor, which was validated in our recent study. Performance on the STS test is associated with disability, fall risk, hip fractures, and mortality among elderly individuals and those with chronic diseases
- Quality of life will be assessed using the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL) questionnaire.
- Patients' dynamic balance using the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test assesses functional mobility and dynamic balance in individuals. The subject rises from a chair, walks a distance of 3 meters, turns around, walks back, and sits down. Participants will be instructed to sit upright in the chair, hands on thighs, and back against the chair's backrest. Once the wearable sensor gives the starting signal, they will rise from the chair, walk at their normal pace, turn around just after passing the 3-meter mark, walk back, and sit down again. The test duration will be measured by our custom sensor, which was also validated in our recent study.
- The treatment credibility and participant expectations for improvement will be assessed with the French version of the Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ).
The CEQ includes a Credibility subscale (3 items) and an Expectancy subscale (3 items). The Credibility subscale has a 1-9 rating scale (1 "not at all" to 9 "very") for a total sub-score ranging from 3 to 27. The Expectancy scale has a 0-100% scale, and item 2 has a 1-9 rating scale for a total sub-score ranging from 3 to 27 after transforming the percentage scales. A moderate score ranges between 13.50 and 20.25; scores above 20.25 are considered high.
Statistical analysis:
Descriptive statistics, including frequencies, percentages, median and interquartile range, will be performed to examine the characteristics of the participants. For the qualitative part, a thematic analysis will be carried out to identify the salient aspects of health professionals' experiences and opinions regarding the ADEPINA device. At the end of the intervention, the average usability rate and the attractiveness of the platform to professionals and their patients will be assessed. We will compare clinical parameters before and after training (between Day 0 and week 12) using either the paired student's t test or the non-parametric Mann- Whitney test, depending on whether the data follow a normal distribution. Data will be analyzed with an analysis of variance (between Day 0, Week 12 and week 18).
All participants will be included in the analysis (intention-to-treat analysis). The quantitative analysis will be performed using SPSS V.23.0.0.3 (IBM® SPSS Statistics) and qualitative analysis will be performed by XLSTAT 16 software. The threshold of significance for all tests will be 0.05.
- Being tested
- Telerehabilitation intervention
- Keywords
- Physical training, Telerehabilitation, Fitness test, health professional, chronic disease
- Medical subject headings
- Chronic Disease, Parkinson Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Telerehabilitation interventionDevice
Inclusion will take place within the framework of routine care for individuals with chronic diseases in rehabilitation services, hospitals, institutions, etc. The study will be offered to patients with chronic illnesses who are being cared for by their therapists. Data collection will be conducted in two sessions. The period between the two sessions will be determined based on the patient's availability, not exceeding a period of 12 weeks:
- 1st session at 0 week : Conducting activities and initial evaluation at their usual care center. Therapists will perform the various planned tests and evaluations.
- 2nd session at 12 weeks : This session will take place under the same conditions as the first one and without any potential health risks to the participants.
- A final evaluation will be carried out at the 18-week follow-up. A telephone call will be made between sessions to check in and assist participants in case of any issues during the study.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Chronic disease patients | Experimental | The only intervention group (chronic disease patients) will use the ADEPINA device as part of their conventional treatment. Receives: Device: Telerehabilitation intervention |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
To assess functional improvement, measured by the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) after the 12 weeks ER program in people with chronic disease.
The investigator will assess the 6-minutes walk distance change after the intervention
Measured: Day 0, Week 12, Week 18
Secondary outcomes (5)
To evaluate the impact of the intervention on patient's lower limb strengh
Physical fitness will be assessed using a clinical test (a 30 seconde' sit to stand test) validated and standardized among the chronic disease population.
Measured: Day 0, Week 12, Week 18
To evaluate the impact of the intervention on patient's dynamic balance
Physical fitness will be assessed using a clinical test (a time up and go test) validated and standardized among the chronic disease population.
