AzTrials
AzTrials

Post Operative PainTEAVSESPBNCT06571188

Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Continuous Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Thoracic Epidural Analgesia

A study testing THORACIC EPIDURAL BLOCK and ERECTOER SPINE BLOCK in people with Post Operative Pain, run by Menoufia University at 1 site in Egypt.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

There are limited studies comparing these two modalities ( thoracic epidural and erector spine block) for relieving the pain after thoracic surgeries .this study aim to investigate this purpose Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 70 years
Conditions the study is for
Post Operative Pain
What is being tested?
THORACIC EPIDURAL BLOCK and ERECTOER SPINE BLOCK
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
29 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
1 Aug 2024to 10 Dec 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Eligible patients will be from18-70 years old with ( American association of anaesthesiologist) ASA physical status I to III scheduled for elective thoracic surgeries.

Who cannot join

  • Patients who are:
  • Unable to cooperate.
  • Patients who have allergy to any of the study drugs.
  • Patients who are on opioids.
  • Local infection at the site of injection or systemic infection.
  • Patients with coagulation disorders or on anticoagulation therapy Unable to communicate preoperatively due to severe dementia, language barrier, or neuropsychiatric disorder
  • Unable to perform nerve block procedure due to difficult anatomy through ultrasound scan.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Egypt1 site
  • Menoufia university

    Cairo, Shibin Elkom, 23535

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Continuous Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Thoracic Epidural Analgesia in Postoperative Analgesia Following Thoracotomy Surgeries: a Randomised Trial

There are limited studies comparing these two modalities ( thoracic epidural and erector spine block) for relieving the pain after thoracic surgeries .this study aim to investigate this purpose

Read the detailed description

The random sequence will be sealed in consecutively numbered opaque envelopes and kept by the study coordinator. Participants will be randomly divided into two groups according to the 1:1 ratio of ESPB group and TEB group. A research coordinator is designated to distribute and preserve randomization result. The coordinator will open the envelopes for allocation according to the order of enrolment and prepare the study drug.

The participants will be blinded to the allocation. Because the needle injection of ESPB and TEB are very close, participants themselves could hardly detect the clinical differences. Anaesthesiologists who perform the nerve block and take charge of intraoperative management and surgeons are independent individuals. Only the random sequence number rather than the specific nerve block type will be recorded in the electronic anaesthesia information management system .Researchers who do not take part in the nerve block and intraoperative management are designated to postoperative follow-up. Besides, trained anaesthesiologist who do not perform the block will be designated to evaluate the clinical features of the block objectively

Being tested
THORACIC EPIDURAL BLOCK, ERECTOER SPINE BLOCK
Medical subject headings
Pain, Postoperative

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • THORACIC EPIDURAL BLOCKOther

    Also called TEB

    In group TEB, The epidural catheter will be inserted preoperatively at the T5-T7 vertebral level; the exact level will be at the discretion of the attending anaesthesiologist. A loading dose of bupivacaine 0.25% (max 10 ml) will be administered, followed by an intraoperative infusion of bupivacaine 0.125 % with fentanyl 1 μg/ml.].

  • ERECTOER SPINE BLOCKOther

    Also called ESPB

    The ESP block will be performed as described by Forero et al

Study groups in NCT06571188
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
TEB GROUPActive comparatorIn group TEB, The epidural catheter will be inserted preoperatively at the T5-T7 vertebral level; the exact level will be at the discretion of the attending anaesthesiologist. A loading dose of bupivacaine 0.25% (max 10 ml) will be administered, followed by an intraoperative infusion of bupivacaine 0.125 % with Fentanyl 1 μg/ml.].
Receives: Other: THORACIC EPIDURAL BLOCK
ESPB groupActive comparatorIn group ESPB, The ESP block will be performed as described by Forero et al. A Tuohy needle will be inserted with an in-plane technique in a caudal to cephalad direction until bony contact with the transverse process is obtained. Hydro dissection with normal saline will be performed to identify and open up the correct plane for injection. A loading dose of Bupivacaine will be injected followed by the insertion of an 18-g catheter 5 cm beyond the needle tip. No further local anaesthetic will be administered intra-operatively. Following the end of surgery, a continuous infusion of 5 ml/h of Bupivacaine 0.125%, supplemented by a 10-ml bolus injection every 3 h, will be administered through the ESPB catheter
Receives: Other: ERECTOER SPINE BLOCK

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. MORPHINE CONSUMPTION

    cumulative 24 h opioid (morphine) consumption

    Measured: 24 hours

  2. Numeric rating scale

    is an 11-point scale scored from 0-10:

    1. "0" = no pain
    2. "10" = the most intense pain imaginable Patients verbally select a value that is most in line with the intensity of pain that they have experienced in the last 24 hours.

    Measured: 24 hours

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Time for first rescue analgesia

    Time for first rescue analgesia will be measured and recorded

    Measured: 24 hours

  2. The number of rescue analgesics

    the number of rescue analgesics within 24hrs after surgery will be recorded

    Measured: 24 hours

  3. Time to ambulation

    Time to ambulation WILL BE RECOREDED

    Measured: 24 hours

  4. Complications

    Complications like bradycardia or hypotension, itching, nausea and vomiting will be recorded.

    Measured: 24 hours

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Aug 2024
  2. Study start1 Aug 2024
  3. Primary completion1 Dec 2024
  4. Study completion10 Dec 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Participants will be randomly divided into two groups according to the 1:1 ratio of ESPB group and TEB group. A research coordinator is designated to distribute and preserve randomization result. The coordinator will open the envelopes for allocation according to the order of enrolment and prepare the study drug
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
29 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06571188
Sponsor's protocol ID
8/2024ANET6-1
Acronym
TEAVSESPB
Status last verified
Aug 2024
First submitted
22 Aug 2024
Last updated
20 Mar 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Habeeb RM, Sultan WA, Basune ME, Safan AG. Continuous Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Thoracic Paravertebral Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Thoracotomy. Clin J Pain. 2026 Oct 1;42(10):e1399. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001399.

    PubMed 42145113

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing THORACIC EPIDURAL BLOCK and ERECTOER SPINE BLOCK in people with Post Operative Pain, run by Menoufia University at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

MORPHINE CONSUMPTION (time frame: 24 hours). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06571188, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Mar 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in