Parkinson DiseaseCAPARENCT06590987
Cueing-assisted Gamified Augmented-reality Gait-and-balance Rehabilitation at Home for People With Parkinson's Disease
A study testing Strolll AR in people with Parkinson Disease, run by VU University of Amsterdam at 1 site in Netherlands.
Trial summary
Background: Physiotherapy in the clinic is highly recommended for improving gait, balance and falls risk in people with Parkinson's disease. In addition, technology may help boost unsupervised exercise hours at home. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 21 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Parkinson Disease
- What is being tested?
- Strolll AR
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 1 siteNetherlands
- Study dates
- 18 Apr 2024to 27 Feb 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 21 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
To be eligible to participate, a person must meet the following criteria:
- 21 years or older
- have command of the Dutch language
- diagnosed with Parkinson's disease according to the UK Parkinson's Disease Brain Bank criteria (stages 1-3 on the Hoehn and Yahr scale)
- bothersome gait or balance impairments (i.e., negatively affecting their ability to perform their usual daily activities as indicated by the person with Parkinson's disease and/or their therapist).
A potential participant who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation:
- inability to comply with the protocol, i.e. additional neurological diseases and/or orthopedic problems seriously interfering with gait function
- insufficient physical capacity to safely perform the intervention (e.g., frequent faller) or severe cognitive impairments (as observed by the therapist)
- visual or hearing impairments (after corrective aids)
- inability to walk independently for 30 minutes (in bouts of 5-10 minutes)
- severe visual hallucinations or illusions
- no stable dosage of medication.
Finally, in case potential participants are susceptible to hallucinations, have a history of seizures, have deep brain stimulation, or a pacemaker, it should be discussed with their therapist if they can participate, as per Strolll's Instructions For Use (DOC-IFU-00021 (NL), Revision 01, Date of Issue 06 2024).
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Cueing-assisted Gamified Augmented-reality Gait-and-balance Rehabilitation at Home for People With Parkinson's Disease: Protocol of a Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial Implemented in the Clinical Pathway
Background: Physiotherapy in the clinic is highly recommended for improving gait, balance and falls risk in people with Parkinson's disease. In addition, technology may help boost unsupervised exercise hours at home. Strolll is an augmented-reality (AR) neurorehabilitation platform for delivering gait-and-balance exercises onto AR glasses that can be performed under direct supervision of the therapist in the clinic, but also independently at home. Strolll AR also has the option to integrate AR cueing in gait-and-balance exercises to assist people with more severe mobility impairments in performing the exercises. The objective of this pragmatic randomized controlled trial (RCT) on Strolll AR is to examine its clinical feasibility and effectiveness for improving indicators of gait, balance and falls risk. A secondary objective is to evaluate procedures for tailoring assistive AR cues.
Methods: 80-100 people with Parkinson's disease (Hoehn and Yahr stages 1-3) with gait and/or balance impairments will participate in this study. This study is a pragmatic RCT in which all participants follow the same procedure. After a baseline assessment (T0), participants will start with a 6-week usual care control period, followed by a midterm assessment (T1). Subsequently, participants will undergo two weeks of in-clinic familiarization with Strolll AR. Then, participants will start with the 6-week Strolll AR intervention at home, followed by a final in-clinic assessment (T2). The primary study parameters are feasibility (i.e., safety, adherence, performance and user experience) and effectiveness for improving indicators of gait, balance and falls risk. For the statistical analyses on effectiveness, participants will be allocated to control (using T0-T1 change data) or intervention (using T1-T2 change data) groups using multiple (n=20) randomizations. Recruitment started in May 2024 and the last T2 assessment is expected in January 2025.
Discussion: The design of this particular pragmatic RCT will demonstrate feasibility and effectiveness in a real-world setting and in a representative population. Strolll AR may facilitate the transition from supervised care in the clinic to independent care at home, providing a platform for delivering individualized treatment, assisted with AR cues when deemed beneficial, for improving gait, balance and falls risk in people with Parkinson's disease.
Read the detailed description
Study design This study is a fully blinded two-armed pragmatic RCT, which will be executed in the Netherlands implemented at multiple physical or exercise therapy clinics. The study consists of three in-clinic assessments performed by the participant's own therapist. After a baseline assessment (T0), participants will start with a 6-week usual care control period, followed by a midterm assessment (T1). Subsequently, participants will undergo two weeks of in-clinic familiarization with Strolll AR supervised by their therapist. Then, participants will start with the 6-week Strolll AR intervention at home integrated with usual care, followed by the final in-clinic assessment (T2).
