AzTrials
AzTrials

Rotator Cuff TearNCT06563739

Study on the Application of Shock Wave Technique After Rotator Cuff Operation

A study testing Divergent low energy shock wave, Divergent medium and low energy shock wave and Focused low energy shock wave in people with Rotator Cuff Tear, run by Peking University Third Hospital at 1 site in China.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study is a prospective cohort study and is a single-center clinical trial. The subjects of this study were patients who underwent rotator cuff repair in the Department of Sports Medicine and the Department of Rehabilitation in the Third Hospital of Beijing Medical University. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Rotator Cuff Tear
What is being tested?
Divergent low energy shock wave, Divergent medium and low energy shock wave and Focused low energy shock wave
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
70 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
5 May 2024to 30 Dec 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • A rotator cuff tear was diagnosed and surgery was required
  • Able to complete cardiopulmonary exercise tests
  • Able to cooperate with rehabilitation training and complete questionnaire survey

Who cannot join

  • Age <17 years or age >75 years
  • Previous shoulder surgery history
  • Irreparable rotator cuff damage

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site, 1 recruiting
  • PekingUTH

    Beijing, Beijing Municipality

    Guoqing Cui, professor

    Recruiting

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Director of Rehabilitation Medicine

This study is a prospective cohort study and is a single-center clinical trial. The subjects of this study were patients who underwent rotator cuff repair in the Department of Sports Medicine and the Department of Rehabilitation in the Third Hospital of Beijing Medical University. The sample size of this study is about 2600 cases. We will collect the results of shoulder joint function score, quality of life score, pain score and MRI examination of all participants at baseline. Meanwhile, epidemiological data and related clinical characteristics of patients will be collected at the time of enrollment. All the collected data information was entered into the computer for statistical analysis, and the prognosis of patients under different programs was evaluated.

Read the detailed description

The shoulder joint is the most flexible joint in the body, and the rotator cuff is an important structure to maintain its stability, and the flexibility of the shoulder joint also leads to joint instability leading to rotator cuff tears, especially in the elderly, previous studies have shown that the incidence of rotator cuff tears in people under the age of 20 is 9.7%, and the incidence of rotator cuff tears in people over the age of 80 can reach 62%. Rotator cuff tears are a common cause of limited mobility and pain in the shoulder joint, severely affecting patients' quality of life. Young people, high-level athletes and sports enthusiasts also have a higher risk of rotator cuff injury.

Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is widely used in the treatment of rotator cuff tears, and has many advantages such as less postoperative tissue damage, less surgical scar, less infection, and faster recovery. However, its postoperative rehabilitation has always been a hot topic of research. The basic goal of rehabilitation is to protect tendons, promote their healing, prevent shoulder stiffness and muscle atrophy.

In recent years, there have been clinical studies on the application of ESWT in arthroscopic postoperative patients, but its efficacy is still different . However, few clinical studies have been conducted to investigate the effects of ESWT on functional recovery, tendon recovery and MRI imaging after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. In addition, currently, the application of shock wave technology in the treatment of patients after rotator cuff surgery is very confusing, and there is no clear optimal treatment plan.

In conclusion, the purpose of this study is to compare the difference in efficacy of postoperative rehabilitation programs of different ESWT combined with conventional rehabilitation training on patients after rotator cuff repair, the impact of ESWT on clinical efficacy of patients after rotator cuff repair, and to explore the application of shock wave technology for accurate diagnosis and treatment of rotator cuff surgery

Being tested
Divergent low energy shock wave, Divergent medium and low energy shock wave, Focused low energy shock wave, Divergent medium energy shock wave, Non-exposed group
Keywords
Shock wave technique
Medical subject headings
Rotator Cuff Injuries

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Divergent low energy shock waveProcedure or surgery

    Receive divergent low energy shock wave once a week

  • Divergent low energy shock waveProcedure or surgery

    Receive divergent low energy shock wave twice a week

  • Divergent medium and low energy shock waveProcedure or surgery

    Receive divergent medium and low energy shock wave once a week

  • Divergent medium and low energy shock waveProcedure or surgery

    Receive divergent medium and low energy shock wave twice a week

  • Focused low energy shock waveProcedure or surgery

    Receive focused low energy shock wave once a week

  • Divergent medium energy shock waveProcedure or surgery

    Receive divergent medium energy shock wave once a week

  • Divergent medium energy shock waveProcedure or surgery

    Receive divergent medium energy shock wave twice a week

  • Non-exposed groupProcedure or surgery

    Traditional rehabilitation assessment and training guidance

Study groups in NCT06563739
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Exposed group1ExperimentalPatients who receive divergent low energy once a week
Receives: Procedure: Divergent low energy shock wave
Exposed group2ExperimentalPatients who receive divergent low energy twice a week
Receives: Procedure: Divergent low energy shock wave
Exposed group3ExperimentalPatients who recieve divergent medium and low energy once a week
Receives: Procedure: Divergent medium and low energy shock wave
Exposed group4ExperimentalPatients who receive divergent medium and low energy twice a week
Receives: Procedure: Divergent medium and low energy shock wave
Exposed group 5ExperimentalPatients who receive focused low energy once a week
Receives: Procedure: Focused low energy shock wave
Exposed group6ExperimentalPatients who receive divergent medium energy once a week
Receives: Procedure: Divergent medium energy shock wave
Exposed group 7ExperimentalPatients who receive divergent medium energy twice a week
Receives: Procedure: Divergent medium energy shock wave
Non-exposed groupExperimentalPatients who receive rehabilitation assessment and training guidance
Receives: Procedure: Non-exposed group

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. pain VAS score

    pain levels in patients, ranging from 0 to 10, with a higher score indicating more intense pain.

    Measured: 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery

  2. ASES score

    The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score is the most commonly used score to describe the function of patients' shoulder joints, ranging from 0 to 100. The higher the score, the better the function of patients' shoulder joints.

    Measured: 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Active shoulder ranges of motion

    internal rotation at the side, and external and internal rotation at 90° of abduction

    Measured: 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Aug 2024
  2. Study start5 May 2024
  3. Primary completion30 Dec 2024 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Dec 2024 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
70 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06563739
Sponsor's protocol ID
M2024520
Status last verified
Jul 2024
First submitted
19 Aug 2024
Last updated
21 Aug 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Divergent low energy shock wave, Divergent medium and low energy shock wave and Focused low energy shock wave in people with Rotator Cuff Tear, run by Peking University Third Hospital at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Aug 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Shuhan Zhang (86-15336331337, shuhan.zhang@bjmu.edu.cn), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

pain VAS score (time frame: 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Aug 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in