HemiplegiaNCT06579027
A Novel Program Using Ride-on Toys to Improve Upper Extremity Function in Children With Hemiplegia
A study testing SPEED Training and CRAFT Training in people with Hemiplegia and Cerebral Palsy, run by University of Connecticut at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility and utility of 2 types of play-based training programs co-delivered by researchers and caregivers within home/community settings to promote arm function among 3-to-8-year-old children with hemiplegia. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 3 to 8 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Hemiplegia, Cerebral Palsy, Children, Only
- What is being tested?
- SPEED Training and CRAFT Training
- Type of treatment
- Medical device, Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 26 Sep 2024to 30 Jul 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 3 to 8 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Boys and girls between the ages of 3 - 8 years
- Diagnosed with hemiplegia by a medical doctor with clear asymmetry in upper extremity strength and control (i.e., one upper limb is clearly weaker than the other)
- Can maintain a supported sitting position for at least 15 minutes
Who cannot join
- Only lower limb involvement
- Recent history (within past 6 months) of trauma or surgery or Botox
- Uncorrected blindness/profound visual impairment
- Fixed deformities at wrist or hand
- No active control in affected UE
- Inability to follow 2-step directions
- Weight > 150 lbs.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Physical Therapy Program, Department of Kinesiology, University of Connecticut
Storrs, Connecticut, 06269
About this study
Official title: A Novel, Child-friendly, Home-based Navigation Training Program Using Joystick-operated Ride-on Toys to Improve Upper Extremity Function in Children With Hemiplegia: A Pilot Study
The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility and utility of 2 types of play-based training programs co-delivered by researchers and caregivers within home/community settings to promote arm function among 3-to-8-year-old children with hemiplegia. Specifically, investigators will assess the feasibility of implementation and acceptance/satisfaction associated with a researcher-caregiver co-delivered community-based training program involving either joystick-operated powered ride-on toys (SPEED training) or creative upper extremity training (CRAFT training).
The investigators will also compare the effects of these 2 types of training programs on children's arm motor function and spontaneous use of their affected arm during daily activities.
Read the detailed description
Prior to the start of the study, researchers will conduct a phone screening with the family to confirm their child's eligibility to participate in the study. Once eligibility is confirmed, during the pretest session (week 1), standardized assessments will be conducted to evaluate the child's ability to use their affected arm for different functional activities. During this testing visit, researchers will also attach small sensors on the child's arms and ask them to complete arm movements and functional tasks (e.g., lifting blocks and putting them into a small cup). At the pretest, the child will also be provided 2 activity monitors (similar to wrist watches) to wear on both wrists for 1 week. The activity monitors will allow the researchers to track the child's habitual arm activity over the duration of a week. In addition, caregivers will be asked to complete questionnaires to obtain information on their child's overall health, development, and their ability to use their affected arm for various activities of daily living.
Assessments and questionnaires will be repeated again at the posttest (i.e., at week 8 that corresponds with completion of the 6-week intervention phase) and at 1-month follow-up following intervention completion (i.e., week 12).
Following the pretest, the child will be randomized into one of the training groups (SPEED or CRAFT). During the 6-week intervention phase, the research team will visit the child's home/community 2 times/week to provide the training. Caregivers will be requested to practice 2 additional sessions every week with their child in both groups.
Children in the Strength and Power in upper Extremities through Exploratory Driving (SPEED) training group will engage in multidirectional navigation games and object-based upper extremity quests using the ride-on toys. The toy will be modified to enable operation in a single joystick control mode with the joystick control provided on the child's affected side. The training activities will be designed to encourage children to use their affected arm for training activities. The training will involve children driving through incrementally challenging courses/paths and completing object-based tasks that require use of their affected arm for reaching, grasping, release, and fine manipulation activities. Children will be asked to wear a mitten on their unaffected hand during the sessions. Children in the Creative Rehabilitation for Arm Functional Training (CRAFT) group will engage in seated creative motor games that will encourage use of their affected arm. Training activities will involve stretching and strengthening exercises, building activities (e.g., using Play-doh, blocks, etc.), and art-craft projects, all of which will require the skillful use of the affected arm for reach, grasp, release, and manipulation activities.
