AzTrials
AzTrials

Subarachnoid Haemorrhage (SAH)SAHNCT06581757

Serum GFAP and UCHL1: Evaluation of Their Predictive Value for SAH

An observational study of Subarachnoid Haemorrhage (SAH), run by The Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To verify the analytical performance of GFAP and UCH-L1 biomarkers marketed by Abbott Diagnostics and to assess diagnostic accuracy of these biomarkers in predicting subarachnoid haemorrhage Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Subarachnoid Haemorrhage (SAH)
How many people
144 participants
Where
1 siteUnited Kingdom
Study dates
16 Jan 2025to 28 Apr 2025
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Adult patients presenting to hospitals covered by the black country pathology service (BCPS) who have had a lumbar puncture (LP) for the investigation of subarachnoid haemorrhage.

Who may be able to join

  • Patients ≥18 years old, who have had an LP with a serum sample taken within 24 hours of the LP.

Who cannot join

  • -

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United Kingdom1 site
  • New Cross Hospital

    Wolverhampton, West Midlands, WV10 0QP

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: Evaluation of the Predictive Value of Serum Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein and Ubiquitin Carboxy-terminal Hydrolase L1 for Subarachnoid Haemorrhage

To verify the analytical performance of GFAP and UCH-L1 biomarkers marketed by Abbott Diagnostics and to assess diagnostic accuracy of these biomarkers in predicting subarachnoid haemorrhage

Read the detailed description

Subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) refers to blood entering the subarachnoid space and may be due to aneurysmal or non-aneurysmal causes. Patients with SAH characteristically present with a sudden onset 'thunderclap' headache (Patel et al., 2021). This is an acute medical emergency and is the third most common type of stroke, with approximately 500,000 cases annually across the world (Claassen and Park, 2022). Morbidity has decreased over the past few decades, however, there is still an approximate 35% occurrence of death within three months of a SAH (Andersen et al., 2019). Early diagnosis is important to enable timely treatment and thereby improve prognosis. Current NICE guideline NG228 state the diagnosis of SAH is to be made from a non-contrast CT scan showing the presence of blood in the subarachnoid space. A negative CT done within 6 hours of symptom onset is considered not indicative of a SAH. If however, the CT is 'negative' and is performed more than 6 hours after onset of symptoms then a LP is advised to look for the presence of xanthochromia in the CSF (NICE, 2022).

Xanthochromia refers to the yellowing of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) due to accumulation of bilirubin from the breakdown of red blood cells in the subarachnoid space. Its presence, in the appropriate clinical context, confirms a diagnosis of SAH. In our population, approximately 10% of CSF xanthochromia tests confirm SAH, meaning 90% of LPs may not have been necessary. This test is reliable only if performed at least 12 hours after the onset of symptoms. The xanthochromia test is considered a manual test and requires trained and competent staff. There are multiple pre-analytical requirements in order to produce a reliable result. For example, the sample must be protected from light during transport and not transported by the air tube. Exposure to light can cause the bilirubin to breakdown which can then lead to a false negative result (Cruickshank et al., 2008). Samples transported in the pneumatic tube system may give false results due to the lysis of red cells.

Traumatic tap, in which the needle causes blood to enter the subarachnoid space, and which will then be present in the CSF sample can also cause interference as discolouration of the sample may mask xanthochromia. The least bloodstained CSF sample must therefore be used for analysis. Finally, an LP is an invasive procedure and is therefore an unpleasant experience for the patient (Long et al., 2017).

In summary, a test for SAH that is subject to fewer pre-analytical and analytical interferences would be superior to the current CSF xanthochromia test. Whilst it is not expected that a serum test could replace the need for CSF xanthochromia completely, a test that could identify which patients are likely to have negative LP could reduce the number of unnecessary LPs.

There are two candidate biomarkers - Ubiquitin C-terminal hydroxylase-L1 (UCH-L1) and Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP) - which have been found to increase in blood following brain damage and in traumatic brain injuries, including SAH. However, current guidelines (NICE, 2022) for SAH state that brain biomarkers are not currently recommended by guidelines as part of the SAH diagnosis pathway.

Keywords
Subarachnoid haemorrhage, Evaluation, SAH, Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein, Ubiquitin Carboxy-terminal Hydrolase L1, Cerebrospinal Fluid, Lumbar Puncture
Medical subject headings
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT06581757
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Residual, surplus serum samplesThe study will utilise residual, surplus serum samples with a minimum volume of 300µl that have already been taken as part of the patient's routine care. The patients have already been consented for investigation of SAH and the leftover sample would otherwise be discarded by the laboratory.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Measures of diagnostic accuracy including sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value and positive predictive value.

    Metrics of diagnostic accuracy to include sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value and positive predictive value.

    Measured: 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Sep 2024
  2. Study start16 Jan 2025
  3. Primary completion28 Apr 2025
  4. Study completion28 Apr 2025

Why it stopped: The study has been terminated as the team did not have the amount of positives they were expecting and the CI has got early employment at another Trust and will not be carrying on the project.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
144 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06581757
Sponsor's protocol ID
2024LAB134
Acronym
SAH
Status last verified
Jun 2025
First submitted
30 Aug 2024
Last updated
15 Jun 2025
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Subarachnoid Haemorrhage (SAH), run by The Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Jun 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: The study has been terminated as the team did not have the amount of positives they were expecting and the CI has got early employment at another Trust and will not be carrying on the project.). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Measures of diagnostic accuracy including sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value and positive predictive value. (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Jun 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in