Subarachnoid Haemorrhage (SAH)SAHNCT06581757
Serum GFAP and UCHL1: Evaluation of Their Predictive Value for SAH
An observational study of Subarachnoid Haemorrhage (SAH), run by The Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
To verify the analytical performance of GFAP and UCH-L1 biomarkers marketed by Abbott Diagnostics and to assess diagnostic accuracy of these biomarkers in predicting subarachnoid haemorrhage Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Subarachnoid Haemorrhage (SAH)
- How many people
- 144 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- 16 Jan 2025to 28 Apr 2025
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Adult patients presenting to hospitals covered by the black country pathology service (BCPS) who have had a lumbar puncture (LP) for the investigation of subarachnoid haemorrhage.
Who may be able to join
- Patients ≥18 years old, who have had an LP with a serum sample taken within 24 hours of the LP.
Who cannot join
- -
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United Kingdom1 site
New Cross Hospital
Wolverhampton, West Midlands, WV10 0QP
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of the Predictive Value of Serum Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein and Ubiquitin Carboxy-terminal Hydrolase L1 for Subarachnoid Haemorrhage
To verify the analytical performance of GFAP and UCH-L1 biomarkers marketed by Abbott Diagnostics and to assess diagnostic accuracy of these biomarkers in predicting subarachnoid haemorrhage
Read the detailed description
Subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) refers to blood entering the subarachnoid space and may be due to aneurysmal or non-aneurysmal causes. Patients with SAH characteristically present with a sudden onset 'thunderclap' headache (Patel et al., 2021). This is an acute medical emergency and is the third most common type of stroke, with approximately 500,000 cases annually across the world (Claassen and Park, 2022). Morbidity has decreased over the past few decades, however, there is still an approximate 35% occurrence of death within three months of a SAH (Andersen et al., 2019). Early diagnosis is important to enable timely treatment and thereby improve prognosis. Current NICE guideline NG228 state the diagnosis of SAH is to be made from a non-contrast CT scan showing the presence of blood in the subarachnoid space. A negative CT done within 6 hours of symptom onset is considered not indicative of a SAH. If however, the CT is 'negative' and is performed more than 6 hours after onset of symptoms then a LP is advised to look for the presence of xanthochromia in the CSF (NICE, 2022).
Xanthochromia refers to the yellowing of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) due to accumulation of bilirubin from the breakdown of red blood cells in the subarachnoid space. Its presence, in the appropriate clinical context, confirms a diagnosis of SAH. In our population, approximately 10% of CSF xanthochromia tests confirm SAH, meaning 90% of LPs may not have been necessary. This test is reliable only if performed at least 12 hours after the onset of symptoms. The xanthochromia test is considered a manual test and requires trained and competent staff. There are multiple pre-analytical requirements in order to produce a reliable result. For example, the sample must be protected from light during transport and not transported by the air tube. Exposure to light can cause the bilirubin to breakdown which can then lead to a false negative result (Cruickshank et al., 2008). Samples transported in the pneumatic tube system may give false results due to the lysis of red cells.
Traumatic tap, in which the needle causes blood to enter the subarachnoid space, and which will then be present in the CSF sample can also cause interference as discolouration of the sample may mask xanthochromia. The least bloodstained CSF sample must therefore be used for analysis. Finally, an LP is an invasive procedure and is therefore an unpleasant experience for the patient (Long et al., 2017).
In summary, a test for SAH that is subject to fewer pre-analytical and analytical interferences would be superior to the current CSF xanthochromia test. Whilst it is not expected that a serum test could replace the need for CSF xanthochromia completely, a test that could identify which patients are likely to have negative LP could reduce the number of unnecessary LPs.
There are two candidate biomarkers - Ubiquitin C-terminal hydroxylase-L1 (UCH-L1) and Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP) - which have been found to increase in blood following brain damage and in traumatic brain injuries, including SAH. However, current guidelines (NICE, 2022) for SAH state that brain biomarkers are not currently recommended by guidelines as part of the SAH diagnosis pathway.
- Conditions
- Subarachnoid Haemorrhage (SAH)
- Keywords
- Subarachnoid haemorrhage, Evaluation, SAH, Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein, Ubiquitin Carboxy-terminal Hydrolase L1, Cerebrospinal Fluid, Lumbar Puncture
- Medical subject headings
- Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Residual, surplus serum samples | The study will utilise residual, surplus serum samples with a minimum volume of 300µl that have already been taken as part of the patient's routine care. The patients have already been consented for investigation of SAH and the leftover sample would otherwise be discarded by the laboratory. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Measures of diagnostic accuracy including sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value and positive predictive value.
Metrics of diagnostic accuracy to include sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value and positive predictive value.
Measured: 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Sep 2024
- Study start16 Jan 2025
- Primary completion28 Apr 2025
- Study completion28 Apr 2025
Why it stopped: The study has been terminated as the team did not have the amount of positives they were expecting and the CI has got early employment at another Trust and will not be carrying on the project.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Subarachnoid Haemorrhage (SAH)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 144 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- The Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Leanne Young, Principal investigator, The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06581757
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2024LAB134
- Acronym
- SAH
- Status last verified
- Jun 2025
- First submitted
- 30 Aug 2024
- Last updated
- 15 Jun 2025
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Jun 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of the Predictive Value of Serum Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein and Ubiquitin Carboxy-terminal Hydrolase L1 for Subarachnoid Haemorrhage
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06581757
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SAH / 2024LAB134
- Conditions
- Subarachnoid Haemorrhage (SAH)
- Keywords
- Subarachnoid haemorrhage, Evaluation, SAH, Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein, Ubiquitin Carboxy-terminal Hydrolase L1, Cerebrospinal Fluid, Lumbar Puncture
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: The study has been terminated as the team did not have the amount of positives they were expecting and the CI has got early employment at another Trust and will not be carrying on the project.
