Upper Extremity ParesisNCT06574737
Use of Surface Electromyography as a Tools to Predict Upper Extremity Recovery Function After Stroke
An observational study of Upper Extremity Paresis and Muscle Contracture Upper Arm, run by Universitas Padjadjaran at 1 site in Indonesia.
Trial summary
Hypothesis : Based on the framework and premises above, the hypothesis is formulated as follows: H0 : surface electromyography parameters cannot predicts upper extremity motor function recovery in stroke patients H1: surface electromyography parameters can predicts upper extremity motor function recovery in stroke… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Upper Extremity Paresis, Muscle Contracture Upper Arm, Stroke
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteIndonesia
- Study dates
- 1 May 2024to 31 Jul 2025
- How long will I take part?
- 3 Months
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: All stroke patients who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria during the duration of the study.
Who may be able to join
- Patients who are hospitalized with upper extremity weakness due to stroke on the same side which confirmed with computed tomography (CT) scan or structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), in the acute phase
- Men and women aged more than 18 years old
- Willing to participate
Who cannot join
- Cognitive impairment (MoCA-Ina score less than 26)
- Impaired consciousness (GCS score less than 15)
- Unstable medical conditions at time of hospitalization
- Patients with pacemaker
- Having other injury or dysfunction in the impaired side of upper extremity that caused restrictions on the range of joint movement and muscle weakness, such as fractures, periarthritis, or moderate-severe pain
- Diagnosis of other neurological disease or disorders in addition to stroke (e.g., traumatic brain injury, neuropathy or radiculopathy)
- Get treated in isolation room
- Hypersensitivity to gel electrodes
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Indonesia1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Berthy Al Mungiza
Bandung, West Java, 40161
Vitriana Biben, Doctoral, +62 815-6262-733, vitriana@unpad.ac.id
Berthy Al Mungiza, Bachelor, +62 857-4752-0920, berthy.almungiza@gmail.com
About this study
Hypothesis :
Based on the framework and premises above, the hypothesis is formulated as follows: H0 : surface electromyography parameters cannot predicts upper extremity motor function recovery in stroke patients H1: surface electromyography parameters can predicts upper extremity motor function recovery in stroke patients
Read the detailed description
Study design and setting This study is an analytic quantitative observational study, to analyse the quantification of Manual Muscle Test score, Fugl Mayer Assessment-Upper Extremity score and electrical signals of the anterior deltoid, biceps, triceps, wrist flexors and wrist extensors muscles based on contractions, length of contraction and amplitude parameters in patients with acute phase stroke. This study performed at HasanSadikin Hospital between February 2024 - July 2024. Study participants Potential participants will be recruited by the main researcher
Inclusion criteria:
- Patients who are hospitalized with upper extremity weakness due to stroke on the same side which confirmed with computed tomography scan or structural magnetic resonance imaging, in the acute phase
- Men and women aged more than 18 years old
- Willing to participate
Exclusion criteria:
- Cognitive impairment (MoCA-Ina score less than 26)
- Impaired consciousness (GCS score less than 15)
- Unstable medical conditions at time of hospitalization
- Patients with pacemaker
- Having other injury or dysfunction in the impaired side of upper extremity that caused restrictions on the range of joint movement and muscle weakness, such as fractures, periarthritis, or moderate-severe pain
- Diagnosis of other neurological disease or disorders in addition to stroke (e.g., traumatic brain injury, neuropathy or radiculopathy)
- Get treated in isolation room
- Hypersensitivity to gel electrodes
Drop out criteria:
- Unable to do 2 or more follow up session
- Withdrawn by themselves
Confounding factor:
- Stroke location
- Stroke size
- Spasticity
- Rehabilitation program
- Compliance rehabilitation
- Stroke risk factor
Sampling Technique The method of sampling based on consecutive samplings, that is, all stroke patients who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria during the duration of the study.
Based on the formula above, the minimum sample size for this research is adequate, so the minimum sample size is 30 samples.