Research-delivered sessions in both groups will last around 30-45 minutes. Caregivers will be encouraged to provide 2 more sessions every week lasting about 15-20 minutes/session. The research team will provide caregivers in both groups with the required materials for caregiver sessions. In the SPEED group, the ride-on toy will be left with the family for the duration of the intervention (i.e., 6 weeks). Both researchers and caregivers will be asked to keep track of training sessions (duration, frequency, etc.) using a training log. During the course of the study, children in both groups will continue to receive treatment-as-usual through school or private settings. Families will be asked to log the therapies their child is receiving every week over the course of the study using a training diary (# of times/week, duration of each session, type of therapy received) provided by the researchers. Researchers will video record all testing and researcher-delivered training sessions so that children's performance can be scored later.
- Conditions
- Hemiplegia, Cerebral Palsy, Children, Only
- Being tested
- SPEED Training, CRAFT Training
- Medical subject headings
- Hemiplegia, Cerebral Palsy
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SPEED TrainingDevice
Also called Strength and Power in upper Extremities through Exploratory Driving
Children will use ride-on toys controlled using their affected arm to navigate through their environment and complete playful theme-based challenges. Children will use their affected UE during navigation to start and stop the toy, move steadily forward and backward, turn to the right and left, perform 180° and 360° turns to either side, and avoid obstacles. Children will complete object-based UE tasks requiring gross and fine motor control at intermediate stops during navigation. Navigational tasks will be progressed by increasing complexity of paths (straight to slalom paths needing more directional changes), spaces (wide to narrow spaces), and precision (obstacle courses and mazes requiring skillful navigation, motor planning, and route finding). Object-based tasks will be progressed in terms of force requirements (small to large forces), range of motion (near to far reaches), precision (manipulation of large to small objects), and speed of movements (slow to fast).
CRAFT TrainingBehavioural
Also called Creative Rehabilitation for Arm Functional Training
Children will engage in predominantly seated activities based on conventional occupational therapy to promote unimanual and bimanual UE function. Training sessions will be based on playful child-friendly themes (e.g., dinosaurs, space exploration, aquatic theme, etc.) and all training activities will incorporate the session theme. Activities will involve practice of functional gross and fine motor UE movement patterns that children typically use during daily life. Training will emphasize the use of the affected UE in different roles (i.e., stabilizer, mobilizer, and active and passive assist) during warm-up, building, and art-craft activities. The training will be progressed in terms of forces needed, range of motion, precision, and movement speed.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| SPEED (Strength and Power in upper Extremities through Exploratory Driving) | Experimental | Children will receive training focused on improving affected arm function using modified, joystick-operated ride-on toys. The commercial ride-on toys will be modified to allow operation in a single joystick control mode provided on the child's affected side. The manualized SPEED sessions will involve 2 components: (a) Multidirectional navigational games where children will use their affected UE to drive and maneuver the toy and (b) Object-based UE tasks completed at intermediate stops/stations during navigation. Navigational opportunities will encourage children to navigate through paths of different shapes, sizes, and complexity levels (e.g., straight, circle, diamond, slalom, obstacle courses etc.) Object-based tasks will encourage functional UE movement patterns during object interactions such as reaching, throwing, catching, pulling, pushing, lifting, knocking, holding, grasping, opening, closing, release, and manipulation. Receives: Device: SPEED Training |
| CRAFT (Creative Rehabilitation for Arm Functional Training) | Active comparator | Children will engage in seated creative motor games focused on promoting gross and fine motor UE function. Training sessions will encourage use of the affected UE during unimanual and bimanual activities. Each training session will involve the following components: (a) Stretching exercises and (b) Task-oriented strengthening activities. Stretching exercises will involve range of motion exercises to encourage active warmup of proximal (shoulder, elbow) and distal (wrist, hand) UE muscles and movement dissociation. Task-oriented strengthening will involve use of the affected UE as a mobilizer and a stabilizer during building (e.g., Play-Doh, blocks, puzzles) and art-craft activities (e.g., folding, cutting, pasting, coloring). Task-oriented practice will emphasize skills such as reaching, grasping, release, and manipulation of training supplies. Receives: Behavioral: CRAFT Training |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Treatment adherence
Researchers and caregivers will maintain training logs to document the frequency (# of sessions/week) and duration (time per session) of training sessions. In the SPEED group, the ride-on toy will collect data on amount of device use during training sessions.
Measured: From start to end of the 6-week intervention phase on a weekly basis
Treatment retention
Researchers will report treatment retention (# of families who withdrew). The researchers will track the # of families who withdrew from the study, the timepoint within the study timeline of withdrawal, and the reasons for withdrawal.
