Abdominal Aortic AneurysmIOPSNCT06570785
IOPS Technology During Cannnulation of Contralateral Limb in EVAR
An observational study of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm and Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Without Rupture, run by Clinical Centre of Serbia at 1 site in Serbia.
Trial summary
Short-term results are favorable for EndoVascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR) compared to open surgery. One of the major drawbacks to this shift is the need for fluoroscopy and contrast dyes to visualise endovascular devices. The use of fluoroscopy exposes both patients and caregivers to harmful ionizing radiation. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 to 100 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Without Rupture, Radiation Exposure
- What is being tested?
- Intra-Operative Positioning System (IOPS) and Conventional group
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 80 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSerbia
- Study dates
- 20 Jan 2025to 3 Nov 2025
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 to 100 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients with infrarenal AAA undergoing standard EVAR according to the IFUs of the manufacturer will be stratified into two groups: 1. IOPS group (used during CL cannulation) 2. Conventional group (as usual using a standardised approach for EVAR)
Who may be able to join
- All patients (over 18 years of age) with infrarenal AAA treated between 1st September 2024 and 1st May 2025 undergoing standard EVAR according to the IFU
Who cannot join
- Patients who are pregnant
- Patients who are under 40 years of age
- Patients who have symptomatic or ruptured AAA
- Patients with more advanced AAA: juxtarenal, pararenal, suprarenal, thoracic, thoracoabdominal AAA
- Non-atherosclerotic origin of disease: dissection, connective tissue disorders, mycotic AAA, posttraumatic AAA
- Patients who were treated in a conservative manner
- Patients undergoing open surgery
- Patients undergoing more advanced treatment options: fenestrated/branched EVAR, endostaplers, chimney EVAR, iliac branch devices, etc.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
About this study
Official title: Contralateral Limb Cannulation Using Intra-Operative Positioning SystemTechnology in Endovascular Aneurysm Repair
Short-term results are favorable for EndoVascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR) compared to open surgery. One of the major drawbacks to this shift is the need for fluoroscopy and contrast dyes to visualise endovascular devices. The use of fluoroscopy exposes both patients and caregivers to harmful ionizing radiation. Because of the harmful effects of radiation, recent radiation protection guidelines strongly recommend as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) principle. The need for additional radiation-reducing navigation techniques is high, with the ultimate goal of performing endovascular procedures without radiation at all.
In response to these challenges, Centerline Biomedical (Cleveland, Ohio, USA) has developed a proprietary electromagnetic tracking and positioning system called the Intra-Operative Positioning System (IOPS). This medical device provides surgeons with 3D visualization for increased surgical precision while reducing the radiation exposure for patients and healthcare professionals. IOPS provides 3D electromagnetic navigation of interventional devices as an adjunct to fluoroscopy. During the intervention, the IOPS devices can be visualized with on-screen image guidance. The IOPS guidewires and catheters can be used together or combined with off-the-shelf 0.035-inch catheters and guidewires, as needed.
This study aims to describe the influence of IOPS technology on radiation exposure during cannulation of the contralateral limb (CL) during standard EVAR.
Read the detailed description
Background:
The current standard of care for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) which has been suggested as the treatment of choice by both European and American guidelines . Although short-term results are favorable for EVAR compared to open surgery, one of the major drawbacks to this shift is the need for fluoroscopy and contrast dyes to visualise endovascular devices. The contrast dyes used during these procedures can induce renal failure in patients with preexisting renal dysfunction. Meanwhile, the use of fluoroscopy exposes both patients and caregivers to harmful ionizing radiation. Because of the harmful effects of radiation, recent radiation protection guidelines strongly recommend as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) principle.
In response to these challenges, Centerline Biomedical (Cleveland, Ohio, USA) has developed a proprietary electromagnetic tracking and positioning system called the Intra-Operative Positioning System (IOPS). This medical device provides surgeons with 3D visualization for increased surgical precision while reducing the use of contrast dye and radiation exposure for patients and healthcare professionals alike. IOPS provides 3D electromagnetic navigation of interventional devices as an adjunct to fluoroscopy. Image guidance is provided using 3D maps of the vasculature, generated from thin-slice contrast-enhanced preoperative computerised tomography angiography (CTA). At the start of the procedure, a self-adhesive sterile fiducial tracking pad is attached to the patient's lumbar region, and the angiography system is used to perform a non-contrast-enhanced cone-beam CT scan. The cone beam CT volume is then loaded onto the IOPS cart and manually aligned with the preoperative CT volume. This work can be performed in parallel with achieving vascular access, with minimal effects on the procedure time. During the intervention, the IOPS devices can be visualized with on-screen image guidance. The console is operated by a technician under a physician's instruction. The IOPS guidewires and catheters can be used together or combined with off-the-shelf 0.035-inch catheters and guidewires, as needed. This technology has been used by other centres for visceral and renal cannulation during complex aortic aneurysm procedures.