- Keywords
- Surface electromyography, Predictor Stroke, Upper Extremity Recovery
- Medical subject headings
- Paresis, Stroke
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Electrical activity deltoid, biceps, triceps, wrist flexor, wrist extensor muscle
- Contraction (number/minute). The number of contractions was reported for each participant as a count of the number of contractions divided per minute time (the more the better outcome) windows analyzed for that participant.
- Length of contraction (millisecond) (the longer the better outcome)
- Amplitude (mV) (the more the better outcome)
Measured: 3 days of stroke onset, 5 days of stroke onset, 1 months, 2 months and 3 months after stroke onset
Secondary outcomes (2)
Manual Muscle Testing score
5: Normal 4: Good 3: Fair 2: Poor
1: Trace 0: Zero
(5 : higher end of strength ability, 0 = low-end ability of strength ability) (the more, the better outcome)
Measured: 3 days of stroke onset, 5 days of stroke onset, 1 months, 2 months and 3 months after stroke onset
Fugl Mayer Assessment-Upper Extremity score
≤25 : severe 26-45 : moderate 46-66 : mild
(66 : maximum score for upper extremity score = normal, the more the better outcome)
Measured: 3 days of stroke onset, 5 days of stroke onset, 1 months, 2 months and 3 months after stroke onset
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Aug 2024
- Study start1 May 2024
- Primary completion30 Apr 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Jul 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (22)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Upper Extremity ParesisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Other
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
- Target duration
- 3 Months
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Universitas Padjadjaran
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06574737
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IKFR-202408.01
- Status last verified
- Aug 2024
- First submitted
- 12 Aug 2024
- Last updated
- 29 Aug 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Sex Women Men Age Length of stay Stroke diagnosis Ischemic stroke Haemorrhagic stroke Stroke side Right hemisphere Left hemisphere Dominant Hand Right Left Stroke severity Minor stroke Moderate stroke Moderate to severe stroke Severe stroke Stroke risk factor Hypertension Diabetes Mellitus Heart disease Dyslipidemia Smoking Recurrent stroke Yes No
Publications
Fan J, Li X, Yu X, Liu Z, Jiang Y, Fang Y, Zong M, Suo C, Man Q, Xiong L. Global Burden, Risk Factor Analysis, and Prediction Study of Ischemic Stroke, 1990-2030. Neurology. 2023 Jul 11;101(2):e137-e150. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207387. Epub 2023 May 17.
PubMed 37197995Venketasubramanian N, Yudiarto FL, Tugasworo D. Stroke Burden and Stroke Services in Indonesia. Cerebrovasc Dis Extra. 2022;12(1):53-57. doi: 10.1159/000524161. Epub 2022 Mar 21.
PubMed 35313314Shelton FN, Reding MJ. Effect of lesion location on upper limb motor recovery after stroke. Stroke. 2001 Jan;32(1):107-12. doi: 10.1161/01.str.32.1.107.
PubMed 11136923Lawrence ES, Coshall C, Dundas R, Stewart J, Rudd AG, Howard R, Wolfe CD. Estimates of the prevalence of acute stroke impairments and disability in a multiethnic population. Stroke. 2001 Jun;32(6):1279-84. doi: 10.1161/01.str.32.6.1279.
PubMed 11387487Feldner HA, Papazian C, Peters KM, Creutzfeldt CJ, Steele KM. Clinical Use of Surface Electromyography to Track Acute Upper Extremity Muscle Recovery after Stroke: A Descriptive Case Study of a Single Patient. Appl Syst Innov. 2021 Jun;4(2):32. doi: 10.3390/asi4020032. Epub 2021 May 10.
PubMed 34778722Steele KM, Papazian C, Feldner HA. Muscle Activity After Stroke: Perspectives on Deploying Surface Electromyography in Acute Care. Front Neurol. 2020 Sep 23;11:576757. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.576757. eCollection 2020.