Measured: From date of randomization to date of the final data collection visit with the last participant, assessed over 24 months
Treatment satisfaction
The researchers will use the 16-item Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale (PAES) with children (delivered in an interview format) scored on a Likert scale of 1 (Disagree a lot) to 5 (Agree a lot) at posttest to assess perceived competence, pleasure/enjoyment, control, and sense of success. Caregivers will complete exit questionnaires/interviews to assess perceived program satisfaction, burden, willingness to continue training beyond the study, likelihood of recommending training to others, and child motivation/engagement during the training.
Measured: At 8 weeks (i.e., at the posttest visit conducted following completion of the 6-week intervention phase)
Changes in use of affected arm in functional activities
The Shriner's Hospital Upper Extremity Evaluation (SHUEE) is a video-based test that analyzes affected UE use spontaneously and on tester demand during 16 bimanual tasks in 3-18-year-olds. It has 3 components: spontaneous functional analysis (SFA), dynamic positional analysis (DPA), and grasp-release analysis (GRA), scored on a 2- to 6-point ordinal scale. The SHUEE assessment includes evaluation of spontaneous use of the involved UE and segmental alignment of the affected UE during performance of tasks on demand, for example, unscrewing a bottle cap, removing money from a wallet, putting socks on, etc. The SFA is scored on a scale from 0 to 5 where higher ratings indicate better performance. The DPA is scored on a scale from 0 to 3, where higher ratings indicate better performance. The GRA is scored on scale from 0 to 1, where higher ratings indicate better performance.
Measured: Baseline (i.e., pretest conducted in week 1), at 8 weeks (i.e., at posttest after completion of the 6-week intervention), and at 12 weeks (i.e., at 1-month followup after the end of intervention phase)
Changes in hand grip strength
A calibrated digital Jamar dynamometer will be used to measure grip strength while seated with forearm supported. Following a single sub-maximal practice trial, a single maximal trial of 3-4 seconds will be collected from each hand.
Measured: Baseline (i.e., pretest conducted in week 1), at 8 weeks (i.e., at posttest after completion of the 6-week intervention), and at 12 weeks (i.e., at 1-month followup after the end of the intervention phase)
Secondary outcomes (7)
Changes in implementation fidelity during training sessions and factors impacting training delivery
In both training groups, a coder naïve to study aims will randomly choose and code videos (one each of early, mid, and late researcher-delivered sessions) using custom-designed fidelity checklists to assess adherence to the manualized training protocols. Caregivers will fill exit questionnaires at posttest to report ease of implementation of the training programs, barriers and facilitators related to session delivery, and adequacy of researcher support to deliver caregiver sessions.
Measured: Early (week 1), Mid (week 3), and late (week 6) training sessions within the 6-week intervention phase and at week 8 (posttest following completion of the intervention phase)
Changes in child engagement during training sessions
The researchers will code 1 early, 1 mid, and 1 late researcher-administered session during the intervention phase in both groups (using Datavyu video coding software) to assess the child's affect and attention to the task. Specifically, in terms of affect, for each training session (early, mid, and late), researchers will code the percent duration of session spent in positive and negative affective states. In addition, training sessions (early, mid, and late session) will be coded for the child's attention patterns. The research team will code the percent duration of the session that the child attended towards task-appropriate and task-inappropriate targets. Specifically, investigators will code for attention directed towards: (a) task, (b) social partners, and (d) elsewhere.
Measured: Early (week 1), Mid (week 3), and Late (week 6) training sessions within the 6-week intervention phase
Changes in parent-rated scores on functional use of the affected arm
The ABILHAND-Kids is a valid and reliable parent-rated questionnaire assessing parent perceptions of their child's level of ease or difficulty in performing 21 manual activities independently over the last 3 months. The 21 manual activities are rated by parents on a 3-point scale of "impossible", "difficult", or "easy". Items become increasingly difficult in terms of required bimanual function. Investigators will report changes in logit scores over the course of the training program.
Measured: Baseline (i.e., pretest conducted in week 1), at 8 weeks (i.e., at posttest after completion of the 6-week intervention), and at 12 weeks (i.e., at 1-month followup after the end of intervention phase)
Change in affected arm movement control
The Quality of Upper Extremity Skills Test (QUEST) is a criterion-referenced, valid, and reliable measure for use between 18 months-12 years to assesses quality of UE function in 4 domains: dissociated movements, grasp, protective extension, and weight bearing. The tool includes 36 items that evaluate movement patterns and hand function in children with Cerebral Palsy and are scored on a dichotomous scale (minimum value = 1, maximum value = 2), with higher scores indicating better performance. The research team will report total scores and 4 sub-domain scores on the QUEST.