Previously there have been publications on the use of Fiber Optic Real Shape (FORS) Technology with both complex and standard endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) showing the potential benefit of this technology in procedural time and radiation reduction. However, the need for additional radiation-reducing navigation techniques is high, with the ultimate goal of performing endovascular procedures without radiation at all.
This study aims to describe the influence of IOPS technology on radiation exposure during cannulation of the contralateral limb (CL) during standard EVAR.
Study outcome and sample size:
Technical success of using IOPS technology during cannulation of CL Navigation time expressed through total procedural time, CL cannulation time, fluoroscopy time (overall and during CL cannulation) Radiation exposure parameters that were described in the latest European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) radiation guidelines: cumulative air kerma (CAK), kerma area product (KAP), fluoroscopy time (FT) (4) To ensure sufficient statistical power to answer hypothetical questions, 80 subjects will be entered into the database. Navigation time and radiation exposure parameters are used to calculate the sample size. Assuming the difference in terms of both parameters, 30 patients are required in each arm to achieve a statistical power of 85% at p=0.05. With two arms (conventional and IOPS group), assuming a 20% rate of missing data, a total N of 80 patients is required.
Research Design:
This prospective study includes patients with standard AAA undergoing EVAR within instructions for use (IFU) treated from September 1st, 2024 until May 1st, 2025 at the Clinic for Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University Clinical Centre of Serbia.
Procedures Involved:
This study will not impact the care that patients receive. Patient data will be compiled and analyzed to accomplish the proposed study objectives. Data collection will include demographic information, patient-related factors, comorbidities, diagnostic imaging information (describing the morphology of the aortoiliac segment), and periprocedural information related to the timing and radiation.
Data management:
After the data has been collected at a participating institution, the data will be transmitted to an online database which will be available only to a central analytic center located at the Clinic for Vascular and Endovascular Surgery/University Clinical Center of Serbia/Medical Faculty, University of Belgrade.
Risks to Subjects:
As this is a prospective observational study performing EVAR in standard AAA using new radiation protection technology for visualisation of wires and catheters in a newly equipped angio suite, there are minimal potential physical risks to subjects. There is also a minimal risk of breach of confidentiality that could occur when patient information is collected and analyzed for the proposed study. However, appropriate measures will be taken to minimize the risk as much as possible. All information recorded will be de-identified. This study will abide by all regulations related to protecting human subjects and protected health information.
Potential Benefits to Subjects:
There is a potential benefit to the subjects involved in the IOPS group. Hypothetically they will have lower procedural times and lower radiation doses during CL cannulation. Future patients treated with this technology might have reduced radiation and cannulation times. This will make it possible to perform more and more procedures with a minimal amount of radiation, or even without radiation at all.
Statistics and Data Analysis:
Continuous variables will be described using the median and interquartile range or mean and standard deviation. Categorical variables will be described using frequencies and percentages. Group comparisons will be performed by using the Student t-test or Mann-Whitney U test, as appropriate. Categorical data will be expressed as percentages and will be compared using the chi-square test or Fisher exact test. Differences will be considered statistically significant at p < 0.05. Analyses will be performed using SPSS software, version 28.0 (SPSS, Chicago, ILLINOIS, USA).
Conflict of Interest:
Since this is a physician-initiated trial, the investigators have no conflict of interest to report.
Funding Source:
There are no plans to apply for additional grants or additional funding. No funding is required for the completion of this study.
Publication Plan:
All research personnel included in this project will be eligible for authorship in any resulting abstracts and publications following the qualifications outlined by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. The order of authors will be determined prior to manuscript development and depend on each individual's contribution to the study.