PubMed 33071953Alt Murphy M, Al-Shallawi A, Sunnerhagen KS, Pandyan A. Early prediction of upper limb functioning after stroke using clinical bedside assessments: a prospective longitudinal study. Sci Rep. 2022 Dec 21;12(1):22053. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-26585-1.
PubMed 36543863Papazian C, Baicoianu NA, Peters KM, Feldner HA, Steele KM. Electromyography Recordings Detect Muscle Activity Before Observable Contractions in Acute Stroke Care. Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2021 Jun 5;3(3):100136. doi: 10.1016/j.arrct.2021.100136. eCollection 2021 Sep.
PubMed 34589686Stinear CM, Smith MC, Byblow WD. Prediction Tools for Stroke Rehabilitation. Stroke. 2019 Nov;50(11):3314-3322. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.025696. Epub 2019 Oct 15. No abstract available.
PubMed 31610763Manzur-Valdivia H, Alvarez-Ruf J. Surface Electromyography in Clinical Practice. A Perspective From a Developing Country. Front Neurol. 2020 Oct 15;11:578829. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.578829. eCollection 2020.
PubMed 33178121Ueda S, Aoki H, Yasuda Y, Nishiyama A, Hayashi Y, Honaga K, Tanuma A, Takakura T, Kurosu A, Hatori K, Hayashi A, Fujiwara T. The MMT of Elbow Flexion and the AFE Predict Impairment and Disability at 3 Weeks in Patients With Acute Stroke. Front Neurol. 2022 Mar 30;13:831800. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.831800. eCollection 2022.
PubMed 35432154Lv W, Liu K, Zhou P, Huang F, Lu Z. Surface EMG analysis of weakness distribution in upper limb muscles post-stroke. Front Neurol. 2023 Apr 25;14:1135564. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1135564. eCollection 2023.
PubMed 37181551Raghavan P. Upper Limb Motor Impairment After Stroke. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2015 Nov;26(4):599-610. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2015.06.008. Epub 2015 Aug 25.
PubMed 26522900Li S. Stroke Recovery Is a Journey: Prediction and Potentials of Motor Recovery after a Stroke from a Practical Perspective. Life (Basel). 2023 Oct 15;13(10):2061. doi: 10.3390/life13102061.
PubMed 37895442Grefkes C, Fink GR. Recovery from stroke: current concepts and future perspectives. Neurol Res Pract. 2020 Jun 16;2:17. doi: 10.1186/s42466-020-00060-6. eCollection 2020.
PubMed 33324923
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Aug 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Use of Surface Electromyography as a Tools to Predict Upper Extremity Recovery Function After Stroke
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06574737
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IKFR-202408.01
- Keywords
- Surface electromyography, Predictor Stroke, Upper Extremity Recovery
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Universitas PadjadjaranUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 May 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Apr 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Jul 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 28 Aug 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Hypothesis :
Based on the framework and premises above, the hypothesis is formulated as follows: H0 : surface electromyography parameters cannot predicts upper extremity motor function recovery in stroke patients H1: surface electromyography parameters can predicts upper extremity motor function recovery in stroke patients
Detailed description
Study design and setting This study is an analytic quantitative observational study, to analyse the quantification of Manual Muscle Test score, Fugl Mayer Assessment-Upper Extremity score and electrical signals of the anterior deltoid, biceps, triceps, wrist flexors and wrist extensors muscles based on contractions, length of contraction and amplitude parameters in patients with acute phase stroke. This study performed at HasanSadikin Hospital between February 2024 - July 2024. Study participants Potential participants will be recruited by the main researcher
Inclusion criteria:
- Patients who are hospitalized with upper extremity weakness due to stroke on the same side which confirmed with computed tomography scan or structural magnetic resonance imaging, in the acute phase
- Men and women aged more than 18 years old
- Willing to participate
Exclusion criteria:
- Cognitive impairment (MoCA-Ina score less than 26)
- Impaired consciousness (GCS score less than 15)
- Unstable medical conditions at time of hospitalization
- Patients with pacemaker
- Having other injury or dysfunction in the impaired side of upper extremity that caused restrictions on the range of joint movement and muscle weakness, such as fractures, periarthritis, or moderate-severe pain
- Diagnosis of other neurological disease or disorders in addition to stroke (e.g., traumatic brain injury, neuropathy or radiculopathy)
- Get treated in isolation room
- Hypersensitivity to gel electrodes
Drop out criteria:
- Unable to do 2 or more follow up session
- Withdrawn by themselves
Confounding factor:
- Stroke location
- Stroke size
- Spasticity
- Rehabilitation program
- Compliance rehabilitation
- Stroke risk factor
Sampling Technique The method of sampling based on consecutive samplings, that is, all stroke patients who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria during the duration of the study.