Measured: Baseline (i.e., pretest conducted in week 1), at 8 weeks (i.e., at posttest after completion of the 6-week intervention), and at 12 weeks (i.e., at 1-month followup after the end of intervention phase)
Changes in independent navigational control
Early, mid, \& late training sessions (one session at each time point) of children in the SPEED group will be coded for percent duration of session engaged in assisted (child needs trainer-provided manual assistance) versus independent (child is able to drive the toy unassisted) navigation.
Measured: Early (week 1), Mid (week 3), and Late (week 6) training sessions within the 6-week intervention phase
Changes in habitual arm activity and arm asymmetry
Children will be asked to wear 2 wrist activity monitors (ActiGraph devices), one each on both wrists, for the duration of 1 week, at 3 time points : (a) baseline/pretest, (b) posttest following completion of the 6-week intervention phase, and (c) followup (i.e., 1 month following intervention completion). Children will be asked to wear the monitors for a period of 1 week at all 3 time points. Children will be asked to wear the monitors continuously when awake and while sleeping (minimum of 4 days - 1 weekend day and 3 weekdays) over the course of the week. Investigators will report extent of asymmetry in affected versus unaffected arm use across the time points.
Measured: Baseline (i.e., pretest conducted in week 1), at 8 weeks (i.e., at posttest after completion of the 6-week intervention), and at 12 weeks (i.e., at 1-month followup after the end of intervention phase)
Changes in maximum UE joint angles and overall range of motion on the affected arm
Movement kinematics will be collected from both UEs during the following tasks: (a) range of motion tasks involving shoulder, elbow, forearm, and wrist movements (adapted from tasks from the QUEST and SHUEE tests) and (b) sequential bimanual tasks adapted from motor tests (i.e., clean-up task with 6 blocks requiring the child to grasp each block, transfer to the other hand, and release into a small cup). Sensors (Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs)) will be placed on both hands, both forearms, both arms, and the C7 spinous process. The research team will report maximum joint angles and overall joint range of motion.
Measured: Baseline (i.e., pretest conducted in week 1), at 8 weeks (i.e., at posttest after completion of the 6-week intervention), and at 12 weeks (i.e., at 1-month followup after the end of intervention phase)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Aug 2024
- Study start26 Sep 2024
- Primary completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Jul 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for HemiplegiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Randomized controlled trial
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Connecticut
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Sudha Srinivasan, University of Connecticut
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06579027
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 23-10-800-910
- Other IDs
- 1R21HD109605-01A1
- Status last verified
- Aug 2026
- First submitted
- 27 Aug 2024
- Last updated
- 13 Aug 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Data generated include screening forms, participant intake forms (with demographic information, clinical information, and details of therapies received by children), parent-rated questionnaires, child-rated questionnaires, researcher-rated qualitative scales, video data from testing and training sessions, raw kinematic data, raw data from accelerometers, toy use data, training logs, and excel files generated from post-processing data collected from the study. All raw data with identifiable information will not be shared. All coded, de-identified scientific data (questionnaire responses, test scores, training logs) will be preserved and shared using Data and Specimen Hub (DASH).
Publications
Srinivasan S, Amonkar N, Kumavor PD, Bubela D, Morgan K. Joystick-Operated Ride-On Toy Navigation Training for Children With Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy: A Pilot Study. Am J Occup Ther. 2024 Jul 1;78(4):7804185070. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2024.050589.
PubMed 38836619Shahane V, Kumavor PD, Morgan K, Srinivasan S. Fast and Fun: A Pilot Feasibility Study Using Dual Joystick-Operated Ride-on Toys for Upper Extremity Rehabilitation in Children with Hemiplegia. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2024;44(6):844-864. doi: 10.1080/01942638.2024.2360462. Epub 2024 Jun 11.
PubMed 38863174Srinivasan S, Kumavor PD, Morgan K. A Pilot Feasibility Study on the Use of Dual-Joystick-Operated Ride-on Toys in Upper Extremity Rehabilitation for Children with Unilateral Cerebral Palsy. Children (Basel). 2024 Mar 29;11(4):408. doi: 10.3390/children11040408.
PubMed 38671624Srinivasan S, Kumavor P, Morgan K. A Training Program Using Modified Joystick-Operated Ride-on Toys to Complement Conventional Upper Extremity Rehabilitation in Children with Cerebral Palsy: Results from a Pilot Study. Bioengineering (Basel). 2024 Mar 23;11(4):304. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11040304.