Measured: Day 0, Week 12, Week 18
To assess the impact of the intervention onpatient's quality of life
Quality of life will be assessed using the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL) questionnaire
Measured: Day 0, Week 12, Week 18
The adherence to the rehabilitation exercise program will be assessed by evaluating the system usage time by participants
Specifically, this study will examine program adherence through the rate of patients who completed the intervention sessions and evaluations
Measured: Week 12, Week 18.
The treatment credibility and participant expectations for improvement were assessed with the French version of the Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ).
The CEQ includes a Credibility subscale (3 items) and an Expectancy subscale (3 items). The Credibility subscale has a 1-9 rating scale (1 "not at all" to 9 "very") for a total sub-score ranging from 3 to 27. The Expectancy scale has a 0-100% scale, and item 2 has a 1-9 rating scale for a total sub-score ranging from 3 to 27 after transforming the percentage scales. A moderate score ranges between 13.50 and 20.25; scores above 20.25 are considered high.
Measured: Week 12, Week 18.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Aug 2024
- Study startJan 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completionDec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completionJul 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Chronic DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- Prospective pilot study.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Limoges University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Regional Health Agency New Aquitaine, University Hospital, Limoges
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Stephane Mandigout, Limoges University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06558591
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SMandigout_ADEPINA
- Status last verified
- Aug 2024
- First submitted
- 13 Jul 2024
- Last updated
- 16 Aug 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Hwang R, Bruning J, Morris NR, Mandrusiak A, Russell T. Home-based telerehabilitation is not inferior to a centre-based program in patients with chronic heart failure: a randomised trial. J Physiother. 2017 Apr;63(2):101-107. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2017.02.017. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
PubMed 28336297Batalik L, Dosbaba F, Hartman M, Konecny V, Batalikova K, Spinar J. Long-term exercise effects after cardiac telerehabilitation in patients with coronary artery disease: 1-year follow-up results of the randomized study. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2021 Oct;57(5):807-814. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.21.06653-3. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
PubMed 33619944Wu YQ, Long Y, Peng WJ, Gong C, Liu YQ, Peng XM, Zhong YB, Luo Y, Wang MY. The Efficacy and Safety of Telerehabilitation for Fibromyalgia: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Med Internet Res. 2023 Apr 25;25:e42090. doi: 10.2196/42090.
PubMed 37097721Scott Kruse C, Karem P, Shifflett K, Vegi L, Ravi K, Brooks M. Evaluating barriers to adopting telemedicine worldwide: A systematic review. J Telemed Telecare. 2018 Jan;24(1):4-12. doi: 10.1177/1357633X16674087. Epub 2016 Oct 16.
PubMed 29320966Mura A, Maier M, Ballester BR, De la Torre Costa J, Lopez-Luque J, Gelineau A, Mandigout S, Ghatan PH, Fiorillo R, Antenucci F, Coolen T, Chivite I, Callen A, Landais H, Gomez OI, Melero C, Brandi S, Domenech M, Daviet JC, Zucca R, Verschure PFMJ. Bringing rehabilitation home with an e-health platform to treat stroke patients: study protocol of a randomized clinical trial (RGS@home). Trials. 2022 Jun 20;23(1):518. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06444-0.
PubMed 35725616Seinsche J, de Bruin ED, Saibene E, Rizzo F, Carpinella I, Ferrarin M, Ifanger S, Moza S, Giannouli E. Feasibility and Effectiveness of a Personalized Home-Based Motor-Cognitive Training Program in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: Protocol for a Pragmatic Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Nov 9;12:e49377. doi: 10.2196/49377.
PubMed 37943591Bohannon RW, Crouch R. Minimal clinically important difference for change in 6-minute walk test distance of adults with pathology: a systematic review. J Eval Clin Pract. 2017 Apr;23(2):377-381. doi: 10.1111/jep.12629. Epub 2016 Sep 4.