The definition of a pragmatic RCT is that the intervention is tested in a real-world population in a real-world setting (i.e., the clinic), with an appropriate comparison arm (i.e., usual care alone in the current study) and relevant outcomes to determine its effectiveness. Special trial designs can be considered. In this particular pragmatic RCT all participants follow the same T0-control-T1-intervention-T2 procedure, suitable for both between-groups and within-subjects comparisons of the Strolll AR intervention effects as well as for evaluating its clinical feasibility. With regard to the between-groups comparison, participants will be allocated to control (using T0-T1 change data) or intervention (using T1-T2 change data) groups using multiple (n=20) two-armed randomizations. The randomization will be predefined by an independent person using a Matlab script, locked with a date and timestamp, and kept concealed from participants, therapists and researchers. After the final T2 assessment of the last participant, the 20 randomizations of participants over control and intervention groups will be revealed to the researchers and applied in the data analysis. Participants, therapists, and researchers will therefore all be blind to group allocation during the study. This design, in which all participants receive the Strolll AR intervention, also allows for a complementary within-subjects evaluation of the intervention effect (i.e., being less susceptible to between-subjects variation than aforementioned between-groups evaluation), whilst at the same time providing ample information on the clinical feasibility of the Strolll AR platform implemented in the clinical pathway in terms of its safety, adherence, performance and user experience (i.e., from both participants' and therapists' perspectives). Moreover, a design with the same procedure for all participants makes implementation of this study in the clinical pathway easier (hence the term pragmatic RCT) and potentially reduces drop-out rate because no participants are withheld from receiving the intervention due to the randomization.
Procedure and outcomes After enrollment, the study consists of three in-clinic assessments spread out over 14 weeks, demarcating a usual-care control period and a Strolll AR intervention period. Below we describe the procedure for each of these parts of the design.
Participant enrollment: enrollment and informed consent The therapist will inform eligible participants about the study. If people are interested, they will receive a flyer with instructions on how to send their contact details to the researchers. Upon receival of contact details of a potential participant, the researcher will call this person to provide more information about the study. Hereafter, potential participants will receive the participant information letter by mail or email. A week after receiving the participant information letter, the researcher will again call the potential participant to answer any questions and to ask if he or she wants to participate. If so, in- and exclusion criteria will be checked by the researcher (to the extent possible, otherwise criteria will be evaluated during the baseline assessment session T0). Furthermore, the potential participant will be informed that the medication should remain stable during the study. If the potential participant is eligible, he or she will be asked to sign the informed consent form, after which the researcher also signs the informed consent form and notifies the therapist that the person can start with the pragmatic RCT. Written informed consent must be given before commencing with the baseline assessment (T0).
Baseline assessment (T0): characterization and effectiveness The baseline assessment serves to characterize the study sample and to provide baseline values for evaluating the effectiveness of Strolll AR. Study parameters used to characterize the participants are demographics (i.e., age, gender, disease duration) and current medication use (i.e., the Levodopa Equivalent Daily Dose [LEDD]). Questionnaires to describe the participant population are the Montreal Cognitive Assessment [MoCA], Movement Disorders Society Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale [MDS-UPDRS], New Freezing of Gait Questionnaire [NFOGQ], Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly [PASE], Cumulative Illness Rating Scale [CIRS], and 12-month falls history. All these outcomes will be collected using online questionnaires, except for the MoCA and MDS-UPDRS part Ia, III and IV, which will be administered in the clinic by the therapist. To be able to evaluate the potential effects of Strolll AR for improving indicators of gait, balance and falls risk, the following standard clinical tests will be administered by the therapists: Timed Up-and-Go test (TUG), Five Times Sit-to-Stand test (FTSTS), 10-meter walk test (10MWT) and Mini Balance Evaluation Scale Test (Mini-BESTest). In addition, participants will fill out the Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I).
Usual care (6-weeks) During the usual-care control period, participants will not receive any additional training or instructions related to the Strolll AR intervention.
Midterm assessment (T1): effectiveness For the midterm assessment, the standard clinical tests of gait, balance and falls-risk indicators (TUG, FTSTS, 10MWT, Mini-BESTest) will again be administered by the therapist. In addition, the participants are asked to fill out the FES-I and 6-week falls history (to assess falls during the usual-care period) questionnaires at home.
Practice with Strolll AR intervention supervised in clinic (2 weeks) To make the participant familiar with the Strolll AR platform technology and procedures and to allow the therapist to evaluate safety aspects, the Strolll AR intervention starts with 1 to 3 supervised in-clinic sessions of (cueing-assisted) personalized AR exercises.
In these supervised sessions in the clinic, the therapist will also test and validate procedures to select and tailor effective assistive AR cues from a library of different AR cues. This is needed for two reasons: 1) to test the premise that a one-size-fits-all cue does not exist as there is heterogeneity in effect of cues among participants, 2) to ensure that the Strolll AR gait-and-balance exercises can be effectively assisted with personalized cues for those who need it (e.g., people experiencing freezing of gait or people with small steps and shuffling gait). The so-obtained best cues for supporting gait, as evaluated subjectively using both the participant's experience and the therapist's impression, will be used during the remainder of the Strolll AR intervention for those who are deemed to benefit from it. We will document if AR cues are added to Strolll AR gait-and-balance exercises, and when applicable, specify the type of AR cues as well as their personalized parameters (intercue distance, height, width, audiofeedback, et cetera).
To deliver the Strolll AR intervention, participants in this study will by default be equipped with Magic Leap 2 AR glasses for its unmatched vertical AR field of view. Special insert lenses from a complementary lens kit (supports 8 prescriptions from -2.0 to +3.0) made available at each clinical site will be used to correct vision for people wearing spectacles. In case vision cannot be corrected with these insert lenses (e.g., due to a special prescription not part of the lens kit), either tailored insert lenses will be ordered for Magic Leap 2 or Microsoft HoloLens 2 with a slightly smaller vertical AR field of view will be used which can be worn over spectacles to deliver the intervention.