PubMed 38671726Srinivasan S, Amonkar N, Kumavor PD, Bubela D. Measuring Upper Extremity Activity of Children With Unilateral Cerebral Palsy Using Wrist-Worn Accelerometers: A Pilot Study. Am J Occup Ther. 2024 Mar 1;78(2):7802180050. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2024.050443.
PubMed 38478583Srinivasan S, Amonkar N, Kumavor P, Morgan K, Bubela D. Outcomes Associated with a Single Joystick-Operated Ride-on-Toy Navigation Training Incorporated into a Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy Program: A Pilot Feasibility Study. Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 May 15;13(5):413. doi: 10.3390/bs13050413.
PubMed 37232651Shahane V, Kumavor P, Morgan K, Friel KM, Srinivasan SM. A protocol for a single-arm interventional study assessing the effects of a home-based joystick-operated ride-on-toy navigation training programme to improve affected upper extremity function and spontaneous use in children with unilateral cerebral palsy (UCP). BMJ Open. 2023 May 9;13(5):e071742. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-071742.
PubMed 37160396Amonkar N, Kumavor P, Morgan K, Bubela D, Srinivasan S. Feasibility of Using Joystick-Operated Ride-on-Toys to Promote Upper Extremity Function in Children With Cerebral Palsy: A Pilot Study. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2022 Oct 1;34(4):508-517. doi: 10.1097/PEP.0000000000000944. Epub 2022 Aug 30.
PubMed 36044637
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Aug 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Novel, Child-friendly, Home-based Navigation Training Program Using Joystick-operated Ride-on Toys to Improve Upper Extremity Function in Children With Hemiplegia: A Pilot Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06579027
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 23-10-800-910
- Conditions
- Hemiplegia, Cerebral Palsy, Children, Only
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of ConnecticutUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
- Study start
- 26 Sep 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Jul 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 30 Aug 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility and utility of 2 types of play-based training programs co-delivered by researchers and caregivers within home/community settings to promote arm function among 3-to-8-year-old children with hemiplegia. Specifically, investigators will assess the feasibility of implementation and acceptance/satisfaction associated with a researcher-caregiver co-delivered community-based training program involving either joystick-operated powered ride-on toys (SPEED training) or creative upper extremity training (CRAFT training).
The investigators will also compare the effects of these 2 types of training programs on children's arm motor function and spontaneous use of their affected arm during daily activities.
Detailed description
Prior to the start of the study, researchers will conduct a phone screening with the family to confirm their child's eligibility to participate in the study. Once eligibility is confirmed, during the pretest session (week 1), standardized assessments will be conducted to evaluate the child's ability to use their affected arm for different functional activities. During this testing visit, researchers will also attach small sensors on the child's arms and ask them to complete arm movements and functional tasks (e.g., lifting blocks and putting them into a small cup). At the pretest, the child will also be provided 2 activity monitors (similar to wrist watches) to wear on both wrists for 1 week. The activity monitors will allow the researchers to track the child's habitual arm activity over the duration of a week. In addition, caregivers will be asked to complete questionnaires to obtain information on their child's overall health, development, and their ability to use their affected arm for various activities of daily living.
Assessments and questionnaires will be repeated again at the posttest (i.e., at week 8 that corresponds with completion of the 6-week intervention phase) and at 1-month follow-up following intervention completion (i.e., week 12).
Following the pretest, the child will be randomized into one of the training groups (SPEED or CRAFT). During the 6-week intervention phase, the research team will visit the child's home/community 2 times/week to provide the training. Caregivers will be requested to practice 2 additional sessions every week with their child in both groups.
Children in the Strength and Power in upper Extremities through Exploratory Driving (SPEED) training group will engage in multidirectional navigation games and object-based upper extremity quests using the ride-on toys. The toy will be modified to enable operation in a single joystick control mode with the joystick control provided on the child's affected side. The training activities will be designed to encourage children to use their affected arm for training activities. The training will involve children driving through incrementally challenging courses/paths and completing object-based tasks that require use of their affected arm for reaching, grasping, release, and fine manipulation activities. Children will be asked to wear a mitten on their unaffected hand during the sessions. Children in the Creative Rehabilitation for Arm Functional Training (CRAFT) group will engage in seated creative motor games that will encourage use of their affected arm. Training activities will involve stretching and strengthening exercises, building activities (e.g., using Play-doh, blocks, etc.), and art-craft projects, all of which will require the skillful use of the affected arm for reach, grasp, release, and manipulation activities.