- Being tested
- Intra-Operative Positioning System (IOPS), Conventional group
- Keywords
- Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm, EndoVascular Aneurysm Repair, Radiation Protection
- Medical subject headings
- Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Intra-Operative Positioning System (IOPS)Device
This medical device provides surgeons with 3D visualization for increased surgical precision while reducing the use of contrast dye and radiation exposure for patients and healthcare professionals alike. IOPS provides 3D electromagnetic navigation of interventional devices as an adjunct to fluoroscopy. During the intervention, the IOPS devices can be visualized with on-screen image guidance. The console is operated by a technician under a physician's instruction. The IOPS guidewires and catheters can be used together or combined with off-the-shelf 0.035-inch catheters and guidewires, as needed.
Conventional groupDevice
This group will be treated using standardised materials (wires, catheters) during EVAR.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| IOPS group | Patients with AAA undergoing standard EVAR according to the IFU using IOPS technology for visulisation of guidewires and catheter for the cannulation of contralateral limb. Receives: Device: Intra-Operative Positioning System (IOPS) | |
| Conventional group | Patients with AAA undergoing standard EVAR according to the IFU using standardised approach and materials. Receives: Device: Conventional group |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Fluoroscopic time per participant required for cannulation
Record cumulative fluoroscopy time reported by fluoroscopic system before and after cannulation of contralateral limb
Measured: Cannulation of contralateral limb during the intervention
Number of participants with technical success of gate catheterisation
Definition of technical success with fluoroscopy: Cannulation completed retrograde; Definition of technical success with IOPS: Cannulation completed retrograde using IOPS catheter
Measured: Cannulation of contralateral limb during the intervention
Secondary outcomes (2)
Clock time per participant required for cannulation
Use stopwatch, or record clock time before and after cannulation of contralateral limb
Measured: Cannulation of contralateral limb during the intervention
Radiation dose per participant during cannulation
Cumulative air kerma [CAK], air kerma area product [KAP], excluding digital subtraction angiography time
Measured: Record radiation reported by fluoro system before and after cannulation of contralateral limb during the intervention
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Aug 2024
- Study start20 Jan 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completion8 Sep 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion3 Nov 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Abdominal Aortic AneurysmStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Clinical Centre of Serbia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Centerline Biomedical, Inc.
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Petar Zlatanovic, Clinical Centre of Serbia
- Investigators
- Igor Koncar, MD PhD, Study chair, University Clinical Centre of Serbia
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06570785
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IOPS study
- Acronym
- IOPS
- Status last verified
- Nov 2024
- First submitted
- 21 Aug 2024
- Last updated
- 20 Nov 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided: This will be decided among the study group, once study has been completed.
Publications
Wanhainen A, Van Herzeele I, Bastos Goncalves F, Bellmunt Montoya S, Berard X, Boyle JR, D'Oria M, Prendes CF, Karkos CD, Kazimierczak A, Koelemay MJW, Kolbel T, Mani K, Melissano G, Powell JT, Trimarchi S, Tsilimparis N; ESVS Guidelines Committee; Antoniou GA, Bjorck M, Coscas R, Dias NV, Kolh P, Lepidi S, Mees BME, Resch TA, Ricco JB, Tulamo R, Twine CP; Document Reviewers; Branzan D, Cheng SWK, Dalman RL, Dick F, Golledge J, Haulon S, van Herwaarden JA, Ilic NS, Jawien A, Mastracci TM, Oderich GS, Verzini F, Yeung KK. Editor's Choice -- European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2024 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Abdominal Aorto-Iliac Artery Aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2024 Feb;67(2):192-331. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.11.002. Epub 2024 Jan 23.
PubMed 38307694Chaikof EL, Dalman RL, Eskandari MK, Jackson BM, Lee WA, Mansour MA, Mastracci TM, Mell M, Murad MH, Nguyen LL, Oderich GS, Patel MS, Schermerhorn ML, Starnes BW. The Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines on the care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2018 Jan;67(1):2-77.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.10.044.
PubMed 29268916Antoniou GA, Antoniou SA, Torella F. Editor's Choice - Endovascular vs. Open Repair for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Updated Peri-operative and Long Term Data of Randomised Controlled Trials. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020 Mar;59(3):385-397. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.11.030. Epub 2019 Dec 30.
PubMed 31899100Zlatanovic P, Davidovic L, Mascia D, Ancetti S, Yeung KK, Jongkind V, Viitala H, Venermo M, Wiersema A, Chiesa R, Gargiulo M. Acute kidney injury in patients undergoing endovascular or open repair of juxtarenal or pararenal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2024 Jun;79(6):1347-1359.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.02.021. Epub 2024 Feb 22.