- Enrolment
- 144 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- The Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS TrustOther government
- Study start
- 16 Jan 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 28 Apr 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 28 Apr 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 3 Sep 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To verify the analytical performance of GFAP and UCH-L1 biomarkers marketed by Abbott Diagnostics and to assess diagnostic accuracy of these biomarkers in predicting subarachnoid haemorrhage
Detailed description
Subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) refers to blood entering the subarachnoid space and may be due to aneurysmal or non-aneurysmal causes. Patients with SAH characteristically present with a sudden onset 'thunderclap' headache (Patel et al., 2021). This is an acute medical emergency and is the third most common type of stroke, with approximately 500,000 cases annually across the world (Claassen and Park, 2022). Morbidity has decreased over the past few decades, however, there is still an approximate 35% occurrence of death within three months of a SAH (Andersen et al., 2019). Early diagnosis is important to enable timely treatment and thereby improve prognosis. Current NICE guideline NG228 state the diagnosis of SAH is to be made from a non-contrast CT scan showing the presence of blood in the subarachnoid space. A negative CT done within 6 hours of symptom onset is considered not indicative of a SAH. If however, the CT is 'negative' and is performed more than 6 hours after onset of symptoms then a LP is advised to look for the presence of xanthochromia in the CSF (NICE, 2022).
Xanthochromia refers to the yellowing of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) due to accumulation of bilirubin from the breakdown of red blood cells in the subarachnoid space. Its presence, in the appropriate clinical context, confirms a diagnosis of SAH. In our population, approximately 10% of CSF xanthochromia tests confirm SAH, meaning 90% of LPs may not have been necessary. This test is reliable only if performed at least 12 hours after the onset of symptoms. The xanthochromia test is considered a manual test and requires trained and competent staff. There are multiple pre-analytical requirements in order to produce a reliable result. For example, the sample must be protected from light during transport and not transported by the air tube. Exposure to light can cause the bilirubin to breakdown which can then lead to a false negative result (Cruickshank et al., 2008). Samples transported in the pneumatic tube system may give false results due to the lysis of red cells.
Traumatic tap, in which the needle causes blood to enter the subarachnoid space, and which will then be present in the CSF sample can also cause interference as discolouration of the sample may mask xanthochromia. The least bloodstained CSF sample must therefore be used for analysis. Finally, an LP is an invasive procedure and is therefore an unpleasant experience for the patient (Long et al., 2017).
In summary, a test for SAH that is subject to fewer pre-analytical and analytical interferences would be superior to the current CSF xanthochromia test. Whilst it is not expected that a serum test could replace the need for CSF xanthochromia completely, a test that could identify which patients are likely to have negative LP could reduce the number of unnecessary LPs.
There are two candidate biomarkers - Ubiquitin C-terminal hydroxylase-L1 (UCH-L1) and Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP) - which have been found to increase in blood following brain damage and in traumatic brain injuries, including SAH. However, current guidelines (NICE, 2022) for SAH state that brain biomarkers are not currently recommended by guidelines as part of the SAH diagnosis pathway.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Residual, surplus serum samples | – | –The study will utilise residual, surplus serum samples with a minimum volume of 300µl that have already been taken as part of the patient's routine care. The patients have already been consented for investigation of SAH and the leftover sample would otherwise be discarded by the laboratory. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Adult patients presenting to hospitals covered by the black country pathology service (BCPS) who have had a lumbar puncture (LP) for the investigation of subarachnoid haemorrhage.
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients ≥18 years old, who have had an LP with a serum sample taken within 24 hours of the LP.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- -
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Measures of diagnostic accuracy including sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value and positive predictive value.
Time frame: 1 year
Metrics of diagnostic accuracy to include sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value and positive predictive value.
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: The study has been terminated as the team did not have the amount of positives they were expecting and the CI has got early employment at another Trust and will not be carrying on the project.). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Jun 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Subarachnoid Haemorrhage (SAH)
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
TicAgreLor Versus Placebo to Prevent Cerebral ISCHemia in anEuRysmal Low Grade SAH A Double Blinded Randomised Controlled Study
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, Aneurysmal, Brain Ischemia
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Continuous Assessment of Brain Blood Perfusion in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Patients Using Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS)
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, Aneurysmal
RecruitingObservational study
AI-based Algorithm Development for Improved Diagnostics in the Intensive Care and Acute Stroke Setting Using Electroencephalography
Hemorrhagic Stroke, Intracerebral, Subarachnoid Haemorrhage (SAH)
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Decompressive Craniectomy After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (DECIDE-SAH)
Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
RecruitingObservational study
Metabolomics in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Subarachnoid Haemorrhage (SAH), Delayed Cerebral Ischemia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Leanne Young principal investigator
The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Subarachnoid Haemorrhage (SAH), run by The Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Jun 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: The study has been terminated as the team did not have the amount of positives they were expecting and the CI has got early employment at another Trust and will not be carrying on the project.). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Measures of diagnostic accuracy including sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value and positive predictive value. (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Jun 2025.