Research-delivered sessions in both groups will last around 30-45 minutes. Caregivers will be encouraged to provide 2 more sessions every week lasting about 15-20 minutes/session. The research team will provide caregivers in both groups with the required materials for caregiver sessions. In the SPEED group, the ride-on toy will be left with the family for the duration of the intervention (i.e., 6 weeks). Both researchers and caregivers will be asked to keep track of training sessions (duration, frequency, etc.) using a training log. During the course of the study, children in both groups will continue to receive treatment-as-usual through school or private settings. Families will be asked to log the therapies their child is receiving every week over the course of the study using a training diary (# of times/week, duration of each session, type of therapy received) provided by the researchers. Researchers will video record all testing and researcher-delivered training sessions so that children's performance can be scored later.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Randomized controlled trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| SPEED (Strength and Power in upper Extremities through Exploratory Driving) | Experimental | Device: SPEED TrainingChildren will receive training focused on improving affected arm function using modified, joystick-operated ride-on toys. The commercial ride-on toys will be modified to allow operation in a single joystick control mode provided on the child's affected side. The manualized SPEED sessions will involve 2 components: (a) Multidirectional navigational games where children will use their affected UE to drive and maneuver the toy and (b) Object-based UE tasks completed at intermediate stops/stations during navigation. Navigational opportunities will encourage children to navigate through paths of different shapes, sizes, and complexity levels (e.g., straight, circle, diamond, slalom, obstacle courses etc.) Object-based tasks will encourage functional UE movement patterns during object interactions such as reaching, throwing, catching, pulling, pushing, lifting, knocking, holding, grasping, opening, closing, release, and manipulation. |
| CRAFT (Creative Rehabilitation for Arm Functional Training) | Active comparator | Behavioral: CRAFT TrainingChildren will engage in seated creative motor games focused on promoting gross and fine motor UE function. Training sessions will encourage use of the affected UE during unimanual and bimanual activities. Each training session will involve the following components: (a) Stretching exercises and (b) Task-oriented strengthening activities. Stretching exercises will involve range of motion exercises to encourage active warmup of proximal (shoulder, elbow) and distal (wrist, hand) UE muscles and movement dissociation. Task-oriented strengthening will involve use of the affected UE as a mobilizer and a stabilizer during building (e.g., Play-Doh, blocks, puzzles) and art-craft activities (e.g., folding, cutting, pasting, coloring). Task-oriented practice will emphasize skills such as reaching, grasping, release, and manipulation of training supplies. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 3 to 8 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Boys and girls between the ages of 3 - 8 years
- Diagnosed with hemiplegia by a medical doctor with clear asymmetry in upper extremity strength and control (i.e., one upper limb is clearly weaker than the other)
- Can maintain a supported sitting position for at least 15 minutes
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Only lower limb involvement
- Recent history (within past 6 months) of trauma or surgery or Botox
- Uncorrected blindness/profound visual impairment
- Fixed deformities at wrist or hand
- No active control in affected UE
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SPEED TrainingAlso: Strength and Power in upper Extremities through Exploratory DrivingChildren will use ride-on toys controlled using their affected arm to navigate through their environment and complete playful theme-based challenges. Children will use their affected UE during navigation to start and stop the toy, move steadily forward and backward, turn to the right and left, perform 180° and 360° turns to either side, and avoid obstacles. Children will complete object-based UE tasks requiring gross and fine motor control at intermediate stops during navigation. Navigational tasks will be progressed by increasing complexity of paths (straight to slalom paths needing more directional changes), spaces (wide to narrow spaces), and precision (obstacle courses and mazes requiring skillful navigation, motor planning, and route finding). Object-based tasks will be progressed in terms of force requirements (small to large forces), range of motion (near to far reaches), precision (manipulation of large to small objects), and speed of movements (slow to fast). | Device | SPEED (Strength and Power in upper Extremities through Exploratory Driving) |
| CRAFT TrainingAlso: Creative Rehabilitation for Arm Functional TrainingChildren will engage in predominantly seated activities based on conventional occupational therapy to promote unimanual and bimanual UE function. Training sessions will be based on playful child-friendly themes (e.g., dinosaurs, space exploration, aquatic theme, etc.) and all training activities will incorporate the session theme. Activities will involve practice of functional gross and fine motor UE movement patterns that children typically use during daily life. Training will emphasize the use of the affected UE in different roles (i.e., stabilizer, mobilizer, and active and passive assist) during warm-up, building, and art-craft activities. The training will be progressed in terms of forces needed, range of motion, precision, and movement speed. | Behavioural | CRAFT (Creative Rehabilitation for Arm Functional Training) |
Primary outcome
Treatment adherence
Time frame: From start to end of the 6-week intervention phase on a weekly basis
Researchers and caregivers will maintain training logs to document the frequency (# of sessions/week) and duration (time per session) of training sessions. In the SPEED group, the ride-on toy will collect data on amount of device use during training sessions.
