AnalgesiaNCT06588751
Effects of SCALP Block on Postoperative Analgesia in Craniotomy Surgery
A study testing Scalp block in people with Analgesia, run by Konya City Hospital at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
Patients undergoing craniotomy surgery often experience severe postoperative pain. This pain can affect the patient's hemodynamics, disrupt sleep patterns, and prolong hospital stays. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Analgesia
- What is being tested?
- Scalp block
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 7 Oct 2024to 11 Nov 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- 18-65 years
- General anesthesia
- American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-III
Who cannot join
- Contraindications to regional anesthesia
- Coagulation disorders
- Known allergy to local anesthetics
- Infections at the block site
- Pregnant patients
- Emergency cases
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Effects of SCALP Block on Postoperative Analgesia in Craniotomy Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled, Double-Blind Study
Patients undergoing craniotomy surgery often experience severe postoperative pain. This pain can affect the patient's hemodynamics, disrupt sleep patterns, and prolong hospital stays. Sudden increases in heart rate and blood pressure due to pain may lead to elevated intracranial pressure in patients, potentially causing morbidity and mortality. Opioids are commonly used to mitigate hemodynamic fluctuations and reduce postoperative pain; however, they may delay recovery, contribute to excessive sedation, and affect postoperative neurological examinations. Additionally, opioids have adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, and respiratory depression. Alleviating hemodynamic instability and postoperative pain are critical concerns for neuro anesthesiologists. Regional analgesia techniques are employed in neurosurgery patients because they minimize anesthesia requirements, alleviate pain, and allow for neurological assessment with a lower incidence of systemic complications.The scalp block was developed due to its potential benefits as an effective regional anesthesia technique that supports the advancement of delicate brain surgeries such as functional and microsurgeries.
Read the detailed description
In this study, we hypothesize that patients who receive a SCALP block will have lower postoperative Numerical Rating Scale scores and consume less total analgesia.
Our primary objective is to evaluate postoperative numerical rating scale scores in patients undergoing craniotomy surgery with a SCALP block.
Our secondary objectives are to assess the total amount of rescue analgesia consumed, the time to first rescue analgesia, patient satisfaction, and any possible complications. The study was planned as a prospective, randomized, controlled, double blind. At each clinic, an anesthesiologist randomly allocated patients to two significant groups using numbered opaque sealed envelopes: Group S (patients receiving SCALP block) and Group C (patients getting just multimodal analgesia). The anesthesiologists responsible for the randomization process were not involved in any other sections of the trial, and the individuals executing the SCALP blocks procedure were not engaged in other areas of the research. Additionally, the researcher who intervened, the participants, and the analyzer were blinded to the details of the study. After the surgery, two different anesthesia technicians recorded the primary and secondary results of the study.
- Conditions
- Analgesia
- Being tested
- Scalp block
- Medical subject headings
- Agnosia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Scalp blockOther
After the surgical procedure, patients in Group S were placed in a semi-sitting position. Following skin antisepsis with 5% povidone-iodine, a sterile drape was applied. A circumferential scalp block with 2 cc of 0.25% bupivacaine was done on each of the supraorbital, supratrochlear, zygomaticotemporal, auriculotemporal, greater occipital, and lesser occipital nerves that supply the forehead and scalp with sensory information. The procedure was performed bilaterally. The supratrochlear and supraorbital nerves were blocked at the brow, close to the upper middle edge orbit, and over the supraorbital notch that could be felt. The zygomaticotemporal nerve was blocked between the posterior edge of the zygomatic arch. The auriculotemporal nerve was blocked at the level of the tragus. The greater and lesser occipital nerves were blocked at the medial and lateral thirds of the superior nuchal line.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| control group | Active comparator | After the surgery was completed, each patient received 3 mg of morphine IV and 8 mg of dexamethasone IV. Upon transfer to the intensive care unit, patients were administered 1 g of paracetamol IV three times a day and 20 mg of tenoxicam IV twice daily. Receives: Other: Scalp block |
