Breast Cancer InvasiveNCT06583655
Precision Regional Node Irradiation for Sentinel Node-positive Breast Cancer
A study testing SLND(clinical low risk), SLND(clinical high risk, genomic low risk) and SLND alone ,clinical high risk and genomic high risk group in people with Breast Cancer Invasive, run by Ruijin Hospital at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
Axillary lymph node dissection has long been regarded as standard if treatment of the axilla is indicated for patients with a positive sentinel node. Although axillary lymph node dissection provides excellent regional control, it is associated with harmful side-effects. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Breast Cancer Invasive
- What is being tested?
- SLND(clinical low risk), SLND(clinical high risk, genomic low risk) and SLND alone ,clinical high risk and genomic high risk group
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 205 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 1 Oct 2024to 30 Apr 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- 1. Histologically confirmed invasive breast cancer; 2. Age between 18 and 80 years; 3. cN0 breast cancer underwent radical surgery combined with Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection (SLND) alone with SLND positive or SLND and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) with positive lymph node metastasis; 4. for SLND alone cohort, the regional lymph node irradiation area was determined according to the clinical risk model and genomic risk model assessment; 5. Ability to understand and willingness to participate the research and sign the consent form
Who cannot join
- • Pathologically positive ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph node
- Pathologically or radiologically confirmed involvement of ipsilateral internal mammary lymph nodes;
- Pregnant or lactating women;
- Insulin dependent diabetes;
- History of non-breast malignancy within 5 years with the exception of lobular carcinoma in situ, basal cell carcinoma of the skin, carcinoma in situ of skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix;
- patients have simultaneous contralateral breast cancer;
- clinical diagnosis of distant metastatic disease;
- Previous radiotherapy to the neck, chest and/or ipsilateral axillary region
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
China1 site
Ruijin hospital, Shanghai jiaotong university school of medicine
Shanghai, China, 200025
About this study
Official title: A Prospective Study of Individualized Regional Node Irradiation for Sentinel Node-positive Breast Cancer Without Axillary Dissection Based on Clinical and Genomic Risk Assessment
Axillary lymph node dissection has long been regarded as standard if treatment of the axilla is indicated for patients with a positive sentinel node. Although axillary lymph node dissection provides excellent regional control, it is associated with harmful side-effects. Since the publication of IBCSG23-01, ACOSOG Z0011 and AMAROS study, these studies indicated that there was no significant difference in recurrence and overall survival rates between the ALNB and SLNB+ALND followed by adjuvant radiotherapy. Therefore, an adaptation of the strategy to omit axillary lymph node dissection in patients with low-risk axillary involvement who are treated with curative surgery and systematic therapy. However, they also pose new challenges for adjuvant radiotherapy decisions. In the Z0011 study, patients were required to receive breast tangent field radiotherapy. In the AMAROS study, axillary radiotherapy included level I-III axillary lymph node drainage areas and the supraclavicular area, but the study results showed a local recurrence rate of only 1.19% at 5 years in the axillary radiotherapy group. Consequently, there is considerable controversy among clinical experts about whether a combined regional lymphatic drainage area radiotherapy strategy is necessary for low-burden sentinel lymph node metastasis breast cancer patients. In contrast, results from the EORTC-22922 and MA-20 studies, which included patients undergoing axillary lymph node dissection, showed that adjuvant radiotherapy to the entire lymphatic drainage area, including the internal mammary region, reduced the risk of disease-free survival and breast cancer-specific mortality. Therefore, the adjuvant radiotherapy strategy for early breast cancer patients with low-burden sentinel lymph node metastasis remains controversial, with a lack of high-level evidence to support it.
