AzTrials
AzTrials

Lower Extremity FractureSvSNCT06586814

Suture Versus Staples for Wound Closure in Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery

A study testing Suture and Staple in people with Lower Extremity Fracture, run by University of Southern California at 1 site in United States.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This pilot study is designed to assess the feasibility of comparing skin closure methods - sutures versus staples - and subsequent rates of surgical site infection following open reduction and internal fixation surgery for orthopaedic trauma injuries. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Lower Extremity Fracture
What is being tested?
Suture and Staple
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
50 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
1 Aug 2024to 31 Dec 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adult Patients 18-80 years old
  • Tibial Pilon, Tibial Plateau Fractures, Patella Fractures, and Distal Femur Fractures
  • Incisions must be able to be approximated with subdermal sutures intraoperatively
  • English and Spanish speaking patients only

Who cannot join

  • Open fractures
  • Incarcerated patients
  • Pregnant patients
  • Patients who do not speak English or Spanish
  • History of infection at surgical incision site at the time of definitive fixation
  • Pre-existing skin condition associated with risk of infection (psoriasis, eczema)
  • Unable to obtain consent from patient prior to surgery or from legally authorized representative (LAR) prior to skin closure if the patient is unable to consent dur to their medical condition.
  • The absence of a subcutaneous closure during the index procedure

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of Southern California

    Los Angeles, California, 90033

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Randomized Study of Suture Versus Staples for Wound Closure in Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery

This pilot study is designed to assess the feasibility of comparing skin closure methods - sutures versus staples - and subsequent rates of surgical site infection following open reduction and internal fixation surgery for orthopaedic trauma injuries. The primary objectives are to determine if enrollment, randomization, and compliance are feasible and to refine data collection methods. Patients =18 years of age with closed fractures of the tibial plateau, tibial pilon, patella, and distal femur presenting within 3 weeks of injury undergoing definitive treatment of their fracture will be approached for participation. If enrolled, they will be randomized to having their surgical wound closed with either nylon sutures or metallic staples. Patient follow up will be standard of care besides answering PROMIS surveys.

Being tested
Suture, Staple

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • SutureOther

    Wound Closure

  • StapleOther

    Wound Closure

Study groups in NCT06586814
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
SutureOtherWound Closure
Receives: Other: Suture
StapleOtherWound Closure
Receives: Other: Staple

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Feasibility of participant enrollment

    • Hitting target enrollment in 12 months, enrolling 50% of eligible patients

    Measured: 12 Months

  2. Feasibility of randomization to each of the treatments

    • Rate of consent

    Measured: 6 Months

  3. Assess Protocol Compliance

    • Percentage of survey completion
    • Percentage of follow-up
    • Percentage of completed planned outcomes measures

    Measured: 6 Months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Sep 2024
  2. Study start1 Aug 2024
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2025
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
50 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06586814
Sponsor's protocol ID
HS-24-00012
Acronym
SvS
Status last verified
Mar 2026
First submitted
19 Jul 2024
Last updated
27 Mar 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Suture and Staple in people with Lower Extremity Fracture, run by University of Southern California at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Feasibility of participant enrollment (time frame: 12 Months). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Mar 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in