Once the participant is deemed sufficiently capable of using the Strolll AR platform technology independently at home in a safe manner (after training in the clinic with the therapist for one to maximally three sessions of 1 hour in two weeks), the participant will take the AR glasses home together with a complementary SIM-card equipped WiFi router to continue the Strolll AR intervention independently at home. If the Strolll AR intervention at home is not deemed safe or suitable by the therapist, the intervention will stop and the reason for this will be documented by the therapist as part of the clinical feasibility evaluation.
Training with Strolll AR intervention independently at home (6 weeks) The Strolll AR intervention, integrated with usual care, comprises of a 6-week home-based individualized AR gait-and-balance exercise program assisted with tailored AR cues when deemed beneficial. The AR exercises are designed to train aspects associated with gait, balance and falls risk in a gamified manner to maximize training compliance. Strolll AR comprises seven AR exercises, namely Basketballl, Smash!, Mole Patrolll, Hot Buttons, Puzzle Walk, Wobbly Waiter and Cue Challenge, intended to improve gait, balance and falls risk in people with Parkinson's disease. Exercises that require walking have optional complementary AR cueing (Smash!, Cue Challenge), integrated cueing (speed cue in Wobbly Waiter) or AR-mediated goal-directedness (the moles in Mole Patrolll, the puzzle pieces in Puzzle Walk), to various degrees enabling and assisting people with more severe mobility impairments to participate. For each AR exercise, feedback of performance in terms of game-play performance metrics and functional performance metrics are given during the exercises. For Basketballl, for example, metrics associated with the number of balls thrown in the basket (game-play performance) and the number of sit-to-stands or squats made (functional performance) are given, derived from AR glasses data.
Participants will be invited by their therapist to use Strolll AR minimally 5 times a week for 30 active minutes per day, resulting in the recommended 150 minutes per week. They can perform the exercises anytime during the day, in one bout or in multiple chunks during the day, with complementary AR cueing when deemed beneficial. The precise exercises, exercise duration, difficulty level and order will be prescribed by the therapist via the Strolll web portal. This will be evaluated and adjusted on a weekly basis in telephone calls, e-consults or during an onsite therapy session using information of the participant in combination with the feedback from exercises that are reported in the Strolll web portal, such as adherence and game-play and functional performance metrics. Adherence will be defined as the percentage of performed over prescribed gait-and-balance exercises (i.e., both frequency and session-duration adherence). The data on game-play level and performance will be used to evaluate whether the exercise program was both progressive (increase in level) and achievable (consistently high game-play performance scores) as intended. The weekly contact moments with the therapist will also be used to ask if participants experienced any adverse events (safety flags). Specifically, safety will be evaluated as the number of adverse events due to the Strolll AR intervention, such as falls, dizziness, eye strain and headache. Potential technical issues will be documented by the researcher, who will be available to provide technical support during the study based on email or telephone contacts with the participants.
Final assessment (T2): effectiveness and clinical feasibility To be able to evaluate the effectiveness of the Strolll AR intervention, the therapist will again administer standard clinical tests of gait, balance and falls risk (TUG, FTSTS, 10MWT, Mini-BESTest). Participants will fill out the FES-I questionnaire together with the researcher during a telephone call.
Clinical feasibility of the Strolll AR platform according to the participants will be assessed in terms of user experience (i.e., the User Experience Questionnaire [UEQ]), technology acceptance and use (i.e., Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology informed questions), top-3 barriers and facilitators of Strolll AR, and intervention-specific questions regarding Strolll AR, including cueing if used during the intervention (see the Supplementary Material for the Strolll AR evaluation questionnaire). Participants will also report their falls history during the intervention period. The questionnaires of the final assessment are completed through a telephone call with the participant to ensure comprehensibility, which was first assessed in think-aloud sessions with a number of participants. In light of the potential future implementation in the clinical pathway, therapists will also be asked about their experience with Strolll AR through a purpose-made questionnaire, including a top-3 barriers and facilitators (assessed before training their first participants and after training their last participant) and the UEQ (assessed after training their last participant). Furthermore, a focus group with the therapist will be organized after the study for an in-depth evaluation of the top-3 barriers and facilitators.