PubMed 27592691
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Aug 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Feasibility and Potential Impact of an Individualized Exercise Program Via a Telerehabilitation Device in Chronic Patients: A Pilot Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06558591
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SMandigout_ADEPINA
- Keywords
- Physical training, Telerehabilitation, Fitness test, health professional, chronic disease
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Limoges UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Regional Health Agency New Aquitaine, University Hospital, Limoges
- Study start
- Jan 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jul 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 16 Aug 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Exercise Rehabilitation (ER) is widely used and effective in the treatment of chronic diseases; however, patients do not adhere to ER programs. Tele-rehabilitation is effective and often used to support and improve patient adherence. Thus, the ADEPINA device could be a promising solution for the individualized management of patients by their therapists. The aim of the study will be: a) To assess functional improvement, measured by the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) after the 12 weeks ER program in people with chronic disease. Additionally, the study will assess the individualized program' adherence and his effect on patients' physical fitness and quality of life. Methods: Fifty patients will follow individualized ER sessions to their patients (with chronic diseases) using the ADEPINA device, 2 to 3 times per week for 12 weeks. At the end of the intervention, the investigator will assess patients' lower limb strength (with sit to stand test), dynamic balance (Timed up and go test), patients' adherence to the ER program by evaluating the usage time of the system by participants, the treatment credibility and participant expectations for improvement will be assessed with the French version of the Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire. The investigator will also evaluate the patients' quality of life (using the "World Health Organization Quality of Life" (WHOQOL) scale) at the beginning and end of the intervention. Discussion: This interventional pilot study could have positive impacts for participants and explore gaps in the current literature regarding the individualized telerehabilitation program' feasibility.
Detailed description
The ADEPINA project is a 12- week prospective multicentric pilot study. The project will be conducted by the HAVAE laboratory and the Limoges university will be the promoter. The study protocol is in accordance with the Standard Protocol Items Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) guidelines. Patients will perform ER program proposed by their professionals (as part of their routine care) through ADEPINA web platform for 12 weeks with evaluations before and after the intervention.
Participants recruitment:
The principal investigator will recruit ER therapists working in the private sector, public sector, or both. The investigator will present the study to potential participants. This study will be conducted with ER professionals (physiotherapists, kinesiologists) and their patients with chronic conditions. Volunteers who meet the inclusion criteria below and provide written consent will be included and will then receive an information notice.
Inclusion will take place within the framework of routine care for individuals with chronic diseases in rehabilitation services, hospitals, institutions, etc. The study will be offered to patients with chronic conditions who are being cared for by their therapists. Data collection will be conducted in two sessions. The period between the two sessions will be determined based on the patient's availability, not exceeding a period of 12 weeks:
- 1st session at Day 0: Conducting activities and initial evaluation at their usual care center. Therapists will perform the various planned tests and evaluations.
- 2nd session at 12 weks: This session will take place under the same conditions as the first one and without any potential health risks to the participants.
- A final follow up session will be carried out at 18 weeks. A telephone call will be made between the two sessions to check in and assist participants (both therapists and patients with chronic illnesses) in case of any issues during the study. Recruitment will be coordinated by the clinical investigation center of the University Hospital of Limoges.
Eligibility:
Participants must meet the following criteria before being included in the present study. Professionals must: a) Be a physiotherapist or kinesiologist working in the public sector, private sector, or in a mixed capacity, b) Have been graduated for at least one year, c) Conduct RE with their patients and provide written consent.
The patients of the professionals included in the study must: a) Be 18 years of age or older, b) Be capable of giving informed consent, c) Be registered with the French social security system, e) Be under the care of a rehabilitation exercise professional.
Non inclusion criteria We will not include patients who: a) Have an intolerance or inability to use digital tools, b) Have a cognitive impairment, c) Have contraindications to physical activity (unstable diabetes, unstable hypertension, unstable angina, intracardiac thrombus). In addition, we will not include professionals who refuse to participate in the study.