| scalp block | Other | After the surgical procedure, patients in Group S were placed in a semi-sitting position. Following skin antisepsis with 5% povidone-iodine, a sterile drape was applied. A circumferential scalp block with 2 cc of 0.25% bupivacaine was done on each of the supraorbital, supratrochlear, zygomaticotemporal, auriculotemporal, greater occipital, and lesser occipital nerves that supply the forehead and scalp with sensory information. The procedure was performed bilaterally. The supratrochlear and supraorbital nerves were blocked at the brow, close to the upper middle edge orbit, and over the supraorbital notch that could be felt. The zygomaticotemporal nerve was blocked between the posterior edge of the zygomatic arch. The auriculotemporal nerve was blocked at the level of the tragus. The greater and lesser occipital nerves were blocked at the medial and lateral thirds of the superior nuchal line. Receives: Other: Scalp block |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Scalp
Our primary objective is to evaluate postoperative numerical rating scale scores in patients undergoing craniotomy surgery with a SCALP block. (Numerical rating scale score 0-10 point. 0= Very Bad, 10= Very Good
Measured: One day
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Sep 2024
- Study start7 Oct 2024
- Primary completion11 Nov 2024
- Study completion11 Nov 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for AnalgesiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- After the surgical procedure, patients in Group S were placed in a semi-sitting position. Following skin antisepsis with 5% povidone-iodine, a sterile drape was applied. A circumferential scalp block with 2 cc of 0.25% bupivacaine was done on each of the supraorbital, supratrochlear, zygomaticotemporal, auriculotemporal, greater occipital, and lesser occipital nerves that supply the forehead and scalp with sensory information. The procedure was performed bilaterally. The supratrochlear and supraorbital nerves were blocked at the brow, close to the upper middle edge orbit, and over the supraorbital notch that could be felt. The zygomaticotemporal nerve was blocked between the posterior edge of the zygomatic arch. The auriculotemporal nerve was blocked at the level of the tragus. The greater and lesser occipital nerves were blocked at the medial and lateral thirds of the superior nuchal line.
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Konya City Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Muhammed Halit Satici, Konya City Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06588751
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- scalp
- Status last verified
- Nov 2024
- First submitted
- 7 Sep 2024
- Last updated
- 12 Nov 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Nov 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effects of SCALP Block on Postoperative Analgesia in Craniotomy Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled, Double-Blind Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06588751
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- scalp
- Conditions
- Analgesia
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Konya City HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 7 Oct 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 11 Nov 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 11 Nov 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Sep 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Patients undergoing craniotomy surgery often experience severe postoperative pain. This pain can affect the patient's hemodynamics, disrupt sleep patterns, and prolong hospital stays. Sudden increases in heart rate and blood pressure due to pain may lead to elevated intracranial pressure in patients, potentially causing morbidity and mortality. Opioids are commonly used to mitigate hemodynamic fluctuations and reduce postoperative pain; however, they may delay recovery, contribute to excessive sedation, and affect postoperative neurological examinations. Additionally, opioids have adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, and respiratory depression. Alleviating hemodynamic instability and postoperative pain are critical concerns for neuro anesthesiologists. Regional analgesia techniques are employed in neurosurgery patients because they minimize anesthesia requirements, alleviate pain, and allow for neurological assessment with a lower incidence of systemic complications.The scalp block was developed due to its potential benefits as an effective regional anesthesia technique that supports the advancement of delicate brain surgeries such as functional and microsurgeries.
Detailed description
In this study, we hypothesize that patients who receive a SCALP block will have lower postoperative Numerical Rating Scale scores and consume less total analgesia.
Our primary objective is to evaluate postoperative numerical rating scale scores in patients undergoing craniotomy surgery with a SCALP block.