- Conditions
- Parkinson Disease
- Being tested
- Strolll AR
- Medical subject headings
- Parkinson Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Strolll ARDevice
Strolll AR is an augmented-reality (AR) neurorehabilitation platform for delivering gait and balance exercises (assisted with cues when deemed beneficial) for Parkinson's disease onto state-of-the-art AR glasses.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Usual care | No intervention | After a baseline assessment of standard clinical tests, participants will start with a 6-week usual care control period. After 6 weeks, participants undergo the midterm assessments. |
| Strolll AR | Experimental | After 6 weeks, participants undergo the midterm assessments. Then, participants will start with the 8-week Strolll AR intervention (i.e., 2 weeks of practice supervised in the clinic and 6 weeks of training independently at home) and will receive a final assessment hereafter. Receives: Device: Strolll AR |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Timed Up-and-Go test (s)
Evaluating the effectiveness of Strolll AR
Measured: Change between baseline, midterm and final assessment (over a period of 14 weeks, which includes 6 weeks usual care and an 8-week Strolll AR intervention [clinic and home])
Secondary outcomes (9)
10-meter walk test (s)
Evaluating the effectiveness of Strolll AR
Measured: Change between baseline, midterm and final assessment (over a period of 14 weeks, which includes 6 weeks usual care and an 8-week Strolll AR intervention [clinic and home])
Five Times Sit to Stand Test (s)
Evaluating the effectiveness of Strolll AR
Measured: Change between baseline, midterm and final assessment (over a period of 14 weeks, which includes 6 weeks usual care and an 8-week Strolll AR intervention [clinic and home])
Mini Balance Evaluation Systems Test
Evaluating the effectiveness of Strolll AR. Higher scores mean a better outcome [0 28])
Measured: Change between baseline, midterm and final assessment (over a period of 14 weeks, which includes 6 weeks usual care and an 8-week Strolll AR intervention [clinic and home])
Falls Efficacy Scale International
Evaluating the effectiveness of Strolll AR. Higher scores mean a worse outcome [14 56])
Measured: Change between baseline, midterm and final assessment (over a period of 14 weeks, which includes 6 weeks usual care and an 8-week Strolll AR intervention [clinic and home])
Safety (i.e. number of adverse events due to Strolll AR)
Evaluating the clinical feasibility of Strolll AR
Measured: During the 8-week Strolll AR intervention
Adherence (i.e., percentage of performed over prescribed gait-and-balance exercises)
Evaluating the clinical feasibility of Strolll AR
Measured: During the 8-week Strolll AR intervention
Performance (i.e., the score per game)
Evaluating the clinical feasibility of Strolll AR
Measured: During the 8-week Strolll AR intervention
Strolll AR evaluation questionnaire
Evaluating the clinical feasibility of Strolll AR in terms of technology acceptance and use, top-3 barriers and facilitators of Strolll AR, and intervention-specific questions regarding Strolll AR, including cueing if used during the intervention
Measured: Final assessment, week 14
User Experience questionnaire
Evaluating the clinical feasibility of Strolll AR. Higher scores mean a better outcome [-78 78])
Measured: Final assessment, week 14
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Sep 2024
- Study start18 Apr 2024
- Primary completion21 Feb 2025
- Study completion27 Feb 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Parkinson DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Fully blinded two-armed pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT). In this particular pragmatic RCT all participants follow the same T0-control-T1-intervention-T2 procedure, suitable for both between-groups and within-subjects comparisons of the Strolll AR intervention effects as well as for evaluating its clinical feasibility. With regard to the between-groups comparison, participants will be allocated to control (using T0-T1 change data) or intervention (using T1-T2 change data) groups using multiple (n=20) two-armed randomizations. The randomization will be predefined by an independent person using a Matlab script, locked with a date and timestamp, and kept concealed from participants, therapists and researchers. After the final T2 assessment of the last participant, the 20 randomizations of participants over control and intervention groups will be revealed to the researchers and applied in the data analysis.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- VU University of Amsterdam
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, dr. Daphne J. Geerse, VU University of Amsterdam
- Investigators
- Melvyn Roerdink, PhD, Principal investigator, Department of Human Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06590987
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NL86191.100.24
- Acronym
- CAPARE
- Status last verified
- Apr 2025
- First submitted
- 5 Feb 2024
- Last updated
- 6 Apr 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Geerse DJ, Coolen B, Roerdink M. Quantifying Spatiotemporal Gait Parameters with HoloLens in Healthy Adults and People with Parkinson's Disease: Test-Retest Reliability, Concurrent Validity, and Face Validity. Sensors (Basel). 2020 Jun 5;20(11):3216. doi: 10.3390/s20113216.
PubMed 32517076Geerse DJ, Coolen B, van Hilten JJ, Roerdink M. Holocue: A Wearable Holographic Cueing Application for Alleviating Freezing of Gait in Parkinson's Disease. Front Neurol. 2022 Jan 10;12:628388. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.628388. eCollection 2021.
PubMed 35082741Lim LI, van Wegen EE, de Goede CJ, Jones D, Rochester L, Hetherington V, Nieuwboer A, Willems AM, Kwakkel G. Measuring gait and gait-related activities in Parkinson's patients own home environment: a reliability, responsiveness and feasibility study. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2005 Jan;11(1):19-24. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2004.06.003.
PubMed 15619458McAuley JH, Daly PM, Curtis CR. A preliminary investigation of a novel design of visual cue glasses that aid gait in Parkinson's disease. Clin Rehabil. 2009 Aug;23(8):687-95. doi: 10.1177/0269215509104170. Epub 2009 Apr 29.
PubMed 19403552Nieuwboer A, Kwakkel G, Rochester L, Jones D, van Wegen E, Willems AM, Chavret F, Hetherington V, Baker K, Lim I. Cueing training in the home improves gait-related mobility in Parkinson's disease: the RESCUE trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007 Feb;78(2):134-40. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.200X.097923.
PubMed 17229744Snijders AH, Jeene P, Nijkrake MJ, Abdo WF, Bloem BR. Cueing for freezing of gait: a need for 3-dimensional cues? Neurologist. 2012 Nov;18(6):404-5. doi: 10.1097/NRL.0b013e31826a99d1.
