ADHDNCT06567444
Computerized Working Memory Training
A study testing Working memory intervention in people with ADHD and Dyslexia, run by Education University of Hong Kong at 1 site in Hong Kong.
Trial summary
Prior research has found that children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and reading difficulties (RD) are at an elevated risk of developing further cognitive deficits and developmental challenges. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 6 to 11 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- What is being tested?
- Working memory intervention
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 122 participants
- Where
- 1 siteHong Kong
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2021to 31 May 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 6 to 11 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Who may be able to join
- being aged between 6 and 11
- having an intelligence quotient (IQ) score above 80
- having a clinical diagnosis of ADHD and/or RD from a clinical or educational psychologist or a psychiatrist
- speaking native Cantonese
Who cannot join
- brain damage, neurological issues, sensory problems, or psychiatric issues
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Improving Cognitive Function in Chinese Children With ADHD and/or RD Through Computerized Working Memory Training
Prior research has found that children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and reading difficulties (RD) are at an elevated risk of developing further cognitive deficits and developmental challenges. ADHD and RD are characterized by a deficit in working memory, which negatively affects learning and behavior. The main aims of this study were to design a working memory training app and examine its effectiveness through a 5-week training program in Chinese children with ADHD and/or RD. There were three experimental groups, with 26 participants in the ADHD group, 38 participants in the RD group, and 24 participants in the ADHD+RD group. The typically developing (TD) control group had 32 participants. All participants completed the pretest and posttest assessments on executive function and reading performance.
Read the detailed description
Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is marked by attention issues and hyperactive-impulsive behaviors. It affects about 7.2% of school-aged children globally, with a 6.5% prevalence in Hong Kong. Reading difficulties (RD) involve persistent challenges in reading and writing, unrelated to brain damage, sensory impairments, or low intelligence. ADHD and RD often co-occur, with a comorbidity rate of 25%-40%, surpassing chance probabilities.
Research indicates that children facing the dual challenge of ADHD and RD are more vulnerable to significant cognitive deficits, particularly in working memory. This vital cognitive function strongly influences academic abilities like math problem-solving, reading, and language understanding. Deficiencies in working memory can result in learning overwhelm, memory lapses with instructions, and struggles with complex tasks in children. Consequently, individuals with this comorbidity are predisposed to more challenges compared to those with a singular disorder.
Studies have verified that individuals with both ADHD and RD symptoms face increased chances of school abandonment, disruptive conduct, delinquency, and notably, more aggression compared to those with singular conditions. These results emphasize the need for additional research to develop a fresh intervention strategy targeting this comorbid cohort, aiming to pre-empt these adverse consequences. The subsequent sections will provide a concise overview of the theoretical basis of working memory and its ties to ADHD and RD, followed by the development of a working memory training application and the research methodology.
Working memory, a crucial cognitive function, involves temporarily storing, processing, and recalling information within specific limits. It underpins various mental processes like problem-solving, language comprehension, and fluid intelligence. This ability is vital for learning new concepts and skills, correlating strongly with vocabulary growth, language understanding, and reading ability. Baddeley and Hitch's influential working memory model includes a central executive, the phonological loop, the visuospatial sketchpad, and later, the episodic buffer. The central executive plays a pivotal role in coordinating these components, managing data retrieval and manipulation while allocating resources to the storage systems.
The phonological loop specializes in processing language-related data crucial for language learning. Meanwhile, the visuospatial sketchpad handles visual and spatial information, linked to nonverbal intelligence and orthographic awareness. The episodic buffer acts as a unified episodic representation, capable of integrating data from other components and long-term memory. This model illuminates how working memory functions, influences cognitive processes, and develops over time.
Working memory is vital for various cognitive functions, with its components showing distinct links to ADHD and RD. Notably, ADHD often presents with noticeable working memory deficits, underscoring its significance in the cognitive makeup of individuals with ADHD. The response inhibition model of ADHD suggests that deficient response inhibition is a core issue leading to executive function problems, including working memory challenges. The central executive element, along with subsystems like the phonological loop and visuospatial sketchpad, plays critical roles in this context. Deficiencies in the central executive are thought to manifest as key ADHD symptoms. While verbal working memory issues are consistently observed in ADHD, visuospatial working memory impairments may vary in severity, indicating a multifaceted working memory profile in ADHD, pivotal to the condition's cognitive characteristics.
