AzTrials
AzTrials

Malaria,FalciparumHS-RDT-MiPNCT06572644

Performance of an Ultrasensible Malaria Rapid Diagnostic Test Among Pregnant Women in Burkina Faso

An observational study of Malaria,Falciparum, run by Centre MURAZ/Institut National de Santé Publique at 1 site in Burkina Faso.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this observational study is to learn about the diagnostic performance of the highly sensitive rapid diagnostic test (HS-RDT) compared to an ultrasensitive qPCR for detection of falciparum malaria in pregnant women attending antenal care (ANC) in Burkina Faso. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age, women only
Conditions the study is for
Malaria,Falciparum
How many people
288 participants
Where
1 siteBurkina Faso
Study dates
11 Oct 2022to 31 Dec 2023
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Pregnant women attending their ANC visits at the Centre Médical Urbain de Lafiabougou

Who may be able to join

  • Living in Bobo-Dioulasso for at least 6 months before the beginning of the study ;
  • Provision of informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • Past history of malaria or antimalarial drugs within the last 3 months ;
  • Having tested positive for malaria by microscopy or RDT in any previous ANC visit ;
  • Symptoms and signs of severe malaria as defined by WHO.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Burkina Faso1 site
  • Centre Médical Urbain de Lafiabougou

    Bobo-Dioulasso, Houet, 390

Other trials in Burkina Faso

About this study

Official title: Evaluation of a Highly Sensitive Rapid Diagnostic Test for Detecting Falciparum Malaria Infection in Pregnancy in Burkina Faso

The goal of this observational study is to learn about the diagnostic performance of the highly sensitive rapid diagnostic test (HS-RDT) compared to an ultrasensitive qPCR for detection of falciparum malaria in pregnant women attending antenal care (ANC) in Burkina Faso. The main question it aims to answer is:

  • What are the sensitivity and specificity of the HS-RDT compared to ultrasensitive quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) considered as gold standard for dection of falciparum malaria in pregnant women attending ANC in Burkina Faso ? Participants will be included during their ANC visits and screened for malaria using the HS_RDT, the conventional RDT (Co_RDT), microscopy, and qPCR.
Read the detailed description

A cross-sectional study including 288 pregnant women was conducted at the Centre médical urbain (CMU) of Lafiabougou located in the periurban area of Bobo-Dioulasso the second largest city of Burkina Faso. Pregnant women attending their ANC visits at the CMU of Lafiabougou were recruited and enrolled into the study if eligible criteria were fulfilled.

At enrolment, an individual structured questionnaire was administered to the selected pregnant women and their sociodemographic data (age, educational level, and profession) and history of illness was collected. In addition, obstetric history (parity, gestational age, number of ANC visits, uptake of IPTp-SP) and clinical information (body temperature, weight, height, and arm circumference) were recorded. Thereafter, a venous blood sample (5 mL) was collected to screen for malaria infection (based on HS-RDT, Co_RDT, and thick and thin blood smears), dried blood spots (DBS) (for molecular studies), and haemoglobin concentration measurement. The remaining blood sample was stored for future studies.

After enrolment, only pregnant women eligible for their first IPTp-SP dose uptake was followed up for 30 days to assess the impact of IPTp-SP on both falciparum parasitaemia and falciparum resistant strains. At the end of follow up, a venous blood sample (5 mL) was collected for thick and thin blood smears, DBS, and haemoglobin concentration measurement. The remaining blood sample was stored for future studies.

All biological samples was collected and stored at ambient temperature before being transported to the Laboratory of Parasitology of Centre MURAZ and processed.

The index tests included HS_RDT (NxTek Eliminate Malaria Pf, product code 05FK140, batch No. 05LDG008B, Alere/Abbott, Republic of Korea), Co_RDT (AdvDxTM Malaria Pf, product code 004ADFEF025KI-2, batch No. ADF77/0222, Advy Chemical, India), and light microscopy.

The ultrasensitive qPCR assay targeting the multicopy conserved var gene acidic terminal sequence (varATS) (Hofmann et al. 2015) was used as gold standard.

Keywords
Pregnancy, Malaria, Performance, Ultrasensible rapid diagnostic test, Burkina Faso
Medical subject headings
Malaria, Falciparum, Malaria

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Sensitivity of HS_RDT

    It is defined as the proportion of positives that are correctly identified when compared with the gold standard (qPCR).

    Measured: At baseline

  2. Specificity of HS_RDT

    It is defined as proportion of negatives that are correctly identified when compared with the gold standard (qPCR).

    Measured: At baseline

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Positive predictive value

    Probability that P. falciparum infection is present when HS_RDT, Co_RDT, and microscopy are positive

    Measured: At baseline

  2. Negative predictive value

    Probability that P. falciparum infection is not present when HS_RDT, Co_RDT, and microscopy are negative

    Measured: At baseline

  3. The prevalence of Pfhrp2 and Pfhrp3 genes deletions among the study participants

    Proportion of pregnant women with malaria parasites carrying Pfhrp2/Pfhrp3 deletions

    Measured: At baseline

  4. Impact of intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancy with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (IPTp- SP) on falciparum parasitaemia

    Proportion of pregnant women with falciparum parasitaemia 30 days after uptake of IPTp-SP

    Measured: 30 days after uptake of IPTp-SP

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Aug 2024
  2. Study start11 Oct 2022
  3. Primary completion16 Dec 2022
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrolment
288 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06572644
Sponsor's protocol ID
INSP_CM_09_2022
Acronym
HS-RDT-MiP
Status last verified
Aug 2024
First submitted
23 Aug 2024
Last updated
28 Aug 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Malaria,Falciparum, run by Centre MURAZ/Institut National de Santé Publique at 1 site in Burkina Faso.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Aug 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Burkina Faso. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Sensitivity of HS_RDT (time frame: At baseline). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Aug 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in