PubMed 38395093Modarai B, Haulon S, Ainsbury E, Bockler D, Vano-Carruana E, Dawson J, Farber M, Van Herzeele I, Hertault A, van Herwaarden J, Patel A, Wanhainen A, Weiss S, Esvs Guidelines Committee, Bastos Goncalves F, Bjorck M, Chakfe N, de Borst GJ, Coscas R, Dias NV, Dick F, Hinchliffe RJ, Kakkos SK, Koncar IB, Kolh P, Lindholt JS, Trimarchi S, Tulamo R, Twine CP, Vermassen F, Document Reviewers, Bacher K, Brountzos E, Fanelli F, Fidalgo Domingos LA, Gargiulo M, Mani K, Mastracci TM, Maurel B, Morgan RA, Schneider P. Editor's Choice - European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2023 Clinical Practice Guidelines on Radiation Safety. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2023 Feb;65(2):171-222. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2022.09.005. Epub 2022 Sep 18. No abstract available.
PubMed 36130680Finnesgard EJ, Simons JP, Jones DW, Judelson DR, Aiello FA, Boitano LT, Sorensen CM, Nguyen TT, Schanzer A. Initial single-center experience using Fiber Optic RealShape guidance in complex endovascular aortic repair. J Vasc Surg. 2023 Apr;77(4):975-981. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.11.041. Epub 2022 Nov 13.
PubMed 36384183Klaassen J, Hazenberg CEVB, Bloemert-Tuin T, Wulms SCA, Teraa M, van Herwaarden JA. Editor's Choice - Radiation Dose Reduction During Contralateral Limb Cannulation Using Fiber Optic RealShape Technology in Endovascular Aneurysm Repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2024 Apr;67(4):594-600. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.10.041. Epub 2023 Nov 3.
PubMed 37925100Muluk SC, Elrakhawy M, Chess B, Rosales C, Goel V. Successful endovascular treatment of severe chronic mesenteric ischemia facilitated by intraoperative positioning system image guidance. J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech. 2021 Nov 22;8(1):60-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2021.11.001. eCollection 2022 Mar.
PubMed 35118217
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Nov 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Contralateral Limb Cannulation Using Intra-Operative Positioning SystemTechnology in Endovascular Aneurysm Repair
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06570785
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IOPS / IOPS study
- Keywords
- Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm, EndoVascular Aneurysm Repair, Radiation Protection
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Clinical Centre of SerbiaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Centerline Biomedical, Inc.
- Study start
- 20 Jan 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 8 Sep 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 3 Nov 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 26 Aug 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Short-term results are favorable for EndoVascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR) compared to open surgery. One of the major drawbacks to this shift is the need for fluoroscopy and contrast dyes to visualise endovascular devices. The use of fluoroscopy exposes both patients and caregivers to harmful ionizing radiation. Because of the harmful effects of radiation, recent radiation protection guidelines strongly recommend as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) principle. The need for additional radiation-reducing navigation techniques is high, with the ultimate goal of performing endovascular procedures without radiation at all.
In response to these challenges, Centerline Biomedical (Cleveland, Ohio, USA) has developed a proprietary electromagnetic tracking and positioning system called the Intra-Operative Positioning System (IOPS). This medical device provides surgeons with 3D visualization for increased surgical precision while reducing the radiation exposure for patients and healthcare professionals. IOPS provides 3D electromagnetic navigation of interventional devices as an adjunct to fluoroscopy. During the intervention, the IOPS devices can be visualized with on-screen image guidance. The IOPS guidewires and catheters can be used together or combined with off-the-shelf 0.035-inch catheters and guidewires, as needed.
This study aims to describe the influence of IOPS technology on radiation exposure during cannulation of the contralateral limb (CL) during standard EVAR.
Detailed description
Background:
The current standard of care for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) which has been suggested as the treatment of choice by both European and American guidelines . Although short-term results are favorable for EVAR compared to open surgery, one of the major drawbacks to this shift is the need for fluoroscopy and contrast dyes to visualise endovascular devices. The contrast dyes used during these procedures can induce renal failure in patients with preexisting renal dysfunction. Meanwhile, the use of fluoroscopy exposes both patients and caregivers to harmful ionizing radiation. Because of the harmful effects of radiation, recent radiation protection guidelines strongly recommend as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) principle.