Exclusion Criteria Participants will be excluded from the study if: a) They (patients or professionals) withdraw their consent to participate in this study during or after data collection, b) A serious adverse event occurs to a patient being treated by a professional included in the study (deterioration of the participant's health, fall, injury). All participants who request to leave the study will be excluded. Similarly, participants who do not use the platform before the final evaluation after two reminders will be excluded from this study and the final analysis.
Sample size calculation :
The sample size calculation is based on a previous study by Hwang et al., that assessed efficacy and safety of a group-based heart failure rehabilitation program delivered into each participant's home via an online telerehabilitation system. Investigators hypothesized that the 12 weeks telerehabilitation program would improve the attendance rates among patients after the intervention by 10%. In addition, a personalized telerehabilitation program could improve clinical parameters such as physical conditions (Timed up and go, sit to stand tests …) and quality of life. Investigators performed an estimation with 0.80 power and 0.05 α risk. The sample size required was 35 patients. Investigators added 20% to ensure the statistical power of the study, considering possible drop-out. The total sample will consist in 50 patients.
Ethical approval and considerations:
All procedures will follow the recommendations of the Good Clinical Practice Guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki. This project will receive authorization from the ethics and individual protection committee (IFC) sud-est 2. Every significant amendment to the protocol will have to be approved by the Committee prior to its implementation. The study will also follow the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The results of the current study will be published in relevant scientific journals and be disseminated in international conferences. The consent form and the information notice will be drawn up in triplicate, one copy of which will be given to each participant. This study is part of routine care, and people with chronic diseases will be cared for in accordance with their usual care plan. Finally, the risks associated with this study are very low, because considering the "jardé law" in effect in France, this is interventional research on the human person with minor risk (RIPH3).
Intervention
ADEPINA device :
- Web-based Platform Therapists will create physical training sessions by compiling exercises into video capsules for the patients. Patients will find these sessions in their personal spaces and will perform the same movements requested by the therapist, adhering to safety instructions and the prescribed dosage (repetitions, sets, etc.). Therapists will use equipment regularly utilized in routine care. ii. Android Tablet All patients will have access to a tablet that allows them to view the sessions from their respective caregivers. They can also perform physical fitness tests by following the therapist's instructions. iii. Wearable Sensor The evaluation of physical activity levels is conducted using tools from the wearable sensor, which includes MEMS components commonly found in smartwatches and mobile phones (accelerometer, gyrometer, magnetometer). Participants will need to wear the sensor on their wrist during evaluations (Sit to stand, TUG, etc.).
Training program We conceptualized our telerehabilitation device based on our previous studies regarding the acceptability of the ADEPINA device. According to previous studies, patients prefer their care to be provided by their healthcare professionals. Therefore, rehabilitation exercise professionals have the opportunity to design their own personalized rehabilitation exercise sessions for their patients. These professionals are required to adhere to the World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations regarding the design of rehabilitation exercise sessions.
Outcomes and Evaluations:
Primary outcomes Over a 12-weeks period, participants will use the digital platform for their regular rehabilitation exercise sessions. This will be a pilot study based on the collection and analysis of quantitative data. The study will investigate the functional improvement, measured by the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) after the 12 weeks ER program in people with chronic disease.
Secondary outcomes
In addition, the study will assess:
- The adherence to the rehabilitation exercise program will be assessed by evaluating the system usage time by participants (professionals and their patients). Specifically, we will examine program adherence through the rate of professionals and patients who completed the intervention and both evaluations at Day 0, Week 12 and Week 18.
- Lower limb muscles strength using the Sit-to-Stand Test (STS). Participants will be instructed to stand up completely and then sit down on a chair with their back against the backrest as quickly as possible within 30 seconds, while keeping their arms crossed over their chest. The number of repetitions performed during the 30-second STS test will be simultaneously recorded by our custom sensor, which was validated in our recent study. Performance on the STS test is associated with disability, fall risk, hip fractures, and mortality among elderly individuals and those with chronic diseases
- Quality of life will be assessed using the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL) questionnaire.