PubMed 23114676Hoogendoorn EM, Geerse DJ, van Dam AT, van Hall SJ, van Doorn PF, Hardeman LES, Hoozemans MJM, Stins JF, Roerdink M. Cueing-assisted gamified augmented-reality home rehabilitation for gait and balance in people with Parkinson disease: feasibility and effectiveness in the clinical pathway. Phys Ther. 2026 Mar 3;106(3):pzag012. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzag012.
PubMed 41665260Geerse DJ, Hoogendoorn EM, van Doorn PF, van Bergem JS, van Dam AT, Hardeman LES, Roerdink M. Cueing-assisted gamified augmented-reality gait-and-balance rehabilitation at home for people with Parkinson's disease: protocol of a pragmatic randomized controlled trial implemented in the clinical pathway. Front Neurol. 2025 Feb 24;16:1512409. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1512409. eCollection 2025.
PubMed 40066314
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Apr 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Cueing-assisted Gamified Augmented-reality Gait-and-balance Rehabilitation at Home for People With Parkinson's Disease: Protocol of a Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial Implemented in the Clinical Pathway
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06590987
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CAPARE / NL86191.100.24
- Conditions
- Parkinson Disease
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- VU University of AmsterdamUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 18 Apr 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 21 Feb 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 27 Feb 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Sep 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Background: Physiotherapy in the clinic is highly recommended for improving gait, balance and falls risk in people with Parkinson's disease. In addition, technology may help boost unsupervised exercise hours at home. Strolll is an augmented-reality (AR) neurorehabilitation platform for delivering gait-and-balance exercises onto AR glasses that can be performed under direct supervision of the therapist in the clinic, but also independently at home. Strolll AR also has the option to integrate AR cueing in gait-and-balance exercises to assist people with more severe mobility impairments in performing the exercises. The objective of this pragmatic randomized controlled trial (RCT) on Strolll AR is to examine its clinical feasibility and effectiveness for improving indicators of gait, balance and falls risk. A secondary objective is to evaluate procedures for tailoring assistive AR cues.
Methods: 80-100 people with Parkinson's disease (Hoehn and Yahr stages 1-3) with gait and/or balance impairments will participate in this study. This study is a pragmatic RCT in which all participants follow the same procedure. After a baseline assessment (T0), participants will start with a 6-week usual care control period, followed by a midterm assessment (T1). Subsequently, participants will undergo two weeks of in-clinic familiarization with Strolll AR. Then, participants will start with the 6-week Strolll AR intervention at home, followed by a final in-clinic assessment (T2). The primary study parameters are feasibility (i.e., safety, adherence, performance and user experience) and effectiveness for improving indicators of gait, balance and falls risk. For the statistical analyses on effectiveness, participants will be allocated to control (using T0-T1 change data) or intervention (using T1-T2 change data) groups using multiple (n=20) randomizations. Recruitment started in May 2024 and the last T2 assessment is expected in January 2025.
Discussion: The design of this particular pragmatic RCT will demonstrate feasibility and effectiveness in a real-world setting and in a representative population. Strolll AR may facilitate the transition from supervised care in the clinic to independent care at home, providing a platform for delivering individualized treatment, assisted with AR cues when deemed beneficial, for improving gait, balance and falls risk in people with Parkinson's disease.
Detailed description
Study design This study is a fully blinded two-armed pragmatic RCT, which will be executed in the Netherlands implemented at multiple physical or exercise therapy clinics. The study consists of three in-clinic assessments performed by the participant's own therapist. After a baseline assessment (T0), participants will start with a 6-week usual care control period, followed by a midterm assessment (T1). Subsequently, participants will undergo two weeks of in-clinic familiarization with Strolll AR supervised by their therapist. Then, participants will start with the 6-week Strolll AR intervention at home integrated with usual care, followed by the final in-clinic assessment (T2).
The definition of a pragmatic RCT is that the intervention is tested in a real-world population in a real-world setting (i.e., the clinic), with an appropriate comparison arm (i.e., usual care alone in the current study) and relevant outcomes to determine its effectiveness. Special trial designs can be considered. In this particular pragmatic RCT all participants follow the same T0-control-T1-intervention-T2 procedure, suitable for both between-groups and within-subjects comparisons of the Strolll AR intervention effects as well as for evaluating its clinical feasibility. With regard to the between-groups comparison, participants will be allocated to control (using T0-T1 change data) or intervention (using T1-T2 change data) groups using multiple (n=20) two-armed randomizations. The randomization will be predefined by an independent person using a Matlab script, locked with a date and timestamp, and kept concealed from participants, therapists and researchers. After the final T2 assessment of the last participant, the 20 randomizations of participants over control and intervention groups will be revealed to the researchers and applied in the data analysis. Participants, therapists, and researchers will therefore all be blind to group allocation during the study. This design, in which all participants receive the Strolll AR intervention, also allows for a complementary within-subjects evaluation of the intervention effect (i.e., being less susceptible to between-subjects variation than aforementioned between-groups evaluation), whilst at the same time providing ample information on the clinical feasibility of the Strolll AR platform implemented in the clinical pathway in terms of its safety, adherence, performance and user experience (i.e., from both participants' and therapists' perspectives). Moreover, a design with the same procedure for all participants makes implementation of this study in the clinical pathway easier (hence the term pragmatic RCT) and potentially reduces drop-out rate because no participants are withheld from receiving the intervention due to the randomization.