In response to these challenges, Centerline Biomedical (Cleveland, Ohio, USA) has developed a proprietary electromagnetic tracking and positioning system called the Intra-Operative Positioning System (IOPS). This medical device provides surgeons with 3D visualization for increased surgical precision while reducing the use of contrast dye and radiation exposure for patients and healthcare professionals alike. IOPS provides 3D electromagnetic navigation of interventional devices as an adjunct to fluoroscopy. Image guidance is provided using 3D maps of the vasculature, generated from thin-slice contrast-enhanced preoperative computerised tomography angiography (CTA). At the start of the procedure, a self-adhesive sterile fiducial tracking pad is attached to the patient's lumbar region, and the angiography system is used to perform a non-contrast-enhanced cone-beam CT scan. The cone beam CT volume is then loaded onto the IOPS cart and manually aligned with the preoperative CT volume. This work can be performed in parallel with achieving vascular access, with minimal effects on the procedure time. During the intervention, the IOPS devices can be visualized with on-screen image guidance. The console is operated by a technician under a physician's instruction. The IOPS guidewires and catheters can be used together or combined with off-the-shelf 0.035-inch catheters and guidewires, as needed. This technology has been used by other centres for visceral and renal cannulation during complex aortic aneurysm procedures.
Previously there have been publications on the use of Fiber Optic Real Shape (FORS) Technology with both complex and standard endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) showing the potential benefit of this technology in procedural time and radiation reduction. However, the need for additional radiation-reducing navigation techniques is high, with the ultimate goal of performing endovascular procedures without radiation at all.
This study aims to describe the influence of IOPS technology on radiation exposure during cannulation of the contralateral limb (CL) during standard EVAR.
Study outcome and sample size:
Technical success of using IOPS technology during cannulation of CL Navigation time expressed through total procedural time, CL cannulation time, fluoroscopy time (overall and during CL cannulation) Radiation exposure parameters that were described in the latest European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) radiation guidelines: cumulative air kerma (CAK), kerma area product (KAP), fluoroscopy time (FT) (4) To ensure sufficient statistical power to answer hypothetical questions, 80 subjects will be entered into the database. Navigation time and radiation exposure parameters are used to calculate the sample size. Assuming the difference in terms of both parameters, 30 patients are required in each arm to achieve a statistical power of 85% at p=0.05. With two arms (conventional and IOPS group), assuming a 20% rate of missing data, a total N of 80 patients is required.
Research Design:
This prospective study includes patients with standard AAA undergoing EVAR within instructions for use (IFU) treated from September 1st, 2024 until May 1st, 2025 at the Clinic for Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University Clinical Centre of Serbia.
Procedures Involved:
This study will not impact the care that patients receive. Patient data will be compiled and analyzed to accomplish the proposed study objectives. Data collection will include demographic information, patient-related factors, comorbidities, diagnostic imaging information (describing the morphology of the aortoiliac segment), and periprocedural information related to the timing and radiation.
Data management:
After the data has been collected at a participating institution, the data will be transmitted to an online database which will be available only to a central analytic center located at the Clinic for Vascular and Endovascular Surgery/University Clinical Center of Serbia/Medical Faculty, University of Belgrade.
Risks to Subjects:
As this is a prospective observational study performing EVAR in standard AAA using new radiation protection technology for visualisation of wires and catheters in a newly equipped angio suite, there are minimal potential physical risks to subjects. There is also a minimal risk of breach of confidentiality that could occur when patient information is collected and analyzed for the proposed study. However, appropriate measures will be taken to minimize the risk as much as possible. All information recorded will be de-identified. This study will abide by all regulations related to protecting human subjects and protected health information.
Potential Benefits to Subjects:
There is a potential benefit to the subjects involved in the IOPS group. Hypothetically they will have lower procedural times and lower radiation doses during CL cannulation. Future patients treated with this technology might have reduced radiation and cannulation times. This will make it possible to perform more and more procedures with a minimal amount of radiation, or even without radiation at all.