- Patients' dynamic balance using the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test assesses functional mobility and dynamic balance in individuals. The subject rises from a chair, walks a distance of 3 meters, turns around, walks back, and sits down. Participants will be instructed to sit upright in the chair, hands on thighs, and back against the chair's backrest. Once the wearable sensor gives the starting signal, they will rise from the chair, walk at their normal pace, turn around just after passing the 3-meter mark, walk back, and sit down again. The test duration will be measured by our custom sensor, which was also validated in our recent study.
- The treatment credibility and participant expectations for improvement will be assessed with the French version of the Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ).
The CEQ includes a Credibility subscale (3 items) and an Expectancy subscale (3 items). The Credibility subscale has a 1-9 rating scale (1 "not at all" to 9 "very") for a total sub-score ranging from 3 to 27. The Expectancy scale has a 0-100% scale, and item 2 has a 1-9 rating scale for a total sub-score ranging from 3 to 27 after transforming the percentage scales. A moderate score ranges between 13.50 and 20.25; scores above 20.25 are considered high.
Statistical analysis:
Descriptive statistics, including frequencies, percentages, median and interquartile range, will be performed to examine the characteristics of the participants. For the qualitative part, a thematic analysis will be carried out to identify the salient aspects of health professionals' experiences and opinions regarding the ADEPINA device. At the end of the intervention, the average usability rate and the attractiveness of the platform to professionals and their patients will be assessed. We will compare clinical parameters before and after training (between Day 0 and week 12) using either the paired student's t test or the non-parametric Mann- Whitney test, depending on whether the data follow a normal distribution. Data will be analyzed with an analysis of variance (between Day 0, Week 12 and week 18).
All participants will be included in the analysis (intention-to-treat analysis). The quantitative analysis will be performed using SPSS V.23.0.0.3 (IBM® SPSS Statistics) and qualitative analysis will be performed by XLSTAT 16 software. The threshold of significance for all tests will be 0.05.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- Prospective pilot study.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Chronic disease patients | Experimental | Device: Telerehabilitation interventionThe only intervention group (chronic disease patients) will use the ADEPINA device as part of their conventional treatment. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Be 18 years of age or older,
- Be able to walk with or without assistives devices
- Be capable of giving informed consent,
- Be registered with the French health social security system,
- Be under the care of a rehabilitation exercise professional.
Key exclusion criteria (0 listed)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Telerehabilitation interventionInclusion will take place within the framework of routine care for individuals with chronic diseases in rehabilitation services, hospitals, institutions, etc. The study will be offered to patients with chronic illnesses who are being cared for by their therapists. Data collection will be conducted in two sessions. The period between the two sessions will be determined based on the patient's availability, not exceeding a period of 12 weeks: 1. 1st session at 0 week : Conducting activities and initial evaluation at their usual care center. Therapists will perform the various planned tests and evaluations. 2. 2nd session at 12 weeks : This session will take place under the same conditions as the first one and without any potential health risks to the participants. 3. A final evaluation will be carried out at the 18-week follow-up. A telephone call will be made between sessions to check in and assist participants in case of any issues during the study. | Device | Chronic disease patients |
Primary outcome
To assess functional improvement, measured by the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) after the 12 weeks ER program in people with chronic disease.
Time frame: Day 0, Week 12, Week 18
The investigator will assess the 6-minutes walk distance change after the intervention
5 secondary outcomes
To evaluate the impact of the intervention on patient's lower limb strengh
Time frame: Day 0, Week 12, Week 18
To evaluate the impact of the intervention on patient's dynamic balance
Time frame: Day 0, Week 12, Week 18
To assess the impact of the intervention onpatient's quality of life
Time frame: Day 0, Week 12, Week 18
The adherence to the rehabilitation exercise program will be assessed by evaluating the system usage time by participants
Time frame: Week 12, Week 18.