Procedure and outcomes After enrollment, the study consists of three in-clinic assessments spread out over 14 weeks, demarcating a usual-care control period and a Strolll AR intervention period. Below we describe the procedure for each of these parts of the design.
Participant enrollment: enrollment and informed consent The therapist will inform eligible participants about the study. If people are interested, they will receive a flyer with instructions on how to send their contact details to the researchers. Upon receival of contact details of a potential participant, the researcher will call this person to provide more information about the study. Hereafter, potential participants will receive the participant information letter by mail or email. A week after receiving the participant information letter, the researcher will again call the potential participant to answer any questions and to ask if he or she wants to participate. If so, in- and exclusion criteria will be checked by the researcher (to the extent possible, otherwise criteria will be evaluated during the baseline assessment session T0). Furthermore, the potential participant will be informed that the medication should remain stable during the study. If the potential participant is eligible, he or she will be asked to sign the informed consent form, after which the researcher also signs the informed consent form and notifies the therapist that the person can start with the pragmatic RCT. Written informed consent must be given before commencing with the baseline assessment (T0).
Baseline assessment (T0): characterization and effectiveness The baseline assessment serves to characterize the study sample and to provide baseline values for evaluating the effectiveness of Strolll AR. Study parameters used to characterize the participants are demographics (i.e., age, gender, disease duration) and current medication use (i.e., the Levodopa Equivalent Daily Dose [LEDD]). Questionnaires to describe the participant population are the Montreal Cognitive Assessment [MoCA], Movement Disorders Society Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale [MDS-UPDRS], New Freezing of Gait Questionnaire [NFOGQ], Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly [PASE], Cumulative Illness Rating Scale [CIRS], and 12-month falls history. All these outcomes will be collected using online questionnaires, except for the MoCA and MDS-UPDRS part Ia, III and IV, which will be administered in the clinic by the therapist. To be able to evaluate the potential effects of Strolll AR for improving indicators of gait, balance and falls risk, the following standard clinical tests will be administered by the therapists: Timed Up-and-Go test (TUG), Five Times Sit-to-Stand test (FTSTS), 10-meter walk test (10MWT) and Mini Balance Evaluation Scale Test (Mini-BESTest). In addition, participants will fill out the Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I).
Usual care (6-weeks) During the usual-care control period, participants will not receive any additional training or instructions related to the Strolll AR intervention.
Midterm assessment (T1): effectiveness For the midterm assessment, the standard clinical tests of gait, balance and falls-risk indicators (TUG, FTSTS, 10MWT, Mini-BESTest) will again be administered by the therapist. In addition, the participants are asked to fill out the FES-I and 6-week falls history (to assess falls during the usual-care period) questionnaires at home.
Practice with Strolll AR intervention supervised in clinic (2 weeks) To make the participant familiar with the Strolll AR platform technology and procedures and to allow the therapist to evaluate safety aspects, the Strolll AR intervention starts with 1 to 3 supervised in-clinic sessions of (cueing-assisted) personalized AR exercises.
In these supervised sessions in the clinic, the therapist will also test and validate procedures to select and tailor effective assistive AR cues from a library of different AR cues. This is needed for two reasons: 1) to test the premise that a one-size-fits-all cue does not exist as there is heterogeneity in effect of cues among participants, 2) to ensure that the Strolll AR gait-and-balance exercises can be effectively assisted with personalized cues for those who need it (e.g., people experiencing freezing of gait or people with small steps and shuffling gait). The so-obtained best cues for supporting gait, as evaluated subjectively using both the participant's experience and the therapist's impression, will be used during the remainder of the Strolll AR intervention for those who are deemed to benefit from it. We will document if AR cues are added to Strolll AR gait-and-balance exercises, and when applicable, specify the type of AR cues as well as their personalized parameters (intercue distance, height, width, audiofeedback, et cetera).
To deliver the Strolll AR intervention, participants in this study will by default be equipped with Magic Leap 2 AR glasses for its unmatched vertical AR field of view. Special insert lenses from a complementary lens kit (supports 8 prescriptions from -2.0 to +3.0) made available at each clinical site will be used to correct vision for people wearing spectacles. In case vision cannot be corrected with these insert lenses (e.g., due to a special prescription not part of the lens kit), either tailored insert lenses will be ordered for Magic Leap 2 or Microsoft HoloLens 2 with a slightly smaller vertical AR field of view will be used which can be worn over spectacles to deliver the intervention.
Once the participant is deemed sufficiently capable of using the Strolll AR platform technology independently at home in a safe manner (after training in the clinic with the therapist for one to maximally three sessions of 1 hour in two weeks), the participant will take the AR glasses home together with a complementary SIM-card equipped WiFi router to continue the Strolll AR intervention independently at home. If the Strolll AR intervention at home is not deemed safe or suitable by the therapist, the intervention will stop and the reason for this will be documented by the therapist as part of the clinical feasibility evaluation.