RD is frequently linked with working memory deficiencies, particularly in the phonological realm. The phonological loop, a key working memory element responsible for temporarily managing and processing speech-based data, plays a crucial part in these shortcomings. Numerous studies consistently demonstrate that individuals with RD encounter difficulties in activities demanding effective phonological loop operation, like verbal memory span tasks. However, recent studies suggest that working memory impairments in dyslexia may transcend phonological processing. Emerging research indicates issues with the central executive aspect of working memory, indicating broader cognitive hurdles in individuals with RD. Challenges in visuospatial processing may also be present in individuals with RD, especially in tasks requiring verbal mediation, underscoring the intricate nature of working memory deficits in RD.
These findings underscore the critical importance of working memory in both ADHD and RD. In ADHD, deficits primarily affect the central executive function, impacting core aspects of working memory, whereas in RD, deficits in phonological processing within working memory are more prominent. While this deficiency is present in both standalone ADHD and RD groups, it appears more pronounced in individuals with comorbid conditions. Wang and Chung's study demonstrates that working memory effectively distinguishes Taiwanese children with comorbid ADHD and RD symptoms from those in singular-deficit groups (ADHD or RD alone) and typically developing children. Recent research by Poon and colleagues suggests that, compared to individual ADHD and RD groups, comorbid groups exhibit additional deficits in central executive function, a critical aspect involving information retention for task completion, which is not observed in singular groups. These results emphasize the importance of early intervention training for this specific group of children.
Over the last 15 years, there has been a significant increase in the use of medication for children with ADHD, with a 36-fold rise in Hong Kong and a 34-fold increase in the UK. In the United States, Danielson and colleagues found that 62% of children with ADHD are on medication. While pharmaceutical interventions can effectively help manage ADHD symptoms, they also come with potential side effects like insomnia, reduced appetite, mood swings, and stunted growth. Additionally, the long-term efficacy of such treatments may be limited, and symptoms could reappear once the medication is ceased. While pharmaceutical treatments have proven effective in addressing the core symptoms of ADHD, their applicability to comorbid conditions remains a subject of ongoing discussion.
Some studies indicate that pharmacological treatments, such as psychostimulants and non-stimulant medications, can effectively mitigate symptoms linked to ADHD, like inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity. These treatments are often seen as crucial in enhancing the daily functionality and well-being of children with ADHD. Nonetheless, it is important to recognize that the impact of pharmacological interventions on comorbid conditions can vary, and they may not consistently yield the same level of improvement across all areas. For example, while ADHD symptoms might respond positively to pharmacological treatments, the same level of efficacy may not be observed for comorbid reading difficulties, as suggested by some researchers.
The administration of psychostimulant medication in cases of comorbidity can yield varying outcomes depending on the specific conditions involved. Research suggests that some children with ADHD and comorbid RD may experience improvements in executive functioning, behavior, and reading abilities with medication. However, responses to medication are highly individualized, and not all children may benefit significantly. It is crucial to carefully consider the potential benefits against the risks and side effects, especially in cases of comorbidity. In the context of ADHD and comorbid conditions, the decision to use psychostimulants or other medications is complex and multifaceted. Factors such as individual needs, parental preferences, and the presence of contraindications all play a role in determining the appropriateness of medication use. It is essential for healthcare professionals to consider these factors and engage in thorough discussions with patients and caregivers to make informed decisions regarding treatment options.
The effectiveness of pharmacological treatments in cases of comorbid conditions remains a subject of continuous research and debate, underscoring the necessity for comprehensive, multimodal strategies to tackle the complex challenges faced by children with ADHD and RD. This study delves into one such approach-working memory training-and its potential to offer advantages to this specific group of children. Through an investigation into the efficacy of working memory training, the aim is to contribute to a deeper comprehension of interventions that could potentially bolster the cognitive and academic skills of these individuals. Such research could pave the way for more tailored and effective interventions that address the diverse needs of children dealing with both ADHD and RD.
Research has firmly established that working memory can be improved through training that targets the prefrontal cortical circuits. The brain's plasticity allows it to continuously adjust to its surroundings. Studies on neural systems have pinpointed "sensitive periods" when specific brain regions are highly responsive to environmental cues. Neuroimaging research demonstrates that changes in neural activation patterns resulting from computerized training often correspond to enhanced working memory capacity. These insights showcase the brain's adaptability and the promise of tailored interventions to boost cognitive functions such as working memory by engaging specific neural pathways effectively.