Statistics and Data Analysis:
Continuous variables will be described using the median and interquartile range or mean and standard deviation. Categorical variables will be described using frequencies and percentages. Group comparisons will be performed by using the Student t-test or Mann-Whitney U test, as appropriate. Categorical data will be expressed as percentages and will be compared using the chi-square test or Fisher exact test. Differences will be considered statistically significant at p < 0.05. Analyses will be performed using SPSS software, version 28.0 (SPSS, Chicago, ILLINOIS, USA).
Conflict of Interest:
Since this is a physician-initiated trial, the investigators have no conflict of interest to report.
Funding Source:
There are no plans to apply for additional grants or additional funding. No funding is required for the completion of this study.
Publication Plan:
All research personnel included in this project will be eligible for authorship in any resulting abstracts and publications following the qualifications outlined by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. The order of authors will be determined prior to manuscript development and depend on each individual's contribution to the study.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| IOPS group | – | Device: Intra-Operative Positioning System (IOPS)Patients with AAA undergoing standard EVAR according to the IFU using IOPS technology for visulisation of guidewires and catheter for the cannulation of contralateral limb. |
| Conventional group | – | Device: Conventional groupPatients with AAA undergoing standard EVAR according to the IFU using standardised approach and materials. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 to 100 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients with infrarenal AAA undergoing standard EVAR according to the IFUs of the manufacturer will be stratified into two groups: 1. IOPS group (used during CL cannulation) 2. Conventional group (as usual using a standardised approach for EVAR)
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- All patients (over 18 years of age) with infrarenal AAA treated between 1st September 2024 and 1st May 2025 undergoing standard EVAR according to the IFU
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Patients who are pregnant
- Patients who are under 40 years of age
- Patients who have symptomatic or ruptured AAA
- Patients with more advanced AAA: juxtarenal, pararenal, suprarenal, thoracic, thoracoabdominal AAA
- Non-atherosclerotic origin of disease: dissection, connective tissue disorders, mycotic AAA, posttraumatic AAA
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Intra-Operative Positioning System (IOPS)This medical device provides surgeons with 3D visualization for increased surgical precision while reducing the use of contrast dye and radiation exposure for patients and healthcare professionals alike. IOPS provides 3D electromagnetic navigation of interventional devices as an adjunct to fluoroscopy. During the intervention, the IOPS devices can be visualized with on-screen image guidance. The console is operated by a technician under a physician's instruction. The IOPS guidewires and catheters can be used together or combined with off-the-shelf 0.035-inch catheters and guidewires, as needed. | Device | IOPS group |
| Conventional groupThis group will be treated using standardised materials (wires, catheters) during EVAR. | Device | Conventional group |
Primary outcome
Fluoroscopic time per participant required for cannulation
Time frame: Cannulation of contralateral limb during the intervention
Record cumulative fluoroscopy time reported by fluoroscopic system before and after cannulation of contralateral limb
Number of participants with technical success of gate catheterisation
Time frame: Cannulation of contralateral limb during the intervention
Definition of technical success with fluoroscopy: Cannulation completed retrograde; Definition of technical success with IOPS: Cannulation completed retrograde using IOPS catheter
2 secondary outcomes
Clock time per participant required for cannulation
Time frame: Cannulation of contralateral limb during the intervention
Radiation dose per participant during cannulation
Time frame: Record radiation reported by fluoro system before and after cannulation of contralateral limb during the intervention
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Nov 2024.
- Background: PubMed 38307694Wanhainen A, Van Herzeele I, Bastos Goncalves F, Bellmunt Montoya S, Berard X, Boyle JR, D'Oria M, Prendes CF, Karkos CD, Kazimierczak A, Koelemay MJW, Kolbel T, Mani K, Melissano G, Powell JT, Trimarchi S, Tsilimparis N; ESVS Guidelines Committee; Antoniou GA, Bjorck M, Coscas R, Dias NV, Kolh P, Lepidi S, Mees BME, Resch TA, Ricco JB, Tulamo R, Twine CP; Document Reviewers; Branzan D, Cheng SWK, Dalman RL, Dick F, Golledge J, Haulon S, van Herwaarden JA, Ilic NS, Jawien A, Mastracci TM, Oderich GS, Verzini F, Yeung KK. Editor's Choice -- European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2024 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Abdominal Aorto-Iliac Artery Aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2024 Feb;67(2):192-331. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.11.002. Epub 2024 Jan 23.