Training with Strolll AR intervention independently at home (6 weeks) The Strolll AR intervention, integrated with usual care, comprises of a 6-week home-based individualized AR gait-and-balance exercise program assisted with tailored AR cues when deemed beneficial. The AR exercises are designed to train aspects associated with gait, balance and falls risk in a gamified manner to maximize training compliance. Strolll AR comprises seven AR exercises, namely Basketballl, Smash!, Mole Patrolll, Hot Buttons, Puzzle Walk, Wobbly Waiter and Cue Challenge, intended to improve gait, balance and falls risk in people with Parkinson's disease. Exercises that require walking have optional complementary AR cueing (Smash!, Cue Challenge), integrated cueing (speed cue in Wobbly Waiter) or AR-mediated goal-directedness (the moles in Mole Patrolll, the puzzle pieces in Puzzle Walk), to various degrees enabling and assisting people with more severe mobility impairments to participate. For each AR exercise, feedback of performance in terms of game-play performance metrics and functional performance metrics are given during the exercises. For Basketballl, for example, metrics associated with the number of balls thrown in the basket (game-play performance) and the number of sit-to-stands or squats made (functional performance) are given, derived from AR glasses data.
Participants will be invited by their therapist to use Strolll AR minimally 5 times a week for 30 active minutes per day, resulting in the recommended 150 minutes per week. They can perform the exercises anytime during the day, in one bout or in multiple chunks during the day, with complementary AR cueing when deemed beneficial. The precise exercises, exercise duration, difficulty level and order will be prescribed by the therapist via the Strolll web portal. This will be evaluated and adjusted on a weekly basis in telephone calls, e-consults or during an onsite therapy session using information of the participant in combination with the feedback from exercises that are reported in the Strolll web portal, such as adherence and game-play and functional performance metrics. Adherence will be defined as the percentage of performed over prescribed gait-and-balance exercises (i.e., both frequency and session-duration adherence). The data on game-play level and performance will be used to evaluate whether the exercise program was both progressive (increase in level) and achievable (consistently high game-play performance scores) as intended. The weekly contact moments with the therapist will also be used to ask if participants experienced any adverse events (safety flags). Specifically, safety will be evaluated as the number of adverse events due to the Strolll AR intervention, such as falls, dizziness, eye strain and headache. Potential technical issues will be documented by the researcher, who will be available to provide technical support during the study based on email or telephone contacts with the participants.
Final assessment (T2): effectiveness and clinical feasibility To be able to evaluate the effectiveness of the Strolll AR intervention, the therapist will again administer standard clinical tests of gait, balance and falls risk (TUG, FTSTS, 10MWT, Mini-BESTest). Participants will fill out the FES-I questionnaire together with the researcher during a telephone call.
Clinical feasibility of the Strolll AR platform according to the participants will be assessed in terms of user experience (i.e., the User Experience Questionnaire [UEQ]), technology acceptance and use (i.e., Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology informed questions), top-3 barriers and facilitators of Strolll AR, and intervention-specific questions regarding Strolll AR, including cueing if used during the intervention (see the Supplementary Material for the Strolll AR evaluation questionnaire). Participants will also report their falls history during the intervention period. The questionnaires of the final assessment are completed through a telephone call with the participant to ensure comprehensibility, which was first assessed in think-aloud sessions with a number of participants. In light of the potential future implementation in the clinical pathway, therapists will also be asked about their experience with Strolll AR through a purpose-made questionnaire, including a top-3 barriers and facilitators (assessed before training their first participants and after training their last participant) and the UEQ (assessed after training their last participant). Furthermore, a focus group with the therapist will be organized after the study for an in-depth evaluation of the top-3 barriers and facilitators.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Fully blinded two-armed pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT). In this particular pragmatic RCT all participants follow the same T0-control-T1-intervention-T2 procedure, suitable for both between-groups and within-subjects comparisons of the Strolll AR intervention effects as well as for evaluating its clinical feasibility. With regard to the between-groups comparison, participants will be allocated to control (using T0-T1 change data) or intervention (using T1-T2 change data) groups using multiple (n=20) two-armed randomizations. The randomization will be predefined by an independent person using a Matlab script, locked with a date and timestamp, and kept concealed from participants, therapists and researchers. After the final T2 assessment of the last participant, the 20 randomizations of participants over control and intervention groups will be revealed to the researchers and applied in the data analysis.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Usual care | No intervention | –After a baseline assessment of standard clinical tests, participants will start with a 6-week usual care control period. After 6 weeks, participants undergo the midterm assessments. |
| Strolll AR | Experimental | Device: Strolll ARAfter 6 weeks, participants undergo the midterm assessments. Then, participants will start with the 8-week Strolll AR intervention (i.e., 2 weeks of practice supervised in the clinic and 6 weeks of training independently at home) and will receive a final assessment hereafter. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 21 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Strolll ARStrolll AR is an augmented-reality (AR) neurorehabilitation platform for delivering gait and balance exercises (assisted with cues when deemed beneficial) for Parkinson's disease onto state-of-the-art AR glasses. | Device | Strolll AR |
Primary outcome
Timed Up-and-Go test (s)
Time frame: Change between baseline, midterm and final assessment (over a period of 14 weeks, which includes 6 weeks usual care and an 8-week Strolll AR intervention [clinic and home])
Evaluating the effectiveness of Strolll AR
9 secondary outcomes
10-meter walk test (s)
Time frame: Change between baseline, midterm and final assessment (over a period of 14 weeks, which includes 6 weeks usual care and an 8-week Strolll AR intervention [clinic and home])
Five Times Sit to Stand Test (s)
Time frame: Change between baseline, midterm and final assessment (over a period of 14 weeks, which includes 6 weeks usual care and an 8-week Strolll AR intervention [clinic and home])
Mini Balance Evaluation Systems Test
Time frame: Change between baseline, midterm and final assessment (over a period of 14 weeks, which includes 6 weeks usual care and an 8-week Strolll AR intervention [clinic and home])
Falls Efficacy Scale International
Time frame: Change between baseline, midterm and final assessment (over a period of 14 weeks, which includes 6 weeks usual care and an 8-week Strolll AR intervention [clinic and home])
Safety (i.e. number of adverse events due to Strolll AR)
Time frame: During the 8-week Strolll AR intervention
Adherence (i.e., percentage of performed over prescribed gait-and-balance exercises)
Time frame: During the 8-week Strolll AR intervention
Performance (i.e., the score per game)
Time frame: During the 8-week Strolll AR intervention
Strolll AR evaluation questionnaire
Time frame: Final assessment, week 14
User Experience questionnaire
Time frame: Final assessment, week 14
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Apr 2025.