Computerized working memory training has proven effective in reducing ADHD symptoms and enhancing visual domains. Klingberg et al.'s five-week program notably boosted working memory capacity and behaviors in students with ADHD. Similarly, Luo et al. reported improvements in working memory, especially in visual tasks, for children with RD undergoing specific training. However, no training to date has integrated both storage pathways as proposed by Barkley's model. To address this gap, the first author developed an app combining phonological and visuo-spatial working memory training using n-back and card pairing exercises.
Children with ADHD and/or RD often face challenges due to poor working memory, leading to various developmental issues. The rise in ADHD and RD cases, along with increased medication usage, has drawn attention. Many educators and caregivers seek non-medication solutions to enhance cognitive function in these children. This study aims to assess the impact of computerized working memory training on different memory areas and reading skills in ADHD, RD, ADHD+RD, and typically developing groups. The goal is to introduce this new training app to assist teachers and parents in supporting children with ADHD and/or RD both at school and home.
- Being tested
- Working memory intervention
- Keywords
- ADHD, dyslexia, executive function, intervention, training app, working memory
- Medical subject headings
- Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Dyslexia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Working memory interventionOther
During the intervention, the participants in the ADHD group received five computerized working memory training sessions per week over five weeks, and each session lasted 20 minutes. This training paradigm is based on previous studies which show improvements in working memory capacities after a 5-week training period.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| ADHD Group | Experimental | This experimental group received the working memory training conducted in primary schools in Hong Kong. This group was led by trained research assistants. Receives: Other: Working memory intervention |
| RD Group | Experimental | This experimental group received the working memory training conducted in primary schools in Hong Kong. This group was led by trained research assistants. Receives: Other: Working memory intervention |
| ADHD+RD Group | Experimental | This experimental group received the working memory training conducted in primary schools in Hong Kong. This group was led by trained research assistants. Receives: Other: Working memory intervention |
| TD Group | No intervention | The participants in the TD group did not receive any training. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Intellectual ability
The Raven's Progressive Matrices comprises five sets (starting with set A and ending with set E) of 12 items each, totalling 60 items. Each presents a visual pattern with a missing piece. Participants were required to identify the missing piece that would complete the pattern.
Measured: Two weeks before the pretest
Central executive function
The central executive function subscale of BRIEF consists of 10 items. Teachers rated their student's behavior using a 3-point Likert scale (1 = never, 2 = sometimes; 3 = often). All 10 items were added together to form the central executive function subscale.
Measured: One week before the intervention
Central executive function
The central executive function subscale of BRIEF consists of 10 items. Teachers rated their student's behavior using a 3-point Likert scale (1 = never, 2 = sometimes; 3 = often). All 10 items were added together to form the central executive function subscale.
Measured: One week after the intervention
Verbal working memory
Verbal working memory capacity was measured using the third edition of the backward digit spans subtest from the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC-III). Participants were presented with two to nine orally delivered digits and asked to recall them in reverse order. They must retain auditory information while filtering out irrelevant details and focusing on relevant ones. The backward digit spans subtest consists of 18 trials, and participants who correctly repeated the backward digit sequence received one point.
Measured: One week before the intervention
Verbal working memory
Verbal working memory capacity was measured using the third edition of the backward digit spans subtest from the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC-III). Participants were presented with two to nine orally delivered digits and asked to recall them in reverse order. They must retain auditory information while filtering out irrelevant details and focusing on relevant ones. The backward digit spans subtest consists of 18 trials, and participants who correctly repeated the backward digit sequence received one point.
Measured: One week after the intervention
Visual-spatial working memory
Visual-spatial working memory was assessed using the Spatial Working Memory Test (SWM) from Cambridge Cognition. This computerized measure presents several boxes on the screen. Participants were asked to locate a hidden yellow token in each search. Once the token is collected, participants must continue searching for the remaining tokens until all of them have been found (the number of tokens equals the number of boxes). The token never appears in boxes where one has been found before. The number of boxes increases in difficulty from four to eight.