Treatment retention
Time frame: From date of randomization to date of the final data collection visit with the last participant, assessed over 24 months
Researchers will report treatment retention (# of families who withdrew). The researchers will track the # of families who withdrew from the study, the timepoint within the study timeline of withdrawal, and the reasons for withdrawal.
Treatment satisfaction
Time frame: At 8 weeks (i.e., at the posttest visit conducted following completion of the 6-week intervention phase)
The researchers will use the 16-item Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale (PAES) with children (delivered in an interview format) scored on a Likert scale of 1 (Disagree a lot) to 5 (Agree a lot) at posttest to assess perceived competence, pleasure/enjoyment, control, and sense of success. Caregivers will complete exit questionnaires/interviews to assess perceived program satisfaction, burden, willingness to continue training beyond the study, likelihood of recommending training to others, and child motivation/engagement during the training.
Changes in use of affected arm in functional activities
Time frame: Baseline (i.e., pretest conducted in week 1), at 8 weeks (i.e., at posttest after completion of the 6-week intervention), and at 12 weeks (i.e., at 1-month followup after the end of intervention phase)
The Shriner's Hospital Upper Extremity Evaluation (SHUEE) is a video-based test that analyzes affected UE use spontaneously and on tester demand during 16 bimanual tasks in 3-18-year-olds. It has 3 components: spontaneous functional analysis (SFA), dynamic positional analysis (DPA), and grasp-release analysis (GRA), scored on a 2- to 6-point ordinal scale. The SHUEE assessment includes evaluation of spontaneous use of the involved UE and segmental alignment of the affected UE during performance of tasks on demand, for example, unscrewing a bottle cap, removing money from a wallet, putting socks on, etc. The SFA is scored on a scale from 0 to 5 where higher ratings indicate better performance. The DPA is scored on a scale from 0 to 3, where higher ratings indicate better performance. The GRA is scored on scale from 0 to 1, where higher ratings indicate better performance.
Changes in hand grip strength
Time frame: Baseline (i.e., pretest conducted in week 1), at 8 weeks (i.e., at posttest after completion of the 6-week intervention), and at 12 weeks (i.e., at 1-month followup after the end of the intervention phase)
A calibrated digital Jamar dynamometer will be used to measure grip strength while seated with forearm supported. Following a single sub-maximal practice trial, a single maximal trial of 3-4 seconds will be collected from each hand.
7 secondary outcomes
Changes in implementation fidelity during training sessions and factors impacting training delivery
Time frame: Early (week 1), Mid (week 3), and late (week 6) training sessions within the 6-week intervention phase and at week 8 (posttest following completion of the intervention phase)
Changes in child engagement during training sessions
Time frame: Early (week 1), Mid (week 3), and Late (week 6) training sessions within the 6-week intervention phase
Changes in parent-rated scores on functional use of the affected arm
Time frame: Baseline (i.e., pretest conducted in week 1), at 8 weeks (i.e., at posttest after completion of the 6-week intervention), and at 12 weeks (i.e., at 1-month followup after the end of intervention phase)
Change in affected arm movement control
Time frame: Baseline (i.e., pretest conducted in week 1), at 8 weeks (i.e., at posttest after completion of the 6-week intervention), and at 12 weeks (i.e., at 1-month followup after the end of intervention phase)
Changes in independent navigational control
Time frame: Early (week 1), Mid (week 3), and Late (week 6) training sessions within the 6-week intervention phase
Changes in habitual arm activity and arm asymmetry
Time frame: Baseline (i.e., pretest conducted in week 1), at 8 weeks (i.e., at posttest after completion of the 6-week intervention), and at 12 weeks (i.e., at 1-month followup after the end of intervention phase)
Changes in maximum UE joint angles and overall range of motion on the affected arm
Time frame: Baseline (i.e., pretest conducted in week 1), at 8 weeks (i.e., at posttest after completion of the 6-week intervention), and at 12 weeks (i.e., at 1-month followup after the end of intervention phase)
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Aug 2026.
