SurgeryEMUsNCT06565559
EMUs: Enhanced Monitoring Using Sensors After Surgery
An observational study of Surgery and Inpatients, run by University of Edinburgh at 17 sites in 8 countries.
Trial summary
Patients can become critically unwell following surgical operations. Delay in recognition of this deterioration can result in patient harm and even death. Wearable wireless sensors that record patients vital signs such as heart rate could help improve recognition of patient deterioration. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Surgery, Inpatients
- What is being tested?
- Wearable Wireless Sensor
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 1,332 participants
- Where
- 17 sitesin 8 countries
- Study dates
- 28 Feb 2024to 31 Jul 2027
- Phase
- Observational
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: The study population are all patients undergoing a surgical procedure at the NIHR Global Health Research Unit on Global Surgery hubs/spoke hospitals in India, Nigeria, Ghana, Guatemala, Mexico, Rwanda, Benin and the United Kingdom that fit the eligibility criteria.
Participant Inclusion Criteria:
- Adults 18 years and older.
- Undergoing an elective or emergency major surgery procedure with a planned skin incision of 5 cm or greater. Any indication for surgery can exist, including benign, malignant, and trauma.
- Willing and able to provide written informed consent.
Participant Exclusion Criteria:
- Those under the age of 18.
- A documented or suspected allergy to adhesive dressings.
- Obstetric patients
- Unwilling or unable to provide written informed consent.
Trial locations and contacts
17 sites in 8 countries. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
17 sites in 8 countries
Benin4 sites, 4 recruiting
- Recruiting
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Mere Enfant Lagune
Cotonou, Littoral Department
Ismail Lawani, ismaillawani@gmail.com
- Recruiting
Hopital de Zone Atlantique Ouidah
Ouidah, Atlantique Department
Ismail Lawani, ismaillawani@gmail.com
- Recruiting
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Departemental Borgou-Alibori
Parakou, Borgou Department
Ismail Lawani, ismaillawani@gmail.com
- Recruiting
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire et Departemental Oueme Plateau
Porto-Novo, Oeume
Ismail Lawani, ismaillawani@gmail.com
Ghana3 sites, 3 recruiting
- Recruiting
Berekum Holy Family Hospital
Berekum, Berekum East
Stephen Tabiri, kstephenba@yahoo.com
- Recruiting
Tamale Teaching Hospital
Tamale
Stephen Tabiri, kstephenba@yahoo.com
- Recruiting
Techiman Holy Family Hospital
Techiman, Bono East
Stephen Tabiri, kstephenba@yahoo.com
India3 sites, 3 recruiting
- Recruiting
Christian Medical College and Hospital
Ludhiana, Punjab
Dhruv Ghosh, dhruvghosh@cmcludhiana.in
- Recruiting
Lady Willingdon Hospital
Manali, Himachal Pradesh
Dhruv Ghosh, dhruvghosh@cmcludhiana.in
- Recruiting
Padhar Hospital
Pādhar, Madhya Pradesh
Dhruv Ghosh, dhruvghosh@cmcludhiana.in
Nigeria3 sites, 3 recruiting
- Not yet recruiting
Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospital Complex
Ife
Adesoji Ademuyiwa, adesojiademuyiwa@yahoo.co.uk
- Not yet recruiting
Lagos State University Teaching Hospital
Ikeja
Adesoji Ademuyiwa, adesojiademuyiwa@yahoo.co.uk
- Recruiting
Lagos University Teaching Hospital
Lagos
Adesoji Ademuyiwa, adesojiademuyiwa@yahoo.co.uk
Guatemala1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Hospital General San Juan de Dios
Guatemala City
Maria Lorena Aguilera Arévalo, cuevaslore@ufm.edu
Mexico1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Hospital Español de Veracruz
Veracruz
Antonio Ramos de la Medina, ramos.antonio@heveracruz.mx
Rwanda1 site, 1 recruiting
- Not yet recruiting
University Teaching Hospital of Rwanda
Kigali
Faustin Ntirenganya, fostino21@yahoo.fr
United Kingdom1 site
- Active, not recruiting
Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh
Edinburgh, EH16 4SA
About this study
Patients can become critically unwell following surgical operations. Delay in recognition of this deterioration can result in patient harm and even death. Wearable wireless sensors that record patients vital signs such as heart rate could help improve recognition of patient deterioration. The goal of this observational study: Enhanced Monitoring Using Sensors After Surgery (EMUs) is to determine if data from wearable physiological monitors can be used for the early detection of postoperative deterioration, while being acceptable to patients and healthcare staff. The study participants and surgical inpatients undergoing open surgery. There are 3 objectives which each represent a stage of the study:
- To perform usability testing of device with clinicians, nurses, and healthcare workers in non-clinical environment.
- To determine baseline postoperative monitoring practice across our network and perform device usability testing in clinical environment.