Our secondary objectives are to assess the total amount of rescue analgesia consumed, the time to first rescue analgesia, patient satisfaction, and any possible complications. The study was planned as a prospective, randomized, controlled, double blind. At each clinic, an anesthesiologist randomly allocated patients to two significant groups using numbered opaque sealed envelopes: Group S (patients receiving SCALP block) and Group C (patients getting just multimodal analgesia). The anesthesiologists responsible for the randomization process were not involved in any other sections of the trial, and the individuals executing the SCALP blocks procedure were not engaged in other areas of the research. Additionally, the researcher who intervened, the participants, and the analyzer were blinded to the details of the study. After the surgery, two different anesthesia technicians recorded the primary and secondary results of the study.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- After the surgical procedure, patients in Group S were placed in a semi-sitting position. Following skin antisepsis with 5% povidone-iodine, a sterile drape was applied. A circumferential scalp block with 2 cc of 0.25% bupivacaine was done on each of the supraorbital, supratrochlear, zygomaticotemporal, auriculotemporal, greater occipital, and lesser occipital nerves that supply the forehead and scalp with sensory information. The procedure was performed bilaterally. The supratrochlear and supraorbital nerves were blocked at the brow, close to the upper middle edge orbit, and over the supraorbital notch that could be felt. The zygomaticotemporal nerve was blocked between the posterior edge of the zygomatic arch. The auriculotemporal nerve was blocked at the level of the tragus. The greater and lesser occipital nerves were blocked at the medial and lateral thirds of the superior nuchal line.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| control group | Active comparator | Other: Scalp blockAfter the surgery was completed, each patient received 3 mg of morphine IV and 8 mg of dexamethasone IV. Upon transfer to the intensive care unit, patients were administered 1 g of paracetamol IV three times a day and 20 mg of tenoxicam IV twice daily. |
| scalp block | Other | Other: Scalp blockAfter the surgical procedure, patients in Group S were placed in a semi-sitting position. Following skin antisepsis with 5% povidone-iodine, a sterile drape was applied. A circumferential scalp block with 2 cc of 0.25% bupivacaine was done on each of the supraorbital, supratrochlear, zygomaticotemporal, auriculotemporal, greater occipital, and lesser occipital nerves that supply the forehead and scalp with sensory information. The procedure was performed bilaterally. The supratrochlear and supraorbital nerves were blocked at the brow, close to the upper middle edge orbit, and over the supraorbital notch that could be felt. The zygomaticotemporal nerve was blocked between the posterior edge of the zygomatic arch. The auriculotemporal nerve was blocked at the level of the tragus. The greater and lesser occipital nerves were blocked at the medial and lateral thirds of the superior nuchal line. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- 18-65 years
- General anesthesia
- American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-III
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Contraindications to regional anesthesia
- Coagulation disorders
- Known allergy to local anesthetics
- Infections at the block site
- Pregnant patients
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Scalp blockAfter the surgical procedure, patients in Group S were placed in a semi-sitting position. Following skin antisepsis with 5% povidone-iodine, a sterile drape was applied. A circumferential scalp block with 2 cc of 0.25% bupivacaine was done on each of the supraorbital, supratrochlear, zygomaticotemporal, auriculotemporal, greater occipital, and lesser occipital nerves that supply the forehead and scalp with sensory information. The procedure was performed bilaterally. The supratrochlear and supraorbital nerves were blocked at the brow, close to the upper middle edge orbit, and over the supraorbital notch that could be felt. The zygomaticotemporal nerve was blocked between the posterior edge of the zygomatic arch. The auriculotemporal nerve was blocked at the level of the tragus. The greater and lesser occipital nerves were blocked at the medial and lateral thirds of the superior nuchal line. | Other | control group, scalp block |
Primary outcome
Scalp
Time frame: One day
Our primary objective is to evaluate postoperative numerical rating scale scores in patients undergoing craniotomy surgery with a SCALP block. (Numerical rating scale score 0-10 point. 0= Very Bad, 10= Very Good
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Nov 2024.
Related trials for Analgesia
RecruitingPhase 4
ESP Blocks for Posterior Spinal Fusion
Postoperative Pain
Not yet recruiting
Comparing Non-Medicine Strategies for Improving Low Back Pain
Chronic Low-back Pain (cLBP), High-Impact Chronic Pain (HICP)
Active, not recruiting
Efficacy of Laparoscopic-Assisted TAP Block in Laparoscopic Appendectomy
Appendectomy, Laparoscopic, Blockades Neuromuscular
Recruiting
SIRI Levels Following PENG Block in Pediatric Hip Surgery
Hip Dysplasia
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
A Clinical Trial of MK-6916 in Participants With Pain After Bunion Removal Surgery (MK-6916-007)
Pain Management
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Scalp block in people with Analgesia, run by Konya City Hospital at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Nov 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Scalp (time frame: One day). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Nov 2024.