- Background: PubMed 38836619Srinivasan S, Amonkar N, Kumavor PD, Bubela D, Morgan K. Joystick-Operated Ride-On Toy Navigation Training for Children With Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy: A Pilot Study. Am J Occup Ther. 2024 Jul 1;78(4):7804185070. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2024.050589.
- Background: PubMed 38863174Shahane V, Kumavor PD, Morgan K, Srinivasan S. Fast and Fun: A Pilot Feasibility Study Using Dual Joystick-Operated Ride-on Toys for Upper Extremity Rehabilitation in Children with Hemiplegia. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2024;44(6):844-864. doi: 10.1080/01942638.2024.2360462. Epub 2024 Jun 11.
- Background: PubMed 38671624Srinivasan S, Kumavor PD, Morgan K. A Pilot Feasibility Study on the Use of Dual-Joystick-Operated Ride-on Toys in Upper Extremity Rehabilitation for Children with Unilateral Cerebral Palsy. Children (Basel). 2024 Mar 29;11(4):408. doi: 10.3390/children11040408.
- Background: PubMed 38671726Srinivasan S, Kumavor P, Morgan K. A Training Program Using Modified Joystick-Operated Ride-on Toys to Complement Conventional Upper Extremity Rehabilitation in Children with Cerebral Palsy: Results from a Pilot Study. Bioengineering (Basel). 2024 Mar 23;11(4):304. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11040304.
- Background: PubMed 38478583Srinivasan S, Amonkar N, Kumavor PD, Bubela D. Measuring Upper Extremity Activity of Children With Unilateral Cerebral Palsy Using Wrist-Worn Accelerometers: A Pilot Study. Am J Occup Ther. 2024 Mar 1;78(2):7802180050. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2024.050443.
- Background: PubMed 37232651Srinivasan S, Amonkar N, Kumavor P, Morgan K, Bubela D. Outcomes Associated with a Single Joystick-Operated Ride-on-Toy Navigation Training Incorporated into a Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy Program: A Pilot Feasibility Study. Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 May 15;13(5):413. doi: 10.3390/bs13050413.
- Background: PubMed 37160396Shahane V, Kumavor P, Morgan K, Friel KM, Srinivasan SM. A protocol for a single-arm interventional study assessing the effects of a home-based joystick-operated ride-on-toy navigation training programme to improve affected upper extremity function and spontaneous use in children with unilateral cerebral palsy (UCP). BMJ Open. 2023 May 9;13(5):e071742. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-071742.
- Background: PubMed 36044637Amonkar N, Kumavor P, Morgan K, Bubela D, Srinivasan S. Feasibility of Using Joystick-Operated Ride-on-Toys to Promote Upper Extremity Function in Children With Cerebral Palsy: A Pilot Study. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2022 Oct 1;34(4):508-517. doi: 10.1097/PEP.0000000000000944. Epub 2022 Aug 30.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Data generated include screening forms, participant intake forms (with demographic information, clinical information, and details of therapies received by children), parent-rated questionnaires, child-rated questionnaires, researcher-rated qualitative scales, video data from testing and training sessions, raw kinematic data, raw data from accelerometers, toy use data, training logs, and excel files generated from post-processing data collected from the study. All raw data with identifiable information will not be shared. All coded, de-identified scientific data (questionnaire responses, test scores, training logs) will be preserved and shared using Data and Specimen Hub (DASH).
Related trials for Hemiplegia
RecruitingObservational study
Functional Benefits of Multisite Upper Limb Surgery in Children With Unilateral Cerebral Palsy (RETRO-CHIRc)
Cerebral Palsy, Hemiplegia
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Post-Stroke Apraxia, Motor Function, Balance, and Gait
Stroke, Ideomotor Apraxia
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Ideomotor Apraxia and Robotic Gait Rehabilitation Outcomes After Stroke
Stroke, Ideomotor Apraxia
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Evaluation of a Voice-Activated Call Light System for Clients With Limited Upper-Extremity Mobility
Spinal Cord Injury (=3 Years), Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) Patients
Active, not recruiting
Visual and Auditory Electromyography Biofeedback Among Stroke Patients
Stroke, Hemiplegia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing SPEED Training and CRAFT Training in people with Hemiplegia and Cerebral Palsy, run by University of Connecticut at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Treatment adherence (time frame: From start to end of the 6-week intervention phase on a weekly basis). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06579027, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Aug 2026.