- To perform a shadow-mode cohort study with collection of time-stamped sensor clinical event data to determine relationships between physiological waveforms and patient deterioration.
Read more
This registration focuses on the shadow-mode cohort study.
Participants will wear wireless sensors on their chest and fingers, pre-, intra-, and post-operatively for up to 10 days. The sensors will record their vital signs such as heart rate, and oxygen levels. This will then be analysed, and used to aid the design of early detection algorithms that may be able to predict clinical illness or complications in this patient group. This is an observational study gathering real time data only. No changes in patient care will result, and in Stages 2 and 3 no sensor data will be available to clinical teams. This study will be performed in departments of general surgery in Benin, Ghana, Guatemala, India, Mexico, Nigeria, Rwanda, and the United Kingdom.
Read the detailed description
Patients who die after surgery frequently have treatable complications which are not identified in a timely manner. This is due to a failure to "recognize", "relay" or "react" to the deterioration of a patient in the postoperative period. This study aims to determine whether data from wearable physiological monitors can be used for the early detection of patient deterioration, while being acceptable to patients and healthcare staff. If found useful, future studies would be conducted to determine the performance and safety of such a device.
This study has three objectives which will be addressed in three stages.
STAGE 1. Usability testing of device with clinicians, nurses, and healthcare workers in non-clinical environment.
STAGE 2. Baseline postoperative monitoring practice assessment and device usability testing in clinical environment.
STAGE 3. Shadow-mode cohort study with collection of time-stamped sensor and clinical event data to determine relationships between physiological waveforms and patient deterioration.
This registration focuses on the shadow-mode cohort study.
This study will be performed in departments of general surgery in Benin, Ghana, Guatemala, India, Mexico, Nigeria, Rwanda, and the UK. In Stages 2 and 3, patients will have undergone major surgery and will be recovering in postoperative wards.
This study can be performed using any suitable wearable device (it is device agnostic), as it seeks to gather generalisable information. In the first instance, the Sibel ANNE® One device will be used. ANNE® One is a wireless ICU-grade dual sensor system that provides real-time physiological monitoring. The system features two skin-mounted, bio-integrated sensors that provide continuous storage of vital sign measurements and physiological waveforms.
This is an observational study gathering real time data only. No changes in patient care will result, and in Stages 2 and 3 no sensor data will be available to clinical teams. True equipoise exists: it is not clear whether these data are useful or how they should be used. Patients will be managed with standard care throughout.
Wearable sensors have potential application in improving postoperative monitoring and consequently, the reduction of avoidable morbidity and mortality. Sensor data may be used to generate prediction algorithms providing a continuous readout of individual patient risk. Such algorithms could enhance healthcare workers' capacity to identify and intervene upon patients with early complications. However, few high-quality studies have yet been performed in this area.
This study has approvals form the following ethical review boards:
Edinburgh Medical School Research Ethics Committee West of Scotland Research Ethics Service (on behalf of NHS Health Research Authority) Health and Care Research Wales (on behalf of NHS Health Research Authority) Ghana Health Service Ethics Review Committee Comite de Investigacion, Hospital General San Juan de Dios, Guatemala, Guatemala Christian Medical College and Hospital, Institutional Ethics Committee, Ludhiana, India El Comite de Etica en Investigacion del Hospital General de Boca del Rio, Veracruz, Mexico Lagos University Teaching Hospital Health Research Ethics Committee, Lagos Nigeria Lagos State University Teaching Hospital Health Research Ethics Committee, Ikeja, Nigeria Obafemi Awolowo University Hospitals Teaching Complex, Ethics and Research Committee, Ife, Nigeria Ethics Committee of University Teaching Hospital of Kigali, Kigali, Rwanda
- Conditions
- Surgery, Inpatients
- Being tested
- Wearable Wireless Sensor
- Keywords
- Surgery, Wearable Devices, Global Surgery
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Wearable Wireless SensorDevice
Stage III is a shadow mode evaluation of the device with participants wearing sensors pre-, intra-, and post-operatively. Sensor and clinical data will be collected contemporaneously in the clinical environment. No sensor data is made available to clinical teams for decision making, with no change in patient care.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Study Cohort | All surgical patients that fit the study eligibility criteria. Receives: Device: Wearable Wireless Sensor |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Cardiovascular data from wearable device
Data includes core vital sign measures to assess the patient's cardiovascular function (e.g. heart rate in beats per minute), advanced indices (e.g., pulse arrival time, Heart Rate (HR) /Respiratory Rate (RR) quotient) and raw waveform data.
Measured: 0-10 days from device application.
Respiratory data from wearable device
Data includes core vital sign measures to assess the patient's respiratory function (e.g. oxygen saturation as a percentage), advanced indices (e.g, Heart Rate (HR) /Respiratory Rate (RR) quotient) and raw waveform data.
Measured: 0-10 days from device application.