Based on the formula above, the minimum sample size for this research is adequate, so the minimum sample size is 30 samples.
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Other
- Target follow-up
- 3 Months
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- All stroke patients who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria during the duration of the study.
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients who are hospitalized with upper extremity weakness due to stroke on the same side which confirmed with computed tomography (CT) scan or structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), in the acute phase
- Men and women aged more than 18 years old
- Willing to participate
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Cognitive impairment (MoCA-Ina score less than 26)
- Impaired consciousness (GCS score less than 15)
- Unstable medical conditions at time of hospitalization
- Patients with pacemaker
- Having other injury or dysfunction in the impaired side of upper extremity that caused restrictions on the range of joint movement and muscle weakness, such as fractures, periarthritis, or moderate-severe pain
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Electrical activity deltoid, biceps, triceps, wrist flexor, wrist extensor muscle
Time frame: 3 days of stroke onset, 5 days of stroke onset, 1 months, 2 months and 3 months after stroke onset
* Contraction (number/minute). The number of contractions was reported for each participant as a count of the number of contractions divided per minute time (the more the better outcome) windows analyzed for that participant. * Length of contraction (millisecond) (the longer the better outcome) * Amplitude (mV) (the more the better outcome)
2 secondary outcomes
Manual Muscle Testing score
Time frame: 3 days of stroke onset, 5 days of stroke onset, 1 months, 2 months and 3 months after stroke onset
Fugl Mayer Assessment-Upper Extremity score
Time frame: 3 days of stroke onset, 5 days of stroke onset, 1 months, 2 months and 3 months after stroke onset
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Aug 2024.
- Results publication: PubMed 37197995Fan J, Li X, Yu X, Liu Z, Jiang Y, Fang Y, Zong M, Suo C, Man Q, Xiong L. Global Burden, Risk Factor Analysis, and Prediction Study of Ischemic Stroke, 1990-2030. Neurology. 2023 Jul 11;101(2):e137-e150. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207387. Epub 2023 May 17.
- Results publication: PubMed 35313314Venketasubramanian N, Yudiarto FL, Tugasworo D. Stroke Burden and Stroke Services in Indonesia. Cerebrovasc Dis Extra. 2022;12(1):53-57. doi: 10.1159/000524161. Epub 2022 Mar 21.
- Results publication: PubMed 11136923Shelton FN, Reding MJ. Effect of lesion location on upper limb motor recovery after stroke. Stroke. 2001 Jan;32(1):107-12. doi: 10.1161/01.str.32.1.107.
- Results publication: PubMed 11387487Lawrence ES, Coshall C, Dundas R, Stewart J, Rudd AG, Howard R, Wolfe CD. Estimates of the prevalence of acute stroke impairments and disability in a multiethnic population. Stroke. 2001 Jun;32(6):1279-84. doi: 10.1161/01.str.32.6.1279.
- Results publication: PubMed 34778722Feldner HA, Papazian C, Peters KM, Creutzfeldt CJ, Steele KM. Clinical Use of Surface Electromyography to Track Acute Upper Extremity Muscle Recovery after Stroke: A Descriptive Case Study of a Single Patient. Appl Syst Innov. 2021 Jun;4(2):32. doi: 10.3390/asi4020032. Epub 2021 May 10.