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer Invasive
- Being tested
- SLND(clinical low risk), SLND(clinical high risk, genomic low risk), SLND alone ,clinical high risk and genomic high risk group, Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection(SLND) + axillary lymph node dissection(ALND)
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SLND(clinical low risk)Radiation
treated with whole breast irradiation(WBI)alone 50Gy/25Fx + 10Gy/5Fx or 40Gy/15Fx + 10Gy/4Fx or no PMRT
SLND(clinical high risk, genomic low risk)Radiation
treated with whole breast irradiation(WBI)/Post-Mastectomy Adjuvant Radiotherapy(PMRT) + regional node irradiation (Axillary +supraclavicular radiotherapy),the radiation dose could be conventional radiation or hypo-fraction irradiation:50Gy/25Fx + 10Gy/5Fx or 40Gy/15Fx + 10Gy/4Fx
SLND alone ,clinical high risk and genomic high risk groupRadiation
treated with whole breast irradiation(WBI)/Post-Mastectomy Adjuvant Radiotherapy(PMRT) + regional node irradiation (Internal Mammary Node Irradiation+ axillary +supraclavicular radiotherapy),the radiation dose could be conventional radiation or hypo-fraction irradiation:50Gy/25Fx + 10Gy/5Fx or 40Gy/15Fx + 10Gy/4Fx
Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection(SLND) + axillary lymph node dissection(ALND)Radiation
treated with whole breast irradiation(WBI)/Post-Mastectomy Adjuvant Radiotherapy(PMRT) + regional node irradiation (Internal Mammary Node +supraclavicular radiotherapy),the radiation dose could be conventional radiation or hypo-fraction irradiation:50Gy/25Fx + 10Gy/5Fx or 40Gy/15Fx + 10Gy/4Fx
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection alone , clinical low risk group | Experimental | patients treated with surgery and Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection alone with positive lymph node metastasis. |
| Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection alone , clinical high risk but genomic low risk group | Experimental | patients treated with surgery and Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection alone with positive lymph node metastasis. |
| Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection alone ,clinical high risk and genomic high risk group | Experimental | patients treated with surgery and Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection alone with positive lymph node metastasis. |
| with Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection(SLND) + axillary lymph node dissection(ALND) | Active comparator | patients treated with surgery and Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection and ALND with positive lymph node metastasis. Receives: Radiation: Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection(SLND) + axillary lymph node dissection(ALND) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of patients with arm lymphedema
Incidence of ipsilateral arm lymphedema 1 year after the completion of adjuvant radiotherapy
Measured: 2 year
Secondary outcomes (2)
Disease free survival
Number of patients with an oncological event (local, regional and distant recurrence free survival)
Measured: 5 years
Overall survival
Number of patient alive after 5 years of follow up
Measured: 5-year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Sep 2024
- Study start1 Oct 2024
- Primary completion30 Dec 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Apr 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Breast Cancer InvasiveStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Ruijin HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 205 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ruijin Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, QIWEIXIANG, Ruijin Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06583655
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2024(50)
- Status last verified
- Aug 2026
- First submitted
- 1 Sep 2024
- Last updated
- 11 Aug 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Aug 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Prospective Study of Individualized Regional Node Irradiation for Sentinel Node-positive Breast Cancer Without Axillary Dissection Based on Clinical and Genomic Risk Assessment
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06583655
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2024(50)
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer Invasive
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 205 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Ruijin HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Oct 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Dec 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Apr 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 4 Sep 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Axillary lymph node dissection has long been regarded as standard if treatment of the axilla is indicated for patients with a positive sentinel node. Although axillary lymph node dissection provides excellent regional control, it is associated with harmful side-effects. Since the publication of IBCSG23-01, ACOSOG Z0011 and AMAROS study, these studies indicated that there was no significant difference in recurrence and overall survival rates between the ALNB and SLNB+ALND followed by adjuvant radiotherapy. Therefore, an adaptation of the strategy to omit axillary lymph node dissection in patients with low-risk axillary involvement who are treated with curative surgery and systematic therapy. However, they also pose new challenges for adjuvant radiotherapy decisions. In the Z0011 study, patients were required to receive breast tangent field radiotherapy. In the AMAROS study, axillary radiotherapy included level I-III axillary lymph node drainage areas and the supraclavicular area, but the study results showed a local recurrence rate of only 1.19% at 5 years in the axillary radiotherapy group. Consequently, there is considerable controversy among clinical experts about whether a combined regional lymphatic drainage area radiotherapy strategy is necessary for low-burden sentinel lymph node metastasis breast cancer patients. In contrast, results from the EORTC-22922 and MA-20 studies, which included patients undergoing axillary lymph node dissection, showed that adjuvant radiotherapy to the entire lymphatic drainage area, including the internal mammary region, reduced the risk of disease-free survival and breast cancer-specific mortality. Therefore, the adjuvant radiotherapy strategy for early breast cancer patients with low-burden sentinel lymph node metastasis remains controversial, with a lack of high-level evidence to support it.