AzTrials
AzTrials

Periapical LesionsNCT06587048

Outcome of Bone Window Approach in Endodontic Microsurgery Using Novel Piezoelectric Device

A study testing periapical surgery in people with Periapical Lesions and Chronic Apical Periodontitis of Pulpal Origin, run by Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences Rohtak at 1 site in India.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The Bone window technique provides excellent access to the surgical site while preserving cortical bone in cases of tooth with large periapical lesion and an intact cortical plate. Traditionally, rotary burs and a bone chisel were used to create a bone window. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 60 years
What is being tested?
periapical surgery
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
40 participants
Where
1 siteIndia
Study dates
1 Sep 2023to 1 May 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 60 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • • Consenting adults (age range: 18-60 years)
  • Non-contributory medical history (ASA Class I or Class 2)
  • Participants with symptomatic/persistent apical periodontitis showing clinical signs and symptoms and evidence of periapical lesion of strictly endodontic origin with minimum lesion diameter of 5mm on periapical radiography (PR).
  • Radiographic evidence of an intact buccal cortical plate on cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) imaging with minimum thickness of 1mm.

Who cannot join

  • Patients with systemic diseases (diabetes mellitus, uncontrolled hypertension, hepatic/renal disease, or systemic bleeding disorders), pregnancy, smoking
  • Patients on anticoagulant/ antiplatelet drugs
  • Teeth that were unrestorable, fractured/perforated teeth,
  • Teeth with endodontic-periodontal communication and
  • Teeth with deep pockets (probing depth \>4 mm)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

sanjay tewari, MDS conservative dentistry 941 contact

9416259534

tewarisanjayrohtak@yahoo.co.in

India1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Post Graduate Institute of Dental Sciences

    Rohtak, Haryana, 124001

    Sanjay Tewari, MDS, 9416259534, tewarisanjayrohtak@yahoo.co.in

    keerthana G, MDS, 9789502701, keerthuguru94@gmail.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in India

About this study

Official title: Outcome of Bone Window Approach in Endodontic Microsurgery Using Novel Piezoelectric Device Versus Conventional Rotary Burs in the Treatment of Periapical Lesions - a Randomized Controlled Trial

The Bone window technique provides excellent access to the surgical site while preserving cortical bone in cases of tooth with large periapical lesion and an intact cortical plate. Traditionally, rotary burs and a bone chisel were used to create a bone window. Piezoelectric bone surgery, on the other hand, is an innovative technique that uses thin osteotomy instrument to selectively cut hard tissue while preserving soft tissues. To the best of our knowledge, no study comparing the results of a bone lid using a piezoelectric device and a conventional bur is currently available.

Read the detailed description

Endodontic microsurgery is the treatment option frequently opted to manage endodontically failed cases with persistent apical periodontitis, after nonsurgical root canal treatment (1,2). Contemporary surgical endodontic therapy using dental operating microscope enables a more precise technique with no or little bevel of root-end excision and retrograde canal preparation with an ultrasonic tip to a depth of 3-4 mm (3). The cumulative loss of cortical bone may further result in slowed or unsuccessful healing at the surgical site as a result of the disease process and/or the removal of cortical plates during a surgical procedure (4,5). According to the animal histologic sections, the cortical plate heals slowest, with a 70% healing rate at the 6-month follow-up. Von Arx et al reported that only 54.1% of patients demonstrated complete cortical plate healing at the end of one-year follow-up when assessed by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) (6). The degree of cortical plate loss and its limited capacity for regeneration may necessitate the use of regenerative methods involving graft materials.

A novel and minimally invasive procedure called the bone window approach to the apical region aims to preserve more bony structure and the structural integrity of the healthy cortical plate. The bone window also functions as autologous graft material, which has been recognized as the gold standard for regeneration without the need for additional substitute materials (7,8). For obtaining bone window, use of traditional burs in combination with chisels, reciprocating or oscillating saws and lasers have been reported in literature. Piezoelectric bone surgery is an innovative technology that has gained popularity in recent years. It makes use of thin osteotomy instruments that enable selective hard tissue cutting while safeguarding soft tissues (9). This technique is not only clinically effective, but histological and histomorphometric evidence of wound healing and bone formation in experimental animal models has shown that tissue response is better in piezo surgery than in conventional bone-cutting techniques such as diamond or carbide rotary instruments (10-12).

In cases of large periapical lesions where the buccal cortical plate is intact, the application of the piezoelectric device has recently been reported in case reports to create a bony window on buccal bone (13, 14). In a recent randomized trial (15), piezo surgery was compared to traditional microsurgery to assess haemorrhage control and patient postoperative quality of life. In a recent randomized trial (16) comparing bone lid technique over traditional technique in the surgical management of mandibular lesions, the bone lid technique using a piezoelectric device was found to be safe and effective for treating lesions in the posterior mandibular region and was associated with less postoperative complications. The bone lid approach has been used in the literature on oral and maxillofacial surgery for a number of procedures, including root-end surgery, cystic enucleation, impacted tooth extraction, implant explantation, and access to the maxillary sinus for the removal of cysts or foreign bodies. The review concluded that the included clinical studies were of low quality evidence, and that randomized clinical trials were necessary to compare the effectiveness of the bone lid technique to other methods. Furthermore, the best cutting tool for fashioning bone lids has not yet been identified (17).

The transition of endodontic diagnosis and treatment planning from two dimensions to three dimensions is facilitated by CBCT scanning, which also shows the location of anatomical structures in three dimensions, provides precise measurements in depth and length, and enhances localization of the periapical lesion (18, 19). Furthermore, CBCT imaging has high sensitivity to detect the presence of a bony defect in the cortical plate and precisely measure its thickness (20, 21, 22).

Being tested
periapical surgery
Keywords
endondontic microsurgery, piezoelectric device, piezoendodontic surgery, bone window

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • periapical surgeryProcedure or surgery

    In piezo group, the periapical surgery will be performed using piezoelectric device.

  • periapical surgeryProcedure or surgery

    In conventional bur group, the periapical surgery will be performed using rotary burs.

Study groups in NCT06587048
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Piezo groupExperimentalThe bone window osteotomy will be created with a piezoelectric device during endodontic microsurgery
Receives: Procedure: periapical surgery
conventional bur groupActive comparatorThe bone window osteotomy will be created with a conventional rotary burs in slow-speed handpiece during endodontic microsurgery
Receives: Procedure: periapical surgery

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. clinical assessment

    All patients will undergo surgical evaluation 24 h, 48h, 72 h, one week, six months and 12 months after the surgery. Postsurgical pain was measured using the VAS scale.

    Measured: 1 year after surgery

  2. Radiographic outcome

    CBCT will be performed 12 months postoperatively, and the findings will be compared with preoperative CBCT findings to assess the bone defect fill and cortical plate formation using modified PENN 3D criteria and RAC index

    Measured: 1 year after surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Sep 2024
  2. Study start1 Sep 2023
  3. Primary completion31 Oct 2024 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 May 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
40 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06587048
Sponsor's protocol ID
keerthana
Status last verified
Sep 2024
First submitted
4 Sep 2024
Last updated
19 Sep 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing periapical surgery in people with Periapical Lesions and Chronic Apical Periodontitis of Pulpal Origin, run by Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences Rohtak at 1 site in India.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Sep 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in India. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact sanjay tewari, MDS conservative dentistry 941 (9416259534, tewarisanjayrohtak@yahoo.co.in), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

clinical assessment (time frame: 1 year after surgery). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Sep 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in