- Background: PubMed 29268916Chaikof EL, Dalman RL, Eskandari MK, Jackson BM, Lee WA, Mansour MA, Mastracci TM, Mell M, Murad MH, Nguyen LL, Oderich GS, Patel MS, Schermerhorn ML, Starnes BW. The Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines on the care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2018 Jan;67(1):2-77.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.10.044.
- Background: PubMed 31899100Antoniou GA, Antoniou SA, Torella F. Editor's Choice - Endovascular vs. Open Repair for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Updated Peri-operative and Long Term Data of Randomised Controlled Trials. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020 Mar;59(3):385-397. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.11.030. Epub 2019 Dec 30.
- Background: PubMed 38395093Zlatanovic P, Davidovic L, Mascia D, Ancetti S, Yeung KK, Jongkind V, Viitala H, Venermo M, Wiersema A, Chiesa R, Gargiulo M. Acute kidney injury in patients undergoing endovascular or open repair of juxtarenal or pararenal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2024 Jun;79(6):1347-1359.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.02.021. Epub 2024 Feb 22.
- Background: PubMed 36130680Modarai B, Haulon S, Ainsbury E, Bockler D, Vano-Carruana E, Dawson J, Farber M, Van Herzeele I, Hertault A, van Herwaarden J, Patel A, Wanhainen A, Weiss S, Esvs Guidelines Committee, Bastos Goncalves F, Bjorck M, Chakfe N, de Borst GJ, Coscas R, Dias NV, Dick F, Hinchliffe RJ, Kakkos SK, Koncar IB, Kolh P, Lindholt JS, Trimarchi S, Tulamo R, Twine CP, Vermassen F, Document Reviewers, Bacher K, Brountzos E, Fanelli F, Fidalgo Domingos LA, Gargiulo M, Mani K, Mastracci TM, Maurel B, Morgan RA, Schneider P. Editor's Choice - European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2023 Clinical Practice Guidelines on Radiation Safety. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2023 Feb;65(2):171-222. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2022.09.005. Epub 2022 Sep 18. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 36384183Finnesgard EJ, Simons JP, Jones DW, Judelson DR, Aiello FA, Boitano LT, Sorensen CM, Nguyen TT, Schanzer A. Initial single-center experience using Fiber Optic RealShape guidance in complex endovascular aortic repair. J Vasc Surg. 2023 Apr;77(4):975-981. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.11.041. Epub 2022 Nov 13.
- Background: PubMed 37925100Klaassen J, Hazenberg CEVB, Bloemert-Tuin T, Wulms SCA, Teraa M, van Herwaarden JA. Editor's Choice - Radiation Dose Reduction During Contralateral Limb Cannulation Using Fiber Optic RealShape Technology in Endovascular Aneurysm Repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2024 Apr;67(4):594-600. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.10.041. Epub 2023 Nov 3.
- Background: PubMed 35118217Muluk SC, Elrakhawy M, Chess B, Rosales C, Goel V. Successful endovascular treatment of severe chronic mesenteric ischemia facilitated by intraoperative positioning system image guidance. J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech. 2021 Nov 22;8(1):60-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2021.11.001. eCollection 2022 Mar.
- Link to the further description of IOPS technologyLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided. This will be decided among the study group, once study has been completed.
Related trials for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
RecruitingPhase 4
Effect of Remimazolam Versus Propofol Total Intravenous Anesthesia on Intraoperative Hemodynamic Stability in Patients Undergoing Thoracic or Abdominal Endovascular Aortic Repair
Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracoabdominal, Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Aortic Size and Height Indices in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm, Ruptured
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Real-World Data Collection of GORE Devices Used In the Endovascular Treatment of Aortic Aneurysms Which Incorporate Visceral Arteries.
Complex Aortic Aneurysms, Thoracoabdominal Aneurysm
Enrolling by invitation
AneuFix - Prophylactic Sac Filling
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm, Endoleak
Enrolling by invitation
Endovascular Treatment of Thoracic Aortic Disease
Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms, Dissecting, Aneurysm
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Igor Koncar, MD PhD study chair
University Clinical Centre of Serbia
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm and Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Without Rupture, run by Clinical Centre of Serbia at 1 site in Serbia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Nov 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Serbia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Petar Zlatanovic, MD PhD FEBVS (+381668300278, petar91goldy@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Fluoroscopic time per participant required for cannulation (time frame: Cannulation of contralateral limb during the intervention). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06570785, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Nov 2024.