- Results publication: PubMed 33071953Steele KM, Papazian C, Feldner HA. Muscle Activity After Stroke: Perspectives on Deploying Surface Electromyography in Acute Care. Front Neurol. 2020 Sep 23;11:576757. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.576757. eCollection 2020.
- Results publication: PubMed 36543863Alt Murphy M, Al-Shallawi A, Sunnerhagen KS, Pandyan A. Early prediction of upper limb functioning after stroke using clinical bedside assessments: a prospective longitudinal study. Sci Rep. 2022 Dec 21;12(1):22053. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-26585-1.
- Results publication: PubMed 34589686Papazian C, Baicoianu NA, Peters KM, Feldner HA, Steele KM. Electromyography Recordings Detect Muscle Activity Before Observable Contractions in Acute Stroke Care. Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2021 Jun 5;3(3):100136. doi: 10.1016/j.arrct.2021.100136. eCollection 2021 Sep.
- Results publication: PubMed 31610763Stinear CM, Smith MC, Byblow WD. Prediction Tools for Stroke Rehabilitation. Stroke. 2019 Nov;50(11):3314-3322. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.025696. Epub 2019 Oct 15. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 33178121Manzur-Valdivia H, Alvarez-Ruf J. Surface Electromyography in Clinical Practice. A Perspective From a Developing Country. Front Neurol. 2020 Oct 15;11:578829. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.578829. eCollection 2020.
- Results publication: PubMed 35432154Ueda S, Aoki H, Yasuda Y, Nishiyama A, Hayashi Y, Honaga K, Tanuma A, Takakura T, Kurosu A, Hatori K, Hayashi A, Fujiwara T. The MMT of Elbow Flexion and the AFE Predict Impairment and Disability at 3 Weeks in Patients With Acute Stroke. Front Neurol. 2022 Mar 30;13:831800. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.831800. eCollection 2022.
- Results publication: PubMed 37181551Lv W, Liu K, Zhou P, Huang F, Lu Z. Surface EMG analysis of weakness distribution in upper limb muscles post-stroke. Front Neurol. 2023 Apr 25;14:1135564. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1135564. eCollection 2023.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Sex Women Men Age Length of stay Stroke diagnosis Ischemic stroke Haemorrhagic stroke Stroke side Right hemisphere Left hemisphere Dominant Hand Right Left Stroke severity Minor stroke Moderate stroke Moderate to severe stroke Severe stroke Stroke risk factor Hypertension Diabetes Mellitus Heart disease Dyslipidemia Smoking Recurrent stroke Yes No
Related trials for Upper Extremity Paresis
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Nerve Transfer Surgery to Restore Upper-limb Function After Cervical Spinal Cord Injury
Spinal Cord Injury, Spinal Cord Injury at C5-C7 Level
Not yet recruiting
Haptic-Assisted Virtual Reality Upper-Limb Rehabilitation After Intracerebral Haemorrhage
Intracerebral Hemorrhage, Hemorrhagic Stroke
RecruitingObservational study
Kinematic Analysis of Manual Dexterity
Down Syndrome, Hemiparesis
Recruiting
Telerehabilitation for Post-Stroke Hand Function
Stroke
Not yet recruiting
PhiCube for Bilateral Upper Limb Neuromotor and Cognitive Rehabilitation in Adults
Stroke, Parkinson Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Upper Extremity Paresis and Muscle Contracture Upper Arm, run by Universitas Padjadjaran at 1 site in Indonesia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Aug 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Indonesia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Vitriana Biben, Doctoral (022-7302-931, vitriana@unpad.ac.id), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Electrical activity deltoid, biceps, triceps, wrist flexor, wrist extensor muscle (time frame: 3 days of stroke onset, 5 days of stroke onset, 1 months, 2 months and 3 months after stroke onset). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06574737, which also lists 22 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Aug 2024.