Measured: One week before the intervention
Visual-spatial working memory
Visual-spatial working memory was assessed using the Spatial Working Memory Test (SWM) from Cambridge Cognition. This computerized measure presents several boxes on the screen. Participants were asked to locate a hidden yellow token in each search. Once the token is collected, participants must continue searching for the remaining tokens until all of them have been found (the number of tokens equals the number of boxes). The token never appears in boxes where one has been found before. The number of boxes increases in difficulty from four to eight.
Measured: One week after the intervention
Chinese word reading
The 1-minute word reading test from HKT-P(III) was used to measure reading fluency. It consists of 120 simple Chinese two-character words. Participants were asked to read the words as quickly and accurately as possible within a minute. The total number of words read correctly was recorded, and the reading ability score can vary between 0 and 120.
Measured: One week before the intervention
Chinese word reading
The 1-minute word reading test from HKT-P(III) was used to measure reading fluency. It consists of 120 simple Chinese two-character words. Participants were asked to read the words as quickly and accurately as possible within a minute. The total number of words read correctly was recorded, and the reading ability score can vary between 0 and 120.
Measured: One week after the intervention
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Aug 2024
- Study start1 Jan 2021
- Primary completion31 May 2023
- Study completion31 May 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for ADHDStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- A single-blind study design was adopted in which all assessors were blinded to the treatment condition of the students. There were three experimental groups, with 26 participants in the ADHD group, 38 participants in the RD group, and 24 participants in the ADHD+RD group. The typically developing control group had 32 participants.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 122 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Education University of Hong Kong
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06567444
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EdUHK_WM
- Status last verified
- Aug 2024
- First submitted
- 19 Aug 2024
- Last updated
- 22 Aug 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Poon K, Ho MSH, Wang LC, Lee HM, Lau WKW, Chan WWL. Improving cognitive function in Chinese children with ADHD and/or RD through computerized working memory training. BMC Psychol. 2024 Oct 18;12(1):574. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-02065-1.
PubMed 39425120
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Aug 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Improving Cognitive Function in Chinese Children With ADHD and/or RD Through Computerized Working Memory Training
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06567444
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EdUHK_WM
- Keywords
- ADHD, dyslexia, executive function, intervention, training app, working memory
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 122 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Education University of Hong KongUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 May 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 May 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Aug 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Prior research has found that children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and reading difficulties (RD) are at an elevated risk of developing further cognitive deficits and developmental challenges. ADHD and RD are characterized by a deficit in working memory, which negatively affects learning and behavior. The main aims of this study were to design a working memory training app and examine its effectiveness through a 5-week training program in Chinese children with ADHD and/or RD. There were three experimental groups, with 26 participants in the ADHD group, 38 participants in the RD group, and 24 participants in the ADHD+RD group. The typically developing (TD) control group had 32 participants. All participants completed the pretest and posttest assessments on executive function and reading performance.
Detailed description
Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is marked by attention issues and hyperactive-impulsive behaviors. It affects about 7.2% of school-aged children globally, with a 6.5% prevalence in Hong Kong. Reading difficulties (RD) involve persistent challenges in reading and writing, unrelated to brain damage, sensory impairments, or low intelligence. ADHD and RD often co-occur, with a comorbidity rate of 25%-40%, surpassing chance probabilities.
Research indicates that children facing the dual challenge of ADHD and RD are more vulnerable to significant cognitive deficits, particularly in working memory. This vital cognitive function strongly influences academic abilities like math problem-solving, reading, and language understanding. Deficiencies in working memory can result in learning overwhelm, memory lapses with instructions, and struggles with complex tasks in children. Consequently, individuals with this comorbidity are predisposed to more challenges compared to those with a singular disorder.
Studies have verified that individuals with both ADHD and RD symptoms face increased chances of school abandonment, disruptive conduct, delinquency, and notably, more aggression compared to those with singular conditions. These results emphasize the need for additional research to develop a fresh intervention strategy targeting this comorbid cohort, aiming to pre-empt these adverse consequences. The subsequent sections will provide a concise overview of the theoretical basis of working memory and its ties to ADHD and RD, followed by the development of a working memory training application and the research methodology.
Working memory, a crucial cognitive function, involves temporarily storing, processing, and recalling information within specific limits. It underpins various mental processes like problem-solving, language comprehension, and fluid intelligence. This ability is vital for learning new concepts and skills, correlating strongly with vocabulary growth, language understanding, and reading ability. Baddeley and Hitch's influential working memory model includes a central executive, the phonological loop, the visuospatial sketchpad, and later, the episodic buffer. The central executive plays a pivotal role in coordinating these components, managing data retrieval and manipulation while allocating resources to the storage systems.