Body temperature data from wearable device
Data includes core vital sign measures (e.g. temperature measurement in degrees centigrade), advanced indices, and raw waveform data.
Measured: 0-10 days from device application.
Secondary outcomes (8)
Standard-of-care cardiovascular vital sign observation data
Standard-of-care vital sign observation data to assess cardiovascular function e.g. heart rate in beats per minute, blood pressure in mmHg at a frequency normally collected. These will be assessed as part of the National Early Warning Score 2 system (NEWS2) which a validated early warning score for detecting patient deterioration or equivalent in participating centers.
Measured: 0-10 days from day of device application.
Standard-of-care respiratory vital sign observation data
Standard-of-care vital sign observation data to assess respiratory function e.g. respiratory rate in breaths per minute, oxygen saturations in percentage, at a frequency normally collected. These will be assessed as part of the National Early Warning Score 2 system (NEWS2) which a validated early warning score for detecting patient deterioration, or equivalent in participating centers.
Measured: 0-10 days from day of device application.
Standard-of-care temperature vital sign observation data
Standard-of-care vital sign observation data to assess temperature e.g. in degrees centigrade or Fahrenheit, at a frequency normally collected. These will be assessed as part of the National Early Warning Score 2 system (NEWS2) which a validated early warning score for detecting patient deterioration or equivalent in participating centers.
Measured: 0-10 days from day of device application.
Standard-of-care neurological observation data
Standard-of-care vital sign observation data to assess neurological function e.g. Alert Verbal Pain Unresponsive (AVPU) at a frequency normally collected. These will be assessed as part of the National Early Warning Score 2 system (NEWS2) which a validated early warning score for detecting patient deterioration or equivalent in participating centres.
Measured: 0-10 days from day of device application.
Incidence of clinical complications during the study period
Incidence of clinical diagnosis data such as bleeding, major adverse cardiac event, sepsis will be derived from patient records and recorded and any uncertainty reviewed post hoc by an expert adjudication panel. Clinical complication data will also be gathered at 30 days.
Measured: 0-10 days from the day of device application and then 30 day follow up will be performed.
Incidence of clinical investigations during the study period
The incidence of clinical investigations and descriptive details about the investigations will be derived from the patient records such as chest xray, CT abdomen, and wound swab.
Measured: 0-10 days from the day of device application.
Incidence of clinical interventions during the study period
The incidence of clinical interventions performed and descriptive details, during the period of the device being worn will be recorded, e.g. commencement of antibiotics, unplanned admission to critical care, unplanned reoperation.
Measured: 0-10 days from the day of device application.
Incidence and results of blood tests to assess patient physiological status during the study period
The incidence of blood tests will be recorded and the associated results from during the 10 day study period. Bloods tests recorded will include full blood count, urea and electrolytes, inflammatory markers, liver function tests and coagulation profile as well as blood gas results. They will be recorded using whichever the standard units are at participating centres.
Measured: 0-10 days from the day of device application.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Aug 2024
- Study start28 Feb 2024
- Primary completion31 Jul 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Jul 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for SurgeryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 1,332 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Edinburgh
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Birmingham, University for Development Studies, Tamale, Ghana, Hospital San Juan de Dios Guatemala, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, India, Hospital Español de Veracruz, Veracruz, Mexico, University of Rwanda, University of Lagos, Nigeria, School of health sciences, University of Abomey Calavi, Benin
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Ewen Harrison, Principal investigator, University of Edinburgh
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06565559
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EMUs
- Other IDs
- 13344828
- Acronym
- EMUs
- Status last verified
- Feb 2026
- First submitted
- 15 Jul 2024
- Last updated
- 10 Feb 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
Publications
Burke JR, Downey C, Almoudaris AM. Failure to Rescue Deteriorating Patients: A Systematic Review of Root Causes and Improvement Strategies. J Patient Saf. 2022 Jan 1;18(1):e140-e155. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000720.
PubMed 32453105Ghaferi AA, Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB. Variation in hospital mortality associated with inpatient surgery. N Engl J Med. 2009 Oct 1;361(14):1368-75. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa0903048.
PubMed 19797283Jiwa A, Cameron MM, Ademuyiwa AO, Adisa A, Aguilera Arevalo ML, Bahrami Hessari M, Bhangu A, Brennan PM, Clark N, Cresswell K, Czerwinska I, D'Adderio L, Gunn E, Haque PD, Ikegwuonu T, Lawani I, Morton D, Nganwa A, Ntirenganya F, Pius R, Ramos de la Medina A, Samuel S, Shaw CA, Tabiri S, Townsend RC, Varghese C, Ghosh D, Harrison EM; NIHR Global Health Research Unit on Global Surgery. Continuous physiological monitoring for the detection of postoperative deterioration: a protocol for a multistage, multicentre, international, prospective cohort study. BMJ Open. 2025 Oct 6;15(10):e104463. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104463.
PubMed 41057181