The treatment credibility and participant expectations for improvement were assessed with the French version of the Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ).
Time frame: Week 12, Week 18.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Aug 2024.
- Background: PubMed 28336297Hwang R, Bruning J, Morris NR, Mandrusiak A, Russell T. Home-based telerehabilitation is not inferior to a centre-based program in patients with chronic heart failure: a randomised trial. J Physiother. 2017 Apr;63(2):101-107. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2017.02.017. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
- Background: PubMed 33619944Batalik L, Dosbaba F, Hartman M, Konecny V, Batalikova K, Spinar J. Long-term exercise effects after cardiac telerehabilitation in patients with coronary artery disease: 1-year follow-up results of the randomized study. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2021 Oct;57(5):807-814. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.21.06653-3. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
- Background: PubMed 37097721Wu YQ, Long Y, Peng WJ, Gong C, Liu YQ, Peng XM, Zhong YB, Luo Y, Wang MY. The Efficacy and Safety of Telerehabilitation for Fibromyalgia: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Med Internet Res. 2023 Apr 25;25:e42090. doi: 10.2196/42090.
- Results publication: PubMed 29320966Scott Kruse C, Karem P, Shifflett K, Vegi L, Ravi K, Brooks M. Evaluating barriers to adopting telemedicine worldwide: A systematic review. J Telemed Telecare. 2018 Jan;24(1):4-12. doi: 10.1177/1357633X16674087. Epub 2016 Oct 16.
- Results publication: PubMed 35725616Mura A, Maier M, Ballester BR, De la Torre Costa J, Lopez-Luque J, Gelineau A, Mandigout S, Ghatan PH, Fiorillo R, Antenucci F, Coolen T, Chivite I, Callen A, Landais H, Gomez OI, Melero C, Brandi S, Domenech M, Daviet JC, Zucca R, Verschure PFMJ. Bringing rehabilitation home with an e-health platform to treat stroke patients: study protocol of a randomized clinical trial (RGS@home). Trials. 2022 Jun 20;23(1):518. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06444-0.
- Results publication: PubMed 37943591Seinsche J, de Bruin ED, Saibene E, Rizzo F, Carpinella I, Ferrarin M, Ifanger S, Moza S, Giannouli E. Feasibility and Effectiveness of a Personalized Home-Based Motor-Cognitive Training Program in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: Protocol for a Pragmatic Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Nov 9;12:e49377. doi: 10.2196/49377.
- Results publication: PubMed 27592691Bohannon RW, Crouch R. Minimal clinically important difference for change in 6-minute walk test distance of adults with pathology: a systematic review. J Eval Clin Pract. 2017 Apr;23(2):377-381. doi: 10.1111/jep.12629. Epub 2016 Sep 4.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Chronic Disease
Recruiting
Dietary Intervention for Migraine Relief
Migraine
RecruitingPhase 2
Neurovascular Regulation During Exercise in Humans With Chronic Kidney Disease: Sympatholysis in CKD
Chronic Kidney Disease
Not yet recruiting
Combined Versus Multicomponent Training in People With Chronic Kidney Disease Stages 3a and 3b
Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3A, Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3B
RecruitingPhase 3
A Follow-up Study of Mezagitamab in Adults With Chronic Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia
Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP)
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of Tezepelumab in Patients With Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Telerehabilitation intervention in people with Chronic Disease and Chronic Condition, run by Limoges University.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Aug 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Stephane Mandigout, Full professor (+33 5 55 45 76 32, stephane.mandigout@unilim.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
To assess functional improvement, measured by the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) after the 12 weeks ER program in people with chronic disease. (time frame: Day 0, Week 12, Week 18). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06558591, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Aug 2024.