The phonological loop specializes in processing language-related data crucial for language learning. Meanwhile, the visuospatial sketchpad handles visual and spatial information, linked to nonverbal intelligence and orthographic awareness. The episodic buffer acts as a unified episodic representation, capable of integrating data from other components and long-term memory. This model illuminates how working memory functions, influences cognitive processes, and develops over time.
Working memory is vital for various cognitive functions, with its components showing distinct links to ADHD and RD. Notably, ADHD often presents with noticeable working memory deficits, underscoring its significance in the cognitive makeup of individuals with ADHD. The response inhibition model of ADHD suggests that deficient response inhibition is a core issue leading to executive function problems, including working memory challenges. The central executive element, along with subsystems like the phonological loop and visuospatial sketchpad, plays critical roles in this context. Deficiencies in the central executive are thought to manifest as key ADHD symptoms. While verbal working memory issues are consistently observed in ADHD, visuospatial working memory impairments may vary in severity, indicating a multifaceted working memory profile in ADHD, pivotal to the condition's cognitive characteristics.
RD is frequently linked with working memory deficiencies, particularly in the phonological realm. The phonological loop, a key working memory element responsible for temporarily managing and processing speech-based data, plays a crucial part in these shortcomings. Numerous studies consistently demonstrate that individuals with RD encounter difficulties in activities demanding effective phonological loop operation, like verbal memory span tasks. However, recent studies suggest that working memory impairments in dyslexia may transcend phonological processing. Emerging research indicates issues with the central executive aspect of working memory, indicating broader cognitive hurdles in individuals with RD. Challenges in visuospatial processing may also be present in individuals with RD, especially in tasks requiring verbal mediation, underscoring the intricate nature of working memory deficits in RD.
These findings underscore the critical importance of working memory in both ADHD and RD. In ADHD, deficits primarily affect the central executive function, impacting core aspects of working memory, whereas in RD, deficits in phonological processing within working memory are more prominent. While this deficiency is present in both standalone ADHD and RD groups, it appears more pronounced in individuals with comorbid conditions. Wang and Chung's study demonstrates that working memory effectively distinguishes Taiwanese children with comorbid ADHD and RD symptoms from those in singular-deficit groups (ADHD or RD alone) and typically developing children. Recent research by Poon and colleagues suggests that, compared to individual ADHD and RD groups, comorbid groups exhibit additional deficits in central executive function, a critical aspect involving information retention for task completion, which is not observed in singular groups. These results emphasize the importance of early intervention training for this specific group of children.
Over the last 15 years, there has been a significant increase in the use of medication for children with ADHD, with a 36-fold rise in Hong Kong and a 34-fold increase in the UK. In the United States, Danielson and colleagues found that 62% of children with ADHD are on medication. While pharmaceutical interventions can effectively help manage ADHD symptoms, they also come with potential side effects like insomnia, reduced appetite, mood swings, and stunted growth. Additionally, the long-term efficacy of such treatments may be limited, and symptoms could reappear once the medication is ceased. While pharmaceutical treatments have proven effective in addressing the core symptoms of ADHD, their applicability to comorbid conditions remains a subject of ongoing discussion.
Some studies indicate that pharmacological treatments, such as psychostimulants and non-stimulant medications, can effectively mitigate symptoms linked to ADHD, like inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity. These treatments are often seen as crucial in enhancing the daily functionality and well-being of children with ADHD. Nonetheless, it is important to recognize that the impact of pharmacological interventions on comorbid conditions can vary, and they may not consistently yield the same level of improvement across all areas. For example, while ADHD symptoms might respond positively to pharmacological treatments, the same level of efficacy may not be observed for comorbid reading difficulties, as suggested by some researchers.
The administration of psychostimulant medication in cases of comorbidity can yield varying outcomes depending on the specific conditions involved. Research suggests that some children with ADHD and comorbid RD may experience improvements in executive functioning, behavior, and reading abilities with medication. However, responses to medication are highly individualized, and not all children may benefit significantly. It is crucial to carefully consider the potential benefits against the risks and side effects, especially in cases of comorbidity. In the context of ADHD and comorbid conditions, the decision to use psychostimulants or other medications is complex and multifaceted. Factors such as individual needs, parental preferences, and the presence of contraindications all play a role in determining the appropriateness of medication use. It is essential for healthcare professionals to consider these factors and engage in thorough discussions with patients and caregivers to make informed decisions regarding treatment options.