- Background: PubMed 32517076Geerse DJ, Coolen B, Roerdink M. Quantifying Spatiotemporal Gait Parameters with HoloLens in Healthy Adults and People with Parkinson's Disease: Test-Retest Reliability, Concurrent Validity, and Face Validity. Sensors (Basel). 2020 Jun 5;20(11):3216. doi: 10.3390/s20113216.
- Background: PubMed 35082741Geerse DJ, Coolen B, van Hilten JJ, Roerdink M. Holocue: A Wearable Holographic Cueing Application for Alleviating Freezing of Gait in Parkinson's Disease. Front Neurol. 2022 Jan 10;12:628388. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.628388. eCollection 2021.
- Background: PubMed 15619458Lim LI, van Wegen EE, de Goede CJ, Jones D, Rochester L, Hetherington V, Nieuwboer A, Willems AM, Kwakkel G. Measuring gait and gait-related activities in Parkinson's patients own home environment: a reliability, responsiveness and feasibility study. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2005 Jan;11(1):19-24. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2004.06.003.
- Background: PubMed 19403552McAuley JH, Daly PM, Curtis CR. A preliminary investigation of a novel design of visual cue glasses that aid gait in Parkinson's disease. Clin Rehabil. 2009 Aug;23(8):687-95. doi: 10.1177/0269215509104170. Epub 2009 Apr 29.
- Background: PubMed 17229744Nieuwboer A, Kwakkel G, Rochester L, Jones D, van Wegen E, Willems AM, Chavret F, Hetherington V, Baker K, Lim I. Cueing training in the home improves gait-related mobility in Parkinson's disease: the RESCUE trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007 Feb;78(2):134-40. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.200X.097923.
- Background: PubMed 23114676Snijders AH, Jeene P, Nijkrake MJ, Abdo WF, Bloem BR. Cueing for freezing of gait: a need for 3-dimensional cues? Neurologist. 2012 Nov;18(6):404-5. doi: 10.1097/NRL.0b013e31826a99d1.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41665260Hoogendoorn EM, Geerse DJ, van Dam AT, van Hall SJ, van Doorn PF, Hardeman LES, Hoozemans MJM, Stins JF, Roerdink M. Cueing-assisted gamified augmented-reality home rehabilitation for gait and balance in people with Parkinson disease: feasibility and effectiveness in the clinical pathway. Phys Ther. 2026 Mar 3;106(3):pzag012. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzag012.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40066314Geerse DJ, Hoogendoorn EM, van Doorn PF, van Bergem JS, van Dam AT, Hardeman LES, Roerdink M. Cueing-assisted gamified augmented-reality gait-and-balance rehabilitation at home for people with Parkinson's disease: protocol of a pragmatic randomized controlled trial implemented in the clinical pathway. Front Neurol. 2025 Feb 24;16:1512409. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1512409. eCollection 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Parkinson Disease
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
STAR0602 With Nivolumab in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer and in Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer, and STAR0602 Alone in Thymic Carcinoma
NSCLC, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Early Molecular Biomarkers for Differentiating Parkinsonian Syndromes
PARKINSON DISEASE (Disorder), Atypical Parkinsonism
RecruitingPhase 3
A Clinical Study of Sacituzumab Tirumotecan (MK-2870) in Combination With Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) as First-line Maintenance Treatment of Cervical Cancer (MK-2870-036/TroFuse-036/GOG-3123/ENGOT-cx22)
Cervical Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Clinical Safety and Efficacy of Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stromal Cells-derived Exosomes in Patients With Parkinson's Disease
Parkinson Disease (PD)
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Adaptive DBS to Offset STN Dysregulation During Exercise in PD
Parkinson Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Melvyn Roerdink, PhD principal investigator
Department of Human Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Strolll AR in people with Parkinson Disease, run by VU University of Amsterdam at 1 site in Netherlands.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Apr 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Timed Up-and-Go test (s) (time frame: Change between baseline, midterm and final assessment (over a period of 14 weeks, which includes 6 weeks usual care and an 8-week Strolll AR intervention [clinic and home])). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06590987, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Apr 2025.