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection alone , clinical low risk group | Experimental | –patients treated with surgery and Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection alone with positive lymph node metastasis. |
| Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection alone , clinical high risk but genomic low risk group | Experimental | –patients treated with surgery and Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection alone with positive lymph node metastasis. |
| Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection alone ,clinical high risk and genomic high risk group | Experimental | –patients treated with surgery and Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection alone with positive lymph node metastasis. |
| with Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection(SLND) + axillary lymph node dissection(ALND) | Active comparator | Radiation: Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection(SLND) + axillary lymph node dissection(ALND)patients treated with surgery and Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection and ALND with positive lymph node metastasis. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- 1. Histologically confirmed invasive breast cancer; 2. Age between 18 and 80 years; 3. cN0 breast cancer underwent radical surgery combined with Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection (SLND) alone with SLND positive or SLND and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) with positive lymph node metastasis; 4. for SLND alone cohort, the regional lymph node irradiation area was determined according to the clinical risk model and genomic risk model assessment; 5. Ability to understand and willingness to participate the research and sign the consent form
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- • Pathologically positive ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph node
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SLND(clinical low risk)treated with whole breast irradiation(WBI)alone 50Gy/25Fx + 10Gy/5Fx or 40Gy/15Fx + 10Gy/4Fx or no PMRT | Radiation | – |
| SLND(clinical high risk, genomic low risk)treated with whole breast irradiation(WBI)/Post-Mastectomy Adjuvant Radiotherapy(PMRT) + regional node irradiation (Axillary +supraclavicular radiotherapy),the radiation dose could be conventional radiation or hypo-fraction irradiation:50Gy/25Fx + 10Gy/5Fx or 40Gy/15Fx + 10Gy/4Fx | Radiation | – |
| SLND alone ,clinical high risk and genomic high risk grouptreated with whole breast irradiation(WBI)/Post-Mastectomy Adjuvant Radiotherapy(PMRT) + regional node irradiation (Internal Mammary Node Irradiation+ axillary +supraclavicular radiotherapy),the radiation dose could be conventional radiation or hypo-fraction irradiation:50Gy/25Fx + 10Gy/5Fx or 40Gy/15Fx + 10Gy/4Fx | Radiation | – |
| Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection(SLND) + axillary lymph node dissection(ALND)treated with whole breast irradiation(WBI)/Post-Mastectomy Adjuvant Radiotherapy(PMRT) + regional node irradiation (Internal Mammary Node +supraclavicular radiotherapy),the radiation dose could be conventional radiation or hypo-fraction irradiation:50Gy/25Fx + 10Gy/5Fx or 40Gy/15Fx + 10Gy/4Fx | Radiation | with Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection(SLND) + axillary lymph node dissection(ALND) |
Primary outcome
Percentage of patients with arm lymphedema
Time frame: 2 year
Incidence of ipsilateral arm lymphedema 1 year after the completion of adjuvant radiotherapy
2 secondary outcomes
Disease free survival
Time frame: 5 years
Overall survival
Time frame: 5-year
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Aug 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Breast Cancer Invasive
RecruitingObservational study
Collecting Blood Samples From Patients With and Without Cancer to Evaluate Tests for Early Cancer Detection
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 1/2
[18F]FPyQCP PET Imaging of Fibroblast Activation Protein in Selected Oncology Indications
Colorectal Cancer, Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of 68Ga-FAPI Breast PET/MRI Scans in People With Breast Cancer
Breast Cancer, Invasive Breast Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Neoadjuvant Pyrotinib in HR-positive and HER2-low High-risk Early Breast Cancer
Breast Cancer Invasive, Hormone-receptor-positive Breast Cancer
Active, not recruiting
NearWave Optical Molecular Monitoring
Breast Cancer, HER2-positive Breast Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing SLND(clinical low risk), SLND(clinical high risk, genomic low risk) and SLND alone ,clinical high risk and genomic high risk group in people with Breast Cancer Invasive, run by Ruijin Hospital at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of patients with arm lymphedema (time frame: 2 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Aug 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 31 Oct 2026.