The effectiveness of pharmacological treatments in cases of comorbid conditions remains a subject of continuous research and debate, underscoring the necessity for comprehensive, multimodal strategies to tackle the complex challenges faced by children with ADHD and RD. This study delves into one such approach-working memory training-and its potential to offer advantages to this specific group of children. Through an investigation into the efficacy of working memory training, the aim is to contribute to a deeper comprehension of interventions that could potentially bolster the cognitive and academic skills of these individuals. Such research could pave the way for more tailored and effective interventions that address the diverse needs of children dealing with both ADHD and RD.
Research has firmly established that working memory can be improved through training that targets the prefrontal cortical circuits. The brain's plasticity allows it to continuously adjust to its surroundings. Studies on neural systems have pinpointed "sensitive periods" when specific brain regions are highly responsive to environmental cues. Neuroimaging research demonstrates that changes in neural activation patterns resulting from computerized training often correspond to enhanced working memory capacity. These insights showcase the brain's adaptability and the promise of tailored interventions to boost cognitive functions such as working memory by engaging specific neural pathways effectively.
Computerized working memory training has proven effective in reducing ADHD symptoms and enhancing visual domains. Klingberg et al.'s five-week program notably boosted working memory capacity and behaviors in students with ADHD. Similarly, Luo et al. reported improvements in working memory, especially in visual tasks, for children with RD undergoing specific training. However, no training to date has integrated both storage pathways as proposed by Barkley's model. To address this gap, the first author developed an app combining phonological and visuo-spatial working memory training using n-back and card pairing exercises.
Children with ADHD and/or RD often face challenges due to poor working memory, leading to various developmental issues. The rise in ADHD and RD cases, along with increased medication usage, has drawn attention. Many educators and caregivers seek non-medication solutions to enhance cognitive function in these children. This study aims to assess the impact of computerized working memory training on different memory areas and reading skills in ADHD, RD, ADHD+RD, and typically developing groups. The goal is to introduce this new training app to assist teachers and parents in supporting children with ADHD and/or RD both at school and home.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 4
- Model description
- A single-blind study design was adopted in which all assessors were blinded to the treatment condition of the students. There were three experimental groups, with 26 participants in the ADHD group, 38 participants in the RD group, and 24 participants in the ADHD+RD group. The typically developing control group had 32 participants.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| ADHD Group | Experimental | Other: Working memory interventionThis experimental group received the working memory training conducted in primary schools in Hong Kong. This group was led by trained research assistants. |
| RD Group | Experimental | Other: Working memory interventionThis experimental group received the working memory training conducted in primary schools in Hong Kong. This group was led by trained research assistants. |
| ADHD+RD Group | Experimental | Other: Working memory interventionThis experimental group received the working memory training conducted in primary schools in Hong Kong. This group was led by trained research assistants. |
| TD Group | No intervention | –The participants in the TD group did not receive any training. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 6 to 11 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- being aged between 6 and 11
- having an intelligence quotient (IQ) score above 80
- having a clinical diagnosis of ADHD and/or RD from a clinical or educational psychologist or a psychiatrist
- speaking native Cantonese
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- brain damage, neurological issues, sensory problems, or psychiatric issues
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Working memory interventionDuring the intervention, the participants in the ADHD group received five computerized working memory training sessions per week over five weeks, and each session lasted 20 minutes. This training paradigm is based on previous studies which show improvements in working memory capacities after a 5-week training period. | Other | ADHD Group, ADHD+RD Group, RD Group |
Primary outcome
Intellectual ability
Time frame: Two weeks before the pretest
The Raven's Progressive Matrices comprises five sets (starting with set A and ending with set E) of 12 items each, totalling 60 items. Each presents a visual pattern with a missing piece. Participants were required to identify the missing piece that would complete the pattern.
Central executive function
Time frame: One week before the intervention
The central executive function subscale of BRIEF consists of 10 items. Teachers rated their student's behavior using a 3-point Likert scale (1 = never, 2 = sometimes; 3 = often). All 10 items were added together to form the central executive function subscale.
Central executive function
Time frame: One week after the intervention
The central executive function subscale of BRIEF consists of 10 items. Teachers rated their student's behavior using a 3-point Likert scale (1 = never, 2 = sometimes; 3 = often). All 10 items were added together to form the central executive function subscale.
Verbal working memory
Time frame: One week before the intervention
Verbal working memory capacity was measured using the third edition of the backward digit spans subtest from the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC-III). Participants were presented with two to nine orally delivered digits and asked to recall them in reverse order. They must retain auditory information while filtering out irrelevant details and focusing on relevant ones. The backward digit spans subtest consists of 18 trials, and participants who correctly repeated the backward digit sequence received one point.
Verbal working memory
Time frame: One week after the intervention
Verbal working memory capacity was measured using the third edition of the backward digit spans subtest from the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC-III). Participants were presented with two to nine orally delivered digits and asked to recall them in reverse order. They must retain auditory information while filtering out irrelevant details and focusing on relevant ones. The backward digit spans subtest consists of 18 trials, and participants who correctly repeated the backward digit sequence received one point.
Visual-spatial working memory
Time frame: One week before the intervention
Visual-spatial working memory was assessed using the Spatial Working Memory Test (SWM) from Cambridge Cognition. This computerized measure presents several boxes on the screen. Participants were asked to locate a hidden yellow token in each search. Once the token is collected, participants must continue searching for the remaining tokens until all of them have been found (the number of tokens equals the number of boxes). The token never appears in boxes where one has been found before. The number of boxes increases in difficulty from four to eight.
Visual-spatial working memory
Time frame: One week after the intervention
Visual-spatial working memory was assessed using the Spatial Working Memory Test (SWM) from Cambridge Cognition. This computerized measure presents several boxes on the screen. Participants were asked to locate a hidden yellow token in each search. Once the token is collected, participants must continue searching for the remaining tokens until all of them have been found (the number of tokens equals the number of boxes). The token never appears in boxes where one has been found before. The number of boxes increases in difficulty from four to eight.
Chinese word reading
Time frame: One week before the intervention
The 1-minute word reading test from HKT-P(III) was used to measure reading fluency. It consists of 120 simple Chinese two-character words. Participants were asked to read the words as quickly and accurately as possible within a minute. The total number of words read correctly was recorded, and the reading ability score can vary between 0 and 120.
Chinese word reading
Time frame: One week after the intervention
The 1-minute word reading test from HKT-P(III) was used to measure reading fluency. It consists of 120 simple Chinese two-character words. Participants were asked to read the words as quickly and accurately as possible within a minute. The total number of words read correctly was recorded, and the reading ability score can vary between 0 and 120.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Aug 2024.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39425120Poon K, Ho MSH, Wang LC, Lee HM, Lau WKW, Chan WWL. Improving cognitive function in Chinese children with ADHD and/or RD through computerized working memory training. BMC Psychol. 2024 Oct 18;12(1):574. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-02065-1.
Related trials for ADHD
RecruitingObservational study
Psychotherapy for Irritability in Youth: Comparing Active Treatment to Nonactive Psychoeducation Supportive Psychotherapy
Irritability, Disruptive Mood Dysregulation Disorder
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of ALKS 7290 Compared With Placebo in Adult Participants With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ALKS 7290-201)
Attention Deficit Disorder With Hyperactivity (ADHD)
RecruitingObservational study
Pharmacogenomics of Stimulant Treatment Response
Attention-Deficit/ Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)
RecruitingObservational study
Augmenting Parent Management Training for Child Temper Outbursts Using a Digital Tool
Disruptive Behavior Disorders, Conduct Disorder
Not yet recruiting
QAIAx - SGI/SI Smart Health Cities: Microcity Enclave Program (Quantum SI/AGI Agency a/k/a AI City Hall Project - UPSTO App Nos. 64/074,526, 64/063,557, 64/105,164, 63/903,181, 63/729,428, 64/125,360; USPTO EO 9424 Assignment ID: 2101042 / ARN: REEL/FRAME: 76481/0026 - OUSD-R&E, Department of War)
Asperger's Disorder, Asperger Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Working memory intervention in people with ADHD and Dyslexia, run by Education University of Hong Kong at 1 site in Hong Kong.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Aug 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Hong Kong. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Intellectual ability (time frame: Two weeks before the pretest). The study lists 9 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06567444, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Aug 2024.